Narcotics
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2022
I still think the claim is bullshit, and i agree that the media is full of scum that will twist and turn the events for their own benefit, what i'm trying to say is that even if there's no real evidence as of yet, ukraine has 0 benefit to claim the attack didn't happen, they won't let a claim (specially one as hyped up by journo scum and goys like this one) slip because they know just how much weapons and supplies it will bring to the table, and the cycle with continue. event happens>both sides blame eachother>ukraine blaims russia>russia gets bullied at the un>media picks up and spreads sanitised versions of the event>govs/nato send more shit and approve more sanctions>event happens>repeat.It will be like Syria, No real evidence apart from the media telling you its true so it has to be true. i don't think they have used any special weapons. we have not seen any NBC equipped guys running around yet.
Besides, it looks good on tv and internet, the average civilian who sympathizes for the ukranians will gladly eat it up, ramping up public perception for support for ukraine, you'll see more and more people who won't actually believe nato intervention will lead to a wider, global conflict, not because they are war hungry hawks like the glowies in the government, but because they see how free nato is to pump up ukraine with tanks and missiles and mines and shit. We are sending all of this already, why not just step in and help them directly? While i still believe a direct nato / russia clash is the number one event that both sides are clearly wanting to avoid, i am now open to the idea that this war is open ended and just about anything can happen, like an unexpected plot twist in a shitty book's story.
It sucks because i personally believe both sides are respondable for slowly over the decades building up the foundations for this war to explode in, i wish for peace to return to europe and the world as soon as possible.