Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

Yeah Ryulong would support rewriting history cause it hurts his little feelings. What pains me though is seeing that there are others like him that are just as cringeworthy to watch.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hellfire
So I was watching Ryulong's movements for the last few, and I came upon something interesting. In general, veteran wiki users have a few traits they'll show when edit warring. Unbeknownst to them, there is a right and a wrong way to edit war. Let me elaborate:

When you want to wage internet war on a Wiki, you want to do it right.

You want your posts to be straightforward, fact-laden if possible, and arguing from logical, common-sense and NPOV viewpoints. Nothing angers shitbirds like the Ryulong crew like someone who writes a well-worded rebuttal. Don't hold back the longtext, either - go full out with it. Leave them with no wiggle room. A three-page long comprehensive breakdown, in this regard, is a great example of what to do with this, but if it's a short post filled with facts then just go with that. Get in-depth and analytical, and everything else falls into place. You beat them using the rules and by playing fair. This is why the GethN7 approach works so well.

If you do it right, you will provoke a response that goes on for fucking pages without any additional input from you, and when you do come back, you'll be able to pick and choose from the barrage of vitriol to respond to. Don't go for the bait - instead address the best, most well-written post and use that to push dialogue forward. Keep it up and you win people over eventually.

This brings us to Team Dragondicks:

Ryulong and his friends fundamentally do not know how to properly edit war. The main thing you do not want to do in an edit war is do tons of shortposts, especially disrespectful ones. Shortposts, especially ones as devoid of facts as Team Ryulong's are, generally indicate that whoever neither has the time nor effort to debunk the longpost. If a longpost has dozens of links and has in-depth analysis, and the shortpost response is LOL NO DEBUNKED ALREADY, then it makes those trying to hold the line come across as desperate, if not unhinged.

To correctly fight a longpost, you need a longpost of your own. Always be respectful and analytical during it, and make abundantly clear that you are addressing that user's concerns. Don't be a dick and dismiss them outright, explain calmly why they are factually inaccurate and you'll do just fine. At this point, you've forced the other side to respond to your longpost, and the exchange will continue as long as there's genuine discussion going on - or until one side or the other drops spaghetti. Thing is, Team Ryulong doesn't get that. In their eyes, they're automatically right, so it'd be helpful if you fucks just shut the fuck up and let them push their agenda.

This always works against them; they can't help but automatically frame themselves as ever-so-important, but they always betray themselves. Using rapid shortposts and constant reverts makes those doing them look obsessive, if not dangerously so. With Ryulong generating as many edits as Brianna Wu generates twitter posts, this is pretty much exactly what's happened; even RationalWiki, as a result, thinks Ryulong is a fucking Sperg of godzilla proportions.

It is solely through a cozy relationship with an RW staffer that Ryulong is even still around.
 
@Jaimas and with Ryulong vandalbinned and having to solve captchas because of previous behavior, in this case it is really, really amplified.

The vandal bin is the absolute best thing to happen to this thread, hands down. That last flounce of his that led to it made everything not boring and awesome again. People were complaining because the ban was lifted when he was "staying away". That was a good thing.

Edit: words.
 
That's Seriously, the guy who's been consistently BTFO'ing Ryulong ever since he showed up. I doubt he's anti-GG.

edit: And your last two links are the same, and not a neutral party by any stretch.

Shit, I have so many tabs open I get confused and forget to copy paste right.

And yeah, doubt Seriously is totally anti-GG, but he sure does argue why Ryulong a dishonest asshole from that side of the fence quite a bit.
 
And yeah, doubt Seriously is totally anti-GG, but he sure does argue why Ryulong a dishonest asshole from that side of the fence quite a bit.

Dr7PYbo.png


Fucking lol.
 
tbxXbVx.png


Currently up for vote and passing. Basically looks like "stop being lying shitheads" to me, and it's sad they need to even say this. DlagonDlagon's gonna shit his pants and probably get shuffled along the line to SJWiki if this passes.
Those are pretty good, and if voted in are as good as any guidelines as I've seen for a site with bias. It's hard to believe they'd be rigorously enforced, but I've been pleasantly surprised by the rising maturity levels on RW since saner minds decided to stop Ryulong's article ownership issues.

It is possible to disagree on something and not treat everyone with even minor disagreements like shit.

Nice to see Ryulong having a positive effect somewhere, even if it is in reaction to his douchery and is entirely an unintended consequence.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
Back