US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
GuntPunt said:
Introspection is dead.
View attachment 3147466
Click to expand...
Just continues to show that if Republicans want voter ID in place, they must exploit the same loopholes Democrats do currently. Nothing will make Democrats shoot themselves in the foot better than making them eat their own shit. Watch how quick they'll jump on voter ID when a Republican wins using the same shenanigans. Won't be no racism then.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: the fall of man, Humble Crab, spiritofamermaid and 17 others
Delta Integrale said:
Just continues to show that if Republicans want voter ID in place, they must exploit the same loopholes Democrats do currently. Nothing will make Democrats shoot themselves in the foot better than making them eat their own shit. Watch how quick they'll jump on voter ID when a Republican wins using the same shenanigans. Won't be no racism then.
Click to expand...

A reminder, from the Excellent Days of Rage review I keep quoting.

Setting up fake petitions to get your enemies to sign themselves up on your Enemies List is a tactic I expect to be pretty bipartisan. Lefties’ enemies lists will have fewer prominent Righties and Righty infrastructure types on them, just because there are fewer of those.

If you notice who Lefties really tend to go after, it’s two kinds of people:
  1. Righties who might be growing in popularity and/or influence, to make them radioactive and make others afraid to associate with them
  2. regular people, who have employment and social fragility, to make them scared to admit WrongThink.
So Lefties will target more people on top and on bottom, status-wise. Righties will target more in the middle, go for the Lefty NCO corps. That’s because the biggest impact the Right can make at this stage of conflict is to destroy, damage, or neutralize Lefty Institutions. But Lefty Institutions are massive cultural power centers. Universities, Media, Bureaucracies, Organizations/Foundations, Cities.

The Right is not big enough or organized enough to really destroy Lefty Institutions. Like the Left, they’ll be looking to intimidate people out of the game and take away enemy tools. Example: Institutional and media bias means radical Leftist tactics are accepted, which means radical Leftist tactics become normalized. Ergo, the only way the Right can delegitimize Lefty tactics is to use them, at which point they’ll become The Worst Things Ever Done By Man. My guess is the Right will start using Leftist tactics against members of Leftist Institutions: “This is what you ordered. Eat it.”

Some of this could actually be constructive for campus civility. For instance, I’ve long argued that if a Righty speaker is disrupted on a college campus, then campus Righties should *disrupt every single Lefty speaker for the remainder of the school year.* Of course, Righties can’t get away with what Lefties get away with, so no swarming, no intimidating people, no pulling fire alarms. What Righties can get away with: standing up and chanting, at the top of their lungs, “THIS IS WHAT YOU DO TO US.” In multiple stages, for maximum distraction. Leaving peacefully, of course. The bad news is that’s about as cheerful as these face-offs are going to get. They can and probably will get much nastier.

Specifically, I think the hard Right is going to discover the joys of “nonviolent property damage,” which the Left has foolishly normalized. I’m always puzzled when Lefty journalists praise “nonviolent property damage” as if they don’t have offices, homes, and personal property. University administrators who let Lefties disrupt Righty speakers with impunity also have offices, homes, and personal property. Heck, when Lefty rioters get arrested, papers print their names and mugshots. And they have homes, and cars, and … you know the drill.

The advantage of “nonviolent property damage” for Righties: one person can do it without trying to put together a conspiracy. Nor does it injure people. But let’s be blunt: though no people are hurt it is, despite what Lefties say, violence and it would get very ugly, very fast. And it wouldn’t be entirely effective. The Institutions wouldn’t be destroyed. They’d still be there.
Click to expand...

status451.com

Days of Rage

“People have completely forgotten that in 1972 we had over nineteen hundred domestic bombings in the United States.” — Max Noel, FBI (ret.) Recently, I had my head torn off by a b…
status451.com status451.com

If you want the Democrats to stop using a tactic, get the Republicans to start using it. The second Cernovich used cancel culture against a Pedophile director to get him fired, cancel culture was suddenly the worst thing ever and a completely unfair thing to use against a man who never even got a day in court. Hell, when the right started using ballot collections and the like in ... California? Bouncing off of local churches to organize it all? They shut that shit down HARD, because that tactic is only valid when a Democrat uses it in a purple or red state. Republicans using it in a blue state isn't fair.

If you want to destroy lefty identity politics in schools? Force civics classes and the rebirth of the American Identity, something that they have subtly destroyed over the past 50 years -- basically ever since the left fled into academia in the 70s, again, after the days of rage. Civics classes for every single grade level -- trust me, we can cut back on some of the "The holocaust was the worst thing in the history of time and you white people are to blame for it and every other evil in history" teaching that 40% of public school is nowadays. Use IdPol with right wing identities to push back against the left's. Remember, you can make a strong case the CRT, BLM, and LGBTQP are religious belief, or at least belief. Civics you can't attack in the same way, and I wager "American children should learn more about Civics and American Government" polls pretty darned well.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: 6thRanger, Donny Cheese, Desu Mountain and 40 others
CrippleThreat said:
Plus, if he wants libtarded faggots who vote blue, he can have them all. Same goes for Adams in NYC. The city is already gay enough.
Click to expand...
Are they trying to shore up electoral votes/representatives that they lost? Are they virtue signaling? Are they trying to make Florida more red? All three? Something else? What's the play here?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid and Vyse Inglebard
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Idiot Asshole, Isaac Clarke and 35 others
thismanlies said:
The shot
Click to expand...
Dark-skinned people don't look good in brown/tan clothing. Didn't we already go over this with Obama? Virtually nobody looks snappy in brown anyway, it's a dowdy academic color. In politics you want lively colors to suggest you're doing something or black to suggest you have a somber attitude. Blue suits are for people trying to be different.
Pig Cups said:
Supposedly, she worked for a “conservative” radio station. Just goes to show how gutless these people are in the face of *any* racism allegation, regardless of how ludicrous and false it is.
Click to expand...
It's so easy to hire these people and push hard-right propaganda. You could build a whole media empire around saying what nobody else will say. None of the right-wing media that ever pops up is hard enough. Ahhh if only I had millions of dollars, or connections, or a clue.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AnitaSarsleezian, Yamma Damma and 4 others
Pig Cups said:
Aaaannnnd fired…
View attachment 3147692
Supposedly, she worked for a “conservative” radio station. Just goes to show how gutless these people are in the face of *any* racism allegation, regardless of how ludicrous and false it is.
Click to expand...
how was her tweet racist? What can brown do for you was UPS' slogan at one point. JFC. So brown is now a racial slur? I guess every color other than WHITE is a slur now.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Hüftpriester, Confused Doggo and 11 others
tehpope said:
how was her tweet racist?
Click to expand...
It’s racist because the self-flagellating, self-loathing, self-castigating leftists who raised the alarm think that black and brown individuals are incapable of holding jobs outside of the low-information, minimum-wage, grunt work variety. This is known as The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations.

You see, these racist leftists are the ones who look at black and brown people and see nothing but maids, delivery people, garbagemen, janitors, landscapers, toll booth workers, and lawn jockeys. So when Amber simply pointed out that Kumala’s outfit resembled that of a UPS delivery person, they twisted that into “SHE’S SAYING THAT BEING A LOWLY DELIVERY PERSON IS A DISTINCTLY BLACK/BROWN THING BY DEFAULT BECAUSE KAMALA’S BLACK. DAS WAYCISSREEEEEEEEE.”

Jokes on them because they, unlike Amber, are the only ones who are making the connection between blacks and delivery drivers in the first place, exposing their own racist thinking. Yet, they’ll accuse their opponents of that which they are guilty of. It’s all so tiresome.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Humble Crab, spiritofamermaid, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob and 12 others
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: the fall of man, spiritofamermaid, Open Window Maniac and 3 others
She worked in a radio station in D.C and went against the T so only a matter of time:

" I spoke critically of protests in favor of 'trans kids' at the University of North Texas. A group of maniacal left-wing activists who want to chemically castrate children in the name of 'gender affirmation' came after me. All of a sudden, the Kamala tweet was being re-framed as racist and dozens of Twitter accounts were bragging about contacting my employers about my "bigotry,"' Athey explained in a column for the publication."
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Humble Crab, spiritofamermaid, Confused Doggo and 7 others
Pig Cups said:
“Andrew”??? I prefer to call him by his real name, Robert Francis. It reinforces that he’s a pasty cracker trying to appropriate a Latino identity to try and score updoots from TX Hispanics. He’s fucking gringo trash who deserves nothing but contempt from the choir he’s trying to play to.

Beta is *still* their best choice, though. For some reason, a lot of people really like him and see him as some sort of charismatic RFK-esque figure. Open progressives generally don’t work, and while Beta fits that mold to a T, there is still a sizable population that looks at him as a moderate choice (especially when juxtaposed against people like Jessica Cisneros). So he’s got some star power (probably residual from his first senate run), and that really benefits the democrats because:

1.) They have no new faces to run that are remotely winnable in the state, and they have to run SOMEBODY, lest they cease to exist as a party. Beta is a great throwaway candidate. Why?
2.) Because he’s able to pull in fundraising. People inside and outside of TX love to throw money at him, so not only can he sustain his own campaign (thanks partly to his wife coming from money), but…
3.) The money he pulls in can be used to support vulnerable democrats in other states. 2022 is looking like it’ll be a bloodbath, and the democrats are going to have to sink whatever money they have left into states that they really shouldn’t have to (VA and the NJ governor’s race are good examples of foreshadowing). If they’re having to pump money into normally-safe states, which is something they obviously dread, TX is going to be really low on their list of priorities.

In summary, Beta is a relatively self-sufficient candidate who doesn’t need money from the DNC. The democrats can instead use him to generate funds for more urgent needs, while still appearing to give a shit about TX. And Beta himself gets another go in the sandbox to keep himself entertained, while boosting his profile further. Everybody wins.

Edit: Yeah, TX is faced with a reeaall tough choice.
View attachment 3147686
View attachment 3147687
Click to expand...
This motherfucker is a danger to kids so it's no surprising he supports cutting off healthy body parts (he wrote poetry about visualizing running over a bunch of kids with his car and how euphoric it made him feel, it's not a very good poem either).

He also lost to the Zodiac Killer by 3% cause white bitches in metro areas think he's "charming". He's basically an attempt at a Hispanic Obama with a bunch of skeletons in his closet.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Oats12345, Spasticus Autisticus and 2 others
Obummer showed up at the White House today to do some PR for expanding Obummercare, and probably restock on Adrenochrome.

88768.png





Can someone determine what this RINO cunt is smoking? Unless the GA voter laws are so watered down they won't stop anything, and Walker doesn't punch a puppy, I can't see him losing to Warnock unless all the principled RINOs vote democrat. Again.

67567.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Humble Crab, spiritofamermaid, Oats12345 and 15 others
mandatorylurk said:
Can someone determine what this RINO cunt is smoking? Unless the GA voter laws are so watered down they won't stop anything, and Walker doesn't punch a puppy, I can't see him losing to Warnock unless all the principled RINOs vote democrat. Again.
Click to expand...
The way it's worded makes me believe it's RINO fuckery and a way to justify withholding support from the RNC. From what Barnes and Barris talked about yesterday the Georgia voter law isn't great and all the same people are in place. They were very positive on Walker but the rest of Georgia not so much.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Oats12345, Yamma Damma and 3 others
Pig Cups said:
“Andrew”??? I prefer to call him by his real name, Robert Francis. It reinforces that he’s a pasty cracker trying to appropriate a Latino identity to try and score updoots from TX Hispanics. He’s fucking gringo trash who deserves nothing but contempt from the choir he’s trying to play to.

Beta is *still* their best choice, though. For some reason, a lot of people really like him and see him as some sort of charismatic RFK-esque figure. Open progressives generally don’t work, and while Beta fits that mold to a T, there is still a sizable population that looks at him as a moderate choice (especially when juxtaposed against people like Jessica Cisneros). So he’s got some star power (probably residual from his first senate run), and that really benefits the democrats because:

1.) They have no new faces to run that are remotely winnable in the state, and they have to run SOMEBODY, lest they cease to exist as a party. Beta is a great throwaway candidate. Why?
2.) Because he’s able to pull in fundraising. People inside and outside of TX love to throw money at him, so not only can he sustain his own campaign (thanks partly to his wife coming from money), but…
3.) The money he pulls in can be used to support vulnerable democrats in other states. 2022 is looking like it’ll be a bloodbath, and the democrats are going to have to sink whatever money they have left into states that they really shouldn’t have to (VA and the NJ governor’s race are good examples of foreshadowing). If they’re having to pump money into normally-safe states, which is something they obviously dread, TX is going to be really low on their list of priorities.

In summary, Beta is a relatively self-sufficient candidate who doesn’t need money from the DNC. The democrats can instead use him to generate funds for more urgent needs, while still appearing to give a shit about TX. And Beta himself gets another go in the sandbox to keep himself entertained, while boosting his profile further. Everybody wins.

Edit: Yeah, TX is faced with a reeaall tough choice.
View attachment 3147686
View attachment 3147687
Click to expand...
This cringe makes my skin crawl.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Yamma Damma and Vyse Inglebard
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back