G
GS 281
Guest
kiwifarms.net
People form relationships with other people based on mutual interests, or at least a perception that mutual interests exist. They can form around just about anything, and trust and respect will facilitate the growth of of a desire to be around that other person. Over time, this fondness becomes a part of our routines and a part of who we are.
Our development of relationships is done within proximal, temporal and social boundaries. These parameters limit the nature of relations we will have with people when we meet them and set a trajectory for how we would typically develop our relationships. These boundaries, right or wrong, are generally accepted to be a healthy part of society.
One boundary we place on our relationships is that of age. Whether our intent in a relationship is to be a mentor, platonic friend, romantic interest, professional associate, age will play a pivotal role. In many advanced societies the limitation of age is significant. Between people in the age of minority and majority it is considered inappropriate for relations to be anything more than a mentor role.
Romantic relationships would be inappropriate because an adult could exploit a child, same goes for a professional relationship. It is also abnormal for an adult to have an attraction to a child, obviously. Friendship-type intergenerational relationships do not carry the social stigma that romantic relationships have earned. Personally, I feel that an intergenerational friendship is not healthy unless the adult is instructing and being a role model for an activity. Friendships are inappropriate because a child below 18 and an adult would not have the same peripheral interests in most instances from what brought the two together, and even if they did, the adult and child could not relate because their life experience and perspective is too different. Overall, my general take is that beyond mentoring, adults who form relationships range from disturbed to criminally perverted. Is there a benefit I am missing?
Our development of relationships is done within proximal, temporal and social boundaries. These parameters limit the nature of relations we will have with people when we meet them and set a trajectory for how we would typically develop our relationships. These boundaries, right or wrong, are generally accepted to be a healthy part of society.
One boundary we place on our relationships is that of age. Whether our intent in a relationship is to be a mentor, platonic friend, romantic interest, professional associate, age will play a pivotal role. In many advanced societies the limitation of age is significant. Between people in the age of minority and majority it is considered inappropriate for relations to be anything more than a mentor role.
Romantic relationships would be inappropriate because an adult could exploit a child, same goes for a professional relationship. It is also abnormal for an adult to have an attraction to a child, obviously. Friendship-type intergenerational relationships do not carry the social stigma that romantic relationships have earned. Personally, I feel that an intergenerational friendship is not healthy unless the adult is instructing and being a role model for an activity. Friendships are inappropriate because a child below 18 and an adult would not have the same peripheral interests in most instances from what brought the two together, and even if they did, the adult and child could not relate because their life experience and perspective is too different. Overall, my general take is that beyond mentoring, adults who form relationships range from disturbed to criminally perverted. Is there a benefit I am missing?