Artcow WogglebugLoveProductions / Cynthia Hanson / Cherie Anne Hapney - One Womanchild's Fruitless Quest to Make Her Cockroach Husbando a Household Name

What is the Wogglebug's sexual orientation?


  • Total voters
    434
Here is the new version done in HD with the 5th version (I may stick with this one), and the Wogglebug's lip movements and expressiveness have been updated, and Sylvie's face has been adjusted to fit better to her.

Unfortunately, I don't have anything to compare this new take with other than your original upload of Fun With Seasons, but I can tell he's come a long way from that point. I like Wogglebug's expressions more this time around. His body language is pretty fluid too. His lips have improved, but sometimes they come out a bit too much (like in "how much I love the ones surrounding ME and how much they love me" - problem words are bolded), which may have something to do with the program you're using, so you'll need to continue your work in tinkering with that, but he's definitely evolved.
 
Unfortunately, I don't have anything to compare this new take with other than your original upload of Fun With Seasons, but I can tell he's come a long way from that point. I like Wogglebug's expressions more this time around. His body language is pretty fluid too. His lips have improved, but sometimes they come out a bit too much (like in "how much I love the ones surrounding ME and how much they love me" - problem words are bolded), which may have something to do with the program you're using, so you'll need to continue your work in tinkering with that, but he's definitely evolved.

Thank you for your compliments, Golly. I also like his expressions more this time around. Yes, I have come a long way from before. As for his lips moving out too much, that is because I turned up the expressiveness to the maximum, but it should be easy to lessen it a little bit. I've updated a couple more scenes from the original short film also which I will post later on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Golly
I haven't had the chance to talk to VoiceGuy yet. But I've noticed he's been online a little bit in the past few days and so I at least think that is a good sign he didn't need to go into the hospital and he's getting better.

In the meantime I've uploaded new versions of both the short film of The Wogglebug's Fun with Seasons and Holidays and the campaign promo video. Some of the previous scenes / sequences have been updated or replaced to better quality as I'm hoping.
 
I talked to VoiceGuy yesterday. He saw his doctor and he didn't need to go into the hospital, his leg wound's infection is clearing up and he should be in good shape to make the trip to Texas to spend Christmas with his sister's family. He also has promised me that right after New Years he will start on the recordings for my movie. I am so relieved.

In the meantime, I'm going to film the first few scenes in the movie that don't include the Wogglebug but just Sylvie. And also work on the script for the second film in my series.
 
I talked to VoiceGuy yesterday. He saw his doctor and he didn't need to go into the hospital, his leg wound's infection is clearing up and he should be in good shape to make the trip to Texas to spend Christmas with his sister's family. He also has promised me that right after New Years he will start on the recordings for my movie. I am so relieved.

In the meantime, I'm going to film the first few scenes in the movie that don't include the Wogglebug but just Sylvie. And also work on the script for the second film in my series.

Thanks for letting us know, that's great news. I'm glad he's OK.
 
I talked to VoiceGuy yesterday. He saw his doctor and he didn't need to go into the hospital, his leg wound's infection is clearing up and he should be in good shape to make the trip to Texas to spend Christmas with his sister's family. He also has promised me that right after New Years he will start on the recordings for my movie. I am so relieved.

In the meantime, I'm going to film the first few scenes in the movie that don't include the Wogglebug but just Sylvie. And also work on the script for the second film in my series.

Fully agreed with @Jared , that's great news.
 
I am sticking with my plan of only releasing "The Wogglebug and Sylvie's Rescue of the Enchanted Forest" publicly through Amazon's Instant Video and the DVDs, which will have a few awesome bonus features, only to actual fans who contact me to request them via my website email which I will mention in the description of the movie at Amazon. You'll still be able to see the movie except you will each have to pay the small fee Amazon will charge for their Instant Videos and will be able to do no more than watch it by yourselves individually. And that's that.

I've also been working on the novelization of the movie which I think should go excellently with it on the Kindle. Especially because I am writing it myself and not hiring anyone to do it for me. Although there have been at least some movie novelizations that have been excellent at being what they should be as novel of an excellent movie that conveys certain things in it that couldn't be on screen as well. Examples that come to my mind are the official novelizations of Disney movies, and the Back to the Future trilogy. And of the Return to Oz movie from 1985. A best example of how this one conveys what is going on inside a character's head in just the right way that makes sense in this one comes in the written version of the scene where Jack Pumpkinhead asks Dorothy if he may call her his mom even if it isn't so and she smiles and nods yes to him. This text conveys why she agreed:

Dorothy had never thought she could be a mother to anyone before, except her dolls, and certainly not someone as large as Jack. Especially with her being so young. But then Jack was apparently younger than her, and besides she knew what it was like to lose a mother.

This is a perfect example of what makes for an excellent movie novelization. The reason why the examples I cited may have been done right was because they may have been done by people hired to do them but were done by really true fans who had seen the movie and read the script and loved and understood them equally well, in addition to having the proper writing skills for the job.

Since I've read both good and bad novelizations of movies I love, and think I know what makes for an excellent one, I feel I should be able to do my movies. novelizations splendidly.

And speaking of the E.T. novelization by William Kotzwinkle, it had at least just a few excellent little touches and moments to it. Such as how the scene at the very beginning of E.T. and his companions spaceship's interior and all of the plants they had collected from Earth as intergalactic botanists through the centuries that were there, and how E.T. professionally lifted up the Redwood tree sapling as he was collecting it for this particular mission. And also there was mention that he had the ability to communicate with all of plantlife in a few scenes. Which makes sense because Spielberg has revealed that E.T. is not animal but plant matter which explains about him perfectly altogether. And in addition to this Spielberg mentioned E.T. is neither male nor female due to being plant matter also. Which is exactly why his being in a lustful and humanlike infatuation with Mary, the mother of the children is pointless and futile overall, I couldn't agree more on this one.

I will admit one scene in it that did make me laugh that wasn't in the film was a short scene in which Keys (it's revealed he had a proper name but Keys is a nickname that his co-workers give him because he holds all of the keys to the whole building and always carries them on a ring on his belt as shown in the movie) and a colleague of his are discussing how to track down the alien they are after and while Keys believes he's in a house in the neighborhood somewhere the other guy insists he must be camping out in the woods somewhere like an islander trying to survive. They argue a little and then the other fellow agrees to let Keys be the boss but just before he leaves he says, "But if he is out there he's out in the woods, he's not sitting at someone's table drinking a milkshake."

Which, of course promptly cuts to E.T. sitting calmly at Elliot's kitchen table beside him and politely drinking a milkshake from a straw. Elliot asks "You like that, E.T.?" To which he nods and thinks how straws make drinking easier.

And the Junior novelization of E.T. that came out during its 20th anniversary was much better in being true to the plot of the movie and accurate to the storyline and had some excellent points of its own. Such as it included what I learned was actually a deleted scene from the actual film in which Elliot is in the Principal's office after his incident in science class with the frog rescue, and while the principal is going on and on about the bad effects of drugs and alcohol, Elliot because of his connection with E.T. lifts up off the floor while still sitting in his chair, goes up to the ceiling and then drops back to the floor in one second just as the Principal turned around in his own chair as he had been facing away from him the whole time before. Then the way the author of this novelization wrote of how the Principal reacted as he went quickly to the door to answer it and seemed to be hoping desperately he wasn't losing his mind and hadn't seen what he thought he did made me laugh here as well. There was also an excellent as sensible explanation as to why Elliot had lifted up in his chair, he was connected with E.T. who was in that moment using his levitation abilities with full force to lift all that he found he needed to construct his transmitter to phone home up the stairs.

An excellent scene in this version also in conveying the character's thoughts was as to why Gertie brought E.T. the geranium plant. Because she had observed her mother would often bring flowers to people when she was going to visit with them and felt she should do the same for their new visitor. She was only five but she was already a firm believer in manners and wanted to make a good impression after her last meeting with E.T.

And also included were a couple of scenes that were not in the film or the screenplay but were excellent at bridging minor gaps in the story and conveyed the character's emotions and thoughts in a sensible way. These were two connected scenes just before and after Michael the older brother brings home the literally homesick E.T.. Mary is in Elliot's bedroom comforting him and giving him tomato soup and he says "I feel like everything is worth nothing." And Mary replies "We can only do the best we can do, we can't do anymore." This is followed by a scene with Elliot and Michael in the bathroom and seeing E.T.'s condition Elliot repeats what his mother said to him to E.T. and Michael convinces him they need to tell their mother about E.T. now at last.

It is in these excellent ways that I intend to write my own novelization of my first and all the rest of my movies to come.
 
Last edited:
All very fair points. I hadn't read the Kotzwinkle in some time, but I might dig it out and give it a reread just for nostalgia value. I do remember the botany aspect being a favorite plot point of mine. I either never knew or forgot that E.T. was said to be plant-based himself, which does raise all sorts of questions about other aspects of his biology (e.g. why eat or drink at all, let alone be able to get drunk). Spielberg's statement to that effect is a little silly, though, because plants have sexes -- some crops need to have the males separated from the females quite early on so that pollination doesn't spoil any of various desired effects from the females. So E.T. could still have had a physical sex -- compare the single-episode character Jabe in the Ninth Doctor series of Doctor Who. She's descended from trees (and literally hands the Doctor a cutting from her grandfather, if memory serves), but is unmistakably female, down to the utterly useless bosom. And the Ents in Lord of the Rings used to have wives, who all wandered off aeons ago and haven't been seen since. When Treebeard and Frodo part in Return of the King, the Ent specifically asks Frodo to keep an eye out for any Entwives once he gets home to the Shire. To me, though, it makes more sense in pure science fiction to have E.T.'s reproduction be something humans might not even be able to comprehend, especially since it has no bearing on the story.

Trivia: Did you know that M&M/Mars, when approached for permission to have M&Ms be the candy Elliot uses to lure E.T., declined because they didn't want their brand associated with a "monster"? Oops. I was in Hersheypark not long after the movie's release and almost everything had some kind of movie tie-in or promo. Posters and banners everywhere. I wonder whether the M&M/Mars exec responsible for the decision kept their job or was fired.

I haven't forgotten the feedback I was trying to extract from my sister. Her husband's grandmother is extremely ill right now, so with that and the approaching holiday, she's pretty overwhelmed. I did flip through the preview images visible on the Manners book's Amazon page, and I love Katy the Care-Keeper's house. The stone/thatch combination is just endearing, partly because it reminds me of some actual historical architecture. Feel free to quote me on that if you talk to your illustrator.

Also, PM incoming.
 
I am sorry to know about your sister's family emergency. I understand, of course. And I can at least extend the the campaign's deadline to January 17th if I contact Indiegogo about it on time. I'm just waiting for the 15th when I hope to able to have $200 to be able to deposit to KickStartMyAds to do more of their Facebook Ads reaching. At least I think that is what I need, I hope to have them call me again today this afternoon.

And, yes I am aware about the M&M's candy company turning down the film because they were afraid it would flop because it was so groundbreaking and different and had an alien be a cute and kind creature who loved children instead of the opposite which was almost entirely how aliens in film had been portrayed as up to that point. This is why E.T. is inspiring to me as a filmmaker and screenwriter for my Wogglebug movie series.

And I am very pleased you like the design of the house I chose for Kate in my picture book. It will be shown in the second movie also. And just so you know, the current pictures in my picture books are not actually illustrations by my illustrator but are still photo captures from my movie making program. Because at the moment its the best I can do until I can actually afford for my illustrator to change the settings of the some of the previous pictures and do more for other books. This depends on how successful of a campaign I can have.
 
Last edited:
I am certain all of you have it straight by now that VoiceGuy has never been taking advantage of me and that he is not that kind of guy in any way. The one who was however taking advantage of me once had been my former publisher before I turned to self-publishing. To make it clear from what information was given before in this from about it I want to explain more.

When I decided I wanted to no longer publish through him after it became evident he was just using me to get more books for him to publish out of that would suit his agenda (I discovered later he must have been planning things for them behind my back) I agreed to buy back the rights to my book from him and I so I did. That is, I paid him the $200 he paid to my first illustrator for the illustrations (but no more than that). However long after I had already done this his edition of my book was still available at Amazon (nowhere else though) much to my dismay. Finally after months I contacted Lulu and told them about this problem. That was when I found out from them that the book wasn't actually retired from them but had just been put in private access on my former publisher's account. This they said made all the difference about whether or not it could be retired and discontinued from Amazon. Then I just explained all about my dealings with my former publisher to them and when I mentioned about I had in fact paid back before as an agreement my book would be discontinued they straightaway gave me a DMCA claim form to fill out and sign. Which I did and sent back to them and just two days later the old edition of my first book was gone from Amazon for good because the site admins of Lulu had took away the book from my former publisher's account all on their own.

I discovered the reason my former publisher forced me to file a DMCA takedown claim form before my book was retired was because (believe it or not) he expected by not honoring my wishes he could file "criminal charges" against me and there would be an actual court trial. Which isn't happening because it doesn't work that way. Because Lulu is a self-publishing site, and this is my own intellectual property we were dealing with and not his. And the DMCA claim form was invented to enable for the site admins of such self-publishing places to be able to remove books from the accounts of dishonest publishers on their own. Be assured Lulu told me they sent him a copy of the DMCA claim form also. That he would try to do such a thing to me proves all the more that publishing through him had been a mistake that shouldn't have been ever made. And actually my former publisher and the people with him are not really so much a scam as they are a cult.

Self publishing is the only way for me. I would much rather have my own customized name of WogglebugLoveProductions on my ISBN instead of Tails of the Cowardly Lion and Friends (or anything else for that matter) for anything I write to publish.
 
While it can be debated about what exactly Baum intended for the Wogglebug to be viewed as when he was originally created in The Marvelous Land of Oz. There are some things to be considered about certain statements made during this book and afterwards. In the short stories of the "Queer Visitors From the Marvelous Land of Oz" that came in a weekly comic strip following the aforementioned book's publication the Wogglebug was an awesome leader to the others with him. In addition to being described as being "very wise and quick to discover things" and "generous" and having a "tender-heart" and comforting a little girl "as politely as if she were a great lady" (which he really proves to all of these attributes to a tee and only confirmed what I believed about him from the previous book) there was also this exact statement made in the story of "How the Wogglebug Proved his Knowledge of Chemistry":

It has been said, with considerable lack of kindness, that the Wogglebug's excellent education is of little account because it is applied to a wogglebug intellect. But the wonderful insect is constantly proving the falsity of this scandal by doing and saying brilliant things that people of regulation brains would be very proud of.

Mind you, these are all Baum's words and not mine!

And also at the end of "The Marvelous Land of Oz" Baum had made this statement about the Wogglebug's future to come (which he went back on later) The Wogglebug, who was given the important position of Public Educator, proved to be very helpful to Ozma whenever her duties grew perplexing. So from these two statements I suppose Baum must have been intending originally for the Wogglebug to earn his respect in rather the way Hermoine Granger did in the Harry Potter series (for the cool use of intellect while others were at peril), and meant also for him to become the kind of friend and helper to Ozma that the individual advisers were to the four young princesses of the Jewel Kingdom series. This was, of course before the Wizard came back to Oz in the fourth book and became what was once mere pretense for him instead of the Wogglebug who just seemed to fade into the background afterward.

Another important thing to consider from The Marvelous Land of Oz story is that the group the Wogglebug met with never told him why they were actually on their way to the Emerald City and he didn't know there was something of a war going on there, either. It's true.

I quote from the book: Tip asks the Wogglebug, "Where were you going when you met us?"

The Wogglebug replies, "Nowhere in particular, although it is my intention soon to visit the Emerald City to arrange to give a course of lectures to select audiences on the advantages of magnification."

Then the Tin Woodman responds with: "We are bound for the Emerald City now. So if it pleases you to do so you are welcome to travel in our company."

You see! He didn't know! And they never told him! And you know the reason why they never told him about what was going on at the Emerald City? Because they had fully expected to defeat General Jinjur and her army of revolt on their first attempt. Then the Scarecrow would just simply reclaim the throne and be King of Oz again, no Princess Ozma on their minds.

I also understand the Wogglebug had not even originally been planned to be put in the Oz series all along. Baum himself implied in an interview in 1904 the character had just come to him at random when he was not even thinking about his second Oz book which was already a third written and he only decided to include him at all in the exact moment he was in the story because his wife suggested and encouraged it. And the Wogglebug's presence in the story is largely superfluous to the overall plot. And the truth is the Wogglebug is worthy of heroism and admiration and more. And I always saw also how his most heroic moments in Baum's work always take place either away from the world of Oz or from the other Oz characters at least. So, essentially Baum might have in fact been better off making him the star of a different book in a different place than Oz altogether. I realize Baum did not know he would write anymore about Oz after the second, or the sixth book, let alone knew how enormous the fandom and franchise of Oz would expand long after his death.

But in my new fandom for him he becomes all that he could have become in Oz if circumstances had been different, and much more by the end. Baum must have been just a severely flawed writer who never gave any great deal of thought of what to do with the Wogglebug and especially after he started writing more than he expected to about Oz. If I had a time machine I would go back and convince Baum to put the Wogglebug in his own story that wasn't related to Oz and be a true hero for it. It might have been the only book featuring the Wogglebug he would write, but it would still have gone to public domain by now and I would likely still be pursuing my visions with him just for different reasons.
 
Last edited:
Many writers have crippling flaws, as you suggest. Ernest Hemingway let his alcoholism take over his talent, to the point that his late novel, Across the River and Into the Trees, stars an old man with a heart condition who nevertheless downs something like four entire bottles of alcohol over a single day -- which, for anyone who wasn't a severe alcoholic, would be fatal -- and is capable of certain acts with his girlfriend at the end of the day. So his allegedly realistic novel really isn't, and what's worse, the dialogue sucks. The Colonel and his girlfriend sit there having a debate about celery. In genre fiction, consider also H.P. Lovecraft's staggering racism; Robert Heinlein's insertion of his own politics and fetishes, including a totally serious suggestion in Starship Troopers that only people who had served in the military should be allowed to vote; and Piers Anthony's increasing obsession, over the course of the Xanth series, with little girls' panties and the act of "summoning the stork." So Baum's randomly sticking the Wogglebug into the middle of a plot and leaving him there is sadly kind of par for the course. We already discussed the bright spots and flaws (such as E.T.'s crush on Mary) in the Kotzwinkle novelization.

But in the sequel to that novelization, Kotzwinkle is allowed by Spielberg to make up for those flaws by giving us a hard-working, dedicated botanist as the main character, whose plant friends have silly names on occasion, but who is given the chance to really develop as a character. You have this absolutely golden opportunity before you, since Wogglebug is in the public domain now, to show him struggling with the balance between intellect and emotion, and otherwise being not just admirable but relatable. (Baum wrote some characters who are technically quite admirable -- the Tin Man is willing to battle his literal counterpart, Chopfyte, for the hand of the Winkie girl they both love until she rejects both of them -- but really difficult to relate to at times.) Since you don't suffer from the same pressures Baum did -- if memory serves, he was kind of in Arthur Conan Doyle's position of being prodded by his publisher to grind out more novels in a series he was growing tired of -- what will be some of the ways you avoid the flaws in Baum's presentation of the Wogglebug?

I quite like it that you will allow him to keep some personal flaws and difficulties to overcome. Consider, as a counterexample, Hemingway's Old Man and the Sea. He intended to make the "old man" of the title a Christ analogy, right down to the wounded hands, and gave us a nauseatingly saintly character with no flaws whatsoever. High school teachers like to force kids to read the book because the symbolism is so easy to point out, but sadly it's not actually a good book, even by his own standards. (Interestingly, Hemingway's friend and rival, William Faulkner, also attempted to write a Christ story in his war novel A Fable, and that one too is one of his worst books.) Paradoxically, it seems easier to love a character who does have some flaws, because you've said he's also part-human, and that's a very human trait -- struggling against one's own negative tendencies.

What other techniques will you use to avoid some of the difficulties that trip up even the very greatest novelists and screenwriters? Genoma's forest has an array of powerful guardians, but Wogglebug and Sylvie will be necessary to save the forest nevertheless. So I'm betting each of them will have to reach deep inside themselves to draw on strengths, too. That's a powerful message -- just letting us watch the characters become stronger through facing the powerful enemies you described.
 
But in the sequel to that novelization, Kotzwinkle is allowed by Spielberg to make up for those flaws by giving us a hard-working, dedicated botanist as the main character, whose plant friends have silly names on occasion, but who is given the chance to really develop as a character.

That's true. I've read E.T.: The Book of the Green Planet by William Kotzwinkle. It was penned three years after the first movie's release (the novelization of the movie was written before it was actually released which explains why E.T. is so out of character in it a lot) and so E.T. is much more in character and lovable based on how the audiences came to know him through the movie. I was lucky enough to obtain a copy with the original illustrations which are excellent and serve the story well. E.T's character in this book sequel actually reminded me most fondly of how I portray the Wogglebug in at least of my writing. He's at odds with the higher intellectuals of his planet, he loves a human child and will do all he can for him, he has only a handful of other friends on his planet and they unite with him in his new journey, and of course he is equally intellectual and tenderhearted and tries his best to put both to the best of use. Especially at the same time and one of them might conflict with the other for a moment at least. The book really told a lot of E.T.'s home planet that was delightful and made sense especially along with how E.T. and the others of his kind grow like trees more than humans and his fingers will light up each time he does a great deed. The ending of the story was sensational as well as delightful (not to spoil it) and left it open for a third book that hasn't come to be unfortunately.

You have this absolutely golden opportunity before you, since Wogglebug is in the public domain now, to show him struggling with the balance between intellect and emotion, and otherwise being not just admirable but relatable.

Exactly! I am so glad you seem to understand precisely what I've been trying to explain to all here for years. Thank you for understanding.

Since you don't suffer from the same pressures Baum did -- if memory serves, he was kind of in Arthur Conan Doyle's position of being prodded by his publisher to grind out more novels in a series he was growing tired of -- what will be some of the ways you avoid the flaws in Baum's presentation of the Wogglebug?

For starters he is the main character of the series I'm writing and it's set in Genoma instead of Oz which is a fantasy land more closer connected to our world than Oz. In his first adventure he basically teams with Sylvie in getting all of the residents of the Enchanted Forest to unite to combine their magic forces together to save the Forest from the villain's wrongdoing. In this way he both connects to being the heart of all nature as an insect, and a big one as a great source for bringing together all the other elements in a big and meaningful way like a human would. He achieves his worth of being respected of having "the seven living values of intelligence" which are courtesy, kindness, honesty, loyalty, courage, perseverance, and humility. Which he had heard Professor Nowitall talk about a lot in his lectures and discourses. He knew them from the start, but just had to go through experiences to know them all completely by heart.

He then goes on in the next movie to find out about and how to use the four keys of wisdom, which appear to him in the form he is the most comfortable with of course. They represent four aspects of his best qualities. These are intelligence through honesty and good intentions, deep unconditional love, and optimism in the joy of living, and natural growth. He learns how to share all these values and wisdom keys with others around him no matter where he goes. He next learns to travel beyond Genoma and soon ends up in differnet dimensions where he gains enlightenment by the end of the series.

I quite like it that you will allow him to keep some personal flaws and difficulties to overcome. Paradoxically, it seems easier to love a character who does have some flaws, because you've said he's also part-human, and that's a very human trait -- struggling against one's own negative tendencies.

What other techniques will you use to avoid some of the difficulties that trip up even the very greatest novelists and screenwriters? Genoma's forest has an array of powerful guardians, but Wogglebug and Sylvie will be necessary to save the forest nevertheless. So I'm betting each of them will have to reach deep inside themselves to draw on strengths, too. That's a powerful message -- just letting us watch the characters become stronger through facing the powerful enemies you described.

Yes, Sylvie and the Wogglebug will both need to reach deep inside themselves to draw on their strengths to face powerful dark adversaries in the first movie and in more to come. For instance Sylvie has a fear of heights which the Wogglebug helps her to overcome in increasingly bigger ways throughout the movie series. Sylvie starts out as mostly shy and reserved (so did Harry Potter at first) and then as she grows older through the series she becomes an ever smarter and stronger heroine with a big heart that she is inspired to grow to be because of the life lessons she gains from the Wogglebug and how he learns also along the way.

I've also figured out how to always present the Wogglebug as being a three-dimensional character while also showing how he was always a good and lovable one from the start, but nonetheless have him evolve to a higher consciousness as a greater hero by the end for all the right and logical reasons and purposes.

The Wogglebug in addition to learning about how to deal with many kinds of people and situations through the Seven Living Values of Intelligence and the Four Keys of Wisdom, also gains the ability to be a great hero through dealing with dark adversaries in the right ways. At first he makes a mistake in how he does so in letting his anger and pride get the better of him but he soon learns from this mistake and corrects it shortly after in the first movie. Then from there on he only gets better at it, as well as better at all the things he is good at and was becoming good at.

He only actually achieves a full hero's degree of being dubbed as "practically perfect in every way" during the final three movies and especially the last one. In which he's evolved right up to where he is able to show courtesy and kindness in the face of even the darkest adversaries because it is to rescue a weaker creature in need of him, and after he is praised for this he just smiles modestly and says he only does his best. And in all the movies before this one you get the vibe he's getting ever closer to this great final metamorphosis through his new experiences and challenges and there is a good reason why they are all in the places they are in each movie in each order.
 
Last edited:
I'm on a tablet, so a quote will have to do.
Just to make sure that you all in particular have heard my announcement. My upcoming movie will be released publicly to Amazon, but not as a DVD. But only as being among Amazon's Instant Video purchases. Which means if anyone at all wants to see it they will have to pay to see it individually and apiece. And with Amazon's Digital Rights Management enabled it will only ever be publicly viewable through there. And nowhere else. You may watch it when it is released but you will need to pay at least a small fee Amazon charges with their Instant Videos.

And none of you or anyone on these forums will ever receive a copy of the DVD. As I am still sticking with the plan of only releasing the DVDs through my website. And I will be the only one to actually purchase them from.

And I will have a bit of a test for all who come to me to want to have a copy of the DVD. Which is that they first must be verified as having watched the movie on Amazon Instant Video by having submitted a no less than 5 star review on its Amazon page that must be verified as being completely real and legitimate through a process of them linking the reviewing to me in my email and I will look for certain things in the review to make sure also, which I will not tell you what I will look for to make sure you won't try to cheat me.

Therefore I strongly advise you all to kiss your movie party you wanted on these forums goodbye forever.
 
I'm on a tablet, so a quote will have to do.
So wait..to buy the DVD of her "movie" you have to already pay for it once, to watch it on Amazon, give it no less than a perfect score that has "legitimacy" and then pass her silly little test? What the actual hell?
 
So wait..to buy the DVD of her "movie" you have to already pay for it once, to watch it on Amazon, give it no less than a perfect score that has "legitimacy" and then pass her silly little test? What the actual hell?

To make it more clear, you will only have to pay to watch the movie once and if I do send you a copy of the DVD I will be the one paying for the copy from the manufactuer of it which is a "print-on-demand" service which charges me about as much or less than Amazon Instant Video. Then I will be the one needing to receive the address to ship it to.
 
Back