War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
The accusation is specifically that they're developing bioweapons. Considering how Russian forces approached nuclear power plants, it makes sense to worry how their actions might affect these labs, even if research is purely for pharmacological purposes.
On top of that, it might be a desinfo campaign in preparation for deployment of chemical weapons.

Either way, it's not the first time they shifted their narrative to justify the invasion.

Just noticed, it's the account Gynn kept referring to, I wasn't impressed by the quality of their reporting.
To point out the Bioweapons lab issue.

Ukraine of the 90s was a hellish place of hilarious corruption and this tiny new state suddenly found itself with a number of cold war era pathogen labs and a nuclear arsenal that placed it at number 3 in the world.

We don't actually know where some of those nukes went and stuff from former soviet republics being stolen/bought by terrorists was a thing of 90s action movies. The same, scarily, could be said of the bioweapons that the soviets had been tinkering with before the collapse. We're not totally sure if its all there and American funding, as the world remaining superpower, stepped in largely to secure them and to keep them locked down. As well as secure a series of adept soviet scientists of the era.

Research likely has continued and with the fact we know Fauci and his band of merry medial psychos funded the gain of function research that lead to the last lost two years means that the Russians can make these claims and cause just enough doubt. Hence the articles by Jack Probisec where there isn't any skeptisism whatsoever from anyone because it's the Approved Thing To Say from TPTB.

Considering the man who demands he "is science" is that much of a madman, I'm very skeptical of what the labs functions was for, especially with DoD funding.

==========

Middle East Mercs means this will become even more of a shitshow in the near future.

That being said, we all saw what happened to the super battle hardened Chechens that were sent out specifically to try and kill Zelensky.

Not heard from them in a while, have we?
 
Middle East Mercs means this will become even more of a shitshow in the near future.

That being said, we all saw what happened to the super battle hardened Chechens that were sent out specifically to try and kill Zelensky.

Not heard from them in a while, have we?
Incidentally, some Chechen also fight on the Ukrainian side. There are pics of Sheikh Mansur Batallion returning to Ukraine
 
To point out the Bioweapons lab issue.

Ukraine of the 90s was a hellish place of hilarious corruption and this tiny new state suddenly found itself with a number of cold war era pathogen labs and a nuclear arsenal that placed it at number 3 in the world.

We don't actually know where some of those nukes went and stuff from former soviet republics being stolen/bought by terrorists was a thing of 90s action movies. The same, scarily, could be said of the bioweapons that the soviets had been tinkering with before the collapse. We're not totally sure if its all there and American funding, as the world remaining superpower, stepped in largely to secure them and to keep them locked down. As well as secure a series of adept soviet scientists of the era.

Research likely has continued and with the fact we know Fauci and his band of merry medial psychos funded the gain of function research that lead to the last lost two years means that the Russians can make these claims and cause just enough doubt. Hence the articles by Jack Probisec where there isn't any skeptisism whatsoever from anyone because it's the Approved Thing To Say from TPTB.

Considering the man who demands he "is science" is that much of a madman, I'm very skeptical of what the labs functions was for, especially with DoD funding.

==========

Middle East Mercs means this will become even more of a shitshow in the near future.

That being said, we all saw what happened to the super battle hardened Chechens that were sent out specifically to try and kill Zelensky.

Not heard from them in a while, have we?
Biolab stuff is murky as hell, but as you said, it's enough to be effective for propaganda

Ukraine has Chechens of their own, the good ones, and they totally shit on Kadyrov's dogs, they're not afraid.
Commander of Sheikh Mansur battalion gave an interview on the matter. I'll add it for posterity, but there's no English translation. They've been helping Ukraine fight against Russia-funded separatists since 2015, I think
 
There's been a lot of arguments regarding the bombing of children hospital in Mariupol.
Apparently, the one that got bombed is hospital #3, and the one where Azov was supposedly based is hosptial #1 (presumably evacuated) according to locals.
First Kremlin denied that bombing happened, then they admitted it and claimed that they targeted Azov. This is pretty retarded, because they bombed the wrong one.

Regarding bioweapons, there was an open letter, claiming to be from from Russian biologists, university graduates from the related academic field, saying that it's basically all bullshit: https://facebook.com/eugene.lewitin/posts/10223786884675110
It's something, I guess
 
Last edited:
Biolab stuff is murky as hell, but as you said, it's enough to be effective for propaganda

Ukraine has Chechens of their own, the good ones, and they totally shit on Kadyrov's dogs, they're not afraid.
Commander of Sheikh Mansur battalion gave an interview on the matter. I'll add it for posterity, but there's no English translation. They've been helping Ukraine fight against Russia-funded separatists since 2015, I think
Holy shit you're a faggot. There is no such thing as a good Chechen, they're either the servants of a kleptocratic strongman or radical islamists. Dzhokhar Dudaev was probably fine, but he's been dead almost 20 years and secular Chechen nationalism died even before the Second Chechen War.
 
Are there any sources for that?
Yes. Watch this video, it goes over all the sources (and read the reuters article)

The accusation is specifically that they're developing bioweapons.
Not according to the article:
The United Nations Security Council will convene on Friday at Russia's request, diplomats said, to discuss Moscow's claims, presented without evidence, of U.S. biological activities in Ukraine.
But if they were only researching food (as Journalists claim they do), why did US officials testify before Congress that they are afraid of Russians taking those labs? Seems like there might be something more. We know viruses were studied there as per Ukraine embassy, and reuters.
 
But if they were only researching food (as Journalists claim they do), why did US officials testify before Congress that they are afraid of Russians taking those labs? Seems like there might be something more. We know viruses were studied there as per Ukraine embassy, and reuters.
Well, as some people are saying here and the other thread, even if their intention was not for bioweapon purposes, those are still deadly viruses. If they get out, they could spread everywhere, especially in a war situation like this. And if the purpose for the research really was for, say military vaccines, those are still valuable data worth millions there
 
Well, as some people are saying here and the other thread, even if their intention was not for bioweapon purposes, those are still deadly viruses. If they get out, they could spread everywhere, especially in a war situation like this. And if the purpose for the research really was for, say military vaccines, those are still valuable data worth millions there
Right, but if it was that, why not just say that? We were told for most of Covid that such labs are normal. Their refusal to give more details just makes the conspiracies seem to have more weight behind them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
Right, but if it was that, why not just say that? We were told for most of Covid that such labs are normal. Their refusal to give more details just makes the conspiracies seem to have more weight behind them.
I'm much more of the opinion that by admitting the existence of the biolabs, they didn't allow the Russian (and the Chinese) an opportunity to form a narrative. They certainly wouldn't expect that the US would just admitted that. So by saying they exist, but not revealing what's inside, Washington still have the last card

I imagine the scenario they thought of was: The Russian took the labs, they claimed it was for bioweapons intended to them by showing "proof", US rebutted the claim by showing their own "proof", and because the US was the one who started the labs they could use their "proof" so push back that either the Russian faked their "proof" or misinterpreted what actually was inside

Also by denying the labs exist, they would be called a big liar if the Russian inevitably took the labs. Hence why they admitted it exist, but now telling what's inside. You can't say they're lying that way. And since the US is trying to show that the Russian are lying about their justification of this war, the US can't afford to be called a liar for now
 
I'm much more of the opinion that by admitting the existence of the biolabs, they didn't allow the Russian (and the Chinese) an opportunity to form a narrative. They certainly wouldn't expect that the US would just admitted that. So by saying they exist, but not revealing what's inside, Washington still have the last card

I imagine the scenario they thought of was: The Russian took the labs, they claimed it was for bioweapons intended to them by showing "proof", US rebutted the claim by showing their own "proof", and because the US was the one who started the labs they could use their "proof" so push back that either the Russian faked their "proof" or misinterpreted what actually was inside

Also by denying the labs exist, they would be called a big liar if the Russian inevitably took the labs. Hence why they admitted it exist, but now telling what's inside. You can't say they're lying that way. And since the US is trying to show that the Russian are lying about their justification of this war, the US can't afford to be called a liar for now
I don't exactly agree, but I haven't considered that point of view before, thanks!

Putin Warns Any Attempts to Prevent Exports of Fertilizers, Oil, Gas Will Have ‘Serious Consequences’​


Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that any attempts to prevent exports of fertilizers, oil, gas, and metals will have “serious consequences on this segment of the world market and for food in general.”

Putin made the comments at a meeting with government members on March 10, according to the Russian state-run news agency TASS.

The president also doubled down on his support for comments made by Russia’s Industry and Trade Minister, Denis Manturov, who previously said that Russia would redirect exports to other countries that were not hostile to Russia if problems with “logistics” were to continue after claiming that European carriers are not loading Russian products on their ships.

Unfriendly countries to Russia include the United States, Canada, and member states of the European Union, among others.

“This obstruction of supplies concerns energy carriers, oil. Of course, it concerns gas, including liquefied gas. This also concerns fertilizers and some other goods, metals, and so on, chemical products in the broad sense of the word. As for fertilizers, then, of course, if this continues further, it will have serious consequences for this segment of the world market and for food in general,” Putin said, according to TASS.

Putin added that any attempts to interfere with the supply of Russian products will also negatively impact the global economy.

“It will also affect macroeconomic indicators because inflation is inevitable in this case,” Putin said.

On Thursday Russian Industry Minister Denis Manturov announced that Russia has temporarily banned fertilizer exports to countries it deems hostile to Moscow, according to Firstsquawk.

The Epoch Times has been unable to verify if Russia has banned fertilizer exports and has contacted the Minister of Trade and Industry for comment.

Russia’s ministry previously recommended that the country’s fertilizer producers halt exports, citing uncertainty as to whether these exports would reach foreign markets.

“Taking into account the current situation with the work of foreign logistics operators and the risks associated with it, the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia was forced to recommend to Russian manufacturers to temporarily suspend the shipment of Russian fertilizers for export until the carriers resume rhythmic work and provide guarantees for the fulfillment of export deliveries of Russian fertilizers in full,” the ministry said in a statement.

Russia produces 50 million tons of fertilizers every year, accounting for 13 percent of the world’s total, according to Reuters.

The country is also a major producer of potash, phosphate, and nitrogen-containing fertilizers which serve as major crop and soil nutrients.

Amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the cost of fertilizer has already risen significantly across the globe and is expected to further impact the cost of goods and push food prices higher.

However, even before the invasion, fertilizer prices had risen drastically in part due to the rising gas costs which are needed to ship fertilizers across countries and continents.

On top of this, a reduced amount of natural gas, which is a key ingredient in making nitrogen-based fertilizers, forced some producers to reduce production and in some worse cases, completely halt it.

Peter Zeihan, a geopolitical analyst and author, told FOX Business that the world was on the verge of “the worst fertilizer situation in modern history in terms of supply” before the invasion of Ukraine.

“All three source materials that go into fertilizer (phosphate, nitrogen, potash) are subject to abject shortage. And even if the war were to stop tomorrow, it’s already too late. It’s too late for the planting season for the Northern Hemisphere this year,” Zeihan said, adding that the crisis could potentially hit Brazil, Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia the hardest.

These nations, he said, would likely not see enough yields that are “necessary to support the global population.”

“And as food prices rise, as they’ve been for the last two weeks—and pretty sharply—farmers will do what farmers do. They will plant what they think that they can grow for the greatest bang for their buck,” Zeihan said. “So, I can see (the United States) increasing our production and our exports by a small amount. But the scale of what we’re talking about here is insufficient food for hundreds of millions of people.”

Meanwhile, Ryan Jacobsen, Chief Executive Officer at Fresno County Farm Bureau, has warned that there’s a strong possibility that there is simply “not going to be enough on the worldwide market.”

“Let alone with the prices, you just won’t be able to find it,” Jacobsen told ABC30. “We are early in the season,” Jacobsen added. “There is still a lot of growing to come, so we are expecting this to compound as we go farther on.”

The fertilizer ban comes after the West levied heavy sanctions on Russia in recent weeks in response to what Putin calls a “special military operation” in Ukraine.

 
Funny how Russia wants to accuse the West of nuclear doom-speak, when Putin openly used nukes as a threat to keep the Western armies out of Ukraine.

I mean, dude, this is just gaslighting at its most blatant.

Also, Russia doesn't want war? Then why did they step into Ukraine in the first place? They were winning the diplomatic battle with the west (Zelensky was unpopular before the war, and they don't call Biden "Sleepy Joe" for nothing) before Putin's little temper tantrum.

Russia is acting like your stereotypical drunk husband who beats his wife, trying to gaslight her into thinking that she deserved it and that he loves her.
It comes off as so incredibly pathetic. Poor little Russia, bullied so bad by the West. Makes the whole tough guy act a joke. I just wish this kind of international reaction would happen to any country that pointlessly starts a war (US included going forward)
 

Ukraine news – live: Zelensky says ‘we will’ beat Russia as Putin widens attack hitting western cities​


‘Impossible to say how many days we still have to free Ukrainian land. But we can say we will do it,’ says country’s president

Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, has said his country has reached a “strategic turning point” in the conflict against Russia and vowed his forces would prevail.

In a televised address, he said: “It is impossible to say how many days we still have to free Ukrainian land. But we can say we will do it. For we have already reached a strategic turning point.”



He also accused Russia of deploying Syrian mercenaries into Ukraine, which comes after Vladimir Putin invited people to volunteer and fight for him.

Earlier, local authorities said Russian airstrikes had hit near airports in the western Ukrainian cities of Ivano-Frankiivsk and Lutsk, far from Russia’s main attack targets elsewhere in the country.

Russian forces also shelled a psychiatric hospital near the eastern Ukrainian town of Izyum, Ukrainian regional authorities have claimed, two days after hitting a maternity hospital in Mariupol.

Euro Rises as Putin Sees ‘Certain Positive Shifts’ in Talks With Ukraine​


The euro rose on Friday after Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some progress in Moscow’s talks with Ukraine.

Even if Putin provided no details, the euro rose 0.4 percent to $1.1043 minutes after Putin said in a meeting with his Belarusian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko that talks continued practically on daily basis.

“There are certain positive shifts, negotiators on our side tell me,” Putin said, without elaborating.

The euro was 0.25 percent higher at $1.1023 as of 1225 GMT, after rising as high as $1.11215 on Thursday in a choppy day.

The euro has fallen almost 2 percent against the U.S. dollar in March after Russia started a military operation in Ukraine last month. But it was heading on Friday to its first weekly gains in five weeks.

“Although both parties are still quite some distance apart from compiling and signing a formal peace treaty, headlines suggest that ground is being made in trying to bring about a more peaceful resolution,” Simon Harvey, head of FX Analysis at Monex Europe.

This is the reason why euro saw some modest gains after Putin’s statement, he added.

After falling to its lowest level in almost two years on Monday amid rising stagflation worries arising from the Ukraine war, the euro also found some support on the European Central Bank’s announcement that it will phase out its stimulus, opening the door to an interest rate hike before the end of 2022.

The dollar rose 0.06 percent against a basket of peers to 98.418. It was still near a five-year high on the Japanese yen, up 0.7 percent to 116.88 yen as markets prepare for the Federal Reserve tightening after the release of strong U.S. inflation data.

Both the Fed and the Bank of Japan have policy meetings next week, but while the Fed is all but certain to hike rates from their pandemic low, the BOJ is set to remain an outlier.

Amid rising energy prices, commodity-linked Norwegian crown rose 0.7 percent versus the dollar to 8.8910 crowns.

The Ukraine war has also weighed on sterling, which has fallen 2.3 percent this month versus the dollar and hit a 16-month low on Friday, before rising 0.3 percent to $1.3117 after Putin’s statement.

Bitcoin rose 1.8 percent to $40,000. It had surged this week after President Joe Biden signed an executive order on Wednesday requiring the government to assess the risks and benefits of creating a central bank digital dollar.

 

UK Government to Ask Citizens to House Ukrainian Refugees​


The UK government will ask the British public to open their homes to Ukrainians fleeing the fighting in their country, Prime Minister Boris Johnson has confirmed.


The Daily Telegraph reported that ministers will ask individuals, charities, businesses, and community groups to offer rooms to Ukrainian refugees through a hotline and a webpage.


Johnson told Sky News on Thursday that Michael Gove, the levelling up secretary, will unveil the programme on Monday.

A government spokesman said the details of the scheme are still being worked on.


“The routes we have put in place follow extensive engagement with Ukrainian partners,” the spokesman said. “This is a rapidly moving and complex picture and as the situation develops we will continue to keep our support under constant review.”


Technology minister Chris Philp told Sky News on Friday that the details of the plan will be set out “in the very near future.”


The UK government has come under pressure from both Conservative and opposition lawmakers to do more to take in Ukrainian refugees.


While the European Union allows visa-free travel for Ukrainian refugees, the UK has insisted that visas are necessary to guarantee security.


On Thursday, Home Secretary Priti Patel announced that the visa procedures for Ukrainian refugees have been simplified.


Under the new rules, Ukrainians with passports will be able to apply for visas “fully online” and will not need to submit their biometric information until they have arrived in Britain.


According to the United Nations, 2.5 million refugees have now fled the war in Ukraine.


UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi wrote on Twitter on Friday: “The number of refugees from Ukraine—tragically—has reached today 2.5 million.”


The UN also estimates that about 2 million people are displaced inside Ukraine.


On Thursday, the prime minister warned that the “cynical, barbaric” Russian regime appeared to be preparing to use chemical weapons in Ukraine.


“The stuff which you are hearing about chemical weapons is straight out of the Russian playbook,” he told Sky News.

“They start saying that there are chemical weapons that are being stored by their opponents or by the Americans, so that when they themselves deploy chemical weapons—as I fear they may—they have a sort of a maskirovka, a fake story, ready to go.”


It comes as the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) warned Russia could be re-posturing for a “renewed offensive” in Ukraine.

“This will probably include operations against the capital Kyiv,” a MoD statement said


Wall Street Opens Higher at End of Choppy Week on Ukraine Talks Hope​


Wall Street’s main indexes opened higher on Friday after Russian President Vladimir Putin said there were “certain positive shifts” in talks with Ukraine, at the end of a week roiled by geopolitical tensions and inflation angst.


The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 105.65 points, or 0.32 percent, at the open to 33,279.72. The S&P 500 opened higher by 19.98 points, or 0.47 percent, at 4,279.50, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 99.81 points, or 0.76 percent, to 13,229.77 at the opening bell.


UK Sanctions 386 Russian Parliamentarians for Supporting Ukrainian Separatists​


Britain has sanctioned hundreds of Russian parliamentarians as the government seeks to further “tighten the screw” on President Vladimir Putin’s regime over the invasion of Ukraine.

The government said on Friday that 386 members of the Duma—the lower house of the Russian parliament—are being banned from travelling to the UK and any assets they have in the country will be frozen.

They have been sanctioned for voting in February to recognise the independence of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions in Eastern Ukraine and authorise the permanent presence of Russian military there, the Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office (FCDO) said.

Announcing the decision, Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said: “We’re targeting those complicit in Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine and those who support this barbaric war. We will not let up the pressure and will continue to tighten the screw on the Russian economy through sanctions.


“Together with our allies, we stand firmly beside our Ukrainian friends. We will continue to support Ukraine with humanitarian aid, defensive weapons, and diplomatic work to isolate Russia internationally.”


This follows the government’s announcement on Thursday that seven Russian Oligarchs, including Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich, had been hit with UK travel bans and asset freezes over their close links to Putin.


Since the Russian invasion began on Feb. 24, the UK has sanctioned 18 of Russia’s leading oligarchs with a combined worth in excess of £30 billion ($39 billion), the FCDO said.


Altogether, the UK has sanctioned more than 500 of Russia’s most significant and high-value individuals, entities, and subsidiaries.


In a speech in Washington on Thursday, Truss said Western allies needed to continue to do more—including freezing all Russian banking assets and excluding Russia completely from the SWIFT global payments system.


“We want a situation where they can’t access their funds, they can’t clear their payments, their trade can’t flow, their ships can’t dock, and their planes can’t land,” she said.


Russia has been hit with crippling sanctions that threaten to cast the country into its gravest crisis since the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union.


More than 2 million people have fled Ukraine since the invasion began two weeks ago, with NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg describing the situation as “Europe’s fastest-growing refugee crisis since the Second World War.”


Around 16,000 ‘Volunteer’ Foreign Fighters to Help Russia in War Against Ukraine​


Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday gave the green light for “volunteers” from abroad to head to combat zones in eastern Ukraine to bolster Russian forces in the war.

Putin made the remarks at a Security Council meeting, according to Russian state news agency Tass, which described the move as the “provision of military assistance to Donbass on a no-cost basis,” apparently in a bid to distinguish between volunteer fighters and paid mercenaries. Ukraine and Russia have traded accusations of sending mercenaries into the conflict.

Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu was cited by Tass as saying that there have been over 16,000 requests from so-called volunteers, mostly in the Middle East, who are ready to come to the pro-Russian separatist-controlled regions of Lugansk and Donetsk and take part in “what they believe is a liberation movement.”

The 16,000 figure mirrors the number cited by Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky when he announced several days ago that foreign “volunteers” would be coming to Ukraine to help resist Russian forces.

“Ukraine is already greeting foreign volunteers. The first 16,000 are already on their way to protect freedom and life for us, and for all,” Zelensky said in a video posted on Facebook.

Ukrainian law allows foreigners to join the Ukrainian military on a voluntary basis, with incentives including being eligible for Ukrainian citizenship. Around 100 U.S. citizens have been cleared to join Ukrainian forces fighting against Russia.

Putin, in his remarks to the Security Council, accused the West of openly sending mercenaries to fight on the side of the government in Kiyv.


“As for the mercenaries from all over the world being sent to Ukraine, we see that they do not conceal it, the Western sponsors of Ukraine, the Ukrainian regime, do not hide it, they do it openly, neglecting all norms of international law,” Putin said.


Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense, for its part, has accused Russia of enlisting mercenaries affiliated with the “Wagner” group, an off-the-books private military outfit reportedly run by Putin associate Yvgeney Prigozhin, to fight in Ukraine. Prigozhin has always denied any links to Wagner.


That followed a report from British newspaper The Times claiming that over 400 Wagner-linked mercenaries had been sent to Kyiv with orders from the Kremlin to assassinate Zelensky.


There have been reports of a surge in demand for private military contractors in the context of the war in Ukraine.

Robert Young Pelton, a Canadian American author and expert on private military companies told the BBC that there was a “frenzy in the market” for private military contractors to take on missions in Ukraine, including for help with logistics to extractions.


Tass also cited Putin as saying Russia should meet its “volunteers” half way and help cover the costs of transporting them to combat zones.


Ukraine Civilian Deaths Exceed Military Losses: Defense Minister​


Russian forces invading Ukraine have killed more Ukrainian civilians than soldiers, according to Ukraine’s Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov.

“I want this to be heard not only in Kyiv but all over the world,” Reznikov said, without providing further details.

Thousands of people are believed to have been killed across Ukraine since Russian forces invaded two weeks ago. The United Nations human rights office said Thursday it had recorded the killings of 549 civilians in Ukraine since the invasion began, including 26 children.

Most of the casualties have been caused by “the use of explosive weapons with a wide impact area,” it said. It believes the real toll is “considerably higher,” however, noting that the numbers don’t include some areas of “intense hostilities,” including Mariupol.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba met with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov in Turkey on Thursday in a bid to secure a ceasefire so that civilians could be evacuated via humanitarian corridors but this—like prior peace efforts—ended with no progress.

In an extraordinary claim following their meeting, Lavrov claimed that Russia “did not attack” Ukraine while dismissing concerns about Russian shelling of a Ukrainian children’s hospital in Mariupol as a “pathetic outcry.” Lavrov claimed the hospital had earlier been seized by Ukrainian far-right radical fighters who were using it as a base.
On his way back to Ukraine, Kuleba visited Poland, where he was received by Polish President Andrzej Duda. Their discussions focused on Ukraine’s efforts to join the European Union and on practical steps to protect the people of Ukraine amid the Russian onslaught.

Duda said he was told by his Ukrainian counterpart, President Volodymyr Zelensky, that Russian troops were still not ready to storm Kiyv and were instead bombing residential buildings and hospitals to try to “break” the will of the Ukrainian defenders.

“Tomorrow another attempt will be made to evacuate civilians from Mariupol. RU are shelling non stop. God save UA!” the Polish president said in a tweet.

The Red Cross on Wednesday estimated more than 400,000 people were trapped in Mariupol without humanitarian aid and evacuation corridors, with a spokesperson describing the conditions in the city as “apocalyptic.”

Ukrainian authorities say they’ve been trying to evacuate their citizens from the besieged city, but that this requires cooperation from the Russian side, which they say has been lacking. They accuse Russian forces of shelling civilian areas to terrorize civilians and pressure Kiyv into capitulation.

Poland has been a staunch ally to Ukraine during the war, taking in around 1.5 million refugees, more than any other country, according to the latest U.N. data.
A somber milestone was hit on Friday, with the total number of people fleeing the war in Ukraine hitting 2.5 million, according to Filippo Grandi, U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees.

“We also estimate that about two million people are displaced inside Ukraine. Millions forced to leave their homes by this senseless war,” Grandi said in a tweet.

Top officials from NATO and the U.N. have called the war in Ukraine the fastest growing refugee crisis since World War Two.

Former President Donald Trump said Thursday that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is “truly is a crime against humanity.”

“This is something that has to end, and it has to end soon,” Trump told Fox News in an interview.

Roman Brovko, a Ukrainian filmmaker living in Kyiv, told The Epoch Times in a phone interview that he’s witnessed the destruction of civilian infrastructure first-hand by Russian shelling.

He said that, even if Russia prevails in its military campaign, he believes Moscow’s efforts to control the country will be met with staunch resistance via insurgency.

“Ukrainians are ready to give up their lives for freedom. A partisan resistance movement is already starting to take shape,” he said.

“We don’t want to live under a dictatorship,” Brovko added.


100 Americans Approved to Join Fight Against Russia: Ukrainian Officer​


Approximately 100 U.S. citizens have been cleared to join Ukrainian forces fighting against Russia, part of a wave of some 20,000 foreigners who have been approved after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called for help.

The Americans include veterans who fought in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, including helicopter pilots.


They and other foreigners who have moved to help “really feel that this war is unfair, unprovoked,” Ukraine’s military attaché, Maj. Gen. Borys Kremenetskyi, said in Washington after meeting with U.S. defense officials. “They feel that they have to go and help.”


Despite top U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Antony Blinken, discouraging Americans from going to fight in Ukraine, the embassy in Washington has heard from at least 6,000 people inquiring about volunteering for service since Russia invaded Ukraine.


The vast majority of that group are American citizens, according to Kremenetskyi, who oversees the screening of potential U.S. recruits.


Half the potential recruits were quickly rejected and didn’t even make it to a Zoom interview, the general said. They lacked the required military experience, had a criminal background, or weren’t suitable for other reasons such as age, including a 16-year-old boy and a 73-year-old man.


Some who expressed interest were rejected because the embassy said it couldn’t do adequate vetting. The general didn’t disclose the methods used to screen people.


Those approved must make their own way to Poland, where they are to cross at a specified point, with their own protective gear but without a weapon, which they will get after they arrive. They will be required to sign a contract to serve, without pay, in the International Legion for the Territorial Defense of Ukraine.


A source from the legion told The Epoch Times in a Facebook message that volunteers need military or combat experience. At least 550 Canadians and over 1,000 Americans have joined the legion, according to the source.


Fight for Ukraine, a group helping interested Canadians prepare to apply, recommends getting a pack that includes a satellite phone, a battery charger, and a pair of walkie-talkies.

“A lot of volunteers come with many years of military experience. Many have been in various combat situations and thus can help Ukrainian Armed Forces right upon arrival. This saves time that Ukraine would have to spend on training new fighters and can save lives of both fighters and civilians,” the legion source said.

Provided Americans who join aren’t violating international rules or committing war crimes and are adhering to Ukrainian law, they should avoid legal problems, Mary Beth Long, former assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs and a professor at the Penn State School of International Affairs, told The Epoch Times.

Under U.S. law, Americans need to steer clear from exporting technology or techniques to Ukraine that the Ukrainians can’t obtain elsewhere. Retired military personnel, meanwhile, aren’t supposed to fight for another country, though getting paid through a third party, if payment is rendered, could help them avoid repercussions for joining the fight.

“As long as they are, as a practical matter, on the Ukraine side of the conflict, and they’re not taking and handing over the kind of technical equipment that Ukraine would not otherwise be authorized to have, they’re pretty safe,” Long said.

The U.S. government has said Americans shouldn’t take part in the war. “U.S. citizens should not travel to Ukraine,” deputy White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters in a recent briefing. “We’ve been very clear for some time in calling on Americans who may have been resident in Ukraine to leave, and making clear to Americans who may be thinking of traveling there not to go,” Blinken added later.

Other countries have threatened prosecution of certain nationals if they join; still others have encouraged interested citizens to apply to join.

Zelensky, Ukraine’s president, issued a call on Feb. 27 for help from foreigners. The invasion “is the beginning of a war against Europe, against European structures, against democracy, against basic human rights, against a global order of law, rules, and peaceful coexistence,” according to his office, which added that Zelensky was appealing to “all citizens of the world, friends of Ukraine, peace and democracy” while making clear “anyone who wants to join the defense of Ukraine, Europe, and the world can come and fight side by side with the Ukrainians against the Russian war criminals.”

Ukrainian law lets foreigners join the Ukrainian military on a voluntary basis.

The international legion, a group inside the armed forces entirely composed of foreigners, was formed at the time.

Incentives for joining include being eligible for Ukrainian citizenship. People on their way to the front line have spoken of seeing a need to act.


“Everybody likes to talk about freedom but freedom only really goes to people who are willing to show up and fight for it—whether it be at the ballot box or the war,” Eric Creager, a Minnesota resident, told CTV Canada on his way to Ukraine.

“I’m a little nervous, to be honest,” Michael Ferkol, an American, told Reuters in Lviv. “But at the same time, it’s not about me. It’s about the people that are suffering.”


Ukrainian officials estimated as of Wednesday that some 20,000 foreigners had volunteered. Ukraine was also seeing a response from Ukrainian nationals, with nearly 12,000 arriving in the 24 hours leading up to March 9, according to the legion.


Not everybody who made it to the region ended up fighting.


Keiran Murphy, a Briton who used to serve in the military, wanted to join the Ukrainian military but decided against it because he was told he’d have to stay for months.


“My boy’s 11. So to leave him for maybe six months is too long,” Murphy told The Epoch Times in Poland, near the border with Ukraine.

He is now helping out with a humanitarian mission.


The number of volunteers matters less than their skills, experience, and potential for cohesion Long, the military expert, said. Deploying foreigners in their own groups is a smart move, because they can be used for precision missions “very tactically,” she added.


Russian officials have warned the “mercenaries the West is sending to Ukraine,” saying they will not “enjoy the status of prisoners of war.”


“At best, they can expect to be prosecuted as criminals,” Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov told state media recently.


Kremenetskyi, the Ukrainian military official, said the volunteers are “not mercenaries who are coming to earn money,” describing them as “people of goodwill who are coming to assist Ukraine to fight for freedom.”


Europe’s Central Bank to Speed up End to Economic Stimulus​


The European Central Bank (ECB) said Thursday that it will make an early exit from its economic stimulus efforts as it combats record inflation that threatens to go ever higher as energy prices soar during Russia’s war in Ukraine.


The move was a tough choice because the invasion also has exposed Europe to a potential hit to economic growth. But the ECB chose higher inflation as the bigger threat, surprising many analysts who had expected no change in the bank’s roadmap for the coming months.


The bank was keeping its options open and could modify its stimulus exit depending on what happens with the economy, President Christine Lagarde said. That’s hard to answer right now because of massive uncertainty over the impact of the war.


“The prospects for the economy will depend on the course of the Russia-Ukraine war and on the impact of economic and financial sanctions and other measures,” she said.


“At the same time, other headwinds to growth are now waning,” Lagarde said, pointing to signs some of the supply bottlenecks that have held back business are showing “signs of easing.”


She said the impact of sharply higher energy prices could be “partly cushioned” by savings that people couldn’t spend during the pandemic restrictions.


The bank’s 25-member governing council headed by Lagarde decided to end its bond purchases in the third quarter. Previously, it said it would taper them off to 20 billion euros ($22 billion) per month by the last three months of the year and continue them as long as needed.


The purchases aim to keep borrowing costs low for companies and promote business investment and hiring.

But the bank did not move up its schedule for a first interest rate increase, dropping a promise that rates would go up shortly after the end of bond purchases. Instead it said only that rate changes will take place “some time after” the end of the purchases and “will be gradual.”


During a news conference, Lagarde refused to be drawn out on whether an interest rate increase was possible this year. After the end of the bond purchases, “it can be the week after and it can be months after,” she said, depending on inflation and growth.


“The ECB has signaled that it is more concerned about a further sharp rise in inflation than the negative shock to demand which will result from the war in Ukraine,” said Andrew Kenningham, chief Europe economist at Capital Economics.


Inflation in the 19 countries that use the euro currency is running at an annual 5.8 percent, the highest since statistics started in 1997, and is expected to keep climbing in the coming months. The bank sees inflation running well above its 2 percent target throughout this year but falling to 2.1 percent next year.


The European bank is still behind the U.S. Federal Reserve, which is set to raise interest rates several times this year, beginning with a modest hike next week after inflation came in at a 40-year high of 7.9 percent.


The recovery from the pandemic recession has lagged in Europe, which only reached pre-pandemic levels of output at the end of last year, well behind the United States, where stimulus and support spending was higher.


The European bank’s road map includes ending a 1.8 trillion euro purchase program this month and transferring some of the purchases to an existing program that will now end sooner than planned. The bank used the purchases to support the economy through the coronavirus pandemic.


It had been assuming that high oil and gas prices and pandemic supply bottlenecks were temporary. But that equation is changing as inflation seems to be both worse and longer lasting than originally expected. Fears of oil and gas cutoffs have sent already high energy prices even higher, leading to predictions that inflation can only go higher in the short term.


On the other hand, economic growth is at risk in the eurozone because Europe is more exposed to the war on the continent and is more dependent on Russian oil and gas than the United States and China.


Satellite Images Appear to Show Russian Convoy Near Kyiv Has Dispersed, Redeployed​


Satellite images taken on Thursday appear to show that the large Russian military convoy that had been slowly advancing towards the Ukraine capital city of Kyiv has dispersed and redeployed into nearby locations.


The convoy, which stretches for as much as 40 miles, was last seen northwest of Kyiv near Antonov airport.


On March 7, U.S. Press Secretary John Kirby said the convoy remained stalled but noted that the Pentagon doesn’t have “perfect visibility” on the convoy.


However, satellite imagery from U.S. company Maxar Technologies showed the line of vehicles, tanks, and artillery has broken up and been redeployed, with armored units moving into positions in surrounding towns.


Some of the vehicles have moved into forests, Maxar reported, adding that images also show parts of the convoy further north have repositioned near the town of Lubyanka with towed artillery in firing position.

Still, the immediate threat to Kyiv remains unclear.


The convoy originated in Belarus and had been slowly advancing south toward Kyiv but last week it appeared to have stopped entirely amid reports of food and fuel shortages.


“It’s a very, very long convoy. We don’t even know if it’s all, we can’t even say that, that it’s all one convoy and not several. But it does remain as our best assessment as it remains stalled,” Kirby said during a press conference last week.

Kirby said the Pentagon believes the convoy was heading to Kyiv to “resupply.”


“When you look at the images from the air, you can see a lot of it but they don’t look like armored vehicles so much as they look like resupply trucks. That’s not to say that there aren’t combat vehicles in there,” he said. “We don’t have perfect visibility on it. But the assessment is that it was largely meant to help resupply and it is still stalled. It’s still stuck.”


U.S. officials previously said the large Russian convoy had been targeted by Ukrainian troops with anti-tank missiles, adding that they likely slowed down its progress and even stopped it in some places.


Kirby said the Russian military likely did not anticipate such problems or the extent of Ukrainian resistance.

But on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War said Russian forces “continued concentrating in the eastern, northwestern and western outskirts of Kyiv for an assault on the Ukrainian capital in the coming 24-96 hours.”


Meanwhile, Kyiv mayor Vitali Klitschko said that half of the city’s population has fled, and that the city has been “transformed into a fortress” while “every street, every building, every checkpoint has been fortified.”


The convoy’s re-deployment comes shortly after Mariupol Mayor Vadym Boichenko called for a no-fly zone to be implemented over Ukraine after a reported Russian airstrike devastated a maternity hospital, leaving 17 people injured during what was meant to be a temporary ceasefire in Mariupol.


In a video message posted to Telegram, Boichenko asked for the global community to “close the sky over Ukraine.”

“Today I am asking the global community for help. Close the sky over Ukraine. Our will has not been broken, we will fight to the end,” Boichenko said. “We have motivated soldiers and officers who defend our homeland. But today we need support.”


Russian President Vladimir Putin has issued a stark warning that he would view any country that declares a no-fly zone over Ukraine as a participant in the “armed conflict.”


Meanwhile, Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia’s first deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, said reports that Russian forces had bombed the maternity hospital in Mariupol were “fake news” and accused Ukraine of having set up the hospital as a combat site.


On Thursday, the Russian Ministry of Defense claims that the hospital building, “due to its favorable tactical location close to the city center, was re-equipped into a stronghold of the Azov National Battalion,” an insurgent group with strong allegiance to neo-Nazi ideology that has been battling Russian forces or forces aligned with Russia. There were “two separate staged explosions near the hospital”—more specifically, “[a]n underground explosion and another of minor power, aimed at the hospital building,” the ministry claims.


Senate Approves $13.6 Billion to Help Ukraine as Part of Huge Government Funding Bill​


The Senate on Thursday night passed a $1.5 trillion budget bill to fund the government through the end of September after months of back and forth between lawmakers.

The Senate voted 68–31 to pass the bill, which will fund the federal government through Sept. 30, with 18 Republicans joining all Democrats voting in support. The billion-dollar spending package had earlier been passed by the House on Wednesday night.

Its passing means the government will avert a shutdown that would have started on Friday night, when funding runs out.
The bill now heads to President Joe Biden’s desk where he is expected to sign the measure into law before Friday night.

Among other things, the bipartisan spending measure contains emergency funding requested by the White House to provide humanitarian and security assistance to Ukraine amid Russia’s invasion, which has forced millions of Ukrainians to flee their homes.

Specifically, it contains $13.6 billion in emergency funding to support the people of Ukraine, split between humanitarian and security assistance.

Among the more than $13 billion set aside to help Ukraine, $100 million is for Food for Peace grants “to support in-kind agricultural commodity donations for food assistance to Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees.”

Another $22.1 million has been pledged to support “economic and trade-based analysis, enforcement, and coordination with partners on Russian and American vulnerabilities related to global trade and export ramifications of the conflict in Ukraine.”

Millions more would be directed toward helping Ukraine tackle cybercrime, deploying personnel to the region to offer intelligence support, and replenishing “US stocks of equipment sent to Ukraine through drawdown.”
A total of $4 billion will help displaced refugees.

Ahead of the vote, Republican senators called for the Biden administration to send Ukraine fighter jets after the country’s President Volodymyr Zelensky requested them.

But the Biden administration has expressed reluctance to do so for fear of dangerously escalating the conflict, even if the jets were supplied by Poland and sent to Ukraine by America.

Along with support for Ukraine, the spending measure funds regular U.S. military programs and a number of non-defense operations through Sept. 30, including money for infrastructure projects authorized by an earlier bipartisan package.

About $782 billion is allocated for military spending under the Defense Department, while an additional $125 billion has been allocated to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Notably, the government funding bill does not include the $22 billion that the Biden administration said was needed for things like treatments, vaccines, and other measures in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki called on Congress to provide those funds earlier Thursday, telling reporters at the White House, “We will need that funding in order to continue to fight the pandemic.”

“Without additional resources from Congress, the results are dire,” Psaki said, adding that testing capacity would decline this month and that in April, “free testing and treatments for tens of millions of Americans without health insurance will end.”

“In May, America’s supply of monoclonal antibodies will run out,” Psaki said. “So, failing to take action now will have severe consequences for the American people. That’s why we requested $22.5 billion to avoid severe disruptions to our COVID response.”

Biden had earlier called on lawmakers to approve the $22.5 billion in new spending during his State of the Union address.

However, the billions of dollars were negotiated down to $15.6 billion before pandemic funding was ultimately left out of the bill entirely as Republicans objected to the additional spending.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) also noted that lack of additional spending for COVID-19, but said that the bill “is overflowing with very good things for our troops, for American jobs, for our families, and for America,” NBC reported.

“It will give our troops a raise, provide more money for schools and Head Start programs and Pell grants, reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act, fund the president’s Cancer Moonshot, and open the floodgates for funding the bipartisan infrastructure law,” he said ahead of the vote.

 
BBC now reporting Major General Andrei Kolesnikov, Commander of the 29th Army of the Eastern Military District has been KIA.

When such high level officers are getting whacked (that now makes 3 generals and 4 high ranking officers total) it means they're pushing themselves to the front line to shore up morale and to get things moving. Which is not what a senior officer does when things are going as fine as the Russians endlessly claim they are.
 
BBC now reporting Major General Andrei Kolesnikov, Commander of the 29th Army of the Eastern Military District has been KIA.

When such high level officers are getting whacked (that now makes 3 generals and 4 high ranking officers total) it means they're pushing themselves to the front line to shore up morale and to get things moving. Which is not what a senior officer does when things are going as fine as the Russians endlessly claim they are.
Someone made an estimate that there should have been around 20 generals for an invasion like this. 3 KIA is a big rate of casualties, not gonna lie

Edit:
Personally, I'm not believing the "Purge Theory" some people tried to throw around. Unless Putin became full Stalin, killing your generals during an active war is not a good idea. There's going to be a time where the unit got ineffective as the replacement tried to learn and improve what their predecessor have been up to. And lets not get started how it could affect the morale of the troops and junior officers
 
Last edited:
But if they were only researching food (as Journalists claim they do), why did US officials testify before Congress that they are afraid of Russians taking those labs? Seems like there might be something more. We know viruses were studied there as per Ukraine embassy, and reuters.
why would you study food production in ukraine? normaly you just ask the dutch for a short how to. Viruses are part of agricultural research, but those are harmles.
 

US, Allies to Revoke 'Most Favored Nation' Status for Russia​


President Joe Biden will announce Friday that along with the European Union and the Group of Seven countries, the U.S. will move to revoke “most favored nation” trade status for Russia over its invasion of Ukraine.

President Joe Biden is announcing Friday that, along with the European Union and the Group of Seven countries, the U.S. will move to revoke “most favored nation” trade status for Russia over its invasion of Ukraine.

That's according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to preview the announcement. Each country would have to follow its own national processes, the person said.

Stripping most favored nation status from Russia would allow the U.S. and allies to impose higher tariffs on some Russian imports, increasing the isolation of the Russian economy in retaliation for the invasion.

Biden's changes on Russia's trade status come as bipartisan pressure has been building in Washington to revoke what is formally known as “permanent normal trade relations” with Russia. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pressed the U.S. and allies to take the action against Russia in remarks to Congress over the weekend. It follows days after the Biden moved to ban imports of Russian oil and gas products.

This week's moves are the latest for the sanctions that have crippled the Russian economy and a sign that the U.S. and its allies will continue to use their financial heft to retaliate against Russian President Vladimir Putin. The other measures include the freezing of central bank assets, limits on exports and sanctions against Russian oligarchs and their families. These financial tools have led to the Russian ruble losing 76% of its value against the U.S. dollar over the past month, which has caused destructive inflation that could erode Putin’s ability to wage a prolonged war in Ukraine.

Putin has suggested that Russia can thrive despite the sanctions, according to a readout by the Kremlin of a Friday meeting. The Russian president specifically cited the former Soviet Union as proof of the nation's grit, though that communist state collapsed in 1991.

“The Soviet Union did live the entire time under the conditions of sanctions; it developed and achieved colossal successes," Putin said.

Biden, after initially slow-walking congressional attempts to take the trade action against Russia, was to embrace lawmakers' efforts to do just that on Friday.

The White House said Biden would announce "actions to continue to hold Russia accountable for its unprovoked and unjustified war on Ukraine.”

The earlier sanctions on imports of Russian oil, gas and coal cut off about 60% of U.S. imports from the country.

Most favored nation status has been a baseline for global trade, ensuring that countries within the World Trade Organization are treated similarly. Some countries in the WTO have special privileges due to their status as developing economies. Russia would join the ranks of Cuba and North Korea by not having MFN status from the U.S.

The revocation carries mostly symbolic weight. Because Russian imports into the U.S. are primarily natural resources, they would generally face little to no increase in their tariffs because of the lost status, Ed Gresser of the Progressive Policy Institute in Washington, said in an online post.

Instead of the current tariff rate, buyers of Russian goods would pay rates established under the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which disrupted trade during the Great Depression. This would still be zero for uranium, rhodium, palladium, silver bullion and king crabs. But the import tax would shoot up for unwrought aluminum, plywood, semi-finished steel and diamonds, among other products.

On Monday, Democrats on the powerful House Ways & Means Committee posted, then removed, an announcement on a bipartisan bill to ban Russian oil imports and slap further trade sanctions on the country, according to an aide, because of pushback from the White House against acting before Biden had coordinated with allies and reached a decision on both matters. The House voted Wednesday on a narrower bill to ban Russian energy imports after Biden instituted the ban by executive order.

Canada was the first major U.S. ally to remove most favored nation status for Russia last week.
Biden's action was first reported by Bloomberg News.


Ukraine says Russia fired at Belarus from Ukrainian airspace to drag it into war​

Ukraine's armed forces said Russian aircraft fired at a Belarusian settlement near the border with Ukraine from Ukrainian air space on Friday to try to drag Belarus into Moscow's war on Ukraine.
The Ukrainian air force said at 1430 local time (1230 GMT) the state border service received information that Russian aircraft had taken off from an airfield in Belarus, crossed into Ukrainian air space and then fired at the village of Kopani.

"This is a PROVOCATION! The goal is to involve the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus in the war with Ukraine!," Ukraine's Air Force Command said in an online statement.
The Ukrainian military said two other Belarusian settlements were also targeted in the same operation.
"We officially declare: the Ukrainian military has not planned and does not plan to take any aggressive action against the Republic of Belarus," the security service said in a statement.


G7 Urges Countries Not To Restrict Food Exports​


The Group of Seven industrialised nations on Friday urged countries not to limit their food exports over the war in Ukraine after a meeting of their agriculture ministers to discuss the crisis.


"We call upon all countries to keep their food and agricultural markets open and to take precautions against unjustified restrictive export measures," the G7 agriculture ministers said in a joint statement.


The agriculture minister from Germany, which currently holds the presidency of the G7, said he was "very concerned" about the potential impact of countries shutting off exports.

"If everyone thinks of themselves in this situation, it will exacerbate the crisis and cause prices to shoot through the roof. These are avoidable costs that we do not need -- the crisis is already bad enough," Cem Ozdemir said.


Asked about potential sanctions on Russia's agricultural industry, Ozdemir said the discussion was "similar... to the one we are having in other areas, such as energy".

"I wish we were more independent, but we are not in this area, which is why I think the honest answer is that we first look at everything together and examine it, but we do not make isolated decisions that also have an impact on others," he said.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine last month has aggravated a global surge in prices of key commodities including food and oil.

Both Russia and Ukraine are major producers of foodstuffs, including sunflower oil and wheat, and the Middle East is particularly dependent on imports from the two countries.


Russian President Vladimir Putin warned on Thursday that food prices will soar because of sanctions since Moscow is one of the world's top fertiliser producers.


Viruses are part of agricultural research, but those are harmles.
Well, depends on the virus, I suppose. We did get the Covid shit out of virus research
 

Ukraine War Is a Study Case for Taiwan’s Defense Against China: US Defense Official​


Ukraine’s fierce resistance against invading Russian forces could be a model for how Taiwan should defend itself in the event of an invasion by the Chinese regime, a senior defense official told senators at a congressional hearing on March 10.


“I think the situation we’re seeing in Ukraine right now is a very worthwhile case study for them about why Taiwan needs to do all it can to build asymmetric capabilities, to get its population ready, so that it can be as quickly as possible should China choose to violate its sovereignty,” said Mara Karlin, assistant secretary of defense for strategy, plans, and capabilities.


Karlin added: “It is absolutely a priority to ensure that Taiwan is getting the asymmetric capabilities that it needs, that is most appropriate for the challenge that it faces.”


Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has drawn widespread concerns that the Chinese regime might follow through with its long-awaited plan of taking over Taiwan. Chinese leader Xi Jinping openly declared his desire to rule the island in October last year, when he vowed that the “reunification” of Taiwan with China would “definitely be realized.”



China sees Taiwan as a part of its territory, even though the island is a de facto independent entity with its own democratic government.


Xi could be more emboldened now to invade Taiwan since he would likely have Moscow’s political support. Under the current “no limits” partnership, Beijing has provided tacit support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine by refusing to condemn Moscow over the military aggression and abstaining twice at United Nations votes.


The United States and Taiwan are currently not formal allies, since Washington changed its diplomatic recognition in favor of Beijing in 1979. However, Washington has been Taiwan’s main arms supplier, selling Taiwan military equipment such as F-16V fighter jets, advanced drones, missiles, and M1A2 Abrams tanks.


So far, Ukraine has been able to stall Russia’s military advancement through the use of mobile weapons, including Javelin anti-tank missiles and Stinger portable air-defense systems.


The success of these weapons showed that asymmetric warfare is effective when fighting a superior military force, said Ma Cheng-kun, director of the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies at Taiwan’s National Defence University, during a forum in Taiwan on March 1, according to the island’s media outlet Taipei Times.


Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen, since taking office in 2016, has emphasized the importance of the island adopting an asymmetric defense strategy. In May 2019, Tsai said the island would speed up the production of domestically-manufactured submarines and anti-aircraft and anti-ship missiles as a way to improve the island’s asymmetric warfare capabilities.

Jessica Lewis, assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs, said at the Senate hearing that Taiwan should continue to procure asymmetric military systems from the United States, given how they had been “used to great effect in Ukraine.”


Lewis suggested Taiwan prioritize short-range air defense systems, naval sea mines, and coastal defense and cruise missiles. She added that the two sides have increasingly shared the same understanding of what constitutes an asymmetric system.


“We are working on that with them today. I think we have a much deeper understanding of that right now,” Lewis explained.


She also suggested that Taiwan learn from Ukraine about the country’s reserve force reforms that make it possible for its population to be quickly “ready to fight.”


To that end, Lewis said Taiwan is working with the U.S. National Guard in establishing “an all-out defense mobilization organization.”

South American Nations Push to Exclude Fertilizer From Russia Sanctions​


Six South American nations are proposing the exclusion of fertilizer from sanctions on Russia, a major world producer whose invasion of Ukraine has disrupted supplies, Brazil’s Agriculture Minister Tereza Cristina Dias said on Thursday.


She said Brazil has secured the support of Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay for a proposal excluding fertilizer products that will be submitted to the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization.


Brazil, an agricultural powerhouse, is the world’s top importer of fertilizers and argues that crop nutrients, like food, should not be targeted by sanctions.


Brazil relies on imports for 85 percent of the fertilizer it needs for its grain crops. More than one-fifth of its imports, totaling 9 million tonnes in 2021, comes from Russia.


Dias, who is expected to talk to FAO Director-General Qu Dongyu, has called on countries to find a global solution for the issue, noting a shortage of fertilizers will cause food inflation and potentially undermine food security.



She hopes to get enough support from FAO to persuade other U.N. members to back the proposal.


“Global food inflation is something that should worry all countries,” Dias said in a recent interview.

Even before the war in Ukraine, the global supply of fertilizers, especially potash, was already being curtailed after the United States sanctioned Belarus, another major producer.


As part of Brazil’s efforts to secure supplies, Dias and Brazilian company representatives will travel next week to Canada, where Nutrien, the world’s largest global producer of potash, is based.


While Russia is Brazil’s main supplier of the NPK fertilizer mixture of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, Canada is Brazil’s main source of potash used to raise crop yields.


Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro visited Moscow days before the invasion of Ukraine to discuss Russian fertilizer supplies and sales of Brazilian beef.

Ukraine Loses Communication With Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant: IAEA​


Ukraine lost all communications with the Chernobyl nuclear power plant on March 10, the country’s regulatory authority informed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).


Just a day earlier, the site had lost all external power supply, following which, the plant made use of emergency generators. The loss in communication means that the Ukraine operator cannot provide IAEA with updated information about the site.


Prior to the loss of communication, power lines on the site were damaged, disconnecting it from the electric grid. To ensure the site receives continuous power, either the power lines have to be repaired or diesel deliveries must be made. The generators have a capacity of two days’ worth of fuel.


“The diesel generators were powering systems important for safety, including those for spent nuclear fuel and water control and chemical water treatment,” the agency said in a March 10 press release. However, “the operator was not able to maintain some functions such as radiation monitoring, ventilation systems, and normal lighting.”


The operator confirmed that there would be no impact on “essential safety systems” of the spent fuel storage facility even in case of a complete power loss. This includes the scenario where even the diesel generators fail.



The operator also stated that spent fuel storage pool systems and structures have not suffered any damage at present. However, the loss of emergency power is not encouraging for staff members as they have to continue working under worsening radiation safety conditions.


“I’m deeply concerned about the difficult and stressful situation facing staff at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and the potential risks this entails for nuclear safety. I call on the forces in effective control of the site to urgently facilitate the safe rotation of personnel there,” IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi had said on March 8.


Though the Chernobyl plant no longer produces nuclear power, the radiation at the site is consistently monitored.


Located around 100 kilometers (62 miles) north of Ukraine’s capital city Kyiv, Chernobyl was taken over by the Russian military during the first day of the invasion. There are about 210 technical experts and guards who have been living at the site ever since Russia took control. The staff has access to water, food, and medicine.


Foreign ministers of Russia and Ukraine held talks in Turkey which failed to produce any positive result on Thursday. However, Grossi met with both ministers after the Turkey meeting, and is hopeful that both nations can arrive at an agreement as to how to manage nuclear sites.


“I am quite encouraged on one important thing—Ukraine and the Russian Federation want to work with us and agreed to work with us,” Grossi said in a news conference. “We have to move fast.”


The Russian energy minister claimed on March 10 that specialists from Belarus had restored power to the Chernobyl plant. Grossi has not yet received confirmation regarding the issue.

 
  • Informative
Reactions: Oats12345

Biden warns direct NATO-Russia clash would trigger ‘World War III’​


President Joe Biden again ruled out any direct intervention by the United States to halt Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on Friday, warning that such conflict pitting the NATO alliance against the Kremlin “is World War III.”


“We will not fight a war against Russia in Ukraine,” Biden said in a speech at the White House, refuting increasingly desperate calls from Kyiv for NATO to intervene against the Russian assault.

Biden says Russia to pay ‘severe price’ if uses chemical weapons​


President Joe Biden on Friday vowed that Russia would pay a “severe price” if it used chemical weapons in Ukraine, after US intelligence reportedly suggested that Moscow was preparing such an attack.


“I’m not going to speak about the intelligence, but Russia would play a severe price if they used chemicals,” Biden said, answering questions at a White House press conference where he announced further sanctions on Russia.

Biden announces US ban on Russian vodka, diamonds, seafood​


US President Joe Biden announced a ban Friday on Russian seafood, vodka and diamonds, as Washington tightened sanctions against the Kremlin over its invasion of Ukraine.


The ban targets goods from “several signature sectors of the Russian economy,” Biden said in a speech at the White House.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back