Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Snoring, Airhorn, the sound of ctrl + v, snoring.
Given his age, lifestyle and fitness level I've got five bucks that says he has sleep apnea. Add that to how many calories he's consuming, how little he exerts himself and the fact that he spends twelve hours a day staring at an LCD screen--he probably isn't tired enough to sleep properly anyway.
 
Given his age, lifestyle and fitness level I've got five bucks that says he has sleep apnea. Add that to how many calories he's consuming, how little he exerts himself and the fact that he spends twelve hours a day staring at an LCD screen--he probably isn't tired enough to sleep properly anyway.
Wrong yet again, delusional child. I cut off my $240 per month cable service and became a mogul overnight. I sleep blissfully on 26,000+ one dollar bills that I do not owe to Quasi.
 
Given his age, lifestyle and fitness level I've got five bucks that says he has sleep apnea. Add that to how many calories he's consuming, how little he exerts himself and the fact that he spends twelve hours a day staring at an LCD screen--he probably isn't tired enough to sleep properly anyway.
It's a common misconception that being overweight causes sleep apnea. I run as much as Patrick used to claim and I am around his same age so a hell of a lot thinner.

I got it. It's more genetics I think than anything else.

Pat's obesity is causing a slew of other issues. Hypertension, diabetes, excessive estrogen levels, etc.

Does he ever even mention those stupid free weights he put on his wife's credit card anymore?

My single greatest fear as a father is my son turning out like Patrick.
 
View attachment 3144134
This tard rage isn't even true.

The Patriot Missile system didn't really work, there's an entire book about this farce but it comes down to two points.

Saddam had removed weight from the nose of the SCUD in an effort to get more which made them unstable and unpredictable. Most of what was being attributed as kills were in fact the SCUDs crashing.

The other is the system had problems with the code. The way this system worked is it would detect what it thought was a missile, wait X amount of time, then look for the missile where it expected it to be based on time and speed. If it detected the missile in this area of the sky it would launch, if it didn't it wouldn't.

There was issues with the code that caused a running timer error. Basically the longer the system was turned on the further the clock would be out of sync. Because this clock is what determined how long the system should wait and where to look it meant it was looking in the wrong place.
There was a prominent SCUD that hit Dhahran and killed 27 personnel and injured an additional 98. Witnesses confirmed that a Patriot had been launched to intercept, but U.S. CENTCOM couldn't confirm it.

ABM technology is notably unreliable, even into the current year. Fat Pat, as usual, doesn't do his research. But did we really expect that he would?
 
Last edited:
I just wonder why he didn't reference Iron Dome.
Curious that is. I can't speak from that perspective, only from what I've trained for (and yes, this might earn me a TMI); there is a reason U.S. military personnel train, at nauseam, for NBC during exercises. The main reason is the sheer amount of chemical and biological weapons that established enemies possess, and have zero qualms about using them should the tactical and strategic need arise. The second... is because a good chunk of these would be distributed either by ballistic missile or bomb canister drop, likely from aircraft. A SCUD, or equivalent, is a pretty large object in of itself. And yet, the likelihood of intercept is still small, due to all of the associated factors. An unguided canister is considerably smaller in scale, for less than what an ABM platform could target. As such. we are trained to expect that at least some of these warheads will impact on the base and disperse the agents via aerosol.

The one pass I would've given to Pat was this: he never served in the military. Any branch. He did not receive any of the training, whatsoever. As such, it would be out of ignorance. However, he argued over ballistic missile technology, and specifically, the effectiveness of the SCUD. The largest threat SCUDs ever had in theater wasn't from explosive or impact damage, but chemical weapons dispersal.

Pat. You're an idiot. You have zero functional knowledge of any of this. Stop while you're behind. Light years behind.
 
Oopsie doodles, child. Patrick S. Tomlinson @stealthygeek admits on tape that he will defy the court order to #PayQuasi. How he intends to avoid the legal ramifications of doing so is anyone's guess.

Archived for posterity:
 
Patrick couldn't nut up and meet Andrew when he was right in the neighborhood. I don't feature him going to Ontario to do the same.

Of course, the bitch might try something else with his identity, but we'll see.
Well, he's going to use this to try to sell pity copies of Starship Homo so he can fund the international lawsuit he desperately needs to make the atalker network collapse like a house of cards, of course
Unless you are Emily Brontë knock off that dialect writing shit. It's distracting, unhelpful, and lazy.
Case in point: Irvine Welsh. As opposed to Pat, his stories are typically interesting enough to overcome the distractions he deliberately introduces

I don't know if this tidbit has come over to us from litcrit, but a local Milwaukee sci fi retard did about a half hour of his podcast on Pat. Despite thinking the rascals are embarrassing themselves, having lived a life as a bullying victim, and begging Pat to come hang out with his sci fi club, this guy immediately concludes "Pat. You need to just ignore this for a couple of months until they get bored. That's how it works"
 
I'm glad he's using his trademark "child" again, it seems Pat has turned to exclusively using "stalker" as of recent. I like thinking of "child" as Pat's catchphrase, like he's a character. But not like that silly Star Trek book where some Star Trek writer wrote him as "Captain Patrick Tomlinson", but a book where he's appropriately a low level villain you can't help but love where he constantly grunts NO CHILD to our heroes before his fatness is beaten down. I won't be sued if I write a low level villain named "Rick Tomlinson" who oinks at our heroes, will I?
 
Last edited:
Piggy tries to pick a fight with Hercules:

View attachment 3146556

Reminder that this creep tweeted this two days ago:

View attachment 3146558
How many other tweets has Fatrick made pertaining to sexualizing young children? We know he associates with pedos and the publisher for his books is full of them. It's no coincidence that Fatrick is using pedophile tactics. Thank god he doesn't have access to his kid. If he molested her, I don't think there's a strong enough rope to hang this fat pedo.
 
I'm glad he's using his trademark "child" again, it seems Pat has turned to exclusively using "stalker" as of recent. I like thinking of "child" as Pat's catchphrase, like he's a character. But not like that silly Star Trek book where some Star Trek writer wrote him as "Captain Patrick Tomlinson", but a book where's appropriately a low level villain you can't but love where he constantly grunts NO CHILD to our heroes before his fatness is beaten down. I won't be sued if I write a low level villain named "Rick Tomlinson" who oinks at our heroes, will I?

"They had distinctive snouts...and their hands were sometimes hoof-like in appearance"

"They were also known for their "stubborn pride."...However, they enjoyed a good argument, and they even considered it a sport on Tellar....Tellarites often began an interaction with a series of complaints; this was how they started arguments with someone they had recently met. If they had nothing to complain about, they would simply insult the person."
 
Let's do a deep dive on that harmonica line, because it actually hurts to read.

It's so fucking clunky. That's the sort of thing a teenager would write, both in terms of the outdated monkeycheese humour and the painfully awkward way the sentence is constructed. The simile itself is a non-sequitur and not clever in the slightest - I'm assuming the character speaking the line is trying to open a safe or a vault (Pat likes his heists), and there's no logical or humorous connection between trying to open something and trying to give a frog a haircut with a harmonica. It's not witty or clever in any way. It's just lolrandom humour.

Now we do need to take into account that this line is spoken by a character, not the narrator. But it still fails on every level. Nobody talks like that - even if you have a character that is fond of lolrandom humour, no human being talking to another human being constructs a sentence like that. "About as effective as" is so awkward and sophomoric that you wouldn't find it in real dialogue. It has way too many syllables to have any comic timing, for a start. A human might say "So far nothing's working, it's like trying to give a frog a haircut with a harmonica." It's still not funny, but at least it's not trying to awkwardly manoeuvre the non-joke into position like a drunk trucker reversing an 18-wheeler through a subway station. (Note to Pat: the simile I used there works better because both sides of it share a recognisable concept - the trucker proposition is recognisably awkward, then the audience mentally applies that to the other side of the simile, and therefore understand the level of awkwardness that I intended to convey with regards to your sentence structure. Some free writing advice because, fuck me, you need some.)

What the fuck even is this character, anyway? He's a safe-cracker, presumably a professional. He's a career criminal. His use of "everthin" instead of "everything" is intending to convey that this man is gruff, salt-of-the-earth, and recalls stereotypical "criminal" accents like cockney or pirate drawl. He calls the door/safe "her", recalling sailor/pirate cant. "Everthin" recalls a bald, fat man with scars who doesn't suffer fools. Now try to imagine that ridiculous purple monkey ninja pirate dishwasher humour coming out of someone like that. It makes your brain throw a cog it's so incongruous. If the character was a 16-year-old cyberpunk hacker trying to open the door with a laptop, then that line would work. Maybe they talk like that all the time and the other characters just roll their eyes at their immaturity. That could be quite good comic relief, handled properly. But that character would NEVER call the door "she" or say "everthin". This is just broken. Re-draft and try again.

Congratulations Pat, you managed to write a character into the ground in a single line of spoken dialogue. That's so incompetent it's almost impressive. Thing is, though, Pat thinks this is some of his BEST work. That means he thinks his lol frog haircut harmonica line is actually witty. It's not. It's just random words. Something witty would use a simile, analogy or metaphor that relates in some way to ineffectively trying to open a door. How about:

"No use so far. Might as well have brought chocolate lockpicks for all the good this is doin' "
"Nothing, boss. I might as well drop trou and try and fart the fuckin' thing open."
"Nothing's working. Might as well be tryin' to open an airlock with a toothpick."

It took me 30 seconds to come up with THREE better lines than your best work, Pat, and I'm sleep deprived. Bitch no wonder the Kindle ebooks I write as a hobby and barely promote outsell your "novels". You seriously fucking suck at writing. Not in a "bad for a novelist" way, but in a "5/10 for a 10th grade creative writing assignment" way.
The stupid metaphor doesn't even make any sense for that situation. Yes, the harmonica is the wrong thing to shave a frog with, but the frog doesn't have any hair to begin with. After you've finished shaving with the harmonica, the frog's as hairless as if you've used a razor. The correct application for that metaphor would be showing up for the job with all the wrong safe-cracking tools for the brand of safe onsite - but that brand was made with some major defect that means you don't need the tools to do the job anyway - you just pull the battery out of the locking mechanism and the safe automatically opens itself. If he'd actually bothered to come up with a metaphor that worked for the situation, he could have made it as wonky as he wanted, and then looked a tiny bit clever when it turned out the metaphor has some meaning for the situation. Still would have looked like a spaz for coming up with the wacky metaphor in the first place, but it'd be better than what Fat did.

The subpoena to patrickstomlinson.net went completely uncontested and Fatso didn't do shit with the info
What you don't realize is that Fat has turned the person's identity over to the SWFA, and they are preparing their revenge in the shadows. Fat doesn't need $100,000 in cash to repay the loan, he needs $100,000 worth of his personal pepperoni, and once they've gotten their hands on the children of all those rascals, he shall repay in full!

The one pass I would've given to Pat was this: he never served in the military. Any branch. He did not receive any of the training, whatsoever. As such, it would be out of ignorance. However, he argued over ballistic missile technology, and specifically, the effectiveness of the SCUD. The largest threat SCUDs ever had in theater wasn't from explosive or impact damage, but chemical weapons dispersal.

Pat. You're an idiot. You have zero functional knowledge of any of this. Stop while you're behind. Light years behind.
Don't give him even the one pass. He's passing himself off as an expert. We've routinely seen him try to tell people with education and field experience why they're wrong, and refuse to listen to any sort of correction from people with real world knowledge. He's wrong, and he's the worst sort of idiot - the kind who refuses to ever learn. He deserves to be given full condemnation for his errors.
 
Let's do a deep dive on that harmonica line, because it actually hurts to read.
Co-signed. The one thing I’d add is that the use of effective in that line is also an amateur/shitty writer mistake. It’s not a word this particular character would use, even if he knew what it meant. Only a complete simpleton could read that line and not be distracted by how wrong it is. But Fat thinks he made a funny.

I really don’t think this bitch has ever had a proper editor. And if he did, I’m sure he is not one who copes well with edits and critical feedback.

Everything he writes, including his tweets, is impossible to read without being distracted by the awkward, atrocious writing. He just can’t write worth a runny shit. Which makes his arrogance even funnier and his ruination more entertaining to watch.
 
Patrick is turning 42 on the 18th. Here's hoping he chums the waters with an anti-fash shirt and finally gets to beat up Nazi #6? #7?
birthdaywish.PNG
birthdaywish2.jpg
birthdaywish3.PNG(A, L)
 
Oopsie doodles, child. Patrick S. Tomlinson @stealthygeek admits on tape that he will defy the court order to #PayQuasi. How he intends to avoid the legal ramifications of doing so is anyone's guess.

If you don't have money to pay a judgment and just blow it off, the worst it will do is collect interest if you're basically judgment-proof. Not only is Pat (or rather his wife) not that, but if you actively tell the court "go fuck yourself you pig judge" he might get a bit more energetic.
Patrick is turning 42 on the 18th. Here's hoping he chums the waters with an anti-fash shirt and finally gets to beat up Nazi #6? #7?
Why doesn't he make millions in MMA? He's such an enormous badass over here, knocking over fascists like tenpins.
 
If you don't have money to pay a judgment and just blow it off, the worst it will do is collect interest if you're basically judgment-proof. Not only is Pat (or rather his wife) not that, but if you actively tell the court "go fuck yourself you pig judge" he might get a bit more energetic.
Such a shame for Patty that Wisconsin is a one-party consent state when it comes to recording phone calls. Seems these calls would absolutely be admissible in court.
 
If you don't have money to pay a judgment and just blow it off, the worst it will do is collect interest if you're basically judgment-proof. Not only is Pat (or rather his wife) not that, but if you actively tell the court "go fuck yourself you pig judge" he might get a bit more energetic.
As long as you have property to lien, you're not judgment-proof. True, Quasi may not be able to force Fats out of his home if Wisconsin recognizes the doctrine of Tenancy by the Entireties, but good luck trying to sell a piece of property with a lien against it.
 
Back