Business Elon Musk Clinches Deal to Take Twitter Private for $44 Billion - The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at the social-media network

1649933159786.png

The tech billionaire Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter for $41.4bn.

A regulatory filing showed on Thursday that Musk was offering $54.20 a share – a 38% premium to the closing price of Twitter’s stock on 1 April, the last trading day before the Tesla chief executive’s investment of more than 9% in the company was publicly announced.

More to follow…



1649933831102.png
1649933810146.png






Elon Musk has made a “best and final” offer to buy Twitter Inc., saying the company has extraordinary potential and he is the person to unlock it.

The world’s richest person will offer $54.20 per share in cash, representing a 54% premium over the Jan. 28 closing price and a valuation of about $43 billion. The social media company’s shares soared 18% in pre-market trading.

Musk, 50, announced the offer in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, after turning down a potential board seat at the company. The billionaire, who also controls Tesla Inc., first disclosed a stake of about 9% on April 4. Tesla shares fell about 1.5% in pre-market trading on the news.

Twitter said that its board would review the proposal and any response would be in the best interests of “all Twitter stockholders.”

1649936433325.png

The bid is the latest saga in Musk’s volatile relationship with Twitter. The executive is one of the platform’s most-watched firebrands, often tweeting out memes and taunts to @elonmusk’s more than 80 million followers. He has been outspoken about changes he’d like to consider imposing at the social media platform, and the company offered him a seat on the board following the announcement of his stake, which made him the largest individual shareholder.

After his stake became public, Musk immediately began appealing to fellow users about prospective moves, from turning Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters into a homeless shelter and adding an edit button for tweets to granting automatic verification marks to premium users. One tweet suggested Twitter might be dying, given that several celebrities with high numbers of followers rarely tweet.

Unsatisfied with the influence that comes with being Twitter’s largest investor, he has now launched a full takeover, one of the few individuals who can afford it outright. He’s currently worth about $260 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaire’s Index, compared with Twitter’s market valuation of about $37 billion.

In a letter to Twitter’s board, Musk said he believes Twitter “will neither thrive nor serve [its free speech] societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company”

The takeover is unlikely to be a drawn-out process. “If the deal doesn’t work, given that I don’t have confidence in management nor do I believe I can drive the necessary change in the public market, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder,” said Musk.

1649936465070.png


Musk informed Twitter’s board over the previous weekend that he thought the company should be taken private, according to today’s statement.

The $54.20 per share offer is “too low” for shareholders or the board to accept, said Vital Knowledge’s Adam Crisafulli in a report, adding that the company’s shares hit $70 less than a year ago.

Although Musk is the world’s richest person, how he will find $43 billion in cash has yet to be revealed.

“This becomes a hostile takeover offer which is going to cost a serious amount of cash,” said Neil Campling, head of TMT research at Mirabaud Equity Research. “He will have to sell a decent piece of Tesla stock to fund it, or a massive loan against it.”

Musk has hired Morgan Stanley as his adviser for the bid. The offer price also includes the number 420, widely recognized as a coded reference to marijuana. He also picked $420 as the share price for possibly taking Tesla private in 2018, a move that brought him scrutiny from the SEC.

“There will be host of questions around financing, regulatory, balancing Musk’s time (Tesla, SpaceX) in the coming days,” said Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush. “But ultimately based on this filing it is a now or never bid for Twitter to accept.”

I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.
Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it.
Elon Musk’s full letter to Twitter’s board





EXCLUSIVE Twitter set to accept Musk's 'best and final' offer-sources​


Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) is nearing a deal to sell itself to Elon Musk for $54.20 per share in cash, the price that he originally offered to the social media company and called his 'best and final', people familiar with the matter said.

Twitter may announce the $43 billion deal later on Monday once its board has met to recommend the transaction to Twitter shareholders, the sources said. It is always possible that the deal collapses at the last minute, the sources added.

Twitter has not been able to secure so far a 'go-shop' provision under its agreement with Musk that would allow it to solicit other bids from potential acquirers once the deal is signed, the sources said. Still, Twitter would be allowed to accept an offer from another party by paying Musk a break-up fee, the sources added.

Twitter and Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment.




Twitter and Elon Musk Strike Deal for Takeover​

Twitter Inc. TWTR 5.52% on Monday accepted Elon Musk’s bid to take over the company, giving the world’s richest man control over the influential social-media network where he is also among its most powerful users.

The deal marks the close of a dramatic courtship and a sharp change of heart at Twitter, where many executives and board members initially opposed Mr. Musk’s takeover approach. The deal has polarized Twitter employees, users and regulators over the power tech giants wield in determining the parameters of acceptable discourse on the internet and how those companies enforce their rules.

The two sides worked through the night to hash out a deal. Earlier on Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported Twitter and Mr. Musk had reached an agreement to value Twitter at $44 billion.

The takeover, if it goes through, would mark one of the biggest acquisitions in tech history and will likely have global repercussions for years to come related to how billions of people use social media. Mr. Musk, who is also chief executive of Tesla Inc. TSLA -1.30% and Space Exploration Technologies Inc., must find a way to balance his commitment to less moderation with the business needs of a company that has struggled to reconcile free-wheeling conversation with content that appeals to advertisers.

On Monday, after the Journal reported that a deal was close, Mr. Musk tweeted to indicate that he wants the platform to remain a destination for wide-ranging discourse and disagreement.

“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means,” he wrote.

The San Francisco-based social-media company had been expected to rebuff the offer, which Mr. Musk made April 14 without saying how he would pay for it.

Twitter, a day after the unsolicited offer, adopted a so-called poison pill, designed to make it more difficult for Mr. Musk to reach more than a 15% stake in the company.

Twitter changed its posture after Mr. Musk detailed elements of his financing plan for the takeover. On April 21, he said he had $46.5 billion in funding lined up. Twitter shares rose sharply, and company executives opened the door to negotiations.

Twitter shares were ahead more than 5% in afternoon trading on Monday.

The potential turnabout on Twitter’s part comes after Mr. Musk met privately Friday with several shareholders of the company to extol the virtues of his proposal while repeating that the board has a “yes-or-no” decision to make, people familiar with the discussions said.

Mr. Musk, with over 82 million Twitter followers, has long used the platform to pronounce his views on everything from space travel to cryptocurrencies. In January, he began buying Twitter stock, becoming the single-largest individual investor with a more than 9% stake by April.

He has previously used Twitter to escalate a conflict with the Securities and Exchange Commission after the agency opened a probe into some of his recent stock sales, and he often blasts his critics on the social network.

Twitter, at the beginning of the month, invited Mr. Musk to join its board—which would have prevented him from owning more than 14.9% of the company’s stock. Mr. Musk initially agreed and then rejected the offer.

Twitter has already embarked on a turnaround plan after a fight with activist Elliott Management Corp. about two years ago. Twitter said a little over a year ago that it would work to at least double its revenue to $7.5 billion by the end of 2023 and reach at least 315 million so-called monetizable daily active users at that time.

Mr. Musk’s proposed changes for the platform include softening its stance on content moderation, creating an edit feature for tweets, making Twitter’s algorithm open source—which would allow people outside the company to view it and suggest changes—and relying less on advertising, among other ideas.

Mr. Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” said in a recent interview at a TED conference that he sees Twitter as the “de facto town square.”

Twitter should be more cautious when deciding to take down tweets or permanently ban users’ accounts, Mr. Musk said, pointing to temporary suspensions as a better solution.

Mr. Musk said he also wants the platform to be more transparent when it takes action that amplifies or reduces a tweet’s reach. He said he wasn’t certain how some of those ideas would be implemented.

Twitter has spent years advocating for healthier discourse on its platform and adding content moderation, arguing at least in part that it is good for business.

The company also has introduced new features that have been gaining some traction with users, including Twitter Spaces, which allows people to host live audio conversations with each other within the platform.

Mr. Musk has said he wants Twitter to rely less on advertising—which provided roughly 90% of its revenue in 2021—and shift its business model more toward subscriptions. The platform currently offers a subscription-based service called Twitter Blue, which gives customers premium features like “undo tweet” for $2.99 a month. He suggested removing all ads on Twitter as part of the subscription offerings.

Mr. Musk also floated the idea of cutting staff, shuttering the company’s San Francisco headquarters building and not giving the board of directors a salary. The latter could save roughly $3 million a year alone, he said.

His other proposed changes for Twitter include trying to stop spam and scam bots and allowing for longer tweets. The current limit is 280 characters.

On Thursday, Twitter is scheduled to announce its first-quarter earnings.


 

Attachments

Last edited:
My favorite autism has been the "why can't magas just make their own platform and go there?" type. The absolute lack of self-awareness of these people who don't realise THEY ARE the ones who invaded the platform and ruined it for the rest of people who were using it before they got there... They really don't get that all the restrictions where not a thing before they started to sperg and demand more censorship. Why couldn't they leave and make their own platform themselves in first place instead?

Fuck it, we all know why: these are parasites who can't create, only infiltrate and destroy. I think we're seeing first hand how's the inside of a person after taking a dewormer.
 
I wonder if this is all actually some business plot by Musk, if he has some way to fold in and expand Twitter into his StarLink program into one larger telecom service. Buying the tech infrastructure and userbase of Twitter sure would be cheaper than building it from scratch. Don't know, just the idea came to me while finishing my whiskey highball.

I don't think they'd have anything too special of a tech infrastructure and their userbase is all Big City dwellers who require and already have gigabit fiber, also they can't put up a starlink dish because they all rent lol
 
Do you honestly think people's gripe with Twitter is that you can't say "nigger"? Really?
This is what the leftcel defaults to, "YOU JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO USE SLURS!".
No, that's not the main, primary reason, you illiterate dipshit. I just want to be able to speak opinions and not get punished online for them. I want to be able to talk to my fellow man as my fellow man and talk about topics that could be considered "taboo" open and freely. I want to be able to be left alone and not get in trouble because I offhand mention my annoyance over something.
THAT is what I want. Not to call someone nigger or faggot. But the freedom of ideas. Which what limiting free speech hampers.
Free-speech is unachivable politically, it has never existed and it will never exist. The people on power will always choose to go against it, if they want to maintain their power.
The only reason free speech has been handled poorly is because no one who coups is properly Libertarian enough to use said power for the people. You're expecting dictators who promise free speech as a bargaining chip to be truthful in what they say. Stop being so pessimistic.
While I disagree with him politically, Zapata was right in saying "I'd rather die standing than live on my knees".
 
The reddit crowd is tech savvy. They won't allow fb tier intrusive snooping measures being introduced on their watch.
At one point they were. They certainly are not today; they care more about memes than another permission being added to the app or another cookie being saved on the website. Also, you can do a lot of ad tech stuff with no extra permissions.

They are however very vulnerable to propaganda. An example of this is net neutrality. That was an organic complaint from tech savvy people, right? Wrong, it was a meme created by literal lobbyists for Netflix and other high bandwidth utilizers who wanted other ISP customers to pay for infrastructure upgrades between them and the ISPs. Ever wonder why mentions of it dropped off a cliff after it being the only thing redditors would talk about for months? Because said companies gave up and bought edge caching servers themselves and installed them at various places around the world. Once they paid out that expense, there was no more need for net “neutrality” and therefore no reason to keep astroturfing social media. Most of its supporters had no clue what it actually was and were supporters of big tech censorship, which one would think you would have to be against if you support a “neutral” internet.
 
My favorite autism has been the "why can't magas just make their own platform and go there?" type. The absolute lack of self-awareness of these people who don't realise THEY ARE the ones who invaded the platform and ruined it for the rest of people who were using it before they got there... They really don't get that all the restrictions where not a thing before they started to sperg and demand more censorship. Why couldn't they leave and make their own platform themselves in first place instead?

Fuck it, we all know why: these are parasites who can't create, only infiltrate and destroy. I think we're seeing first hand how's the inside of a person after taking a dewormer.
Related: a very insightful post from the /g/ thread about this.

1649997422191.png


 
Memes aside I think Musk genuinely does have an ambition for man to travel to Mars on manned flights within his lifetime, I think that's one of those things he jokes about a lot but that is a real goal for him, and not for monetary reasons as much as satisfying some inner wish.
no matter how focused on profits you are, every man would love to be responsible for Getting Our Ass To Mars
 
No but do you seriously think they can pull the same deplatforming on Twitter without a fight?
That's the thing. If Apple suddenly deplatforms Twitter, that's not only a legal question of abusive monopoly, but a question for the public of how much do you love Apple that it would sacrifice your only beloved app? All of a sudden millions of consoomers look up from their non-existent Twitter feeds and shout "NO!" at the heart of darkness. The soyfed CEO reels, not imagining the goyim could ever strike back.
 
This is what the leftcel defaults to, "YOU JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO USE SLURS!".
No, that's not the main, primary reason, you illiterate dipshit. I just want to be able to speak opinions and not get punished online for them. I want to be able to talk to my fellow man as my fellow man and talk about topics that could be considered "taboo" open and freely. I want to be able to be left alone and not get in trouble because I offhand mention my annoyance over something.
THAT is what I want. Not to call someone nigger or faggot. But the freedom of ideas. Which what limiting free speech hampers.

The only reason free speech has been handled poorly is because no one who coups is properly Libertarian enough to use said power for the people. You're expecting dictators who promise free speech as a bargaining chip to be truthful in what they say. Stop being so pessimistic.
While I disagree with him politically, Zapata was right in saying "I'd rather die standing than live on my knees".
Moreover just wanting to use slurs is reason enough.
 
I feel like the thought that the Republicans have been much more interested in funding space expansion and research than Dems have has occurred to him as well. Memes aside I think Musk genuinely does have an ambition for man to travel to Mars on manned flights within his lifetime, I think that's one of those things he jokes about a lot but that is a real goal for him, and not for monetary reasons as much as satisfying some inner wish.

Well, Biden and his admin have already done some damage to those prospects on their own, and the Dems are increasingly adopting the ideology of the radical left, people who oppose combustion engines and argue that billionaires only want to go to space because they've already polluted earth etc.

It's becoming increasingly clear that if the US is going to make any real, tangible progress in the modern space race, there's going to have to be an overhaul of the current establishment. So Elon has every motivation to throw as many stumbling blocks and challenges at them as he can, no one else seems willing or able to accelerate it quicker than TPTB are marching us to thermonuclear war.
Obama literally said that the purpose of NASA should be to help Muslims get interested in space:
When I became the NASA administrator, (President Obama) charged me with three things. One, he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math and engineering.

NASA’s return-to-the-moon program is years behind schedule and will cost more than the Apollo program by the time it ends, but they have spent a lot of effort ensuring that the first astronaut to walk on the moon again will be a black woman. Actually, he’ll probably be a Chinese man, lmao

Trump was a big supporter of sending humans back into space and is the reason why the Artemis program had a deadline of 2024 for a human moon landing instead of 2028 like they originally wanted. When Trump voiced his support for the program, many “scientists” and supporters said stupid stuff like that human space flight is useless and you should pay us billions to spend on sending probes around for “science” instead of actually trying to make human colonization of the solar system possible. If you are seriously interested in human space flight or colonizing Mars like Musk is, I don’t see how you could support NASA.
 
The fact these people are REEEEEEEEing over a service they get to use for free, acting like they own it, is funnier than shit.
Some were talking about collectively buying twitter.

Honestly, Elon should make it a paying service. If it's well managed, I probably would pay a small sum if it offers something that no other platform does. Or at least, many business would probably benefit from it.
 
When Trump voiced his support for the program, many “scientists” and supporters said stupid stuff like that human space flight is useless and you should pay us billions to spend on sending probes around for “science” instead of actually trying to make human colonization of the solar system possible.
Odyssey 5 was years ahead of its time.

It was a show about sentient AI taking over and stopping humans from exploring space so it could instead, or something along those lines. Look it up, torrent it, Robocop was in it.
 
Related: a very insightful post from the /g/ thread about this.

View attachment 3180921

Huh. I experienced this sort of revelation a while ago. I'm glad to know the phenomenon has a name.
Moreover just wanting to use slurs is reason enough.
Unironically though. Words don't do shit to you unless you let it. Giving so much power to a slur that we outlaw even referring to it does more damage than just letting people say nigger.
Obama literally said that the purpose of NASA should be to help Muslims get interested in space:


NASA’s return-to-the-moon program is years behind schedule and will cost more than the Apollo program by the time it ends, but they have spent a lot of effort ensuring that the first astronaut to walk on the moon again will be a black woman.

Trump was a big supporter of sending humans back into space and is the reason why the Artemis program had a deadline of 2024 for a human moon landing instead of 2028 like they originally wanted. When Trump voiced his support for the program, many “scientists” and supporters said stupid stuff like that human space flight is useless and you should pay us billions to spend on sending probes around for “science” instead of actually trying to make human colonization of the solar system possible. If you are seriously interested in human space flight or colonizing Mars like Musk is, I don’t see how you could support NASA.
NASA vs SpaceX is a textbook example of how government funded and run programs stifle innovation, and how free and open markets are necessary for progress.

All in all Musk is a retard and this is a nothingburger. Musk is his own PR for all of his companies and this is just more publicity.
 
View attachment 3180956
Never say that these people aren't motivated by pure spite and rage because it wouldn't be truth. They would rather destroy twitter if that means they can "own" Musk (which isn't gonna happen).
As if Tumblr went down because of Leftists and not because Yahoo banned porn lol

I doubt anyone here has ever used Tumblr, but every teenage genderbender's page had some perverse sexualized post on it, usually reposting some softcore black and white gif with "choke me daddy" on it. It pretty much ruined it for all of the perverts on that website.
 
Back