US Gay parents called 'rapists' and 'pedophiles' in Amtrak incident - The couple blames conservative politicians and right-wing media for the incident, citing a recent uptick in charged rhetoric surrounding LGBTQ issues.

1650130096072.png

Robbie Pierce, his husband and their two young children were enjoying a scenic train ride on the Pacific coast, a peaceful prelude to their spring break getaway. But at the end of their journey from their home in Los Angeles to Oakland, California, the couple said a man sitting across the aisle turned their family vacation into a nightmare.

“He started yelling across me and shouting, ‘Remember what I told you!’” Pierce recalled, saying the man’s remarks were directed at his 6-year-old son. “The next thing he said was, ‘Marriage is between a man and a woman. They stole you, and they’re pedophiles.’”

The shouting started as the Amtrak train was stopped at Diridon Station in San Jose, Pierce said. Immediately, he and his husband, Neal Broverman, stood up and got in between the unidentified man and their children, who started sobbing.

“I’m not a big guy, but I wasn’t nervous,” Broverman said. “When you’re dealing with your children and you feel like they’re being threatened, you’re kind of fearless. It’s kind of that mom lifting the car scenario, but it was hideous, and it was not stopping.”

The man continued to shout at the family of four, yelling, “That’s not a family! You’re rapists and pedophiles. You steal Black and Asian children and you rape them,” Pierce and Broverman said. The couple has an adopted son, who is Black, and a 5-year-old Asian American foster daughter.

Before speaking with NBC News about the Tuesday night incident, the pair documented the event in a now-viral Twitter thread. Along with detailing the encounter, the couple placed blame for the incident on the recent uptick in charged rhetoric concerning LGBTQ issues.


In recent weeks, conservative politicians and pundits have been characterizing opponents of Florida’s newly enacted Parental Rights in Education bill — dubbed the “Don’t Say Gay” bill by its critics — as trying to “groom” or “indoctrinate” children, and in some cases accusing them of being “pro-pedophile.”

The legislation bans teaching about sexual orientation or gender identity “in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.”

Opponents of the measure say that it could prevent youths and teachers from openly talking about themselves and their families and that it is “designed to attack LGBTQI+ kids.”

At the Florida bill-signing ceremony in late March, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is widely believed to be considering a run for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, slammed the law’s critics, saying they “support sexualizing kids in kindergarten” and “camouflage their true intentions.” He added that the law would ensure “that parents can send their kids to school to get an education, not an indoctrination.”

Last week, Rep. Majorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., tweeted that “Democrats are the party of killing babies, grooming and transitioning children, and pro-pedophile politics,” in reference to the Florida legislation. And from March 17 through April 6, Fox News aired 170 segments on transgender issues and regularly characterized the legislation’s opponents as “groomers” and “predators,” according to a report by Media Matters for America, a liberal nonprofit media watchdog.

The word “grooming” has long been associated with mischaracterizing LGBTQ people, particularly gay men and transgender women, as child sex abusers and had, at least in the past decade, appeared to be relegated to the margins of the far-right movement.

Pierce and Broverman said this was not the first time their family has had hate directed at them in public. They said that sometimes strangers will taunt them with “the f word” and other homophobic slurs. Broverman also recalled an episode where a driver rolled down his window and asked the pair’s children: “Did they kidnap you?"

But Pierce and Broverman described this latest incident as more “aggressive” and “egregious” than past instances, adding that it was the first time a verbal attack came “laced with talking points from right-wing media and legislators.”

“As soon as he started saying ‘pedophiles’ and things like that, I thought he just seemed like he came preloaded with these statements,” Pierce said. “So, I thought, ‘Ugh, OK, we’re dealing with someone who’s consuming right-wing media.’”

Several minutes after the shouting erupted, Amtrak employees came to address the situation. Pierce took his children to a different car, while Broverman remained behind to discuss the situation with Amtrak personnel.

The train’s conductor demanded that the unnamed man leave the train, but he refused, Broverman said.


“He said, ‘I’m not getting off. You’re going to have to kill me before I get off the train,’” Broverman recalled. “It was very serious before and even more at that point.”

Amtrak officials then called the Santa Clara Sheriff’s Office for backup. The train was at Diridon Station for roughly 40 minutes before police were able to escort the unnamed man off of the train, Broverman said.

Police for Santa Clara and officials at Amtrak did not address NBC News’ query about whether the man had been arrested.

The Santa Clara Sheriff’s Office confirmed in a statement that “deputies responded as an assisting agency” but directed NBC News to officials with Amtrak Police for more information.

Amtrak said in a statement that it “strongly condemns this reprehensible act of hate” and that it was “conducting a full investigation on this incident.” It added that it is looking into potentially banning the unidentified man from Amtrak.

It wasn’t until the couple went back to their hotel room that their son told them that the man who had harassed them had approached him beforehand in the bathroom — which was just below the parents’ seats on the double-decker train — telling him that his parents “stole” him.

“These people who are allegedly so concerned about pedophiles and rapists are following children to the restroom and talking to him out of earshot of their parents, telling them about sexual issues,” Pierce said. “It’s just frightening. It’s so hypocritical, and it makes me as a parent feel powerless.”

“Even here in our hotel room he won’t use the bathroom by himself right now,” Pierce added. “He’s so frightened of bathrooms because of what happened.”

The couple said that throughout their trip the incident has weighed on their kids, with both of them bursting into tears periodically. Their son woke up in the middle of Wednesday night and threw up, they said, adding that he’s done that in the past after previous traumas.

Pierce and Broverman said that given the recent rhetoric, they expect similar incidents will happen to them again, as well as to other same-sex parents. But they hope that in sharing their story, they can help counter the “normalization” of this language, they said.

“It can feel a little bit harmless to say something like that in passing or in a tweet, but then that message builds and builds and it snowballs and then it gets to someone like the person that we encountered the other night. They buy into it, and it’s taken to a scary new level,” Pierce said. “And the children are the ones who end up suffering.”

“I’m done letting these people pretend that they care about protecting children or not harming them, because this rhetoric is directly harming my children,” Pierce added. “So, if you want to talk about who’s endangering children, it’s anybody who’s sharing these lies.”


 
Right. And what's the word for males who are sexually attracted to other males? - Homosexuals. So, the majority of pedophiles are homosexual pedophiles. Like you.
True pedophiles are only attracted to children who are not sexually developed Androphiles are only attracted to sexually developed men. Sure they both are attracted to males but two different subgroups of males. Again true Pedos have no attraction to actual adults and are disgusted by them. You have no understanding of the subject matter..
 
What evidence would make you reconsider your opinions? No everything that goes against your worldview is a result of a conspiracy. What a fucking joke you are.
Nothing. I've gone from being an open minded lovey dovey hippy retard with gay friends to having a very negative predisposition towards gays, especially men, because they act like you when the dirty laundry of the "gay community" is aired.
"Police your own" and all that jazz.

I used to be very much "live and let live" but they (you) don't believe that so neither can I. I want pedos to be killed.
 
True pedophiles are only attracted to children who are not sexually developed Androphiles are only attracted to sexually developed men. Sure they both are attracted to males but two different subgroups of males. Again true Pedos have no attraction to actual adults and are disgusted by them. You have no understanding of the subject matter..
Here's the thing. You said ephebophilia is pedophilia.

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a diddler who studies children, I am telling you, specifically, in diddling, no one calls ephebophilia pedophilia. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "pedophile family" you're referring to the paraphilia grouping of chronophilia, which includes things from nepiophibilia to hebepohilia to gerontophilia.

So your reasoning for calling ephebophilia pedophilia is because random people "call the ephebopophile ones pedophiles?" Let's get teleiophiles and mesophiles in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. An ephebophile is an ephebophile and a member of the chronophilia classification. But that's not what you said. You said ephebophilia is pedophilia, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the chronophilia class ephebophiles, which means you'd call nepiophiles, teliophiles, and other sexual attractions pedophilia, too. Which you said you don't.

It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

Same energy.
 
Nothing. I've gone from being an open minded lovey dovey hippy retard with gay friends to having a very negative predisposition towards gays, especially men, because they act like you when the dirty laundry of the "gay community" is aired.
"Police your own" and all that jazz.

I used to be very much "live and let live" but they (you) don't believe that so neither can I. I want pedos to be killed.
Your irrational then thank you for admitting to being a lolcow who cannot process evidence that doesn't align with his worldview.

Here's the thing. You said ephebophilia is pedophilia.

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a diddler who studies children, I am telling you, specifically, in diddling, that no one calls ephebophilia pedophilia. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "pedophile family" you're referring to the paraphilia grouping of chronophilia, which includes things from nepiophibilia to hebephilia to gerontophilia.

So your reasoning for calling ephebophilia pedophilia is because random people "call the ephebophile ones pedophiles?" Let's get teleiophiles and mesophiles in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. An ephebophile is an ephebophile and a member of the chronophilia classification. But that's not what you said. You said ephebophilia is pedophilia, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the chronophilia class ephebophiles, which means you'd call necrophiles, bibliophiles, and other sexual attractions pedophilia, too. Which you said you don't.

It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

Same energy.
The study in question was focused exclusively on true pedos who are defined as those who only are attracted to children before the age of puberty. You have no evidence those two men did anything to that boy just admit it.
 
Your irrational then thank you for admitting to being a lolcow who cannot process evidence that doesn't align with his worldview.
Yes I'm a lolcow who will produce tons of milk that boils down to disdain for the LGBTQ+ refusal to acknowledge a genuine problem in their ranks; that they harbor pedophiles and defend them. As a result they are largely responsible for this issue and don't have my sympathy.

People are growing tired of this nonsense and that's a good thing.

edit: Removed "implicitly" as they just outright defend them at this point.
 
True pedophiles are only attracted to children who are not sexually developed Androphiles are only attracted to sexually developed men. Sure they both are attracted to males but two different subgroups of males. Again true Pedos have no attraction to actual adults and are disgusted by them. You have no understanding of the subject matter..

“True pedos have no attraction to adults” since when? There are multiple different branches of pedophiles (r.etards who think like children, psychopaths who want to harm someone smaller than them, people who think they’re really in love with/the children are reciprocating, etc.), There are different levels technically between people who are attracted to pre-pubescent and 11-15 year olds (16-18 being age of consent in most sensible places, so let’s put that as the “not Islamic” line for this example): if you want to fuck a 14 year old as an adult, you might not be a “pedophile,” but you are a pervert.

Gay men overwhelmingly start having sex between 12-15, usually with men 10-15 years older than them. It’s pedophilia, full stop, and so many gay men are in denial about it, because they would be shamed by the community, because molestation is so rampant. They get angry to the point of calling you bigoted for calling out abuse—as you are here.

Don’t get caught up in the “true pedo” argument, you’re dangerously close to admitting to some islamic tendencies.
 
“True pedos have no attraction to adults” since when? There are multiple different branches of pedophiles (r.etards who think like children, psychopaths who want to harm someone smaller than them, people who think they’re really in love with/the children are reciprocating, etc.), There are different levels technically between people who are attracted to pre-pubescent and 11-15 year olds (16-18 being age of consent in most sensible places, so let’s put that as the “not Islamic” line for this example): if you want to fuck a 14 year old as an adult, you might not be a “pedophile,” but you are a pervert.

Gay men overwhelmingly start having sex between 12-15, usually with men 10-15 years older than them. It’s pedophilia, full stop, and so many gay men are in denial about it, because they would be shamed by the community, because molestation is so rampant. They get angry to the point of calling you bigoted for calling out abuse—as you are here.

Don’t get caught up in the “true pedo” argument, you’re dangerously close to admitting to some islamic tendencies.
These are academic terms with definitions. The best anybody has gotten to show that gay men are more likely to be predators is by citing a study done on a completely separate group of people.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: supremeautismo
Again I will sum up what happened you guys said gay men are sexual predators. To prove this assertion a single study from the 90s on true pedophiles a group distinct from gay men was provided. Which you people misunderstood and misrepresented. And you acting like being an idiot, Exclusive pedos are a well-studied group they only show erotic interest in prepubescent children to take a study done on them and conflate them with gay men as a whole is just peak stupidity
 
Again I will sum up what happened you guys said gay men are sexual predators. To prove this assertion a single study from the 90s on true pedophiles a group distinct from gay men was provided. Which you people misunderstood and misrepresented. And your acting like am the idiot,

There is an issue with pedophilia in the gay community, I don’t need a study to tell me the vast majority of gay people I’ve known were either diddled as kids or started having sex with adult men in middle school at the youngest. This should concern you more than people making fun of fags on the internet.
 
These are academic terms with definitions. The best anybody to show that gay men are more likely to be predators is by citing a study done on a completely separate group of people.
It was the first paper I found on the matter, actually. I didn't try very hard because there's no use trying to cite academic papers on an internet forum to win a dumb argument.
Academia is a stalwart defender of gays and pedos, there are things you cannot research in earnest. It's a biased machine with many problems.

Normal people don't need to cite research papers for what is obvious. "But the papers have data that runs counter to the obvious" a disingenuous pedo-defender may cry. Yeah, they do. They also have a reproducibility problem that I've mentioned that won't ever be fixed without massive purges.

The only reason certain domains are less susceptible to the reproducibility issue is because anyone in the world can reasonably implement the methodology themselves, even if only in theory, to help verify the work.
 
Again I will sum up what happened you guys said gay men are sexual predators. To prove this assertion a single study from the 90s on true pedophiles a group distinct from gay men was provided. Which you people misunderstood and misrepresented. And your acting like am the idiot,
You will burn in Hell for eternity defending child rape after you are skinned alive on Earth.
 
Again I will sum up what happened you guys said gay men are sexual predators. To prove this assertion a single study from the 90s on true pedophiles a group distinct from gay men was provided. Which you people misunderstood and misrepresented. And you acting like being an idiot, Exclusive pedos are a well-studied group they only show erotic interest in prepubescent children to take a study done on them and conflate them with gay men as a whole is just peak stupidity
Look, I have no doubt that your friends (lol) consider you to be a clever, insightful person. You may even be well-read, well-heeled and well-respected (lol), but you are assuredly an idiot and the reason is simple: you keep arguing with people who adamantly disagree with your perception of reality.

There's impressionable people out there in the wide world, newfren, but we're nothing but a bunch of simple country bigots, sat at home in our trailers home-spinning rope six feet at a time, hoping to catch two men so much as smiling at each other and BOOM! 'Strange Fruit 2.0; This Time, It's Personal' starring Charles Bronson, Clint Eastwood and Dolph Lundgren, three molested men on a mission to solve history's greatest mistake: gay pedophiles.

No, this isn't the place for you, friend. Try Twitter or Discord, though.
 
Last edited:
There is an issue with pedophilia in the gay community, I don’t need a study to tell me the vast majority of gay people I’ve known were either diddled as kids or started having sex with adult men in middle school at the youngest. This should concern you more than people making fun of fags on the internet.
anecdotes are not data sure there is a correlation between childhood sex abuse and later homosexual orientation. At most sexual minorities are 3.8 times more likely to have been diddles has kids.

But its uncertain if that is the casual factor vs that the gender-nonconforming behavior displayed by homosexuals in childhood make them more of a target to pedos.
 
Look, I do not doubt that your friends (lol) consider you to be a clever, insightful person. You may even be well-read, well-heeled, and well-respected (lol), but you are assuredly an idiot and the reason is simple: you keep arguing with people who adamantly disagree with your perception of reality.

There are impressionable people out there in the wide world, newly free, but we're nothing but a bunch of simple country bigots, sitting at home in our trailers home-spinning rope six feet at a time, hoping to catch two men so much as smiling at each other and BOOM! 'Strange Fruit 2.0; This Time, It's Personal' stars Charles Bronson, Clint Eastwood, and Dolph Lundgren, three men on a mission to solve history's greatest mistake: gay pedophiles.

No, this isn't the place for you, friend. Try Twitter or Discord, though.
Am sorry but arguing with you retards is so much fun. Your irrational seething hatred and dogmatism gives me a good chuckle. Every stupid inane argument every deflection you make makes me laugh your fucking lolcows and it's glorious
 
Back