Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 14.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 115 24.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 84 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 193 41.7%

  • Total voters
    463
The Law and Crime sperging is getting boring. We know they are faggots.

His secondary channel names suck too. Link to show added. Nick is having a pity party about LOL and Crime. H isn't drunk enough to make it entertaining. His superchats for today must have really sucked for him to be so salty.
 
Last edited:
Screen Shot 2022-04-13 at 12.51.03 AM.png


This plus unbreaded is a redpill overdose for tonight lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt
Is Nick hoping for another Rittenhouse moment doing all of these day streams? He's not going to get one. That's a once a generation court case.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Mike Stoklasa
Is Nick hoping for another Rittenhouse moment doing all of these day streams? He's not going to get one. That's a once a generation court case.
I think he'll get more views than normal. It's certainly a high-profile case that's been brewing for quite some time. Not to mention the parallels of an actor seeking legal remedy after getting his otherwise successful career derailed by dubious allegations of abuse.
 
This questioning is pretty tight. Nick and other streamers seem to be listening intently and not making comments.
 
Is Nick hoping for another Rittenhouse moment doing all of these day streams? He's not going to get one. That's a once a generation court case.
Here I was hoping he would do another drinking stream with goodlawgic, it was so funny the other time they did it on stream and went full drunk and full Anti Semitic.
 
Is Nick hoping for another Rittenhouse moment doing all of these day streams? He's not going to get one. That's a once a generation court case.
He doesn't need another Rittenhouse moment, like his other day time trials that weren't Rittenhouse it's about making more money while he can and growing his audience. It's a different potential audience with a different set of wallets that might throw him super chats. There are bound to be viewers interested in the Johnny Depp drama who also might enjoy the night streams. Saying Nick's not likely to hit another home run doesn't mean there's no value in hitting a grounder and getting on first base.
 
"Has Mr. Depp ever called Ms. Heard a cunt?"
"To her face? I've have no recollection of that. He's called me a cunt!"
Fuck! I was going to try to not get roped into this one, but with quotes like that I'm going to have to slog through the coverage. Using Rittenhouse as your guage, how does the entertainment value of the trial coverage stack up?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: TexOffender
Fuck! I was going to try to not get roped into this one, but with quotes like that I'm going to have to slog through the coverage. Using Rittenhouse as your guage, how does the entertainment value of the trial coverage stack up?
Hard to say. Rittenhouse was interesting because the prosecution's case was a shitpile to start with, and it didn't help that several of the state witnesses (Mcginniss, Balch) went completely against their narrative and nuked the case harder. Then you have people like Granbo and PhotoChad.

As a whole, the Rittenhouse trial was more interesting. That said, we're only on day two, and the second witness. I'm sure we'll have plenty of dry, boring witnesses, but if there are more witnesses like this guy I'm sure it'll be entertaining.
 
I have been thoroughly entertained by this guy, I have a feeling he was the high water mark for this case interest wise, though. His paintings are thoroughly disturbing, but the Joan Rivers one was kinda cool.
 
Back