Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
1648063219902.png

No other source so we will find out in a few days.
 
So why do you say that Ukraine send men to Afghanistan in 1979? How this is relevant to discussion?

You asked if The Ukraine had invaded Afghanistan (In an obvious attempt to derail). Stop being a nigger, please.


How are Azov even getting resupplied in Mauripol? Or aren't they? I doubt anything's getting flown in, nor will ships be docking... How much do they have stockpiled there, I wonder? Or are they relying primarily on being a nuisance and hiding behind civilians rather than actually combating the Ruskies directly?
 
They should have accepted the referendum's has legal, or atleast negotiated to have a UN observed referendum. The majority of Ukraine voted for neutrality. This was the "voice of the people". A minority faction violently overthrew the government. They should have accepted that the East and Crimea would then separate, especially considering they are the weaker party. States have been formed over much lesser justifications. They had no qualms about "bombing teh children" when it was they who had to send a military into civillian areas to achieve THEIR strategic objectives.
I don't think you understand, let me repeaterino.
You literally cannot negotiate with Russia, they will, even if you're on their side, try to fuck you in the ass. That's just how the Russia psyche or whatever the fuck works, they pathogicaly need to bully the pathetic weak ex Soviet states into total submission or make life for them a living hell.
All this back and forth about referendums, bombed children is just some stupid grift vs grift bullshit that means nothing. Fact is Putin attacked a country because he could get a fast muscle on Ukraine and make the West shit itself, which isn't working all that well for him now. You literally cannot have a clearer side in the wrong even if it glowed like the Sun in the night.
Do you think Arnold will respond to the Russian girl's video? Uh FUCK NO. . He wants to reduce everything to a simple emotional retort. "Putin is a nazi like my dad!" "They are bombing teh children". He is utterly incapable of sitting down and having normal civil discourse over the complexities of this conflict. They want to shut down ANY discourse as being a Russian spy, a traitor, etc. Because they don't want their arguments held to ANY scrutiny at all. People here have some balls talking about Russian censorship knowing the pure vitriol flaming over the airways here in the west.
Nigger, you're literally talking like a 13 year old girl right nao.
No fucking shit there are corrupt fascistictoid propagandists on both sides, a lot of redditor grift that wants the dopamine rush of having picked the "right" side among the mob instead of discourse and so what? Every major conflict is like with bullshit on both sides.
What you need to do in a time like this is simple, set your priorities straight and give a good though whether it's worth to be some kind of 'truth'ist and defend a balding slav midget while blaming some western fags for being what they are, all the while children ARE LITERALLY being bombed right now.
 
Nonsense. Attempting to create democracy in Afghanistan wasn't an ego trip. It was a side effect of the Taliban shielding Bin Laden, causing the US to decide that the Taliban had to go as well. When you destroy someone's government, the reasonable thing to do is build a replacement for the people. Naturally because the US is a democracy, any replacement governments they build will be democracies. Sort of how like post Napoleon they created constitutional monarchies in France and the Netherlands as part of rebuilding nations.

Bin Laden was in Pakistan, remember.

And the U.S. didn't fuck with Pakistan because they have nuclear bombs.

The reasons for invading and occupying Afghanistan are shaky as fuck and saying that "it's right when we do it" is a good way to tell me that your claims for having any sort of moral highground are a joke.

The regime literally fell right after the U.S. occupation ended, literally a failed conquest for "democracy".
 
You asked if The Ukraine had invaded Afghanistan (In an obvious attempt to derail). Stop being a nigger, please.
Holy shit, like I don't need to do anything to make you look autistic as fuck.

How is Soviet Union attacking Afghanistan relevant in any way to Russian invasion on Ukraine?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vince McMahon
Bin Laden was in Pakistan, remember.

And the U.S. didn't fuck with Pakistan because they have nuclear bombs.

The reasons for invading Afghanistan are shaky as fuck and saying that "it's right when we do it" is a good way to tell me that your claims for having any sort of moral highground are a joke.
He was in Afghanistan at the start of the invasion, and the Taliban had been giving him shelter for some time before the invasion. The US just fucked up and he escaped over the border during the invasion.
 
Well what do you know, Madeline Albright just croaked. Almost on the anniversary of the NATO bombing campaigns of Yugoslavia, too. Press S to spit.
Holy shit I didn't know I could hate a person that I just learned about.
Another witch from the Cold War the war in Yugoslavia now dead. Mrs. Madeleine Albright, may the earth be glassy for you. It's a pity you were not judged at the earthly court, but if there is a god, then he has a good place in hell for you.

Here is a list of war crimes committed in the Kosovo War. Everybody talks about the genocide committed by the Serbs, but nobody speaks about the use of child soldiers by the KLA or organ theft committed by the Kosovo Liberation Army.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crimes_in_the_Kosovo_War#Organ_theft_allegations

These are the people NATO backed.
Fuck them, fuck NATO, fuck the United States.
 
Last edited:
Holy shit, like I don't need to do anything to make you look autistic as fuck.

How is Soviet Union attacking Afghanistan relevant in any way to Russian invasion on Ukraine?

It isnt, and I'm reasonably sure nobody but you is suggesting that it is. Again, please stop being a nigger and derailing. You asked a facetious rhetorical question, and are now whining because there was an actual answer to it that you didn't like.
 
He was in Afghanistan at the start of the invasion, and the Taliban had been giving him shelter for some time before the invasion. The US just fucked up and he escaped over the border during the invasion.

And there it goes the shaky as fuck foundations for conquering Afghanistan.

And it was a conquest because the puppet regime installed there was corrupt as fuck and it literally fell right after the U.S. occupation forces left.
 
You asked if The Ukraine had invaded Afghanistan (In an obvious attempt to derail). Stop being a nigger, please.



How are Azov even getting resupplied in Mauripol? Or aren't they? I doubt anything's getting flown in, nor will ships be docking... How much do they have stockpiled there, I wonder? Or are they relying primarily on being a nuisance and hiding behind civilians rather than actually combating the Ruskies directly?
The encirclement is rather poor in spots so Azov has been poking holes in the weakest links of the Russian lines as they get boxed in and recovers gear and ammunition from what they kill. they recently poked another hole in the Russian lines and ganked a small convoy behind the battle line and recovered a host of war material. considering they also entrenched Mariupol before the war even started, they have probably been squirreling away caches all over the area. Heres an example I posted earlier.
 
Holy shit I didn't know I could hate a person that I just learned about.
Another witch from the Cold War the war in Yugoslavia now dead. Mrs. Madeleine Albright, may the earth be glassy for you. It's a pity you were not judged at the earthly court, but if there is a god, then he has a good place in hell for you.
Looking like a corpse decades ago... There's a serious problem with ancient cunts being installed in power for decades. Like Pedojoe having power for 50+ years, America totally isn't a corrupted Banana republic.
 
Holy shit I didn't know I could hate a person that I just learned about.
Another witch from the Cold War the war in Yugoslavia now dead. Mrs. Madeleine Albright, may the earth be glassy for you. It's a pity you were not judged at the earthly court, but if there is a god, then he has a good place in hell for you.
This one is a key moment.
 
And there it goes the shaky as fuck foundations for conquering Afghanistan.

And it was a conquest because the puppet regime installed there was corrupt as fuck and it literally fell right after the U.S. occupation forces left.
It was a perfectly fine justification for invasion. Iraq was the one with a flakey justification.
 
It isnt, and I'm reasonably sure nobody but you is suggesting that it is. Again, please stop being a nigger and derailing. You asked a facetious rhetorical question, and are now whining because there was an actual answer to it that you didn't like.
Soviet union attacking Afghanistan is as relevan to this thread as is US attacking Afghanistan. But if you wrap your mind in pretzel enough, you can convince yourself, that bringing it is not derailing the thread.
 
All this back and forth about referendums, bombed children is just some stupid grift vs grift bullshit that means nothing. Fact is Putin attacked a country

This is exactly what I mean by being a reductionist and how it only serves to cause and escalate further conflicts. Tsk Tsking Putin for crossing a state line or whatever is definitely more like a "Nigger talking like a 13 year old girl" than expecting a civil discussion in a supposed leader of the free world.

“In more than two and a half years of conversations with key Russian players, from knuckle-draggers in the dark recesses of the Kremlin to Putin’s sharpest liberal critics, I have yet to find anyone who views Ukraine in NATO as anything other than a direct challenge to Russian interests.”

This isn't Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, Tulsi Gabbard, Col. Douglas Macgregor, or anybody else trying to patiently explain the complex matters of why this war started. This is the CURRENT Director of the CIA William J Burns. Before that it was Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, etc, Going back to 1992 you can find Cold War hawks explaining that Ukraine and Crimea being absorbed by NATO would lead to war. This was all while Putin was moonlighting as a taxi driver in moscow to make ends meet.
 
An explanation of the cages seen mounted on Russian tanks.

Infantry Anti-tank weapons have become so good I'm beginning to wonder if the days of the tank are starting to become numbered. It reminds me of the effect even crude, early firearms had on armored knights.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back