- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I think the statement is substantively true about at least Iraq, although we never "occupied" Afghanistan as such. We could put some well dressed fop in Kabul. And then he's called President. Even though he's essentially mayor of Kabul. But we really did have almost as catastrophic an occupation as Russia has had an invasion, even though frankly our invasion went fantastically.The fantasy retellings of Iraq and Afghanistan have begun. In another 20 years people like you will be saying America managed to conquer the two countries without any casualties, using only 3 Humvees and 2 squads of Marines who had just woken up hungover from a weekend booze-up, killed over 900 thousand armed, trained and equipped Iraqi Army and insurgents (who were being supplied with current-gen anti-armor and MANPADs by China) and instilled democracy in the region for the forseeable future.
It's just that the people planning it had weird delusions that they'd greet us as liberators and somehow the power vacuum of Saddam Hussein suddenly being gone wouldn't invite claimants to the throne. Well, we weren't greeted as liberators, but the occupiers we were.
Nevertheless, seriously, it wasn't as disastrous as this. It would have been better to avoid that war at all, but at least we actually got to the occupation stage, as poorly as it went after that.
For a comparison, imagine we invade Mexico and they kick our ass.