War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
So the shitty meme "Kyiv" has officially replaced Kiev even here in fucking ITALY despite Kiev being the fucking dictionary name before our country (or theirs) even existed
 

Attachments

  • 1646410454854.gif
    1646410454854.gif
    2.5 MB · Views: 7
The BBC is temporarily suspending the work of all its journalists and staff in Russia after Russian authorities passed new legislation making the spread of “fake” information an offence punishable with fines or jail terms.

On Friday, Russia’s parliament passed a law imposing a jail term of up to 15 years for spreading intentionally “fake” news about the military. They also imposed fines for public calls for sanctions against Russia.

Russian officials have repeatedly accused the West of spreading false information in an attempt to sow discord among the Russin people.

BBC director-general Tim Davie said the new legislation appeared to “criminalise the process of independent journalism”.

"It leaves us no other option than to temporarily suspend the work of all BBC News journalists and their support staff within the Russian Federation while we assess the full implications of this unwelcome development.

Our BBC News service in Russian will continue to operate from outside Russia."

He continued:

"The safety of staff is paramount and we are not prepared to expose them to the risk of criminal prosecution simply for doing their jobs. I’d like to pay tribute to all of them, for their bravery, determination and professionalism.

We remain committed to making accurate, independent information available to audiences around the world, including the millions of Russians who use our news services. Our journalists in Ukraine and around the world will continue to report on the invasion of Ukraine."
So we're going to see less about this war from the Russian side...that is those that are not propaganda material from official sources. I don't think the Chinese was this strict during the early weeks of Covid
Here’s more on the impact of new Russian legislation that could jail anyone found to be intentionally spreading “fake” news.

Russia’s Novaya Gazeta newspaper said it will remove material on Russia’s military actions in Ukraine from its website because of censorship.

The newspaper, whose editor Dmitry Muratov was a co-winner of last year’s Nobel Peace Prize, said it would continue to report on the consequences that Russia is facing, including a deepening economic crisis and the persecution of dissidents.

In a Telegram post, the newspaper said military censorship in Russia has “moved into a new phase”.


Also, I thought the Russian have complete air supremacy. So you're telling me the airspace is still contested? That might explain why Ukraine is still receiving the drones from the Turks
 

"Vast majority" of $350 million US security assistance package delivered to Ukraine, defense official says​


The “vast majority” of a $350 million US security assistance package has been delivered to Ukraine, a senior defense official said, one week after it was officially approved by the White House.

Approximately $240 million of the package has reached Ukraine, and the rest should arrive within days and maybe weeks “but not longer,” the official said Friday. The components that have already been delivered including “the most-needed capabilities, like anti-armor capabilities.”

The equipment being sent in is equipment on which the Ukrainians have already received training, including some “just-in-time” training in late December and early January. The Ukrainians can “use proficiently” the vast majority of the military equipment being sent in, the official said.

The US has also been coordinating the delivery of security assistance from other countries. A total of 14 countries have contributed security assistance to Ukraine since Russia’s invasion, but the official declined to list the countries, instead preferring they speak for themselves.

US European Command is using its liaison network with allies and partners to coordinate “in real time” to send materials into Ukraine, the official said.

EUCOM is also coordinating with other countries, including particularly with the UK, in terms of the delivery process “to ensure that we are using our resources to maximum efficiency to support the Ukrainians in an organized way,” the official said.


Russian forces are still about 15 miles outside of Kyiv city center, senior US defense official says​


Russian forces are still about 25 kilometers (more than 15 miles) outside of the city center of Kyiv in the north, and Russian forces remain 10 kilometers (about 6 miles) outside of the city centers of Chernihiv and Kharkiv in the north, a senior US defense official told reporters on Friday.

In Kharkiv and Chernihiv, being 10 kilometers away from the city center “equates to really being on the outskirts of the city,” because of the way the city is spread out, the official said.

The US does see more success for Russian forces in the south. The US does not dispute reports that Kherson has been taken by Russian forces, but has no way to independently verify those claims, the official said.

The US is also seeing fighting between Ukrainians and Russians near the city of Mykolaiv in the south, the official said. Mykolaiv is northwest of Kherson.

The Russians have not taken the southern city of Mariupol yet, according to US observations, but there is continued fighting there, the official said.


“We have observed Russian forces continue to advance on Mariupol, but we don’t assess that they’re in there, they are obviously bombarding that city as well,” the official said
“We continue to believe that the Russians want to move on Mariupol from the north as well as moving up that coast on the Sea of Azov,” the official added.

Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory (pink)

Assessed Russian advances* (white)

map.jpg


*Assessments by the Institute for the Study of War show that Russian forces have operated in or launched attacks in these areas, but they do not control them.



Note: Data as of March 3, 2022 at 3 p.m. ET



Source: The Institute for the Study of War with AEI’s Critical Threats Project

Graphic: Renée Rigdon, CNN

 

EU official says Russian military is "bombing and shelling everything" in Ukraine​


The European Union’s diplomacy chief Josep Borrell said the Russian army is “bombing and shelling everything” in Ukraine.

“Today, what we see is the ugly face of war erupting again in our borders. And the Russians are bombing and shelling everything: hospitals, houses, schools. A lot of civilian casualties. It is a barbarian way of doing war,” Borrell told journalists ahead of a EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting on Friday.

He appealed for Russian President Vladimir Putin to stop the shelling and bombing.

“Putin has to stop to stop this war. We remain united in order to ask for this war to stop. To stop and avoid killing of innocent people,” Borrell added.

The EU diplomacy chief added that the UN’s Human Rights Council would soon “launch a mission in order to assess the violation of human rights which are happening in Ukrainian territory.”

US and other Western officials have told CNN Russia is expected to increasingly hit civilian targets and shifting toward a strategy of "slow annihilation" of the Ukrainian military.

CNN has geolocated and verified 13 incidents involving civilians over three days, as attacks intensified on Kharkiv, a city of about 1.5 million people, following Ukraine's resistance. CNN has analyzed and verified digital evidence, including videos and photos, of several indiscriminate attacks in the city.


Switzerland will adopt further EU sanctions on Russia​


Switzerland will adopt the new European Union sanctions on Russia and freeze the assets of more people with close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, the government announced Friday in a statement.

The newly adopted measures concern certain goods and financial services, the government said in a statement, adding that Switzerland’s list of sanctions has been extended accordingly.

According to the government, the implementation of these sanctions is compatible with Switzerland’s neutrality.

"The export of all dual-use items to Russia is now prohibited, regardless of their end-use or end-user. In addition, the export of goods that could contribute to Russia's military and technological enhancement or the development of the defence and security sector is prohibited," the government said, adding that "it is also prohibited to provide technical assistance, brokering services or financing."

"The export to Russia of certain goods and services in the oil sector is no longer permitted. Furthermore, the export of certain goods and technology that can be used in aviation and the space industry is prohibited," the government also said.
Transactions with the Russian Central Bank are also no longer permitted.

The government has also decided "to add the individuals on the list of persons adopted by the EU on 28 February to Annex 8 of the Ordinance and thereby freeze the assets of further persons with close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin."


Ukrainians in Odessa form chain to fill sandbags to protect city​


Ukrainians in Odessa, a city on the Black Sea in southern Ukraine, formed a human chain to fill sandbags in preparation of a possible Russian attack.

CNN's Nick Paton Walsh showed the chain of mainly young men who were passing down the sandbags to be placed into trucks and brought to the center of the city, which is the third largest in Ukraine and a popular tourist destination.
Residents are concerned about a Russia amphibious landing on the shore, Paton Walsh reported, especially because an Estonian vessel sank off the city's port on Thursday. The ship was hit by Russian artillery, according to the official Twitter account of Ukrainian parliament.

When a man in line was asked if he ever expected to be there in the chain, he said, "We will defend our city and our country, for sure."


At a ceremony for a new ferry, Putin details phone call with Belarusian leader and mentions Baltic Sea access​


Russian President Vladimir Putin said he discussed Belarus’ interest in having access to the Baltic Sea in a phone call with his Belarusian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko.

“Just today we talked with the President of Belarus on this matter. Our Belarusian friends are interested in being present in the Baltic, interested in developing their own port facilities. You know that I also support it,” Putin said during a ceremony for a new Russian ferry, which he attended virtually.

Belarus is a landlocked country, so it is unclear what practical steps Putin and Russia could take to provide access to the Baltic Sea. However, Russia has customs union with Belarus and shares a long common border.

NATO’s Baltic members — Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania — are among those most concerned about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

This week, a Ukrainian government official told CNN that Ukrainian intelligence indicates Belarusian "readiness to maybe participate directly" in the invasion.

So far, however, US officials have not seen Belarusian troops "being readied to move into Ukraine" or "that they are moving or are in Ukraine," a senior US defense official said Monday, adding that the forces inside Ukraine are Russian.

The White House on Wednesday detailed a new slate of economic measures levied against Russia and Belarus, condemning Belarus for "enabling Putin's invasion of Ukraine."

“I’ve asked you to provide all possible assistance. This applies to various places, points, structures where our Belarusian friends could fulfill these options. I won't go into details now, you know about them,” Putin also said during his remarks.

“They are important not only for Belarus, but also for us because this is the development of our infrastructure, an increase in cargo transportation on our coast, for our country. Accordingly, the benefits of Belarus will extend to the Russian economy. We are also interested in this, so I ask you to support all these initiatives.”

A province of Russia, Kaliningrad, is situated between Poland and Lithuania along the Baltic Sea coast.

 

UN Official Reveals Extent of Damage at Ukraine’s Nuclear Power Plant​


No damage was done to nuclear reactors at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear plants amid fighting between Russian and Ukrainian forces, said the U.N. atomic chief Rafael Grossi.


Two members of security staff were injured when a projectile hit overnight after officials reported fighting between Russian and Ukrainian forces at the plant, Europe’s largest nuclear facility, early on Friday morning.


“What we understand is that this projectile is a projectile that is coming from the Russian forces. We do not have details about the kind of projectile,” Grossi told news outlets later Friday. The plant’s radiation monitoring system is still functional.


A statement posted on Friday at the State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate, run by Ukraine’s government, said that the plant “has been seized by the military forces” of Russia.


Russian officials, through state-run outlet RT, alleged that Ukrainian forces early Friday attempted to provoke Russian troops by firing at them and forcing them to retaliate.



“Last night, an attempt to carry out a horrible provocation was made by Kyiv’s nationalist regime on the area surrounding the station,” Ministry of Defense spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov announced Friday, while claiming that alleged Ukrainian saboteurs attacked Russian troops patrolling the area around the plant.


That claim was disputed by Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, who alleged that it was Russian troops who were responsible for “terror of an unprecedented level” at the plant. “The Russian tanks knew that they were firing with a direct fire at the station,” Zelensky alleged.


Neither claim could be independently verified.

Should the nuclear plant go into meltdown mode, it could potentially release radiation across Ukraine and Eastern Europe, including Russia. Some analysts noted that in that region, the winds generally blow to the south and east—meaning that Russian cities and towns would be greatly impacted by the radiation.


On Friday, Zelensky again said that because of the nuclear plant fire, NATO should establish a no-fly zone over Ukraine. Later, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg rejected Zelensky’s demand and said enforcing such a rule would lead to an escalation between NATO allies and Russia.


The U.S. Embassy in Ukraine called the Russian assault on the Zaporizhzhia plant a “war crime.” Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby said it showed how reckless the Russian invasion has been.


“It just raises the level of potential catastrophe to a level that nobody wants to see,” he told CNN on Friday morning.


Video footage uploaded online showed one building aflame and a volley of incoming shells before a large incandescent ball lit up the sky, exploding beside a car park and sending smoke billowing across the compound. It’s not clear who fired the shells.


The mayor of Energodar, located near the plant, previously told news outlets that the fire was caused by Russian shelling of the plant, adding that the fire engulfed the power plant itself. Emergency services later dismissed the allegation in local reports.


Yellen Says Treasury to Curb Wealth of Russian Oligarchs Over Ukraine War​


Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Wednesday that the United States and Western allies have immobilized half of the assets of the Russian central bank and will continue to impose “severe consequences” on Russian President Vladimir Putin and the wealthy oligarchs who support him if he escalates his war in Ukraine.


Yellen, speaking in Chicago to promote President Joe Biden’s economic agenda, said the Treasury has “made it a priority to go after oligarchs or Russian elites who are key to President Putin’s corrupt power”.

“We have sanctioned many of these individuals over the last few weeks and we are assembling a task force with Justice Department colleagues and our allies to uncover, freeze, and seize their wealth around the world.”


Yellen, who visited Chicago’s Ukrainian Village neighborhood with Illinois Governor Jay Pritzker, said that the United States and allies around the world have worked together to isolate Russia, making it more much more difficult for Putin to finance Russian aggression against Ukraine. Eighty percent of Russia’s banking system assets are now under restrictions, she said.


“Russia is increasingly on an economic island,” she said. “If President Putin continues this unprovoked invasion, President Biden and our allies and partners around the world will remain steadfast in our commitment to continue to impose severe consequences against Russia and hold President Putin accountable for his illegal and amoral actions.”



Yellen also said that stronger economic policies were needed to strengthen America at home, despite an economic recovery from COVID-19 that has exceeded most expectations and U.S. growth that looks poised to continue.


Oil Rises Above $112 as Ukraine Conflict Offsets Iran Supply Hope​


Oil rose above $112 a barrel on Friday in a volatile session as fears over disruption to Russian oil exports in the face of Western sanctions offset the prospect of more Iranian supplies in the event of a nuclear deal with Tehran.


Signs of an escalation in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, with reports of a fire at a Ukrainian nuclear power plant, spooked markets before authorities said the fire in a building identified as a training center had been extinguished.


Brent crude rose as high as $114.23 a barrel and by 1050 GMT was up $1.97, or 1.8 percent, at $112.43. U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) added $2.21, or 2.1 percent, to $109.88 after touching a high of $112.84.


“Russia’s invasion of Ukraine means that fears over supply will remain front and centre,” said Stephen Brennock of oil broker PVM, though he added that there is “a new sense of urgency” to revive the Iranian nuclear deal.


Crude oil hit its highest in a decade this week and prices are set to post their strongest weekly gains since the middle of 2020, with the U.S. benchmark up more than 18 percent and Brent 13 percent.



On Thursday prices swung in a $10 range but settled lower for the first time in four sessions as investors focused on the revival of the Iran nuclear deal, which is expected to boost Iranian oil exports and ease tight supplies.

Still, Iran’s Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said on Friday that the West’s “haste” to reach a nuclear agreement “cannot prevent the observance of Iran’s red lines,” including economic guarantees.


Oil prices are rising on fears that Western sanctions over the Ukraine conflict will disrupt shipments from Russia, the world’s biggest exporter of crude and oil products combined.


Trading activity for Russian crude has slowed as buyers hesitate to make purchases because of sanctions against Russia while President Joe Biden comes under growing pressure to ban U.S. imports of Russian oil.


More oil supplies are set to be added from a coordinated release of 60 million barrels of oil reserves by developed nations, agreed this week. Japan said on Friday that it plans to release 7.5 million barrels of oil.


Dozens of Companies Pulling Out of Russia After Invasion of Ukraine​


Companies that have been doing business in Russia for decades are now streaming out like ants fleeing a disrupted ant hill.

Dozens of big-name corporations have announced they will stop sales in Russia, break from joint ventures, or remove themselves from other kinds of business relationships in the country because of the nation’s invasion of neighboring Ukraine.

Some made the break immediately. For others, extrication will take some time.

The growing list of companies includes retailers, shippers, carmakers, and energy companies, some joining a global effort to shun Russia in disapproval of the attack that began early on Feb. 24 in what President Vladimir Putin had called a “special operation.”

Companies from around the world have limited, put on hold, or exited business activities in Russia, or have said they’re considering one of those measures.



Some of them had been building their connections, assets, and customer bases there for 30 years, since the official fall of the Soviet Union.


Their individual reasons for the exodus from Russia vary.


For some companies, the pull-out seemed a moral move, simply an intent to punish Moscow and show support for Ukraine.


For others, it seemed to be a decision based more on uncertainty about logistics and getting their people and products in or out of the country safely while security in the region crumbles into chaos.


Some seemed concerned about potential consumer backlash if they didn’t quickly decouple from Russia.


Others said the move was made to keep them in full compliance with government-ordered sanctions.


Doubtless, many boardroom discussions have centered on how to take a meaningful swipe at Russia’s Putin, without unduly hurting the 144 million people living there … or sparking their outrage.


If not handled delicately, moves to leave Russia could backfire financially should those companies ever want to reestablish operations in the country.


Multinational Apple quickly announced the halt of sales of iPhones and all of its other products in Russia.

Alphabet, also multinational and the parent company of Google and other subsidiaries, removed state-owned Russia Today (RT) from news-related features, including the Google News search tool.


Microsoft said it would remove RT media applications from the Windows App store and would not display RT content.


Facebook said it was restricting RT content, as well.


Milwaukee-based Harley-Davidson suspended business in Russia and stopped shipments of its motorcycles there.


Putin was photographed in 2010 leaving a biker gathering in Ukraine riding a three-wheel Harley.


Mammoth shipping firms MSC of Switzerland, Maersk of Denmark, and CMA CGM of France, all suspended sailings to and from Russia, with the exception of delivering essential supplies.


The movement of other cargo has been halted indefinitely, the shippers have said.


Two of the world’s largest logistics companies, Atlanta-based United Parcel Service (UPS) and FedEx, of Memphis, said they’d halted delivery service to both Russia and Ukraine in light of the invasion, as did Germany’s Deutsche Post DHL.


The list of companies extricating themselves from business in Russia now includes Swedish streaming service Spotify, multi-national home goods retailer IKEA, German software maker SAP, Texas software giant Oracle, Swedish clothing company H&M, United States-based Mastercard, VISA, Nike, and American streaming and production company Netflix.

Chicago-based Boeing and Airbus SE, which are headquartered in the Netherlands, along with Brazilian plane-maker Embraer announced the suspension of service and support for airlines in Russia.


AerCap Holdings, the world’s biggest aircraft leasing company, said it will cease activity with Russian airlines.


China-owned Volvo, based in Sweden, said it would stop selling and making cars in Russia. Luxury automakers Aston Martin of Britain, and Jaguar Land Rover Automotive, a subsidiary of India’s Tata Motors, said they had halted deliveries of vehicles to Russia.


Detroit-based General Motors said it was halting shipments to Russia as well.


“Our thoughts are with the people of Ukraine at this time,” GM said in a statement. “The loss of life is a tragedy and our overriding concern is for the safety of people in the region.”


Ford, also of Michigan, said it would suspend manufacturing and sales in Russia, and Germany’s Daimler Truck said it would freeze its business activities there immediately.


Japan’s Toyota announced a halt of production at its Russian plant and will stop sending vehicles to Russia. Honda and Nissan, also of Japan, said they would stop deliveries of vehicles to the country.


Japanese company Mazda said it would stop sending parts to its joint-venture plant soon, and Mitsubishi said it may suspend production and sales in Russia, citing potential supply chain disruptions as a result of sanctions on the country.


German luxury carmakers BMW and Mercedes-Benz said they would stop the export of passenger cars and vans to Russia and would stop production there.


Germany’s Volkswagen also said they would temporarily suspend deliveries of cars to dealers, resuming “as soon as the effects of the sanctions imposed by the European Union and the United States have been clarified,” a VW spokesperson said.

Energy companies including British BP and Shell, Norway’s Equinor ASA, and Texas-based Exxon Mobil all have said they will leave oil-rich Russia. But varying levels of business entanglements made their timelines unclear.


Exxon has said it’s leaving behind oil and gas operations valued at more than $4 billion.


The European Union said it would give seven Russian banks 10 days to prepare to be cut from the SWIFT messaging system that allows for communications and transactions between financial institutions around the globe.


Blocking the banks from using SWIFT has been said to be one of the most powerful tools used, so far, to sanction Russia.


A handful of banking companies also were considering how to exit the country.


Disney, Sony, and WarnerMedia have said they’ve stopped releasing films in Russia. Dell Technologies said it suspended sales in both Ukraine and Russia.

Telecom giants Ericsson of Sweden and Nokia of Finland ended deliveries to Russia.

Governors of Utah, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Pennsylvania have ordered state-run liquor stores to take Russian-made vodka and other spirits from the country off shelves.

And Texas Gov. Greg Abbott urged all restaurants and liquor stores in his state to voluntarily stop selling Russian products.

Throughout the United States, everyday Americans showed their support for Ukraine and disapproval for Russian aggression by taking to social media, posting videos of themselves pouring out Russian-made vodka.

 
I really hope the Baltic threat was just some dick posturing by Putin and not an actual threat
And so, the myth of the invincible Russian army takes another blow to the chin. Really, it's funny to see people like Mr. Obvious state that Russia will inevitably win, and that this convoy is a massive threat, when it seems that this war is shaping up to be more like WW1, and the convoy is just giving Russian toys to the Ukrainians.
Another similarity with WW1 is how the combat ended up devolving into intense shelling because Russia's ground troops are losing against Ukraine's defense, and how the fog of war and propagandas are creating this chaotic and conflicting information of the war
That’s the beauty of the constitution and our electoral process, baby. Yeah it’s a clown show, but at any given time half the country can say “hey don’t look at me, I didn’t vote for this fool..”. Pendulum swings left, pendulum swings right. It’s literally a traceable pattern. Its checkers, not chess. And y’all still can’t figure it out.
Yeah, that's what I really like about Democracy, especially ones that is truly democratic. Sure, it's going to led to some inconsistency, but at least the people actually have the power to influence the government provided they have enough voice. Is it flawed? Of course, but compared to other method of government and power, democracy is the fairest one (that actually works)
I agree. Even through I don't want the U.S to get involved. That still doesn't mean I don't care about Ukraine (even if their hiding Hunter Biden child porn. Thats on the government, not the people in general). I am honselty kind of upset seeing certain conservatives come off a little heartless towards Ukraine here.
I've been wondering about this. For the US to joining the war would definitely require a bipartisan support. I know a lot of the Democrats are pushing for some actual actions against Russia, but what about the GOP? I'm not that knowledgeable about American party politic, so if possible please tell me
 

US State Department tells embassies not to share Kyiv Embassy tweet calling nuclear plant attack a war crime​


The US State Department sent an urgent message to all US embassies in Europe telling them not to retweet the US Embassy Kyiv’s tweet calling the attack on the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant attack by Russia a war crime this morning, according to the message reviewed by CNN.

The message is an indication that the US government may not be endorsing the war crime allegation made by the embassy.

“All – do not/not retweet Embassy Kyiv’s tweet on shelling of the facility being a possible war crime,” the message said. “If you have retweeted it – un-retweet it ASAP.”

As Russian forces continue their onslaught on key Ukrainian cities, the country's biggest nuclear power plant, Zaporizhzhia, came under attack Friday. A blaze there initially sparked fears of a potential accident, but the fire has since extinguished. The International Atomic Energy Agency also said the reactors at the plant are safe and no radioactive material was released.

Thus far, the administration of US President Joe Biden has not said that any of Russia’s aggressions in Ukraine amount to war crimes. President Biden said they are following Russia’s actions closely when asked about the matter on Wednesday.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken has given brief remarks multiple times today in Brussels, but he has not mentioned the attack on the Ukrainian nuclear power plant.

The US has no reason to doubt Russian claims that they are in control of the nuclear power plant, a senior defense official said on Friday. But the official also said that it is "deeply concerning" that US doesn't know what Russian control looks like, expertise of people there and their near-term intentions.

NBC was the first to report on the message.

US labor secretary predicts some "short-term inflation" but says US needs to "stand with" Ukraine​


US Labor Sec. Marty Walsh indicated Friday he didn’t think Russia’s war on Ukraine would impact job creation in the United States, but “certainly” had “potential to have impact on inflation in some cases.”

“At the end of the day, we stand united with the Ukrainian people, and not just the United States, but major ... countries in the world and all countries in the world. We’re rallying around the Ukrainian people. And I think for some short-term inflation, we need to continue to stand with the Ukrainian people. They don't deserve what they're experiencing right now. They don't deserve what they're getting. And we need to ... show the world that we’re united behind them,” Walsh said during an appearance on CNN.
He predicted more American companies will cut ties with Russia.

“I hope companies and people continue putting pressure on Russia, every, every pressure point we can, so they realize that the world does not support their action in the world stands firmly behind Ukraine,” he said.

US President Joe Biden imposed new sanctions Thursday on eight members of the Russian elite, along with members of their families.

IKEA Suspends Operations in Russia, Affecting 17 Stores​


The parent company of IKEA announced on March 3 that it will close all of its stores in Russia, stopping production in the country and halting all exports and imports to and from Russia and Belarus, as Western companies begin to curb business with Russia since its invasion of Ukraine.


Ingka operates seventeen stores and one distribution center in Russia.


The two companies said in a joint statement that the war in Ukraine has already had a huge human impact and is also resulting in serious disruptions to supply-chain and trading conditions.


“The devastating war in Ukraine is a human tragedy, and our deepest empathy and concerns are with the millions of people impacted,” they said.


“For all of these reasons, the company groups have decided to temporarily pause IKEA operations in Russia.”



Ingka, one of the world’s biggest shopping center owners, said its other 14 locations across Russia operating under its Mega brand will remain open to ensure that the many people in Russia have access to their daily needs and essentials such as food, groceries, and pharmacies.


The world’s biggest furniture brand, Inter IKEA Group and Ingka Holding BV, the largest owner of IKEA stores worldwide, will also likely raise its prices by an average of 12 percent this fiscal year, up from the 9 percent flagged in December, amid rising prices for raw material costs and supply chain disruptions.


Inter IKEA is in charge of supply and the manufacturing of products, while Ingka is the main global retailer, owning 392 of its stores around the world.


Inter IKEA Core Business Supply Manager Henrik Elm said in a joint interview with Ingka Group Retail Operations Manager Tolga Oncu, that the decision was made before the European Union approved new sanctions against Belarus on March 3 for supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.


Inter IKEA has not yet decided whether to raise prices at its stores as a result of the Ukraine crisis, according to Elm.


IKEA is one of the first major Western firms to halt business with Belarus.


“We couldn’t offer safety and security of people working in our supply chain—passing the border et cetera was simply too risky. Then, on top of that, the consequences of different sanctions altogether made it simply not possible to operate any longer,” said Elm regarding Belarus.


IKEA produces chipboards and wood-based products at three sites in Russia, with around 50 direct suppliers in the country that produce a wide range of goods, the bulk of which are sold in Russia.


Russian-produced products that are exported to other markets make up less than 0.5 percent of IKEA’s inventory.


Belarus is primarily a sourcing market for IKEA and most of the goods manufactured there, primarily of wood-based products, mattresses, and sofas, are sold in Russia.
Top brands from M&S to Apple, Jaguar Land Rover, Expedia, and Coca-Cola have already suspended operations in Russia, as a wave of international companies are leaving due to the war and the consequent sanctions against the country.


The decision to mothball operations will affect 15,000 workers in Russia, after a similar situation with 416 workers in Ukraine, where its one store and online operations have been suspended since the start of the invasion on Feb. 24.


Through last August last year, Russia was IKEA’s 10th-biggest market with retail sales of 1.6 billion euros ($1.8 billion), or 4 percent of total retail sales.


Oncu, in a joint interview with Elm, promised that all staff in Russia would get paid, in rubles, for at least three months.


“The company groups will secure employment and income stability and provide support to them and their families in the region,” said IKEA.

Wolf Berates Pennsylvania Republicans for ‘Exploiting Ukraine Crises to Enrich Gas Industry’​


Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf has written a terse response to a letter from House Republicans of the Energy Committee that urged him to loosen regulations on Pennsylvania’s gas reserves and ease market instability caused by the conflict in Ukraine.


The largest natural gas reserve in the United States is underground, in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia. Pennsylvania also has more than 100,000 active oil wells.


The March 1 letter was written by Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, chairman of the Environmental Resources and Energy Committee, and signed by 14 other representatives.


It asks Wolf to encourage surrounding states to drop bans on pipeline construction so liquefied natural gas (LNG) can be transported to New England states, which currently import from foreign nations, including, the letter said, from Russia. The letter also asks Wolf to end the natural gas development moratorium within the Delaware River Basin, but Wolf has supported the moratorium in the past. The letter also encourages Wolf to support Pennsylvania’s plentiful oil, gas, and coal industries that have the potential to fuel the world’s energy needs.


“You must encourage the extraction and refinement of our resources for the betterment of the free world. End your crusade against fossil fuels and recognize the gift of energy and production that exists beneath our feet,” the committee wrote.



Wolf sent a response letter on March 3, saying the Republicans are exploiting the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the resulting humanitarian crisis to increase the profits of the natural gas industry and stand in the way of action to address climate change.


“I find your politicization of this tragedy deplorable,” Wolf wrote. He failed to respond to some of the specifics in the letter, such as the Delaware River Basin issue. But he did list some data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Wolf said:


• The United States is a net exporter of natural gas and has increased exports of Liquified Natural Gas to Europe to record levels over the past several years.
• The United States is currently the largest source of European LNG imports, providing more than half of the LNG imported to the continent in January.
• Net natural gas exports from Pennsylvania have roughly doubled since 2015, when Wolf took office, due to increased pipeline construction.


“Despite your hand wringing about Russian LNG tankers entering American ports, you should be aware that the United States imports virtually no natural gas in any form from Russia. I encourage you to review actual data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration if you are confused about any of these points,” Wolf said.


The Energy Information Administration confirmed the United States does not directly import LNG from Russia.


“There were a couple of LNG cargoes imported to the United States from France and the United Kingdom in 2018-19 that may have originally come from Russia,” an administration spokesperson told The Epoch Times. “These were officially recorded as imports from France and the U.K. We don’t track the original source of LNG import volumes, so the source information on these imports is anecdotal.”


But Wolf never mentions oil in his letter. In 2021, the United States imported an average of 209,000 barrels of Russian oil per day, according to the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers website. Oil imports continue today.


Wolf is correct that the United States is a net exporter of natural gas, and currently a large source of European LNG imports. In 2021, the United States, Qatar, and Russia combined, provided 70 percent of Europe’s total LNG imports.


But Wolf can’t take credit for that. Exports of LNG to Europe ramped up in 2017, the year Donald Trump took office. Before then, Europe was using little, if any U.S.-produced LNG. Trump worked to expand U.S. LNG exports abroad.


“The U.S. no longer needs to import energy. With an abundance of American natural gas now available, our European allies no longer have to be vulnerable to unfriendly energy suppliers either,” Trump said in a January 2020 speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. “We urge our friends in Europe to use America’s vast supply and achieve true energy security. With U.S. companies and researchers leading the way we are on the threshold of virtually unlimited reserves of energy, including from traditional fuels, LNG, clean coal, next-generation nuclear power, and gas hydrate technologies.”

Wolf’s letter defends his record on the environment and hints that he is not budging on his energy policies.


“I have moved forward with measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and diversify and strengthen our grid. This newest effort to halt progress in addressing climate change by linking action on climate to events in Ukraine is simply a continuation of the conspiracy theories you are well known for,” Wolf said, directing his comments at Metcalfe. “We are in a moment of significant import for the world. This is no time for small-minded ideologues or armchair energy experts to attempt to capitalize on tragedy to benefit their benefactors.”


Metcalfe said he was surprised Wolf responded to the letter so quickly because often it takes a month or more for a letter from his committee to hear back from the governor.


“His administration has been working time and time again to bring in the heavy regulatory hand on our oil and gas companies to discourage investment, to discourage production, to discourage development. And he could step up and work with the General Assembly to encourage more production of our oil and gas, which the world needs right now. I mean there’s no excuse for any state in the nation to have to be using any Russian gas or oil,” Metcalfe told The Epoch Times.


“We have the resources here in the United States, as long as we can get Wolf, Biden, John Kerry and the ones that are fighting to advance their sci-fi perspective of what’s happening in the world. If they’d get with reality, look at the news, and see all these people dying in the Ukraine—if Russia didn’t have their war machine greased by their sales of energy, they wouldn’t have the ability to fund that operation.”

Speedy Bankruptcy Offered By Russia As One of Three Choices For Foreign Firms​


Russia is offering foreign companies, seeking to exit the country, fast-tracked bankruptcy options as businesses face increasing challenges from western sanctions imposed as a result of Moscow’s initiation of war against Ukraine.


The fast bankruptcy plan “will support the employment and social well-being of citizens so that bona fide entrepreneurs can ensure the effective functioning of business,” said the government.


First Deputy Prime Minister Andrei Belousov outlined three options for foreign firms with operations in Russia. One, “the company continues to work fully in Russia.” Two, “foreign shareholders transfer their share to be managed by Russian partners and can return to the market later.” Or three, “the company permanently terminates operations in Russia, closes production, and dismisses employees.”


All three choices come with risks. Foreign companies that do decide to continue operating in Russia might have to face severe backlash in the West as the general public increasingly rallies behind Ukraine.


If firms decide to transfer shares, they will be handing over business assets with little to no guarantee that these resources will be returned back intact in the future. Finally, companies that decide to quit might be forced to sell their business for cheap and suffer a loss.



Many foreign firms in Russia are still trying to assess the cost of their exposure in the country, a number that keeps changing as new sanctions are imposed or removed. It is estimated that global investors, companies, and banks have over $110 billion worth of exposure in Russia. Research firm Morningstar puts the exposure of international funds to Russia in the form of bonds and stocks at around $60 billion.


Several businesses have announced their decision to pause or exit from their Russian operations. Oil and gas giant Shell plans to withdraw from its projects in Russia as well as end its involvement in the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project.

BP plans to get rid of its 19.75 percent stake in Russian integrated energy firm Rosneft. Norway’s Equinor ASA has announced withdrawal from Russian projects worth around $1.2 billion.


Japanese carmaker Toyota will suspend operations at its sole plant in Russia. French multinational integrated oil and gas company TotalEnergies has decided not to invest any more in the country. IKEA declared store closures across Russia.


Nokian Tyres from Finland plans to shift part of its production to other nations. The world’s largest chemicals group BASF is pausing new businesses in Russia and Belarus. Swiss watchmaker Swatch Group has halted exports to Russia due to the “overall difficult situation.”


Meanwhile, there have been speculations of the Russian government nationalizing the properties of foreign companies. However, Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov recently dismissed such a possibility.


“I am not aware of this, and the Kremlin is not considering it,” he said. “All issues related to sanctions, to minimization of the damage of those sanctions are considered and decisions are taken by the government’s crisis center headed by [Russian Prime Minister Mikhail] Mishustin.”

 
People in Kherson greet "humanitarian help" from Russia (more photo op than anything).
After arguing with the negotiator, man shouts to the gathered crowd of locals: "Anyone wants food from the occupants?"
They shout "No", "Fuck off!" and "Russian ship, go fuck yourself!", which seems to be catching on like "Let's Go Biden!" in US some time ago.
 
I really hope the Baltic threat was just some dick posturing by Putin and not an actual threat

Another similarity with WW1 is how the combat ended up devolving into intense shelling because Russia's ground troops are losing against Ukraine's defense, and how the fog of war and propagandas are creating this chaotic and conflicting information of the war
Considering the quality of their troops, I'm not surprised the Russians just resorted to shelling everything since their soldiers would easily give up or get captured by their enemy.

I've been wondering about this. For the US to joining the war would definitely require a bipartisan support. I know a lot of the Democrats are pushing for some actual actions against Russia, but what about the GOP? I'm not that knowledgeable about American party politic, so if possible please tell me
Neocon old-guard GOP people from the Bush years want to go to war, Trump fans and libertarians don't want to go to war, and in some extreme cases, outright support Putin and think his invasion is justified.
 
By the way, I've been thinking about this for a while, but...we haven't really see any capabilities Ukraine has on counteroffensive and regaining lost territories, right? Sure, that's understandable since they're focusing entirely on defense (especially with their Territorial Defense unit, which honestly reminds me with how my country fought for our independence), but they can only do so much fighting the enemy if they don't have any ability to take back the ground they lost. The only thing that would happen is either they're holding up or losing more area and facilities if they don't strike back

Yes, they don't have any resources to spend for any offensive. But if this war continues longer than we expected, and Ukraine continue to maintain their morale and receiving material support from the West, can we see any offensive from the Ukrainian by then? If the Russian continues in their current state by then, with low morale and incompetent leadership, it's going to be bloody for the Russian

Also, about something else, we've basically had the confirmation that Russia has send 90% of their troops on the border into Ukraine, but what is going to happen if they commit 100% of those? Are they going to send more men to the border? A draft maybe?
 
I've been wondering about this. For the US to joining the war would definitely require a bipartisan support. I know a lot of the Democrats are pushing for some actual actions against Russia, but what about the GOP? I'm not that knowledgeable about American party politic, so if possible please tell me
@LORD IMPERATOR is mostly right, although I don't agree with him saying that Trump supports Putin. Your rank-and-file GOP voter can see it's obvious propaganda to get them killed and want to stay neutral. That's why the Left is saying it's unacceptable to be neutral.
 
One of the things that I (as a Burger) have trouble understanding about Europe is how ethnicity and national allegiance work in areas where the borders shift every few years.

I get that there are a ton of ethnic Russians in Ukraine, but I'm not sure why they would feel loyal to a different country, especially a country that is bombing the shit out of their own neighborhoods. Especially given that unlike in Yugoslavia, they mostly seem to share the same religion, more or less.

There are a ton of what one might call "ethnic Mexicans" in the southwestern US who settled here 200 years ago before the area was the US, but there's no assumption or expectation that they would prefer to be in Mexico. There's also a bunch of ethnic French, a handful of ethnic Swiss Germans, and a handful of ethnic Russians dicking around where they didn't cross the border, the border crossed them.

Are there still people who identify as Austro-Hungarian? Or people who identify as Thuringian?

I guess I don't understand why ethnicity would trump national allegiance when you're a "minority" population living among people who are very, very similar, to the point where you look the same, the languages are mutually intelligible, and one of your own is the president.
 
I wish that was true, but I think Russia still has advantage in the war of attrition. That is, Ukrainians have nowhere to go, and Russia seems perfectly willing to shell their cities into rubble, along with people residing there. Russia will just genocide Ukrainians until they lose resolve to fight or there's no one left.
At least to me, Russian artillery right now looks like one of the biggest problems, that and air strikes. And they have to solve it if they want to have any chance to win.
So if we are just talking numbers, yes, but if we look at military theory - Clausewitz specifically - war is just an extension of politics. The Russian soldiers don't want to fight in this war, it's hard to know what the Russian people think but I speculate they aren't too thrilled at the moment - hence martial law, stricter rules on public expression.

This is how the US was defeated in Afghanistan, and Vietnam. Ultimately, the Taliban/Vietcong know they could never defeat the US in a fight, they just held out until the US left due to political pressure.

Exactly the same fate befell the Soviet Union in Afghan in the 1980s.

The question then becomes, which side can continue the struggle from a political position. From all accounts, it appears that Ukrainian people will be in this one for the long haul if required.

As for the artillery, awful stuff - but crucially, the Ukrainians can - and are - targeting it and attacking supply lines. The Russians can't be everywhere, and as we see some militia with man portables have been successfully confronting top tier Russian armour.

Lastly, it's a horrible thought, but in WW2, the siege of Leningrad lasted for nearly 3 years. It was constantly under artillery bombardment and yet it resisted the German military and never fell. It would a human tragedy on a titanic scale - but it certainly doesn't mean defeat is inevitable.
 

U.S. official: no evidence Russians attacked nuclear reactors in Ukraine -MSNBC​

The United States has not seen evidence that Russia attacked the nuclear reactors themselves at a nuclear power plant in southeastern Ukraine on Thursday and that it appeared small arms were used in the fight, a top U.S. nuclear official said.


U.S. Undersecretary of Energy for Nuclear Energy Jill Hruby told MSNBC in an interview on Friday that the Biden administration feels well-prepared for any scenarios involving radiation released from the targeted power plant in Zaporizhzhia.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back