Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I think it could be argued that there is a direct line of parallel between J.K. Rowling, Brie Larsen and Anita Sarkeesian, in that they are all famous women with feminist opinions that are the subject of obsessive seething and coping by certain extremely online communities of maladjusted, nerdy failed men desperately trying to discredit them, albeit for slightly different reasons - 'she hates gamers', 'she hates comic book fans', 'she hates trans people' - but I don't know if people are quite ready for that conversation yet.
More like CAT-PAN Marvel amirite fellas :suffering:
OT but how do so many women end up in marriages that seem to be completely trad only for the husband to troon out 10 years into the relationship? Are they especially dense or are these men just exceptionally good at hiding their degeneracy,
Not many people get married to alcoholics either, it's a progressive disease.
 
Thats because programming is still used as a safe haven by many men (and a handful women) who think it's the ideal job because they won't have to deal with people and don't have to learn actual social skills.
Speaking as someone who has remained strictly outside of programming while gathering a lot of friends who were either studying or working as programmers, yes exactly. And even worse is that they rarely notice that skills in networking and teamwork are always useful in every field. I'll point out, hey, maybe you should spend ten minutes thinking about learning some social skills like the rest of us, and the response is always "that's only necessary for your field, though." Then they plough through completely unaware, babbling shit about "jira" and "agile team management" and autistifying every possible element of working until the entire office is choked with bureaucracy like a blocked artery.

Imagine, for example, a job making websites for clients without ever actually speaking to the client. Just not possible. But they try it everyday. So Twitter fills up with socially retarded programmers who think filling the internet with passive aggressive post-it notes is going to compensate for their inability to communicate effectively. Sure, your client doesn't know how to make a website! He doesn't know what he's asking you for! It's your job to explain it! Car mechanics have had a handle on this for a century, now!

Once coding becomes more complicated than that, the all-important teamworking comes into play. But of course during programming courses when everyone is gathering around to get through assignments, it didn't matter that if you reeked of diaper and acted like an asshole because you were good enough to be relied on and the class was only six months long, right?

But when you're in a work environment? One where you may intend to stay for the rest of your life? Surely a competitive tech company would consider the disadvantages of hiring grown adults who have deliberately stifled their ability to cooperate and relate to others?
Well, just ask James Damore.

1650297675050.png
 
Heh, decided to try a text to image AI app to do the "oil painting of a transgender programmer" prompt :story:

View attachment 3191004


Give it a try here: https://creator.nightcafe.studio/
I was curious, so I tried two.

The first is "oil painting of a cis programmer," which yielded nothing:
1650298033288.png

So I decided to just go for "oil painting of a transgender woman," which did not disappoint [spoilered because it includes an artistic representation of trans boobs, lol]:
1650298102786.png
 
Anyway, here are a few other posts on the subject of trans 'women' ruining their relationships because of their bullshit. All are thumbnailed so they're a lil small til you click on them.

She's been inactive for over 5 months now. Let's hope she left the doofus:

Screenshot_20220418-113144_Reddit.jpg


This one's a mess. Seems to be an unfortunate pattern as she has also been twice engaged to men who later came out as gay:

jlmitch12a.png

OT but how do so many women end up in marriages that seem to be completely trad only for the husband to troon out 10 years into the relationship? Are they especially dense or are these men just exceptionally good at hiding their degeneracy, because I feel like troon tendencies would be pretty noticeable, especially in seemingly normal people. I know when you love someone you tend to overlook red flags (hence why abusive relationships are so prevalent to begin with, in general) but troonary is such a 180 surely they could've seen it coming? It feels like one of those "husband murders wife, shocking everyone who knew them" cases where everyone is either willfully ignorant or downright stupid, as it turns out the husband showed a million red flags before the murder that they somehow missed.

AGP can be easy to hide, especially if it isn't primarily of the transvestic type. Their competing heterosexuality compensates until it can't anymore. This same pattern has always been common in crossdressers who continue to dress in secret while in long-term relationships and later came out to their partner. Few AGPs ever disclose it during the early stages of a relationship, unfortunately.
 
Last edited:
This is Gretchen Felker-Martin, a trans woman referred to up thread, and her new novel "Manhunt" which came out just a month ago. Attached is a PDF of it so you don't give her any money for it.

The novel is, from what I've read so far, utterly hilarious. In it, a nameless plague causes all men to degenerate into brute beasts who charge around, eat, rape, and kill without any scruples or seeming sentience, but women to be unaffected. The remnants of humanity are now run by TERFs. Trans women are relegated to the fringes of society trying to get underground surgery and enough tiddy skittles made from the testicles of feral men to avoid degenerating themselves. The TERFs don't like this and send out death squads to hunt down the remaining troons.

Can you see the horrible truth involved in this premise? That despite all their mantras ("trans women are women") and twatter campaigns, a real woman you, my troon friend, ain't. Whoops.

The plot follows two trans women called Fran and Beth who are trying to survive and get to Boston where a friendly cis woman ally is going to definitively pickle invert them so they can join the trans resistance. There's also a trans man called Robbie involved who is trying to keep his T levels down enough that he doesn't degenerate but also doesn't end up 41%-ing from dysphoria either for that matter.

Anyhow, the TERFocracy doesn't like that they blasted one of their number (who the protagonists think deserved it because she had white girl dreads) with a crossbow in the face, and sends an elite TERF squad after them called the Knights of J. K. Rowling.

Two things:

1. Yes, the novel is basically The Trooner Diaries.

2. Knights of J. K. Rowling. Seriously. Rent free. Rent fucking free.
Wait, they make titty skittles from the balls of men? How does that work? Even if you pretend it's some pseudo-science like you'd find in a 50's comic book, you'd think they could only get Testosterone from nutsacks and would have to kill actual women for their Estrogen...
 
My point is that it's not the child's fault that it's father is a fuck up. I hate troons as much as anyone here but I find it vile when a woman literally swings an unborn child's life over anyone. What if this was a guy who just had a fight with his wife over something small and she threatened to kill his kid until she got her way. It wouldn't be "based" then.
Yeah well like duh of course the reason matters.

In most situations I'd agree, but that baby was a trap. Effectively rape by deception, and attempting to trap her into being a prop for his fetish by using the child as an anchor. Now she's going to spend years and years tethered to this lunaric by him attempting to use the child as a fetish prop in court, get financially fucked by him, if not have her life outright ruined. I don't think it was using the kid as a barganing chip, it seems like trying to escape.
Also: the child can get abused. What if the creature wins custody or gets it 50/50. You guys are getting boiled like the proverbial frog (a real frog will jump out), but this is really a dystopia-level, no, extinction-level event. Would you abort a child destined for baby rape porn or an organ farm? I'm not catastrophizing, you aren't catastrophizing enough. Lena Dunham abused her sister when Lena was 7 and the sister was 1: growing up in a "normal" bohemian family turned a girl into a baby rapist at 7. Imagine (or, rather, don't) what sick fantasies a troon parent can inflict on a child.

Also x2: having a child by a troon is dysgenic. He's not just a fuckup, he's a genetic fuckup. There are documented cases of sperm donors hiding their autism or whatever and going on to saddle dozens of families and children with severe defects. Now this only gets noticed and discussed because the relationship is contractual and the defective donor selling his defective sperm rustles people's jimmies more than a husband hiding his medical history from a presumably loving wife. But it's bad to give birth to a tard no matter the reason. At least in the case of a fetal defect risk you can roll the dice and abort if the fetus ended up inheriting it after all. With autism, you can't tell until it's too late. She could be giving birth to the next Jonty Bravery. So there could also be aspects of "are you the kind of man who has a coom-induced brain embolism once in a while, or the kind of man who should be forcibly sterilized for the good of humanity"?
 
Also: the child can get abused.

If the dude has a cluster b disorder, which given he came out during a time when he was getting no attention and then was surprised when the promised consequences happened, is likely, it's not a "can" it's a "will".

Narcs or people with strong narc tendencies will always fuck up their children. Always. The only question is how badly. The answer to that depends on how much contact they have with them. The less, the better. Ptsd from constant childhood anxiety and an unstable home life is no joke.

The wife absolutely did the right thing by immediately leaving. It's why I hope she's able to get the bare minimum of custody. He said after "his tour", whatever that means, he's going back to California. The best thing she can do is move back home to a different state (hopefully). That way the kid only sees dad for a few weeks in the summer, if that.

Rainbows for the kid. He doesn't deserve this.
 
Wait, they make titty skittles from the balls of men? How does that work? Even if you pretend it's some pseudo-science like you'd find in a 50's comic book, you'd think they could only get Testosterone from nutsacks and would have to kill actual women for their Estrogen...
Gretchen really hates normal guys and women and wrote a reason to justify writing fanfic about brutally murdering them. I mean, that's obvious from the novel summary, but that's why. It's for cope.
Also x2: having a child by a troon is dysgenic. He's not just a fuckup, he's a genetic fuckup. There are documented cases of sperm donors hiding their autism or whatever and going on to saddle dozens of families and children with severe defects. Now this only gets noticed and discussed because the relationship is contractual and the defective donor selling his defective sperm rustles people's jimmies more than a husband hiding his medical history from a presumably loving wife. But it's bad to give birth to a tard no matter the reason. At least in the case of a fetal defect risk you can roll the dice and abort if the fetus ended up inheriting it after all. With autism, you can't tell until it's too late. She could be giving birth to the next Jonty Bravery. So there could also be aspects of "are you the kind of man who has a coom-induced brain embolism once in a while, or the kind of man who should be forcibly sterilized for the good of humanity"?
Paraphilias may be heritable, i.e. having a brain that is prone to breaking about sex shit if the child is male is likely heritable, so this is a good argument. (Pedophilia and violent rape is pretty convincingly heritable and may be "carried" even by female relatives.)
 
The TERFs don't like this and send out death squads to hunt down the remaining troons.
and sends an elite TERF squad after them called the Knights of J. K. Rowling
Harry Potter And The 59% Aren't Gonna 41% Themselves
memed-io-output_copy_897x673.jpeg

having a child by a troon is dysgenic. He's not just a fuckup, he's a genetic fuckup
Idk, there's an exponential growth curve of trooning going on, completely unprecedented in all of human history, so it seems unlikely genes are responsible because that implies nearly all the historical troons were just hiding in the closet for the last 5,000 years (genes didn't evolve to encourage you to cut off your sex organs)
 
he looks like ppp

the thing i love about this ai painting app is that it’s unbiased, when you tell it to make a transgender programmer it doesn’t go out of its way to make it flattering or feminine. it’s objective and shows what everyone actually sees them as based off the same information/photos we see. there is no way to dispute this or say it’s made to put them as a caricature or be “transphobic”

also
3FB2E79D-7AA3-4A36-B6D5-268C5A34387D.jpeg
lol
 
Last edited:
Not that I'd ever read it, but apparently this manhunt book has a graphic scene of a black woman getting her uterus ripped out while she's alive. Make of that what you will.

But there's no racism in troonry, right? I'm sure it's just a coincidence that she's black, right? It's her fault for being a terf, right? She practically made them do it!
 
But there's no racism in troonry, right? I'm sure it's just a coincidence that she's black, right? It's her fault for being a terf, right? She practically made them do it!
oh dont worry i imagine they can sell it as making some social commentary on white colonialism which they can totally understand as an oppressed minority themselves
 
Idk, there's an exponential growth curve of trooning going on, completely unprecedented in all of human history, so it seems unlikely genes are responsible because that implies nearly all the historical troons were just hiding in the closet for the last 5,000 years (genes didn't evolve to encourage you to cut off your sex organs)
My personal theory is several existing psychological processes are being exploited to create this phenomenon. At its root, I consider this to be an astroturffed big pharma and plastic surgery advertising campaign. Ads have been getting better and better at selling people "more" than just the product (e.g. a sportscar ad tries to convince you that you're also being sold happiness, prestige, and freedom.) Corporations have been working for years to manipulate human psychology and orchestrate societal movements, so sheep will do their advertising for them.

Once an incel is hooked on troondom, their fate is sealed. For the rest of their miserable life, they will be a guaranteed income source for estrogen developers and plastic surgery "touch-ups." You'll probably notice that this is usually the game in medicine - they also knowingly and intentionally got large portions of the US population hooked on opiates. Hormones and SRS are worse because detox is impossible - the damage is permanent and irreversible. A troon's only hope for salvation is the sweet release of joining the 41%.
 
A challenge to do what exactly? Euthanasia?
View attachment 3156007
View attachment 3156008
Nobody ever challenges this freak spontaneously and nobody ever asks him what his sexual orientation is. The only time anybody would ever ask follow-up questions is if he casually dropped "I'm asexual" into some unrelated conversation unsolicited, which might solicit some polite (or even genuinely curious) response. But of course, if questions -- or "challenges" as he calls them -- are such a bother, why would he volunteer the very information that provokes those challenges when he doesn't need to in the first place? Hmmm...

Cool. Challenge accepted, slag.

I feel like this is 100% unconstitutional on some level
I'm sure it is. What do they propose holding states "accountable" for, exactly? They're banning specific medical treatments and procedures under certain circumstances, not forcing one like the feds want to do with the damned Wu Flu vaccine. And those restrictions specifically involve minors, who are routinely afforded stronger protections under the law (and burdened with more constraints and restrictions as well) and in fact don't even have full legal autonomy over themselves in the first place.

What actual injury are they alleging states are causing by prohibiting permanent, irreversible and controversial physiological and surgical changes being made to children who aren't even finished physically developing yet? How do the feds plan to argue against the parents' rights to make medical decisions for their own children? How will they respond when opposing counsel (in the inevitable litigation) points out they already can't override parents' wishes re: medical care of their children when they object on religious grounds, and so have no basis to claim authority to do it in this case?

It's such a fucking can of worms that I can't wait for them to open. If they really do pursue this, they're essentially telling every parent in America "lol fuck you, you're not in charge of your children's healthcare anymore." The state (in the "nation" sense) literally usurping parents' authority over their own kids and punishing anyone trying to stop it.

It was mentioned many pages back that part of the reason all the anti-grooming stuff in Texas sort of sprang up seemingly out of nowhere and scorched its way through the legislature, steamrolling anyone who got in the way and got signed into law in record time was that parents had started openly threatening to shoot school board members personally if they didn't back off the obvious grooming shit they were encouraging in the public schools.

The legislation was a no-brainer for Texas (despite Austin's leftist infestation) since for one thing they take their gun rights and responsibilities very seriously and for another, they don't shy away from actually using the damned things to settle disputes when it becomes clear there's no other option. I've no doubt the legislature and governor there agreed with the parents on this one, but even if they didn't, they were still savvy enough to realize if they didn't act pre-emptively to stop this shit, they really would have some school board shootings on their hands. When law-abiding citizens with a lot to lose start openly threatening gunplay, even in Texas, people pay attention because something has gone horribly wrong.

Now imagine telling those same parents that not only is that legislation protecting their kids null and void, but they'll be personally punished if they try to intervene when random perverts want to meet with their kids privately to talk about sex and emerge with a medical and surgical plan to dose the kid up and mutilate him, and there's nothing they can do to stop it.

They need to be really careful with this shit. You do not fuck with mama bear's cubs, at least not in conservative areas. The tree of liberty occasionally demands to be fed with blood, and this is a situation that could very well keep it well-fed for decades if these idiots keep acting like they're invincible.
 
This troon seriously believes women need to dilate (outside of Vaginismus) and that menstruation is their dilatory maintenance, lmao:

View attachment 3192072
....does this fool think a slow trickle of blood coming out of you somehow stretches the vagina? By far one of the dumbest TRA anatomy takes I had the misfortune of reading
 
....does this fool think a slow trickle of blood coming out of you somehow stretches the vagina? By far one of the dumbest TRA anatomy takes I had the misfortune of reading
I have to imagine he thinks the whole canal cramps and that’s how it gets out? Or maybe he thinks that’s what’s keeping the mucus membrane moist? Trying to figure out these retards’ takes on anatomy is like playing clue while high on ketamine.
 
Last edited:
Back