War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
Right Winger Take - When being assaulted just drop your pants and assume the position so that maybe the attacker let's you live after becoming satisfied.

The absolute fucking state of western right wingers, they've spent so much time obsessing over leftists that they're turning into them to a point where their retarded spiels sound the same, they just apply the same retarded wokey takes to different targets.
It's just new brand of NPC in the field. The same breed that thinks if you think Ukraine has the right to independence means you're reddit.
 
It's just new brand of NPC in the field. The same breed that thinks if you think Ukraine has the right to independence means you're reddit.
Their thought patterns are exemplified by my new avatar.

"If the globohomo supports X, then I must support Y, even if they pump out unfiltered shit, because I'm bored with my quiet, suburban/office rat life and this is the way I make it matter."

Like seriously, all their indignation and moral crusading is just inverse SJW shit.
 
He already fled to the other thread to farm likes after being called an idiot here.
It's not like people in here can't go there to continue the conversation. This thread is not conducive to genuine discussion, if you share the wrong opinion you get swamped with downdoots and berated until you comply or fuck off, usually to the Happenings thread.
There used to be actual articles and news discussion going on in here but now it's mostly just the same few people droning on about how evil Russia is and posting inflammatory pictures to all angrily agree are bad.

Right Winger Take - When being assaulted just drop your pants and assume the position so that maybe the attacker let's you live after becoming satisfied.

The absolute fucking state of western right wingers, they've spent so much time obsessing over leftists that they're turning into them to a point where their retarded spiels sound the same, they just apply the same retarded wokey takes to different targets.
What does this have to do with political lean? And he isn't saying Ukraine shouldn't defend itself, in fact he explicitly said he believes Ukraine should fight back in the other thread. He was saying he doesn't agree with sending them stuff that he thinks will ultimately end up in the wrong hands. Agree or disagree but stop lumping in people you don't 100% agree with as pro-Russian or anti-Ukrainian. It is bizarre.



Frankly, only pro-Ukrainian stuff is allowed in this thread. I posted The Chieftain video and a breakdown of it (to spare viewing if preferred) and not one person bothered to discuss a US Army Lt Colonel's take on what he's seen from the conflict up to the date of that video, particularly with regards to armor. My guess is because he wasn't explicitly pro-Ukrainian and celebrating their epic victories, instead pointing out the editing and reality of some of the clips and pics he's seen from his perspective as a US Army tanker.
This may have been viewed as pro-Russian, even though he's a US Army officer and criticizes Russia the very same.

Not that I care if anyone pays attention to any particular video, it's just an example of an established pattern. This thread isn't for discussing news in a general sense, it's for discussing a specific slant. Then when people choose not to participate because you won't let them, you make fun of them amongst yourselves.
 
It's not like people in here can't go there to continue the conversation. This thread is not conducive to genuine discussion, if you share the wrong opinion you get swamped with downdoots and berated until you comply or fuck off, usually to the Happenings thread.
There used to be actual articles and news discussion going on in here but now it's mostly just the same few people droning on about how evil Russia is and posting inflammatory pictures to all angrily agree are bad.
Nah, fuck off. I gave the guy a cohesive answer to his comment in this thread that he clearly didn't like for him to interject in the other with "THAT GUY IS JUST A UKIE SHILLLLLL! HE DIDN'T AGREE WITH ME!". Total faggot.
 
It's not like people in here can't go there to continue the conversation. This thread is not conducive to genuine discussion, if you share the wrong opinion you get swamped with downdoots and berated until you comply or fuck off, usually to the Happenings thread.
There used to be actual articles and news discussion going on in here but now it's mostly just the same few people droning on about how evil Russia is and posting inflammatory pictures to all angrily agree are bad.


What does this have to do with political lean? And he isn't saying Ukraine shouldn't defend itself, in fact he explicitly said he believes Ukraine should fight back in the other thread. He was saying he doesn't agree with sending them stuff that he thinks will ultimately end up in the wrong hands. Agree or disagree but stop lumping in people you don't 100% agree with as pro-Russian or anti-Ukrainian. It is bizarre.



Frankly, only pro-Ukrainian stuff is allowed in this thread. I posted The Chieftain video and a breakdown of it (to spare viewing if preferred) and not one person bothered to discuss a US Army Lt Colonel's take on what he's seen from the conflict up to the date of that video, particularly with regards to armor. My guess is because he wasn't explicitly pro-Ukrainian and celebrating their epic victories, instead pointing out the editing and reality of some of the clips and pics he's seen from his perspective as a US Army tanker.
This may have been viewed as pro-Russian, even though he's a US Army officer and criticizes Russia the very same.

Not that I care if anyone pays attention to any particular video, it's just an example of an established pattern. This thread isn't for discussing news in a general sense, it's for discussing a specific slant. Then when people choose not to participate because you won't let them, you make fun of them amongst yourselves.
What is there to discuss in the pro-Russian narrative? Do tell. Do tell how Russia is a rational actor in this situation without devolving into a mindtrap of "hurr dürr Nazis globohomo".

Nobody engaged with you on that video, because you didn't provide any context as to why you posted it here. Military tactics are a niche field and in the grand scheme of things, considering the overarching nature of Russia-Ukraine conflict, they matter little. But you can elaborate on why it mattered.
 
If the US did this I'd assume the country literally runs on blood being spilled somewhere in the world to function.
Idk I just described the plot to the anime that guy's pfp came from. Except instead of the US, it's a guild of technicians that provide steampunk weapons to two nations. They make sure each side has parity with each other so that neither ever gets the upper hand and threatens the guild. Even down to enforcing gentlemanly warfare so there is never a decisive victory. This all takes place on two planetoids orbiting each other, both populated by people who left earth centuries ago.
 
It's not like people in here can't go there to continue the conversation. This thread is not conducive to genuine discussion, if you share the wrong opinion you get swamped with downdoots and berated until you comply or fuck off, usually to the Happenings thread.
There used to be actual articles and news discussion going on in here but now it's mostly just the same few people droning on about how evil Russia is and posting inflammatory pictures to all angrily agree are bad.


What does this have to do with political lean? And he isn't saying Ukraine shouldn't defend itself, in fact he explicitly said he believes Ukraine should fight back in the other thread. He was saying he doesn't agree with sending them stuff that he thinks will ultimately end up in the wrong hands. Agree or disagree but stop lumping in people you don't 100% agree with as pro-Russian or anti-Ukrainian. It is bizarre.



Frankly, only pro-Ukrainian stuff is allowed in this thread. I posted The Chieftain video and a breakdown of it (to spare viewing if preferred) and not one person bothered to discuss a US Army Lt Colonel's take on what he's seen from the conflict up to the date of that video, particularly with regards to armor. My guess is because he wasn't explicitly pro-Ukrainian and celebrating their epic victories, instead pointing out the editing and reality of some of the clips and pics he's seen from his perspective as a US Army tanker.
This may have been viewed as pro-Russian, even though he's a US Army officer and criticizes Russia the very same.

Not that I care if anyone pays attention to any particular video, it's just an example of an established pattern. This thread isn't for discussing news in a general sense, it's for discussing a specific slant. Then when people choose not to participate because you won't let them, you make fun of them amongst yourselves.
Yes, I agree this thread has a certain bias but come on, pro-russia takes amount to "Ukraine should surrender because globohomo, based russia, duurrrr" and every single one that may have been valid like Ukrainians potentially executing POWs was invalidated by russians acting like animals, an average soldier won't give a fuck about geneva convention when he learns what the enemy did to people he may have very well known.
 
Screenshot_20220409-045639~2.png

Screenshot_20220409-050052~2.png


Screenshot_20220409-045513~2.png
 
Their thought patterns are exemplified by my new avatar.

"If the globohomo supports X, then I must support Y, even if they pump out unfiltered shit, because I'm bored with my quiet, suburban/office rat life and this is the way I make it matter."

Like seriously, all their indignation and moral crusading is just inverse SJW shit.

Contrarianism, plain and simple. Another flavor of emotional imaturity, I get that it's easy to become jaded with how politically charged everything is nowadays, but even if there loudmouth screeching manbabies, or simply ignorant fools going too far on the other side, it doesn't mean that they are wrong. I don't want to start a flame war, but a good example is women's rights. Just because some feminists can be as far from pleasant as possible, it doesn't mean that women don't deserve rights, that sexual harassment is good, and so on. Contrarians have no principles other than looking for the right flag to wave, preferably the one that pisses off the most people. It is no coincidence that this kind of behaviour is often associated with people on their early teens, because it is little but deep seated immaturity!

Yes, I agree this thread has a certain bias but come on, pro-russia takes amount to "Ukraine should surrender because globohomo, based russia, duurrrr" and every single one that may have been valid like Ukrainians potentially executing POWs was invalidated by russians acting like animals, an average soldier won't give a fuck about geneva convention when he learns what the enemy did to people he may have very well known.
I don't agree with extrajudicial executions, torture and the likes of it, but I can understand why the people that have been impacted by the violence directly, seeing atrocities that hit much closer to home, decide to act like this. Not everyone can be like Gandhi in these times, even more so when your morning alarm is the sound of explosions, followed by gunshots. The belief that there are no atrocities in one of the sides is delusional, but so is believing ridiculous propaganda about staged massacres, biolabs and similar horseshit. That being said, there is a clear cut aggressor here, there are both brutes who belong in a War Crimes Tribunal Judgement and conscripts who don't want to be there (to the point that a Legion of Defectors has been formed). Not every soldier deserves this fate, but plenty of them have it coming due to their own actions. This is War, the glamour exists only in films and video games, in reality there is only suffering for most!

To be crystal clear, I'm not saying "Think of the poor conscripts!" or "Both sides are awful!", what I am saying is that War is Hell, and that I understand why some of the more morally questionable happenings are taking place. That being said, I believe there is no doubt that one side is on the right and the other isn't. This doesn't mean that both cannot commit atrocities, but it's certain that the aggressors are intentionally targeting civilians and building a laundry list of war crimes. In the end, things are still morally grey and there will be a lot of unnecessary suffering until the conflict ends, hopefully with further humiliation of the aggressors. We can only hope for peace, and not a phyrric one!
 
Nah, fuck off. I gave the guy a cohesive answer to his comment in this thread that he clearly didn't like for him to interject in the other with "THAT GUY IS JUST A UKIE SHILLLLLL! HE DIDN'T AGREE WITH ME!". Total faggot.
"Nah fuck off"
Well see that's the problem. D :
But really he didn't go to the other thread strictly because of you and you know it. If you just go to the last page you can see what I'm talking about in my previous post in action. You're continuing it with this post.
What is there to discuss in the pro-Russian narrative? Do tell. Do tell how Russia is a rational actor in this situation without devolving into a mindtrap of "hurr dürr Nazis globohomo".
You are constantly irrational, dude. You instantly jump to "Oh so if we can't talk about only pro-ukrainian stuff we must ALSO talk about pro-russian and how they're rational?" Didn't say anything like that, did I? Did anyone? If they did, quote them.
This is not black and white. Ukraine isn't 100% good and Russia isn't 100% bad. Even if you believed this, you cannot deny that both sides have done some zany and fucked up shit. This is an A&N thread, discussing articles from the Russian side even if only to call out the BS would be something, or just being remotely critical of the stuff currently posted.

As it stands, everyone just accepts all the pro-Ukrainian articles as gospel. Nowhere else on this site does that as far as I know.
Nobody engaged with you on that video, because you didn't provide any context as to why you posted it here. Military tactics are a niche field and in the grand scheme of things, considering the overarching nature of Russia-Ukraine conflict, they matter little. But you can elaborate on why it mattered.
I did. Your justification is unnecessary cope, no one has to explain why they didn't talk about it, it's just the most immediate example that comes to my mind since I posted it. It's part of a pattern.
Nobody needs to provide context to post things related to the invasion of Ukraine in the Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread ™️

That last video, "End of the Tank?" reminded me of The Chieftain's video on some Ukraine stuff.
The video I was replying to (immediately above my post) which was part of the ongoing discussion at the time and people reacted to it accordingly...

Yes, I agree this thread has a certain bias but come on, pro-russia takes amount to "Ukraine should surrender because globohomo, based russia, duurrrr" and every single one that may have been valid like Ukrainians potentially executing POWs was invalidated by russians acting like animals, an average soldier won't give a fuck about geneva convention when he learns what the enemy did to people he may have very well known.
Quote where @Echo_Ender said "Ukraine should surrender because globohomo, based russia, duurrrr"
Ez-mode quote whoever you're quoting that said it.
Here's an actual quote "a country that is notoriously corrupt and will likely be unstable for quite some time even after they win?"



I'm just pointing out that you people can't bitch about others not wanting to discuss if you immediately lash out at an opinion that the regulars don't share. Personally, I used to check in to skim the articles posted and was super appreciative of a consolidated place for them but now there is no point except a sub-containment zone for pro-Ukrainians to hang out.
 
You are constantly irrational, dude. You instantly jump to "Oh so if we can't talk about only pro-ukrainian stuff we must ALSO talk about pro-russian and how they're rational?" Didn't say anything like that, did I? Did anyone? If they did, quote them.
You came here bitching that people accept pro-Ukrainian articles as gospel but somehow, a thread where actual Russians and their Western buttsniffer contrarians basically just slurp pro-Russian content without questioning is okay.
Oh, not to mention how mad people get when others dare to provide pro-Ukrainian counter-points and retort with such witty remarks like "if you love Jewkraine, then go fight for it, pussy" or "but GLOBOHOMO".

Stop being a sealioning contrarian, people can see YOUR slant and this meek "bbbbbut guiz why do you eat up pro-Ukrainian propaganda, bbbleeh" is a pretty pathetic act.

Ah yes, this "context". You brought up a YouTube personality who provides entertainment and serves in a US auxiliary force. He makes comments without saying too much of substance and doesn't add any value whatsoever. Yes, he gets extra points for being an actual tanker but I still fail to see how the news thread is any better with the video essay where he doesn't even say much about anything, afraid to alienate any part of his user base.

As my father likes to say, you farted in a puddle. Now what? To what end have you brought that video? To say that one must not get any judgements on the future of tank warfare? Hell yeah nobody should. You didn't enlighten anyone here.

Or did you bring it because you couldn't find anything else more fitting and close to sane pro-Russian content? I think the latter.

It's part of a pattern.
The Z plan, right.

>I'm just pointing out that you people can't bitch about others not wanting to discuss if you immediately lash out at an opinion that the regulars don't share.

BUT WHAT ABOUT MUH TWO SIDES!!!!11 MUH TWO SIDERINOS!!!!
 
You came here bitching that people accept pro-Ukrainian articles as gospel but somehow, a thread where actual Russians and their Western buttsniffer contrarians basically just slurp pro-Russian content without questioning is okay.
An RT video was just posted and you probably assumed it was taken as gospel because it wasn't negrated but if that's not what you're referring to, please quote whoever you're talking about.
Oh, not to mention how mad people get when others dare to provide pro-Ukrainian counter-points and retort with such witty remarks like "if you love Jewkraine, then go fight for it, pussy" or "but GLOBOHOMO".

Stop being a sealioning contrarian, people can see YOUR slant and this meek "bbbbbut guiz why do you eat up pro-Ukrainian propaganda, bbbleeh" is a pretty pathetic act.
No they tell you to go fight for jewkraine specifically but even @MG-34 didn't get told to go fight there until multiple pages of back and forth where he ultimately implied Ukraine would be "kino" as a non-jewish state modeled on Israel. Not that I agree with telling people to go fight if they support the efforts of either side but the point (since I have to always be very explicit) is that there was a tame conversation for awhile before anyone said that.
Then the very person who said he should go fight there right after his response said they're "team neither" and support the USA, then agreed with me that Russia is a shithole.
Ah yes, this "context". You brought up a YouTube personality who provides entertainment and serves in a US auxiliary force. He makes comments without making too many comments and doesn't add any value whatsoever. Yes, he gets extra points for being an actual tanker but I still fail to see how the news thread is any better with the video essay where he doesn't even say much about anything, afraid to alienate any part of his user base.
You retard. He served in Iraq and sent shells down range plenty, he has a video sharing some Abrams stories. Why are you dismissing his perspective on tanks in Ukraine? Do you think a US tank commander, who trained to fight those tanks, doesn't know anything about them or has nothing to offer in terms of commentary on glimpses of Russian tank doctrine practice?
No need to answer, I'm just expressing my incredulity at "What does a practiced tank commander have to say about tanks? Harumph!"
As my father likes to say, you farted in a puddle. Now what? To what end have you brought that video? To say that one must not get any judgements on the future of tank warfare? Hell yeah nobody should. You didn't enlighten anyone here.

Or did you bring it because you couldn't find anything else more fitting and close to sane pro-Russian content? I think the latter.
Why are you so fixated on the video? You're being autistic. I don't care if people watch it or talk about it, it's part of a pattern.
The Z plan, right.
Grow up.

edit after your edit
>I'm just pointing out that you people can't bitch about others not wanting to discuss if you immediately lash out at an opinion that the regulars don't share.

BUT WHAT ABOUT MUH TWO SIDES!!!!11 MUH TWO SIDERINOS!!!!
Quote where I said anything about muh two siderinos.


-----------

A bit of a rant, as if the previous posts weren't and I do apologize for them extending the scrolling they create.

You people keep quoting and referencing things that were never said. Every time I ask who or what you're quoting and to refer to it specifically no one ever does. Not once.
I've asked someone to quote the pro-Russian posters. I mean apparently I am one but no one can find a pro-Russian post of mine. The no-life losers who are about to autistically dig through my posts are retarded because there's no reason to since there are apparently so many pro-Russian posters all over the Happenings thread. I can think of one but no one ever seems to refer to them interestingly enough.

Regarding Vince's edit, I never said shit about two sides. I said this thread is pro-Ukrainian. That does not mean it needs pro-anything-else, it means you people have blinders on and if spiegel says Russia did X Y and Z in Somewhereigorsk then there isn't an ounce of consideration. It's just immediately accepted that Russia did whatever it is because whatever it is is bad.
The notion that the media is biased is ignored in this thread because it's not favorable to people like Vince's preferred reality. Russians are all literal orcs mowing down villages, raping women and children, hauling around crematoriums (why is this relevant again? lol), and on the backfoot for 4 weeks now.

Oh a video of alleged Ukraine war crimes? Time to question every single thing in the video! Which is the right thing to do, but it exclusively applies to anything that isn't favorable for Ukraine. You cannot post one thing Ukraine has done wrong in here without being assumed a Russian shill.

People could agree that those damned Russians in question deserve to be fucking flayed (seriously? a lot of you guys seem to agree with that) while still being dubious about the pro-Ukrainian/anti-Russian stuff posted, but they aren't. Unfortunately the comparison to reddit is appropriate here because this is effectively an uncensored (we can say "orc") r/ukraine surrounded by threads where people laugh at insane articles and, assuming they read them, question much of their contents.

For some context, Ukraine was accused and investigated for torture of prisoners regarding the Donbas conflict years before the invasion. Suddenly they're angels to their invaders and feed their POWs and take care of them but if they brutally execute them that's also good because the Russians are bad and don't treat their POWs right as well.
My point, since I always need to be as explicit as possible, is that even when Ukrainian officials (see: soldiers) do something terrible, it's painted as a good thing because Russians are bad. Before those videos got out, presumed Ukrainians committing war crimes the narrative in the media and in this thread was that Ukraine is more civilized and treats their POWs right whereas Russians are the inverse. Even though it's almost guaranteed they were torturing and probably killing POWs before the invasion even took off and articles have been written about it.

If you don't see how absurd that is then I don't know what to tell you, it's just worth pointing out even if in an autistically long post.
If you want to reply then I'd rather not shit up the thread further, send me a private message or something. This thread is garbage because you people are so aggressive against anyone who doesn't kowtow and I wish it wasn't so is all.
 
Last edited:
Right Winger Take - When being assaulted just drop your pants and assume the position so that maybe the attacker let's you live after becoming satisfied.

The absolute fucking state of western right wingers, they've spent so much time obsessing over leftists that they're turning into them to a point where their retarded spiels sound the same, they just apply the same retarded wokey takes to different targets.
If Russia wasn’t a complete hell hole it’d make some sense. So I imagine a slight problem is western right wingers not understanding Russia exists with Africa tier living conditions. Like a lot of them think it’s a total joke to bring up the issue of out houses being used there.

They pretty much bought Russian propaganda book line and sinker that Russia was economically superior to Ukraine.
 
Their thought patterns are exemplified by my new avatar.

"If the globohomo supports X, then I must support Y, even if they pump out unfiltered shit, because I'm bored with my quiet, suburban/office rat life and this is the way I make it matter."

Like seriously, all their indignation and moral crusading is just inverse SJW shit.
When someone's moral compass almost always points south it is just as good of a guide as one that points north.

It is a pretty weak position to take acting as though never following the corrupt and stupid is a bad thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher
An RT video was just posted and you probably assumed it was taken as gospel because it wasn't negrated but if that's not what you're referring to, please quote whoever you're talking about.
Below you will find a select few screenshots for what passes as very edifying content.
No they tell you to go fight for jewkraine specifically
Not just to me. The argument in itself is disingenuous. People who tell others to go to the trenches to earn the right for the opinion are just as likely to ignore it if one was in the trenches. They are upset with an opinion and when you are upset, you will find all sorts of logical tricks to justify your emotion.
Either defend YOUR opinion or be prepared to be ridiculed for this niggeritude.
Why are you dismissing his perspective on tanks in Ukraine?
No need to answer, I'm just expressing my incredulity at "What does a practiced tank commander have to say about tanks? Harumph!"
Because you didn't post it in a tank thread, you posted it with a specific intent to add the closest one can get to sane pro-Russian content. Besides, the fact that he has served means nothing beyond the fact that he has battle experience. He also makes comments way above his pay grade - has he finished a General Staff school of some sort that we are supposed to take into consideration and treat as more than the words of an amateur historian and a 1LT? He sees his perspective, he says it and that's it.
Why are you so fixated on the video? You're being autistic. I don't care if people watch it or talk about it, it's part of a pattern.
>brings up the video for some reason
>Y U EAT UP UKRAIN AGITPROP
>people explain why him bringing up the video amounts to nothing
>EEEE AUTISTIC

Holler me up when you're actually acting in good faith, instead of being a disingenuous prick. I was right in our previous convo, wasn't I? You weren't honest then and you're not honest now.

But all the better, we'll have more to and fros.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_225.png
    Screenshot_225.png
    291.7 KB · Views: 26
  • Screenshot_226.png
    Screenshot_226.png
    470.2 KB · Views: 23
  • Screenshot_227.png
    Screenshot_227.png
    473.2 KB · Views: 21
  • Screenshot_228.png
    Screenshot_228.png
    582.1 KB · Views: 22
  • 2022-04-09 (1).png
    2022-04-09 (1).png
    3 MB · Views: 23
  • 2022-04-09.png
    2022-04-09.png
    1,005.4 KB · Views: 26
When someone's moral compass almost always points south it is just as good of a guide as one that points north.

It is a pretty weak position to take acting as though never following the corrupt and stupid is a bad thing.
That presupposes that the power you oppose is absolute evil and that's a very dangerous pronouncement to make.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back