Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%

  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%

  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%

  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%
  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
LUNEKO said:
Long as shit regular mid-range missiles work perfectly fine for fortification/city siege Nukes would be overkill as fuck and will render any and all infrastructure unusable, Russia doesn't want to flatten Ukraine (yet). They want Ukraine to cuck to their demands and give them the border states which is way easier to achieve than outright occupation.
For nukes to start flying it would need NATO intervention and even then i'm sure both sides would rather carry all of this out in conventional warfare rather than reach for the nukes right away

With the only exception being America
USA USA USA !!
View attachment 3053982
Click to expand...
I'm not sure I believe in American exceptionalism, but there are a lot of exceptional individuals in America.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: WalterPresson96, 820㎌Cap, Blatant hypocrite and 48 others
No_one said:
Russian MoD has released some (inflated) numbers concerning recent operations:
According to them since the beginning they have destroyed: 2,482 military facilities including 87 command and communication posts, 124 anti-aircraft missile systems and 79 radar stations. Also they report destroying 866 tanks and armored vehicles, 91 multiple launch rocket systems, 317 artillery pieces and mortars, 634 military vehicles and 81 UAVs.
Click to expand...
The UAV numbers are definitely inflated since AFAIK Ukraine only has Bayraktars and only 6 of them originally with another 12 delivered during the war. So that's a maximum of 18 that Russia could have possibly destroyed and since there are still drones dunking on Russian equipment and troops, they haven't taken all, if any, of them down.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Rezza
LUNEKO said:
Oh my god what if the reddit legion actually ends up draining all the food banks in Kiev before they even get to shoot a bullet, i'll laugh my ass off if suddenly the Ukrainian army runs out of food rations because the reddit squad ate them all and only exacerbated the food shortage
Click to expand...
Redditors should be given the shitty guns and used as a meat shield like the Red Army did in World War II. Casualties may be high, but anything for updoots, right, comrades?
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Sundae, GloJojo and 7 others
1646728939511.png

Hey Rabbi... Whatcha doing?
Hahaha. When memes become reality.

1646728988505.png

Edit: Putler
1646729199847.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Buck Breaker of BUcha, JohnLenin and 14 others
ArthuriusMartyrius said:
Never. Russia has never actually seriously entertained the thought of launching nukes and is desperately reliant on them as a bluff. Just see the insane amount of "close calls" regarding Russia which make it blatantly obvious that despite the warmongering rhetoric, they aren't quite that suicidal. It's an unspoken rule of nuclear powers that "you back off when I yell nuke", which would cause mass chaos if another nuclear power were to actually call a nuclear power's bluff because nobody actually wants to be the one to start the nuclear shitshow.

If any Russian leader is stupid enough to demand nuclear war, he either gets domed by his second-in-command or a civil war/internal struggle for power breaks out.
Click to expand...
Assuming the other side will never use their big guns no matter the provocation is a great way to push them into doing so.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96, not william stenchever, Pomme Poire Peche and 2 others
ArthuriusMartyrius said:
The UAV numbers are definitely inflated since AFAIK Ukraine only has Bayraktars and only 6 of them originally with another 12 delivered during the war. So that's a maximum of 18 that Russia could have possibly destroyed and since there are still drones dunking on Russian equipment and troops, they haven't taken all, if any, of them down.
Click to expand...
They also have some 72 RQ-11 Ravens, so they could have counted them in. But the numbers don't add up of course.
 
Sammich said:
MIght be borderline even asking this question. Why all these open ended rules all of a sudden? Dude asked what seemed like a reasonable question and you just told him if he didn't use twitter he'd be fine. That seems vague as fuck.
Keep in mind, i'm just really asking. Virtue signaling, moral fagging, that's all this really has been fro the past week, lol. MIght as well ban concern trolling and bait posting too, hehe.

I'm honestly just wanting to nail down what will get me thread banned, as i have been enjoying this thread for a week or so.
Click to expand...
Most videos and photos of Russians getting fucked up are from Twitter. That irritates some users here.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: WalterPresson96, PhoBingas and Sammich
No_one said:
Russian MoD has released some (inflated) numbers concerning recent operations:
According to them since the beginning they have destroyed: 2,482 military facilities including 87 command and communication posts, 124 anti-aircraft missile systems and 79 radar stations. Also they report destroying 866 tanks and armored vehicles, 91 multiple launch rocket systems, 317 artillery pieces and mortars, 634 military vehicles and 81 UAVs.
Click to expand...
Nobody on either side of the conflict has that level of detailed information on losses inflicted on the other side. Anyone on any side who produces these sorts of numbers has no credibility and is not worth listening to.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Buck Breaker of BUcha, CashMoney! and 10 others
Ita Mori said:
Second, niggas.

Fr though, that UKE propaganda twitter acc is total cope as they lose more and more territory.
Then we'll get the west say Ukraine was always going to fall, and that 'victory' meant 'holding off Russia as long as possible.'
Click to expand...
“Even when we lose, we win!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: UVB-76
Matt Damon said:
Or alternatively, the Reddit Expeditionary Force.
Click to expand...
I read that as "Retard Expeditionary Force." My God I can't imagine the looks on their faces once they show up and be like "I thought this was supposed to be like escape from Tarkov, where's the loot boxes?"

I'm going to sit at home comfortably listening to the Command and Conquer Red Alert soundtrack while imagining how hilariously bad it's going to go for them.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: PhoBingas, GloJojo, BONE_Buddy and 6 others
Matt Damon said:
Assuming the other side will never use their big guns no matter the provocation is a great way to push them into doing so.
Click to expand...
No, you missed the point. Nobody ever actually wants to use nukes because that's an invitation to get blown the fuck up yourself. Russia understands this perfectly well, which is why they will never throw the first punch (nor will anyone else), they will just threaten to do so and hope other powers back off. This is the "Great Game" of the nuclear weapons era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck Breaker of BUcha
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Buck Breaker of BUcha, Sundae, MrJokerRager and 7 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back