US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[BlueSpark]

I'm honestly surprised the official White House stream wasn't ratio'd, to be honest.

People have probably stopped disliking videos now that you can't see how many dislikes there are.

 

[CarlosDanger]

Here is that CNN poll I was talking about.

 

[pwnest injun]

People have probably stopped disliking videos now that you can't see how many dislikes there are.

I think it's more likely that they knew this was a problem and bought a bunch of likes from an Indian click farm.
Or Youtube just fudged it for them, like how Biden's campaign videos would suddenly get 100,000 views in the first 3 seconds of release and then maybe 5000 views over the next two days.

 

[Dan Abrams]

NO REFUNDS

I guess filling out all those mail in ballots with dead people's information wasn't worth it, huh.

 

[Stoneheart]

Here is that CNN poll I was talking about.

only 51% of all 3 CNN viewers liked him.

 

[Blewberry Nausea]

Look if you want to understand an establishment dem just take a neoconservative, add a thin veneer of PC platitudes, then just sprinkle diversity hires and gibs. Now yes you’ll get your abortion rights and gun control laws but thing is those laws will go back and forth as SOCIETY dictates and that’s controlled by people above the politicians not them. The politician is powerful but too public for that I think I dunno I’m just theorizing really I think you have to be a back scene type to hold the real reins. Like every time I hear some conspiracy say ‘no it’s the illuminati’ or ‘no the rothschilds’ or ‘no the jews’ I keep think nah that’s just another layer of patsies. Dude what if it was something mega weird like a secret cabal of HR Managers?

 

[elite_club]

Here is that CNN poll I was talking about.
View attachment 3033718

>41%

But they didn't even bring out the trans kid

 

[OrangeJuliusEvola]

>41%

But they didn't even bring out the trans kid

My theory is that they're fine with talking about trans shit, it goes over the head of the low-information sections of their voting base.

But as soon as they trot out the little boy dressed like an explosion at the Lisa Frank museum, Tyrone and Sharise will be all "AWWWW HELLL NAAAAAAH".

 

[Retink]

Here is that CNN poll I was talking about.
View attachment 3033718

Why is he being open about the pool being skewed in their favor and still failing?

 

[northstar747]

But as soon as they trot out the little boy dressed like an explosion at the Lisa Frank museum, Tyrone and Sharise will be all "AWWWW HELLL NAAAAAAH".

I honestly think the elites are starting to get that they are alittle too up their own butt hole.

Also tranny and child trannys are not reliable voters.

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

Why is he being open about the pool being skewed in their favor and still failing?

It might be another information war lie just like "Zoomers will be majorly conservative." For all we know the whole "Democrats are in a near death rattle scenario" is literally not fully true thanks to all their import voters and ways to cheat the election. It might even be a set up for election with "Wow, the left really pushed numbers after such a punishing defeat prior" The whole underdog shtick Maybe it's just me but something about the way they always present these disadvantage optics always reeks to high heaven.

My theory is that they're fine with talking about trans shit, it goes over the head of the low-information sections of their voting base.

But as soon as they trot out the little boy dressed like an explosion at the Lisa Frank museum, Tyrone and Sharise will be all "AWWWW HELLL NAAAAAAH".

It could also be if they trotted him out on stage many of our "allies" would have taken a step back or started questioning their allegiances. Let alone the normies becoming aware of the child abuse being pretty obvious from the democrats where quite a few believed it merely conspiracy theory before. Which would have made more people start questioning the school system and those supporting the trannization of the child.

 

[Drag-on Knight 91873]

It might be another information war lie just like "Zoomers will be majorly conservative." For all we know the whole "Democrats are in a near death rattle scenario" is literally not fully true thanks to all their import voters and ways to cheat the election. It might even be a set up for election with "Wow, the left really pushed numbers after such a punishing defeat prior" The whole underdog shtick Maybe it's just me but something about the way they always present these disadvantage optics always reeks to high heaven.

It could also be if they trotted him out on stage many of our "allies" would have taken a step back or started questioning their allegiances. Let alone the normies becoming aware of the child abuse being pretty obvious from the democrats where quite a few believed it merely conspiracy theory before. Which would have made more people start questioning the school system and those supporting the trannization of the child.

Yesterday, I got a fundraising letter from the Dems. That's what I get for writing my congressman and sending them expired coupons, I guess.

 

[JoseRaulChupacabra]

Here is that CNN poll I was talking about.
View attachment 3033718

Look at that face: "If only you knew how bad things really are."

 

[Sekirodiealot]

John Bolton, the US' former national security advisor, said his ex-boss, former President Donald Trump, would not have stood in Putin's way if a Russian invasion of Ukraine had happened when he was in office.

"Well, I'm not sure he would have done much of anything, frankly," Bolton said in an interview with Vice published March 1, responding to a question about what Trump might have done had Russia attacked Ukraine while he was president.

"But you never know with Trump. It depends on what time of day it is, it depends on what he thought his political benefit would be at any given moment. I don't think ultimately he would have stood in Putin's way," Bolton told Vice.

Bolton said he thought Trump's glorification of Putin was "embarrassing for the United States." He also said that he did not think that Trump cared about Ukraine in the first place.

"It's hard for me to describe how little he knows," Bolton said in the interview with Vice.


"When you're operating on such a poor understanding of the circumstances you're talking about, ultimately, your opinions have to be totally unsound," Bolton added. "And ultimately reality triumphs, and these opinions are seen for the flimsy and twisted thoughts that they really are."

In the same interview, Bolton criticized Trump for his lack of understanding of "what the stakes were in Ukraine."

"He once asked (then-White House Chief of Staff) John Kelly if Finland was part of Russia. What he cared about was the DNC server, and Hunter Biden, and the 2016 election, and the 2020 election," Bolton said.

Bolton said in an interview on Newsmax this week, that Trump "barely knew where Ukraine was," pushing back on Newsmax host Rob Schmitt's assertion that Trump, as president, would have handled Russia better than Biden.

Trump has slammed the Biden administration, claiming it was their "stupidity" and "incompetence" that led to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. He also baselessly claimed the crisis would never have unfolded if he had been president.
Trump was impeached in 2019 for withholding nearly $400 million in vital military aid from Ukraine. While in office, Trump also repeatedly bashed NATO and raised the possibility of the US leaving the alliance.

Insider's live blog of the Russian invasion of Ukraine is covering developments as they happen.

 

[Dog-O-Tron 5000v5.0]

My favorite part was watching smug Kamala and Joker Smile Pelosi grimace when Biden would stutter, say shit like "Iranian people" or that one part where Biden.exe totally failed and restarted.

You could just see the "If only you knew how bad things really are" in their eyes.

 

[Grand Wizard Wakka]

I was just WAITING for him to say "We're going to build a wall and make Putin pay for it!"

He stole everything else from other politicians, why not that?

"When they go high, we go low." - Joe Biden

Good fucking job Brandon

View attachment 3033426

"NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! WE WERE ANNIHILATING RUSSIAN FORCES WITH OUR BARE BEAR FISTS AND ABOUT TO TAKE MOSCOW!" - Ukrainians

 

[Another Sperg on the Net]

View attachment 3033978

God Bolton needs to get the cum of Raytheon and Locheed-Martin's CEOs out of his mustache before he goes flapping his cock holster to the press. And Vice of all places, I guess times are getting tough of dried up war mongers these.

 

[Jaimas]

Technically speaking, Judges don't have any say in this. But who wants to cross that line?


Why the sudden backtracking?

View attachment 3033605
That's why. Remembering that this is still the rigged numbers in his favor. These aren't just "bad for reelection" numbers, they're "take down the entire party with you" bad.

That's happening anyway, mind, it's why over 40 congressional dems are retiring this year.

 

[Jordi El Nino Polla]

Okay he did a State of the Union. But he still didn't do one last year. Trump was impeached twice for less.

 

[Trianon]

If Biden makes it to next year's SOTU (doubtful), do you think they try to cancel it to hide his condition by saying something like it's an outdated relic and unnecessary in modern America?

If they do that, it will be the best thing Biden has ever done. We need to go back to the executive writing a letter to Congress and being done with it. Washington didn't do this shit.

I think "go get him" was supposed to be "go get 'em," which is just a generic "I believe in you" kind of statement. "Git 'er done," if you will. There were much weirder gaffes throughout to focus on.