Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well no, once again you're hilariously wrong

The eastern front of WW2 had considerable examples of urban warfare between more or less evenly matched sides

The western front of WW1 after the Marne and the race to the sea was very analogous to urban warfare, fought between very evenly matched sides in extensive field fortifications - like a city's sprawl of buildings provides
I guess I should have included "modern" for the autists in the room. You cannot be so retarded as to think the weaponry and technology utilized in WW2 compares to today's equipment. Then again.. you believe the Roman Empire was the same entity as the Roman Republic... who knows.
 
Modern urban fighting is shit. You take ages to do anything and if the enemy is halfway competent you take heavy losses for it. If Mariupol falls within a week or two, I have a feeling years from now when it's less taboo to do so, people will believe the DPR, Chechens and Russians who assaulted Mariupol did so very competently, especially considering Mariupol held some of the most battle hardened, experienced and well trained troops the Ukrainian Army has.

12,000 defenders (from initial numbers, we don't really know exactly how many there were) vs 20,000 attackers at most (again, from what we know, and I've seen the 10,000 number thrown around for attackers as well) should be getting the attacking side slaughtered, but artillery truly reigns supreme in the modern battlefield.

And yes, this war has no personality. Sparta also lost their old commander, Zoga, in the battle of Volnovakha, who was replaced by his father, which means that most of the old guys who had any media time at all are completely gone, replaced by Slavic names on red links on wikipedia and few pictures all over the internet in general.
A realistic guess for Mariupol is 4-5k defenders originally and 10-15k attackers, and the town had around 350k inhabitants, eerily similar to Fallujah. The Yanks cleared Fallujah in 6 days, and the Russians have been fucking around for 50. Granted there are vast differences in equipment, training, moral, competence, leadership and so on, but the yanks lost around a hundred troops in total, and I have personally seen pictures/vids of well over 200 dead Russians / DPR cannon fodder and dozens of tanks without looking for it. Competently isn't the word I would use here...

Even when Putin declares mission accomplished (for Mariupol) in a week or two, lots of troops will be tied down in mop-up operations and killed by snipers etc. for weeks to come.

No lessons will be learned and taking a city with determined defenders will always suck despite how much ordinance you throw at something, what's essential is precision.
 
I guess I should have included "modern" for the autists in the room. You cannot be so retarded as to think the weaponry and technology utilized in WW2 compares to today's equipment. Then again.. you believe the Roman Empire was the same entity as the Roman Republic... who knows.
As distant as it might be, WW2 wasn't that long ago. Architecture and city planning hasn't improved by much and just because a gun looks shinier and lasts longer doesn't necessarily mean it's deadlier. The M1911 has been in service for over a fucking hundred years at this point. Most of the weapons we use now were produced not long after WW2 ended.

I don't think either of us or most people in this thread have the experience or knowledge of what would constitute modern warfare other than people who have served. or are actually fighting this war.

Best leave that to folks like Jet Fuel Johnny.
 
A realistic guess for Mariupol is 4-5k defenders originally and 10-15k attackers, and the town had around 350k inhabitants
4 to 5k defenders is an EXTREMELY low estimate, considering all the units involved in the fighting (Azov alone numbered at 700-1000 troops, and they're just 1 of 6 different units fighting in there, and not the most numerous). A commander of the DPR estimated, a couple of weeks ago, that there were 4,000 enemy troops remaining, bear in mind that they'd been fighting for a month already by that point. We have no good source for numbers of troops involved, just rumor, hearsay, and common sense (that many Ukrainian units cannot possibly be only 4000 people). In fact, we know at least 1,500 have already surrendered, this would be basically impossible if there were only 4,000 defenders, considering that there's still probably hundreds to a thousand in Azovstal.

The Yanks cleared Fallujah in 6 days
The two are incomparable. You cannot compare a battle hardened, well funded, well trained, incredibly well equipped and high in morale force, to the fucking Taliban, of which there were only 4,000 anyway. Not to mention that the city of Mariupol itself is infinitely harder to fight in considering it's much better developed than Fallujah ever was, with many more tall buildings, fortifiable areas and places like the Illyuch Plant, Azovstal and the Port, all of them incredibly hard places to fight for.

Not to mention that Mariupol has likely been getting fortified and prepared for an eventual invasion or attack for 8 years now. The two situations are completely and 100% incomparable.


lots of troops will be tied down in mop-up operations and killed by snipers

You've been watching too many movies. Russia will likely move in riot police to quell any civilian unrest. When this is over all of the Ukrainian personnel will either be dead, captured, wounded or running the fuck away from Mariupol. There's no point in suiciding yourself to kill a Russian soldier while LARPing as le elite lone wolf sniper when you'd be of much more use elsewhere considering this isn't an insurgency but an actual active war.

Just curious, why these numbers in particular?

same question, why do you think 12k defenders? Why 10k or 20k attackers?
10-14k defenders was the number being thrown around at the start of the war, well before the waters got incredibly muddied with a gorillion articles about Mariupol by journalists who couldn't care less about how many people are fighting there. 10 or 20k attackers was, IIRC, an Ukrainian estimate, and would make relative sense considering much of Russia's numbers have always been focused on fixing the 40,000+ Ukrainian troops stuck in the East, in place. The DPR also cannot bring its full weight to bear in Mariupol because they are also conducting operations in the directions of Adviivka (which is completely surrounded according to them), Novamuhtivka, Troitske, Mari'inka and Novomikailivka. We don't really know how many Chechens are in there, unfortunately, but it's definitely measured in thousands.

PS: To be clearer, considering the Ukrainians have at least 4 brigades defending Mariupol, and considering each brigade is supposed to have at least 3,000 soldiers, even considering typical Eastern Euro military incompetence and poor standards leaving these brigades with only 2,000 each, it would still be around 10,000 defenders, considering the presence of the Azov Batallion and Territorial Defense Force units.

PPS; It's worth considering that some of the troops "defending Mariupol" may have not died in Mariupol at all, but in some of the surrounding villages and small cities (including Volnovakha) that the DPR and Russians had to take before reaching Mariupol proper. When it comes to numbers, at this point the internet is so saturated with articles about the city itself and the destruction there, that it's basically impossible to find any information on important things.

PPPS: Russian MoD today claimed around 8,100 stuck in Mariupol as of March 11, after 15 days of fighting and a ton of small cities and villages taken, including Volnovakha. 10,000 Ukrainian troops defending Mariupol at the start of the war seems like a fairly good estimate.
 
Last edited:
When it comes to numbers, at this point the internet is so saturated with articles about the city itself and the destruction there, that it's basically impossible to find any information on important things.
Crazy how there's a major war going on, in 2022, in Europe, and we know less about what's going on than people listening to the radio in 1943 knew about WW2.
 
Russian MoD shared a video of the commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, Admiral Nikolay Yevmenov visiting the sailors of the Moskva. It appears that many crew members didn't attend because the email announcing the visit went to their spam box.
 
Don't be disingenuous, you are well aware the US (and to a lesser degree other NATO nations, but without the US NATO is nothing) have made no secret of their desire to topple Putin and break up Russia, erase the Russian language and identity because "democracy". While some of it is hyperbole from neocons, Biden himself has stated Putin must go and other members of the US government have made equally irresponsible statements (eg Lindsey Graham).

You don't give someone an out, they can do nothing else but come at you. Russia has been here before several times in its lengthy history; the US is about 240 years old by comparison. You tell me who has more gravitas.
Exactly, you have to give Putin a way out, and they just aren't. How many different senators, congressmen and msm pundits have called for him to be killed? It's pretty shocking how fucking stupid some of these people claiming are trying to spin it as anything but what it is.
Didn't Putin say something along the lines of "no reason for a world without Russia to exist"
 
Key takeaways:
  • Apparently the Moskva was indeed sunk by a Ukrainian missile through NATO support. Most of the crew drowned with the ship and the few that survived were rescued by Turkish vessels. From Russia's POV this is a huge escalation and how they will react to it remains to be seen. VOR fears that we've passed the event horizon where a peaceful solution was probable and that the west underestimates the ramifications of the Moskva's sinking.
  • The Russians are striking targets in Kevin and Lvov Lviv as well as Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory as Bryansk and Belgorod.
  • No significant developments in the Donbass front. While the Russians are flattening the place with artillery, VOR speculated in an earlier video that the offensive itself may not start until May.
  • According to Zelinsky the current Ukrainian death toll is between 2,500 - 3,000 with 10,000 WIA. According to the DPR they suffered 1,488 KIA and 4,956 WIA, which is quite a bit for an army of 20,000. For the Russians it is difficult to estimate and the only thing we have to work with are the 1,500-ish KIA the Russian MOD admitted to some fantastical claims of up to 30K or even 40K KIA. However, judging by the numbers of DPR and video evidence, it is safe to say that both the Russians and the Ukrainians are getting equally felted. VOR speculates that the Ukrainian casualties are on par if not higher than the Russian. In an earlier video he said that we'll probably know the real numbers months, if not years after the war has ended.
 
Key takeaways:
  • Apparently the Moskva was indeed sunk by a Ukrainian missile through NATO support. Most of the crew drowned with the ship and the few that survived were rescued by Turkish vessels. From Russia's POV this is a huge escalation and how they will react to it remains to be seen. VOR fears that we've passed the event horizon where a peaceful solution was probable and that the west underestimates the ramifications of the Moskva's sinking.
  • The Russians are striking targets in Kevin and Lvov Lviv as well as Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory as Bryansk and Belgorod.
  • No significant developments in the Donbass front. While the Russians are flattening the place with artillery, VOR speculated in an earlier video that the offensive itself may not start until May.
  • According to Zelinsky the current Ukrainian death toll is between 2,500 - 3,000 with 10,000 WIA. According to the DPR they suffered 1,488 KIA and 4,956 WIA, which is quite a bit for an army of 20,000. For the Russians it is difficult to estimate and the only thing we have to work with are the 1,500-ish KIA the Russian MOD admitted to some fantastical claims of up to 30K or even 40K KIA. However, judging by the numbers of DPR and video evidence, it is safe to say that both the Russians and the Ukrainians are getting equally felted. VOR speculates that the Ukrainian casualties are on par if not higher than the Russian. In an earlier video he said that we'll probably know the real numbers months, if not years after the war has ended.

I would guess those casualty numbers are not accurate for the Ukres since their 14.000 to 20.000 force in Mariupol was wiped out.

Losing 14.000 - 20.000 men is a huge loss for modern militaries and I wonder if the defenders of Mariupol were professionals or Volksturm trash, probably both.

Also, there hasn't been any TB2 drone footage for a long time now, I wonder if the Ukres have spent all their drones already.
 
Apparently the Moskva was indeed sunk by a Ukrainian missile through NATO support. Most of the crew drowned with the ship and the few that survived were rescued by Turkish vessels. From Russia's POV this is a huge escalation and how they will react to it remains to be seen. VOR fears that we've passed the event horizon where a peaceful solution was probable and that the west underestimates the ramifications of the Moskva's sinking.
I'd say that event horizon was crossed when Russia tried, and failed to take Kiev. They made this a total war from the jump with that move, and failing to follow through pretty much guaranteed a protracted conflict.
 
  • Apparently the Moskva was indeed sunk by a Ukrainian missile through NATO support. Most of the crew drowned with the ship and the few that survived were rescued by Turkish vessels. From Russia's POV this is a huge escalation and how they will react to it remains to be seen. VOR fears that we've passed the event horizon where a peaceful solution was probable and that the west underestimates the ramifications of the Moskva's sinking.
the one bit of the Moskva mess that seems like complete BS is that the ship went down immediately to the loss of all its crew, and Turkish ships happened to be close enough to save them from the frigid waters. US defence themselves said the Russians tried to limp it back to port before it succumbed to its wounds. That or NATO realised they fucked up and wanted to deny any involvement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back