World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Yes. I think the real question is what comes next. From both a social and economic standpoint. It's clear that our economic practices are unsustainable. We are irreparably damaging the planet while billions live in poverty. Ultimately we must learn to live with less. But at the same time, be proud to own it. I think that distributism mixed with corporatism is a good going off point. Also by corporatism I don't mean sucking up to big companies I mean the "we are all part of one social body" corporatism that tries to alleviate class conflict. Small businesses tend to be more down to earth and while they still have a profit motive they tend to be less cut throat. But none of that will matter if we can't revive the West spiritually and culturally. My biggest fear is that we are not on track to do that. It seems that in a collapse scenario the alt-right will be the victor, or rather the faction that gains the most. And I don't think they are up to the task of restoring the West. They are essentially doing the white man's ghost dance by focusing on race and demographics.

The problem with the right-wing is that they don't identify the root of the problem we're facing and offer no solution. That root is the changing technology that obsoletes our post-WWII way of life through automation, enabling of mass surveilliance, etc. Obviously the Fox News solution where banning CRT and promoting "traditional values" doesn't work, because it isn't targetting the root cause. Neither is the racial solution of your Nick Fuentes types, because once again, you aren't focusing on why demographics are changing. Blaming the Jews is just a simple cop-out, you won't magically restore the trad-world if you make it 6 million more or whatever.

I think it's because a lot of this is best analyzed with a left-wing lens. You need to notice that this society is powered by a particular sort of capitalism where the ultimate winners of the past (bankers, megacorps in various fields) have consolidated. You also need to notice that any competition requires joining this cabal of elites simply to raise the colossal amount of money necessary. The barriers to entry in so many fields are simply huge these days because of the cost of technology alone that it's cheaper to pay the big corporations the necessary money to run things. This makes joining the capitalist class nearly impossible, enshrining them as a new sort of nobility.

Now that's not to say socialism is the answer. I thought it was at one point, but Marxian socialism and its offshoots (Trotskyism, Maoism, etc.) are concepts for an earlier age and are purely utopian ideals doomed to fail. Arguably Marx was right that socialism was inevitable, but wrong about the result. The elite adopted the elements of socialism they liked, stopping short of true revolution (that probably wouldn't have worked anyway) but leaving us with a thoroughly socialistic society in many aspects, including rampant corporate welfare and the revolving door between big business and regulative bodies which is akin to the technocracies found in the late USSR or outright corrupt management of state corporations in third world socialist states in Africa and Middle East.

A lot of socialists also neglect the role culture plays in these things in favor of materialism. Culture (including religion) holds a lot of keys to why societies work and why societies fail. Our cultural values have obviously rotted from the inside, and we need to figure out a way to restore it. Probably this means a mix of authoritarian decrees and soft cultural manipulation. Unfortunately, the latter is what the progressive left excels at.

We need to solve the cultural maladaptionism, where we see things like mental illness promoted as normal, obesity considered a good thing, etc. The people in charge like it because it weakens us and makes us money, but it's extremely dangerous. It happens in societies under stress, like the cattle-killing movement among the Xhosa in the 19th century where they destroyed their primary source of food and livelihood or the destructive potlatches among Northwest Coast Indians in that same era, where instead of the chiefs spreading their wealth they simply burnt it all instead. It was also (at times) promoted by the colonialist group as a means of weakening these native cultures and making money--poor and starving Africans and Indians don't fight back, they buy shit from you instead. And just like those proud societies became the violent thugs of South African townships or useless drunks of Canadian reservations, our society is headed in that direction if they have their way.

What's needed is some alternate vision that offers a human-friendly society while not trying to fight the course of technology. I don't think you even can fight this technology, because even if in theory you banned it all, other countries (China) won't and they'll outcompete you simply because this tech is so potent. You can't make your nation like some West African states in the 19th century did where they banned anything even remotely "modern" in favor of traditional Islamic culture. That's how you lose your civilization, just like those West African states did.

How do we get there? We probably need to start with a vision and try and figure out the steps. I'd say the height of prosperity was 1950-1975, the "golden age of capitalism," where the West enjoyed the most prosperous and equal society in all human history. Obviously, a lot of things are different--manufacturing simply can't supply those well-paying jobs anymore (we can and should obviously do better, but it's never going back to the 1950-75 era), and that's where we need to make compromises along the way in what this society looks like.

 

[Mayor Adam West]

@Save the Loli For the record, I am not one of the Nick Fuentes types. I don't give a shit about race or ethnicity and I think much of what he says is utterly degenerate and disgusting. I only care about the Catholic faith. With that said, I think you are right. While the world was going to shit before the internet, the internet has made things way worse. Ideas once thought to be utterly ludicrous have become mainstream ever since the internet was created because we allowed it to be populated with degenerate filth such as porn or gender theory. Furthermore I think that you would like distributism as an alternative to what modern capitalism has become. I highly recommend people look into it. Your analysis of the necessity of authoritarian measures is unfortunately correct. We as a society cannot govern ourselves anymore as we have become too degenerate and sinful to exercise our civic duties without producing even greater evils than authoritarianism. Technology is a gift from God. In the sense that our ability to discover new ways of making things work is uniquely human. It is something that should be cherished. But like all great gifts from God, it can be abused. And that is what we must guard against.

 

[Mega Man II Intro - GB]

There are many worse outcomes than simply giving control of the machine to Christians who use it to persecute degenerates. Sure it'll go off the rails, but I'd rather be ruled by Puritans than demon-worshippers. If all my deeds are tracked by a theocratic government, well I guess I'll just have to take my pleasures in growing a garden instead of watching fetish porn.

I mean a theocratic government that rewards those who have stable families and work hard for the benefit of all... there's probably downsides but how bad could they be?

The only thing about white nationalism is, it's hard to justify non-whites being able to maintain civilization when they haven't been able to build one without our help. So can they maintain such a civilization? Look at crime stats, test scores, all the metrics that would measure a race's capacity to "just be civilized". Whites always come out on top.

It's not like I want to be a racist. It cuts me off from a lot of pussy I'd like to have. But logically racism is the way to go. And I think the best way to help the rest of the world is to socially engineer them to reward white behaviors. There are "good blacks" so let's create "good black communities" and "good black countries". Throw in some minor eugenics by sterilizing the stupidest ones and we'd see an improvement as the decades pass. It has to be very minor eugenics though otherwise you throw out the baby with the bathwater. But even here, going too far with eugenics surely has to be less harmful than the current state of the world where dysgenic behavior is openly rewarded.

 

[Mayor Adam West]

There are many worse outcomes than simply giving control of the machine to Christians who use it to persecute degenerates. Sure it'll go off the rails, but I'd rather be ruled by Puritans than demon-worshippers. If all my deeds are tracked by a theocratic government, well I guess I'll just have to take my pleasures in growing a garden instead of watching fetish porn.

I mean a theocratic government that rewards those who have stable families and work hard for the benefit of all... there's probably downsides but how bad could they be?

The only thing about white nationalism is, it's hard to justify non-whites being able to maintain civilization when they haven't been able to build one without our help. So can they maintain such a civilization? Look at crime stats, test scores, all the metrics that would measure a race's capacity to "just be civilized". Whites always come out on top.

It's not like I want to be a racist. It cuts me off from a lot of pussy I'd like to have. But logically racism is the way to go. And I think the best way to help the rest of the world is to socially engineer them to reward white behaviors. There are "good blacks" so let's create "good black communities" and "good black countries". Throw in some minor eugenics by sterilizing the stupidest ones and we'd see an improvement as the decades pass. It has to be very minor eugenics though otherwise you throw out the baby with the bathwater. But even here, going too far with eugenics surely has to be less harmful than the current state of the world where dysgenic behavior is openly rewarded.

So you're saying white nationalism is better than what I am proposing?

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Sometimes I think a literal theocracy, as in actual rule by God/gods, would be best, because some of this technology we will soon have is too powerful to ever let fallible man touch. Privacy is already dying rapidly, and when you look at brain-computer interfaces, microchipping, self-driving cars, and other technology that will one day be extremely common, you see the exact same thing. It's all technology that could improve our leaves and enable some awesome experiences (like the whole "beam music directly into your brain" thing) but it won't JUST be used like that. No, it will be used to impose the absolute worst totalitarian regime in history. The worst part is, a society that has this tech will out-compete a society that bans it, something that goes back to when agricultural societies outcompeted hunter gatherer societies through sheer numbers and brought about institutions like unchecked government authority.

It's incredibly hard to prevent misuse of this technology, and options like some sort of anarchist or syndicalist society doesn't seem feasible since it would be inefficient compared to the totalitarian option (we're talking about the ability to literally reprogram people to make them enjoy shoveling shit 16 hours a day, 7 days a week).

The only thing about white nationalism is, it's hard to justify non-whites being able to maintain civilization when they haven't been able to build one without our help. So can they maintain such a civilization? Look at crime stats, test scores, all the metrics that would measure a race's capacity to "just be civilized". Whites always come out on top.

Race and IQ is presumably cultural, like how else did the Jews go from desert-dwellers inseparable from other marginal Semitic peoples like the Arabs to their disproportionate economic power? Yes, some eugenics was involved no doubt (dumb Jews either never found a Jewess to marry, joined the Gentile community, or got killed in pogroms), but was it? That's why I'm convinced that even if you wiped out every single non-black person, given a few centuries they'd evolve to be little different than whites in terms of intelligence as they fitted into the economic niches left vacant by other races.

Likewise we'll probably see IQ scores rise in Africa over the next few decades as the continent becomes less poor. If we started fixing elements of African culture, it would probably rise higher since there HAS to be a cultural factor to it, just like the Jews (especially Ashkenazi Jews) have going for them.

 

[Mayor Adam West]

Sometimes I think a literal theocracy, as in actual rule by God/gods, would be best, because some of this technology we will soon have is too powerful to ever let fallible man touch. Privacy is already dying rapidly, and when you look at brain-computer interfaces, microchipping, self-driving cars, and other technology that will one day be extremely common, you see the exact same thing. It's all technology that could improve our leaves and enable some awesome experiences (like the whole "beam music directly into your brain" thing) but it won't JUST be used like that. No, it will be used to impose the absolute worst totalitarian regime in history. The worst part is, a society that has this tech will out-compete a society that bans it, something that goes back to when agricultural societies outcompeted hunter gatherer societies through sheer numbers and brought about institutions like unchecked government authority.

It's incredibly hard to prevent misuse of this technology, and options like some sort of anarchist or syndicalist society doesn't seem feasible since it would be inefficient compared to the totalitarian option (we're talking about the ability to literally reprogram people to make them enjoy shoveling shit 16 hours a day, 7 days a week).

Race and IQ is presumably cultural, like how else did the Jews go from desert-dwellers inseparable from other marginal Semitic peoples like the Arabs to their disproportionate economic power? Yes, some eugenics was involved no doubt (dumb Jews either never found a Jewess to marry, joined the Gentile community, or got killed in pogroms), but was it? That's why I'm convinced that even if you wiped out every single non-black person, given a few centuries they'd evolve to be little different than whites in terms of intelligence as they fitted into the economic niches left vacant by other races.

Likewise we'll probably see IQ scores rise in Africa over the next few decades as the continent becomes less poor. If we started fixing elements of African culture, it would probably rise higher since there HAS to be a cultural factor to it, just like the Jews (especially Ashkenazi Jews) have going for them.

The thing about non-secular politics to me that is so appealing is the fact that it is inherently moral. There's a quote by Antonio Salazar, a dictator, that I like. He calls Nazism a "pagan Caesarism" that recognized neither legal, religious nor moral limits. You'll never see true 1984 totalitarianism in a polity which is theocratic or fundamentally religious in nature. Why? Because there are limits. We are not God and we cannot do certain things. It's why, for instance, every clerical fascist regime (barring the Ustase and Vichy France which were Nazi puppets) was remarkably anti-anti-semetic. For Christ's sake Jews literally fled into Dollfuss' Austria and Franco's Spain. Why? Because at the end of the day these men were informed by a moral code. We can debate whether or not this moral code is correct but at the end of the day non-secular politics prevents an "ends justify the means" kind of thinking way better than anything else.

 

[Mr Bunny]

secular conspiracy theorists have to put in way more work than “end is nigh” Christians and they ultimately reach the same conclusion.

The secular threat of mega death is nuclear war and climate change.

 

[Mega Man II Intro - GB]

Race and IQ is presumably cultural, like how else did the Jews go from desert-dwellers inseparable from other marginal Semitic peoples like the Arabs to their disproportionate economic power?

We can never know for sure what Jews were really like back then, but I suspect they had a talent for the same abstractions they do now, i.e. financial wizardry and telling stories. That's a genetic thing. Sub-Saharan Africans cannot perform financial wizardry because most of them can't even grasp the concept of "I'll meet you here at this time next Tuesday". The storytelling gene is harder to get at, but obviously they're good at it. As are whites. Other cultures very clearly have very different storytelling genes. Japan's stories aren't really comprehensible to Westerners despite what weebs think. You can say it's culture but I say culture is genetic. I think there's something to be said that ancient Hebrews actually were whites, or at least closely related. They mix in rather well with us as it is. The problem is the current crop of jews are mostly physically and mentally damaged due to intense inbreeding. Their insular culture led to insular genes and now it's a feedback loop that prevents most of them from being good people. Even the ones who try to escape like Stephen "Killer" Miller can only manage halfway. He still married a jew in a traditional marriage and is obviously quite neurotic.

If I end up marrying a non-white I'm just going to raise my sons to be future kangz. "You've got to teach your people how to be white, my son." Maybe other white nationalists who can't resist the brown ladies are doing the same thing, I don't know, I'm not invited to the meetings.

 

[ZazietheBeast]

Tbh Christfags - especially those that are into eschatology & apocalypse- have a heads up on fuckery. They’re always keeping an ear out for famine, war, plague, economic restriction (“mark of the beast”), and corrupt political leaders (“anti-Christ”)

Believe in the Bible or not, it’s actually a pretty interesting shortcut to drawing conclusions or foresight into looming disasters.

secular conspiracy theorists have to put in way more work than “end is nigh” Christians and they ultimately reach the same conclusion.

I am almost thankful that thanks to how fragmented the Christian faith actually is, there's a good chance at least one would survive without the Globohomo corruption. And if I remember correctly, there's an entire passage dedicated to the church being corrupted and thus true adherents must be wary of the current corruption within the church. (Gay priests and the Icon of Sin being in the Vatican)

 

[Super-Chevy454]

I am almost thankful that thanks to how fragmented the Christian faith actually is, there's a good chance at least one would survive without the Globohomo corruption. And if I remember correctly, there's an entire passage dedicated to the church being corrupted and thus true adherents must be wary of the current corruption within the church. (Gay priests and the Icon of Sin being in the Vatican)

That reminds me of what Mark Taylor (the guy who did the Trump Prophecies) posted on Telegram about this.

https://t.me/patton6966/1334

The guys of American Thinker posted an article about a Great Reset who's underway in Utah.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/03/a_great_reset_is_already_underway_in_utah.html

March 21, 2022

A Great Reset Is Already Underway in Utah​

By G. Murphy Donovan

We hear much these days about paradigm shifts and resets. Much of the chat comes from crucibles like the World Economic Forum. The WEF is a kind of "masters of the universe" boys club that meets to greet, eat, and ski at fabulously expensive hotels and restaurants in Davos, Switzerland. The globalist press covers these champagne and caviar festivals because the Fourth Estate loves to hobnob with power and money. The holy grail these days seems to be the pursuit of a "great reset," or stakeholder capitalism — in practice, a Beijing model, more like capital communism. A Chicom theologian would argue that their "capitalism" is just a phase on the way to totalitarian social stability. For monopolist mandarins in America and Europe, the COVID-19 crisis is indeed a golden opportunity to remake the world — "capitalism with a Chinese face," if you will.
For Western oligarchs, the Sino model means better control, hegemony, and wealth concentration. For the global lumpenproletariat, unfortunately, the great reset means conformity, subordination, wokeness, utopian rhetoric, and new age social leveling.
The "stake" in stakeholder capitalism goes through the heart of individual liberties.

Some of the necessary paradigm shifts have already been successful above and below the radar. Above the horizon, hiding in plain sight, the guy who blew the whistle on Big Brother in America is now an international fugitive. The Snowden leak is unique to the extent that he seems to have been motivated by morals at the expense of professional ethics. Conscience, alas, is a character defect in the intelligence business.
After Edward Snowden's sierra hit the fan, DNI Jim Clapper actually went up to Congress and denied the advent of universal surveillance in Snowden's Top Secret National Security Agency reveal. General Clapper claimed that "metadata" collection (née wiretapping) did not represent warrantless surveillance of individual citizens.
The theater of federal arrogance is now compounded by parallel commercial digital fascism. Mark Zuckerberg, for example, has rebranded his global Facebook data hustle as META Inc. You can't make this stuff up. Data-mining is a polite euphemism for wiretapping, spying, or surveillance. Big Government and Big Tech are now joined at the hip by visions of meta control.

Congress then kissed that fish on the mouth and sent another big check to Big Brother in Bluffdale, Utah.
So much for congressional oversight; the real truth about intelligence abuse and domestic spying is that the American Intelligence Community, including the FBI, are above the law — free agents, politicized Deep State civil "servants." And thus do elections and maybe democracy itself become less relevant over time. Without accountability, republican democracy is a mirage.
Big reset there.

The urban Deep State, the real deciders, as Bush Junior might say, are a toxic majority in large cities, blue states, and nearly all bloated federal bureaucracies, like the NSA, across America these days. The American election of 2016 was an inflection point, when the apparatchik left came out of the closet with their azimuths on fire. An outsider, God forbid, threatened to drain the Beltway swamp. Alas, elections in America matter now only if the unelected nomenklatura, today well left of center, agree with the electorate.
Big reset there, too.
Below the radar since 9/11, a digital hardware paradigm shift is underway also, out in the desert sands. Bluffdale, Utah is now ground zero for a mega-shift in the metadata trade. Heretofore, the national intelligence meme was a "needle in a haystack" model — to wit: industrious agents and analysts labored in the bowels of a dozen or more intelligence agencies, like George Smiley, looking for the pins of enemy capabilities and the needles of enemy intentions.
At some point on the Clapper-Obama watch, some genius said, "Needles be damned," let's collect and store all the haystacks instead. When your safety pin pops up on Big Brother's radar, the NSA can access your present and her past. At any time, any citizen's future is also a virtual federal hostage, indefinitely.
Abuse here is not just likely; it's inevitable, Clapper's faux reassurances notwithstanding. Ironically, the Bluffdale paradigm and curtailment surveillance was born out of the ashes of Islamist 9/11 infamy. The literal response to Islamic religious fanaticism is now virtual digital fascism.

Who wins that fight?
To be sure, Orwellian spying is possible only with industrial-scale collaboration. The Davos crowd was in on the meta-mega-collection paradigm caper from the start. Here, the tradeoffs are obvious: big data in exchange for a laissez-faire internet. Uncle Sam now has access to communications and internet "back doors" across the world, and that includes all commercial and domestic digital scat at your house, coast to coast.
The price of vague promises about national security is now an absolute loss of privacy, another Chinese model. The motto for the 21st-century Animal Farm should now be "Trust Me," courtesy of the Intelligence Community.
The siting of mega-collection and storage in Bluffdale is no happenstance, either. That desert oasis has three distinctions: isolation, sister wives, and a state prison. The NSA, a DOD agency, has a sweetheart deal with Utah State Police, where local cops are paid $50 per hour for perimeter security. In exchange, the NSA is unlikely to see any citizen dissent or unsightly protests anywhere near Bluffdale's harems or the NSA data facility.
Indeed, for social buffering, Bluffdale is also host to the headquarters of one of the creepiest of many polygamist sects in Utah, the Apostolic United Brethren. Here, local AUB bulls corral herds of Salt Lake Valley underage heifers. No one in Bluffdale is likely to ask too many questions about another sugar daddy, even if it's Uncle Sam. Rural religious cults are happy to be left to their own kinky devices. Indeed, the Utah state Legislature has reduced polygamy to a misdemeanor, like littering.
Now, there's a grand cultural reset with "Me Too" appeal. Social recidivism in Utah, Nevada, and Arizona never makes it above the fold in any major media outlet.

 

[Sailor Kim Jong Moon]

The thing about non-secular politics to me that is so appealing is the fact that it is inherently moral. There's a quote by Antonio Salazar, a dictator, that I like. He calls Nazism a "pagan Caesarism" that recognized neither legal, religious nor moral limits. You'll never see true 1984 totalitarianism in a polity which is theocratic or fundamentally religious in nature. Why? Because there are limits. We are not God and we cannot do certain things. It's why, for instance, every clerical fascist regime (barring the Ustase and Vichy France which were Nazi puppets) was remarkably anti-anti-semetic. For Christ's sake Jews literally fled into Dollfuss' Austria and Franco's Spain. Why? Because at the end of the day these men were informed by a moral code. We can debate whether or not this moral code is correct but at the end of the day non-secular politics prevents an "ends justify the means" kind of thinking way better than anything else.

Good undergrad law & polisci professors make sure to teach their students that God is above Government.

Doesn’t matter if you’re atheist. Doesn’t matter if you’re in a secular society or democracy. You must believe or at least pretend that there is a God above government - or you’re in for a very bad time.

Rather that takes the form of “these rights given to us by God” (democracy) or “Allah said this policy is holy edict” (theocracy), the believe of a higher power commanding government is vitally important. Otherwise, the government IS god, the government is what gives you your rights & freedom, the government can and will take them away when convenient. You just believe there is a higher authority or you are genuinely fucked.

PL: I have come to respect the Christfags immensely over the years and will raise my children in a traditional Church. The values, moral framework, and psychological protection seems well worth it to me, even if I can’t bring myself to truly believe in it.

 

[Mayor Adam West]

Good undergrad law & polisci professors make sure to teach their students that God is above Government.

Doesn’t matter if you’re atheist. Doesn’t matter if you’re in a secular society or democracy. You must believe or at least pretend that there is a God above government - or you’re in for a very bad time.

Rather that takes the form of “these rights given to us by God” (democracy) or “Allah said this policy is holy edict” (theocracy), the believe of a higher power commanding government is vitally important. Otherwise, the government IS god, the government is what gives you your rights & freedom, the government can and will take them away when convenient. You just believe there is a higher authority or you are genuinely fucked.

PL: I have come to respect the Christfags immensely over the years and will raise my children in a traditional Church. The values, moral framework, and psychological protection seems well worth it to me, even if I can’t bring myself to truly believe in it.

Yea that’s fundamentally what I’m getting at. Personally I’d say I’m a mix of theocracy and democracy as you described it since I believe that human rights come from God and are therefore sacred while also believing that some religious law should be applied to the secular realm. I’m not gonna dive into politics anymore but I will say that, in my opinion at least, the WEF has failed to recognize this fact. They don’t believe in a higher authority than themselves or the UN or something. They believe that they can mold society in their image and to their liking. And that’s a very foolish mistake to make.

 

[Irrational Exuberance]

Yea that’s fundamentally what I’m getting at. Personally I’d say I’m a mix of theocracy and democracy as you described it since I believe that human rights come from God and are therefore sacred while also believing that some religious law should be applied to the secular realm. I’m not gonna dive into politics anymore but I will say that, in my opinion at least, the WEF has failed to recognize this fact. They don’t believe in a higher authority than themselves or the UN or something. They believe that they can mold society in their image and to their liking. And that’s a very foolish mistake to make.

You're halfway right, in my opinion - the truly power-mad folk do indeed believe in something higher than themselves, and they deceive themselves by thinking that when everything truly falls apart, they'll get to sit on the throne of God and look down on all the lesser beings.

 

[Mayor Adam West]

You're halfway right, in my opinion - the truly power-mad folk do indeed believe in something higher than themselves, and they deceive themselves by thinking that when everything truly falls apart, they'll get to sit on the throne of God and look down on all the lesser beings.

Yeah. But that’s rather rare. And they still don’t believe in God. Did Hitler believe in a higher power? Yeah, race. Communists believe in class. And the WEF…if I had to guess probably “muh free market” or something.

 

[greenthrowaway]

I don't believe the Mark of the Beast shit at all, but everything else makes perfect sense. As much as the Reset shit terrifies me, as soon as someone hamfists in religion I immediately roll my eyes. That still doesn't mean everything Hicks McGraw said here was incorrect.

Many parts of the Bible are allegorical. The mark could be coinage during the age of Nero (maybe future tracked fiat coin) or could be a metaphor for the act of collaborating (right hand) and believing in the beast’s cause or message (forehead).

 

[ZazietheBeast]

An interesting tidbit in Bezmenov's lecture besides the infamous 4 steps, is actually how his colleague found that societies without religion don't last very long.

And from personal experience, I can see why. Religion has a way of keeping everybody who follows and practices it very closely, together. As people of the same faith are usually very accommodating towards each other. At the same time, hold up its tennets as everyone desires salvation in the end. The ultimate carrot and stick.

Part of the reason why everyone has become quite the degenerate in the west is due to more people leaving the church. And as such, abandoning the values that make one Christian. Because if the US were a bit more theocratic, we really wouldn't be seeing that many simps and e-thots. Simps are idolators, giving worship to another person instead of God, and E-thots are just as guilty but in the terms of drawing worship away from the Lord. That and being vain. Jezebel didn't get a good ending in the Bible.

So an ideal system would definitely have religion. One of the good things I can say about a 3rd-world shithole like the Philippines is that its socially cohesive thanks to the strong Christian faith down there... even though there are weird denominations and sects popping about.

 

[GoingGrink]

Biden: "Look, today my administration issued new warnings that based on evolving intelligence Russia may be planning a cyberattack against us. The magnitude of Russia's cyber capacity is fairly consequential, and it's coming. The federal government is doing its part to get ready."

Good thing Joe gave Putin a list of what not to attack. I wonder if they will declare martial law and cancel the mid-term elections.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

Look, today my administration issued new warnings that based on evolving intelligence Russia may be planning a cyberattack against us.

How about the warning when Putin said "World War 3 will be fought with ones and zeros." Over a Decade ago now.

HOW ABOUT THAT FUCKING WARNING, You stupid faggots had years to get ready for this.

 

[Tsukasa Kadoya]

View attachment 3095692

Biden: "Look, today my administration issued new warnings that based on evolving intelligence Russia may be planning a cyberattack against us. The magnitude of Russia's cyber capacity is fairly consequential, and it's coming. The federal government is doing its part to get ready."

Good thing Joe gave Putin a list of what not to attack. I wonder if they will declare martial law and cancel the mid-term elections.

100% the elections are going to be cancelled. I would also expect the Dems to use "Muh Russian spies" as a cudgel to start locking up any political enemies. And the feds will be the hammer.
You know, I almost admire Biden now. He gave us something the Dems couldn't: the truth.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

An interesting tidbit in Bezmenov's lecture besides the infamous 4 steps, is actually how his colleague found that societies without religion don't last very long.

And from personal experience, I can see why. Religion has a way of keeping everybody who follows and practices it very closely, together. As people of the same faith are usually very accommodating towards each other. At the same time, hold up its tennets as everyone desires salvation in the end. The ultimate carrot and stick.

Part of the reason why everyone has become quite the degenerate in the west is due to more people leaving the church. And as such, abandoning the values that make one Christian. Because if the US were a bit more theocratic, we really wouldn't be seeing that many simps and e-thots. Simps are idolators, giving worship to another person instead of God, and E-thots are just as guilty but in the terms of drawing worship away from the Lord. That and being vain. Jezebel didn't get a good ending in the Bible.

So an ideal system would definitely have religion. One of the good things I can say about a 3rd-world shithole like the Philippines is that its socially cohesive thanks to the strong Christian faith down there... even though there are weird denominations and sects popping about.

I don't think that's necessarily true because SOMETHING always becomes a religion for people. There were a lot of educated people in Ancient Greece, Rome, India, and China who only held vague beliefs in spirituality (a few were even explicitly atheist), and these people often dominated their society's intellectual life. But they developed impressive philosophies that incorporated a moral component. Confucianism is one of the most prominent and enduring examples, since at its core it's a set of moral beliefs and guidance that places a society in order. Confucianism doesn't give much guidance on religion aside from saying that Heaven exists, you should respect it, and by following Confucian guidance you help society become more like Heaven.

Communism can be a religion, with Marx as its prophet and Lenin, Castro, and [your communist of choice] as saints and theologians. Other ideologies like classical liberalism (French Revolution stuff, early 19th century American civil religion), fascism (ideology of some Nazis like Bormann and Rosenberg), Objectivism, etc. all are basically religious. But aside from the latter (which was the inspiration for LaVeyan Satanism i.e. degeneracy), they all do have demands expected of the "adherent".

100% the elections are going to be cancelled. I would also expect the Dems to use "Muh Russian spies" as a cudgel to start locking up any political enemies. And the feds will be the hammer.
You know, I almost admire Biden now. He gave us something the Dems couldn't: the truth.

Already there are voices calling for the imprisonment of Tulsi Gabbard and Tucker Carlson for saying "wait a minute, I don't think we should be trying to start a war with Russia."