- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Can't find a single source for either sentence of this supposed quote from a wise law professor.
Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate
- Thread starter Jaimas
- Start date
idosometimes
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2016
Yeah. Me neever. I tried a few variations. Nothing.
The specific phrases do not appear like that anywhere.
I do not even understand his point here. Is he arguing that asking these types of basic questions is operating in bad faith? The definition of woman is the basis of things like women's right (kek) and feminism (kek agen).
What makes this "quote" so puzzling is that the person did not ask the question because he or she thought John could answer it. They asked it because they knew John could not provide a meaningful answer. That is good "lawyering". Doubt was "sowed" by John's nonsensical response.
John then responding with an implication that he went to law school and one of his instructors encouraged fishing expeditions to possibly get a "whopper" makes no sense here. It is the exact opposite of what occurred. It is also terrible advice for any prospective attorney who wants to win a case. These "foundational questions" he encourages could result in an answer that blows the case apart, like we saw here.
Last edited:
Sonichu-choo trainwreck
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2019
Don't question the assumptions my argument is built on
Did he stop beating his wife at 3am or 3pm?
Um, do we even know that he beat his wife?
Fuck you and your foundational question! You just say that because you'd lose the argument on if it was am or pm!!!!! I'm Brianna Wu dammit and that's all you need to know...PERIOD
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
Crazy, huh, the kinds of thoughts that come into your head when you're cruising through a 19 hour work day as Executive Director of a Super PAC.
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
- Chemical Brothers take 30 second samples of other bands work and string it together, the occasional guest vocals. They are one step above DJ Earworm.
- Name a Basement Jaxx song without google.
- I will give you Daft Punk; Harder Faster Stronger would make for some good bumper SFX.
- No Crystal Method? Fucking zero taste tranny poser.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2017
I vote Frank. Considering how he treated his ex, it would be fitting.
Sonichu-choo trainwreck
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2019
Hey John! I know!
1) Pinball is sooo old. It's a game for MAWGs
2) EDM is about the music - that would be selling out according to music historian wu
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
John will at some point say something like this in front of someone who can cancel him, because he just said there are two classes of women, "biologically female" and transwomen. This is heresy. Everyone knows trans women are women, period, full stop.
The only thing that saves John from cancellation is his complete insignificance.
Also what John made up and then attributed to an imaginary law professor is gibberish. "Foundational questions" are what you would ask to establish a FOUNDATION for the admissibility of evidence, i.e. what is this document, where is it from, who created it, are they here to establish its authenticity, is it self-authenticating and does not need further support, etc.
"Foundational questions" is also used in a number of ways outside law, none of which remotely resemble whatever the fuck John is trying and failing to say.
The fundamental or, let us say, foundational fallacy of SJWism is that no disagreement is possible without malice, and also that somehow a completely valid argument becomes invalid because of who makes it. It's a subspecies of ad hominem that operates on the belief of bad faith, regardless of the evidence or lack of evidence for it.
It's essentially a thought-stopping cliche to avoid ever even addressing or thinking about the holes in one's position. This is why mind-bogglingly stupid arguments get made blithely by these people all day long.
Last edited:
Fibrillar Collagen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2021
I really like this point because it reminds me of the theological debates of early christianity. Is Jesus God or the Son of God? Is he of God or of man? Or of man and God? Is Trinity a thing or a blasphemy? Two thousand years ago, people fought and died for ontological minutiae and theological details that, and I apoligize to the christians here that it may hurt, honestly made no difference to most of people.
What's funny is, now that God is supposedly dead, we're having the exact same ontological debates about trannies and we cast off the public square any who dares defend the wrong stance as defined by the priestly class from the ivory tower of academia.
But apart from that, they're not at all cult-like and totally wouldn't be part of the religious right had they been born 50 years earlier.
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
Which means you'll definitely be cancelling your Nintendo Online subscription any day now. Unless of course you enjoy raping trannies to death, John.
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2020
John and Jim being upset at consumerism in the same thread? What an expected crossover.
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2017
Asking since I do not remember, what stupid comment made Flynt a "poor black girl" specifically? Or is it just a reference to the Jerk and I'm overthinking it?
Grand Fucktard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2020
It's a Jerk ref highlighting one of John's go-to authority things
I think we should do this about medicare
Well, I grew up in the poorest south so don't you tell me
School systems should try
I grew up in the south around the poorest schools, so I know all
Of course, the more authority bri bri needs, the worse his childhood gets. He's simultaneously the child of entrepreneurs going to space camp while living the oppression of southern poverty
Last edited:
At least Jim tried to tell a joke, John can’t even think of anything besides, “TRANSPHOBE, I HAVE DETECTED A TRANSPHOBE”
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
Sure thing John, you go ahead and consult with your totally real lawyer about your totally real PAC activities.
Alan P.
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2022
Did John ever fix the mess that was Revolution 60? Wasn't there a bug that made it impossible to finish the game?
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2020
The girls he hired to make it didn't get paid to fix it, so no.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2017
These ungrateful bitches didn't appreciate the new, crisp $1 that John gave them for their labor! Frank should have ripped out their fucking vaginas because they obviously didn't deserve them!
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
Who knew that being Executive Director could be so much fun?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
According to HowLongToBeat, a completionist run of Stranger of Paradise takes about 55 hours. It's only been two weeks since the game's release, meaning John spent an average of almost 4 hours a day on this game, probably more considering his general lack of skill in vidya anyway. Truly the mark of someone who has a Very Important Job that takes up all of their time.
I did notice that those first few trophies are dated before the game's release, which I think comes from the demo coming out a bit before. Nice of Square Enix to let progress from the demo count in the main game. Still, even if John completed a chunk of the game prior to release, he's clearly spent multiple hours a day to get platinum this quickly.
I also looked over the trophy list, and the overwhelming majority are "complete this level" or "do this task." I'm not that familiar with the game, so I can't speak to the difficulty, but there are only two trophies related to CHAOS difficulty. If someone who's played it is in the thread, I'd like to know if it's actually a challenge. The rest seem to involve just doing a bunch of grinding until you're done leveling everything up.
In short, John continues to inadvertently prove how much of a NEET he truly is. Anyone who donates to his ScamPAC is retarded.
As a bonus, have illiterate John answering an either/or question with a yes:
