It is difficult for many women to overcome being hyper-accommodating because of the social consequences.
This is probably the biggest reason why this whole troon nonsense even got this far. We need more men to stick up for their daughters, wives, sisters, mothers and other women in their lives. Women are just "too nice" to straight up tell these AGPs to fuck off. However, there is still this whole sentiment of "it doesn't affect me, so it's not really my problem" Do we really have to wait for someone close to us to get raped by a coombrained troon in a female dressing room to say "this is also our problem?"
She was widely criticized for watering down the meaning of feminism to appeal to men, and assuming that women need to be rescued by men in order to have rights.
The word "feminism" has lost its meaning over the years. What I believe it is is women being paid equally to men in the same field with the same qualifications, women have access to safe spaces and good healthcare (including access to safe abortions, because they will get them regardless, so at least let them be safe) and the removal of luxury tax on tampons and maxi pads and the likes.
I don't know any men that objectify to this (apart from the last part because they don't understand periods, as this thread has shown many many times), but because of "radical feminists" making a big deal out of every little thing (yes, pink razor blades are stupid, but who really cares?) feminism in general has not been taken seriously anymore.
Having said that though, we
do need men to save women. And that sucks. But the truth is society listens more to men than women. There are a lot of men in charge that simply don't understand female problems (because even when changing your pronouns you still don't know what real women deal with).
The book "
Invisible Women" is a really good, albeit depressing, read about the gender data gap and it is informative without painting all men in a bad light while doing so. I'd recommend everyone to read it.
nowadays
more like.
