Without a doubt, Colin Montgomerie is one of the dumbest fucking troons alive.
Link to
thread.
Archive.

So let me get this straight. We cannot tell apart the sexes, because sex doesn't exist. Sex is not material or real. But I am to believe you're a woman because you take estrogen, dilate that neovaginal disaster, and keep that Cryptkeeper face after it's been destroyed by FFS. Taking all the things to 'pass' as something you state does not exist.
There are a fuckton of absolutely retarded takes here.

Daniel Goldman is a polymath Jew who can be seen answering the Staniland question in the second screenshot. His answer was, predictably: 'people have rights, if you don't like it fuck off'. Seen
here.
To continue, Colin manages to get the dumbest fucking people on his Twitter threads.
Daniel plugged his own
paper. In it, he says this:
This discussion presupposes an understanding of what sex itself is. However,
what is sex? There have been a number of attempts to define sex in rigorous
ways, both for biological and legal purposes[4]. Sex relates to reproduction, but
organisms can be sexed even if they themselves do not reproduce. We could
define sex based on sex related traits. However, such a definition is redundant.
Still, this idea offers a starting point. This paper defines S-traits as the biological
traits which allow for and facilitate the combining of genetic material from two
or more individuals in the process of creating a new individual, as well as the
development of that new individual. We can then define a sex as a mode or
collection of coincidental of S-traits within a discrete population of organisms.
Finally, we can define a male sex as a sex which includes the production
of motile gametes and a female sex as a sex which includes the production of
immotile gametes. This definition allows for multiple male and female sexes
within a population, rather than limiting it to only two sexes. The decision to
call such groups of sexes ”male” and ”female” respectively is largely historical,
as it aligns with the way humans view male and female sexes.
Which is a nice way of saying, 'it's a social construct, we can't define it, and intersex conditions aren't male or female so fuck you'.
Misdiagnosing and killing people because you don't know what sex is? Why not!
3.2 Spectrum or Cloud
Sex is sometimes described as a spectrum, and it is not entirely unreasonable to do so. A person’s biology could potentially be described as more male-like or more female-like. However, not everyone is comfortable with the spectrum description, and there may be a slightly better option. One issue with the spectrum model is that it assumes that sex based traits, and sexes themselves, are quantitative and well ordered. For many dimensions, such as height, levels of testosterone or estrogen, there are orderings, but for the total data point containing all of the potential dimensions of S-traits, a well ordering is not immediately obvious.
As already mentioned, the two modes of sexual configurations, in humans, involve a lot of parameters. There is no single axis that necessarily makes sense. Instead, individual data points exist within a cloud with two primary clusters
indicating male and female modes. So rather than calling sex a spectrum, it can simply be called a distribution or a cloud.
3.3 Othering and Binning
None of this discussion is meant to suggest that intersex is leading towards an extreme divergence in the population in its current state. Human populations are still normally distributed across parameters, as a whole. But the FSM
process is related to the more general evolutionary process and even more so to the process of population divergence, and population divergence tends to disallow for multimodal sex configurations.
Concerns about ”othering” intersex people should not be ignored, but it is important to recognize FSMs and intersex variations, in part because treating everyone as male or female can be dangerous, especially from a medical
perspective. The idea that everyone should be normalized is equally dangerous as othering. For instance, consider an intersex person with XY genotype, but whose phenotype more closely mirrors that of an endosex female. Suppose they’re classified as a female, for medical purposes. Then diseases that are far more likely in endosex males than endosex females may not be considered, or there may be a delay in diagnosis.
Consider Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a disease linked to the X chromosome, and which effects endosex females at a rate that is orders of magnitude smaller than the rate in endosex males. By treating the person as a female,
for medical purposes, a diagnosis of DMD may be delayed by some time, because of the low probability of an endosex female having the condition. Instead, for the purposes of diagnosis of sex-linked genetic conditions, the person should
be treated more similarly to an endosex male
He wrote an entire paper on how DSDs don't count as male or female and that we just don't know what male or female are. Here is his
website.
Addition: Daniel has interacted with Queen TERF Emma Hilton. He has said that while she has a solid background she is not an expert. Calls her the Bill Nye of intersex.
Here.
Someone with a Mercy pfp ended up
getting the dumbest responses.


You heard it from them, folks. PCOS is an intersex condition.

There are cells called 'organizer cells' that are arranged around doing a certain thing. The synapses in your brain are designed to transfer electricity. They aren't random processes that Nature decided to plop in there.
They hate the word 'design', because it infers Intelligent Design, but all it means that a function does the thing it is meant to do.

Swyer's Syndrome and Male XX syndrome or De La Chapelle syndrome leads to females and males, successively. We know because we, uh, can test for it in utero or at birth. Weird.

Males are females because they say so. We don't know what a woman is and sex doesn't exist but their ladybrains are true.
Lauren Pleska is a regular if you hang around the troon/GC space. She's an arbiter of Ann Coates, KM, Charles Clymer and the rest.
Next: we just can't tell what sex is.
Women who get hysterectomies are still female, Dick. They underwent Wolffian development in utero.
If gametes can't be used, because muh infertility, we're basing sex as a metaphysical concept. It can't be defined or used, but magically, we know what it is in non human animals and trans people. I reckon the Jew bitch there knows what sex her cat is despite it being neutered.
We also can't tell whether a fetus is male or female, because we just don't do DNA tests.

Has anyone told these people...we can absolutely test for DNA before birth...and routinely do so to test for genetic conditions?

I've heard it all, folks. Biology is a social construct. Pack it up, Darwin, your BS is finally debunked.
"an identity outside of established definitions of biological sex."
Which mean absolutely nothing. Seriously, these people should have been shoved up their mother's womb or aborted.
Colin Montgomerie cannot define what a woman is. But he goes to great lengths to insist he is one. To troons, human evolution doesn't exist. The only organ that matters is the brain, and it is magically sexually dimorphic.
Look how callously these people use DSDs. One of them even said DSDs shouldn't be considered a disorder because 'they don't affect function'. Even though most are sterile and permanently underdeveloped.
These people are jackshit ignorant yet so proud on what they have to say.