Yeah, they sprayed flu water on a bunch of shit in the grocery stores in order to make non-supporters too sick to go out and vote. Man, imagine doing that sort of thing. Surely no one would use a pandemic to manipulate an election lol.I found this out later on, but this pajeet ran a cult that almost took down Oregon.
Rajneeshpuram - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Looking at the current state of Oregon, I am impressed with this dude given his ideals and it makes sense lol.
Having over six thousand of these makes you a superpower, regardless of the state of your country. That's why everyone wants several of their own.
I think you've bought "not proofs" as "proofs" just because it's in Russian and someone said it is what you want it to be. Fortunately it has been posted but not translated as far as I know.
Thanks. Funnily enough I started to look for proofs since I've seen it so much and I was going down the exact same path as you just now and got so far as translating that exact same tweet on Yandex. I was going to post it but you've done it all and the translations line up.
I kinda want Zelinsky to become the next Hitler and invade Poland with all those fancy NATO guns 5 years down the line.
Since I am struggling to find any info on this new-fangled system, do you mind sharing an article talking about this?
I'm waiting for another plane to get shot down made possible by NATO's gifts of war.
Hazards of 2014 not really being planned. Putin didn't think that not signing the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement would generate enough backlash that Yanukovych could and would be ousted. When that surprise happened, Putin took advantage of the chaos to secure Crimea, but I'm guessing he stopped there as stopping at Crimea's border would make it easier to defend and outside of Crimea he probably didn't feel he was guaranteed enough local support to secure annexation without real problems from the local population. Or maybe he just didn't have enough troops available at the time and he picked supporting the east over trying to make something more happen in the south. Likely no one involved in agriculture was involved in the decision making, or he'd have known he needed to at least push far enough into Kherson to secure river access or Ukraine could simply cut a vital water supply of Crimea's.
Oh yeah, Ukraine's having heavier losses than they'll admit to as well. The thing is that even 400 a day for a week is "just" 2800 casualties. That'd be fairly in line with the 2,000-4,000 Ukrainian KIA that the US was estimating back around March 10th. Yes that's relatively high. The problem for Russia is that its KIA were being estimated by the US to be in the range of 3,000-10,000 as of around March 18th, with 7,000 being one of the more broadly circulated estimates. It's a bad sign for Russia if they probably aren't doing better than 1:1 in losses with Ukraine and could be going as high as 3:1 losses. It's not really sustainable. Ukraine has a general mobilization going and is ready to throw conscripts(hopefully once they've been trained) at Russia, while Russia doesn't have the same. So if that ratio keeps up for too long, Putin runs out of available troops before Ukraine does, and he'll have to either leave rear areas or less crucial borders under defended, or expend the political capital at home to send in his own conscripts and maybe draft more, or break out the chemical or nuclear weapons to start reversing that ratio in his favor. None of which are going to be particularly palpable options for him.
I ain't gonna learn fluent fucking Russian and do a deep dive on radio communications just to prove you wrong. That's retarded and a ridiculous thing to ask because even if I did invest all the time and energy to do all of that your very next response would be the lowest-effort "well, I don't know it so it isn't proof" making all of the work I just did completely meaningless. It is like proving to a flat earther that the world is round. They have to want to entertain whatever evidence provided in good faith. But you know they won't.
Note that they never talk about Ukrainian casualties in any of these reports, the closest you get being that one Swedish university guy saying he thought Ukraine was inflating Russian losses and understating their own. Yeah, 3,000-7,000 Russian dead/wounded would sound really heavy and make Russia sound like it's getting its ass kicked, until you point out the probably 12,000-20,000 Ukrainian dead/wounded. They also keep saying Ukraine's stalling Russian forces with resistance, but we've got maps proving they're not. Russia's either going around them or encircling them and keeping them in "cauldrons" intentionally. Everything we've seen and been told so far makes it sound like Russia's holding back to avoid civilian casualties. Not a Russiaboo thing to say either, if Putin wants to occupy Ukraine the worst thing he could do is be callous toward the population. They learned from Chechnya that even if people are receptive to you at first, bombing them into the dirt will change that very quickly.
And cue "Akshually, it's an ancient symbol of prosperity and good luck..."
Really? Tell me, was it before or after Russia stomped Grozny flat that the Chechens decided not to fuck with Russia anymore?
I think this may be some kind of calculated move by the Ukrainians. They want the west to see videos of their victories, even if it means some security lapses and footage of war crimes are released. I'm basing this on the dearth of videos showing the Ukrainians doing badly. If westerners think Ukraine is winning and not a lost cause, they'll support the continued flood of NATO weapons into the country. Big tech is helping by suppressing the unappealing content that does come out of Ukraine, along with all the pro-Russia content that Russia wants the west to see. So Zelensky is allowing incidents like the guy peeing on the dead Russian, and the TikTok showing the mall held military vehicles in the parking deck, in exchange for all the videos of burned out Russian tanks going almost directly to western viewers. It's for the Ukrainians too.
Certainly. Keep in mind that these are it's claimed capabilities. The official in charge of the project was General Khalil Arslanov. He was convicted after embezzling 6.7 Billion Rubles.
I never asked you to translate anything.
You think I'm saying "proofs" and not referencing the meme that has long been associated with Russian cope? Is of intentional joke, comrade.
This is some reach. It's a list of frequencies sourced by social media, many of which have nothing to do specifically with the invasion. This is like going to a US military base and scanning the waves and saying "THE US MILITARY IS USING UNENCRYPTED COMMS HOLY SHIT LMAO" when you hear a specialist asking where he's supposed to be going again.
Thanks and I wasn't being pedantic, I was making a joke is all.
A large chunk of this thread is taken up with posts like this. Yes the same people who assured us that there was WMD in Iraq, that Kabul could not be taken by the Taliban, that ISIS were invincible, that we had 2 weeks to stop spread, that J6 was worse than 9/11 that the vaccines would protect us, that inflation was just a blip, that Epstein did kill himself, are now telling us that Russia is losing tens of thousands of men. I've heard estimates of Russian KIA ranging from 7,000 to 18,000. The number of wounded will be 5-10 times higher so Russia has 50-100,000 losses, with a fighting force of around 200K. Well a 50% casualty rate over 4weeks would certainly be something, in fact unprecedented in the history of war. Alternatively the lying fucks who lie all the time are lying again.
Imo they were hoping/predicting Zelenskyy himself would fail, setting all the above mentioned failures in motion.
Those Buddha NAZIs, namaste Hitler
Didn't this cunt come out against the war a week or two ago? Must have had a stern talking to.
