Plagued Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

[Frisk]

Dude, at least read all of the post you're responding to. I'm not referring to 4chan/Kiwi Farms types poking fun, as they at least have the decency to be honest about their intentions. My ire is directed at the normies getting in on the fun because they're hemmed in on all other sides. They can't say nigger, they can't say tranny, they can't say faggot so their frustrations are instead directed towards one of the few remaining social groups you can still take shots at without social repercussion. It is so fucking tiring to watch these people parading about acting like they really care about the less fortunate, mentally ill, etc, only for the veneer to drop away the absolute millisecond they have an acceptable target in their sights. And if tomorrow CNN came out and said actually shitting on incels isn't cool they would drop it so fast your head would spin.

And even if it is a miniscule percentage it still speaks to the larger social problems of alienation and isolation that generations raised on the internet will have to face. It's entirely possible to think someone is cringe and wonder what series of events would have to transpire to get someone to this point.

You didn't get the gold, silver or bronze medal in the genetic lottery. That's your personal truth. Your curse. But you choose to wallow in it rather than learning from it. Instead, you make yourself out to be a victim of fate, kinking your inferiority as some kind of mantle for noble suffering. It's masochistic and petty and self-serving and self-defeating. And I think that on some level you are actually enjoying it. How much sympathy can you expect to get from it?

 

[BPD Gunt Rider]

How much sympathy can you expect to get from it?

The same that niggers, fags, troons... well not Jews since they are the masters of victimhood and manipulation.

And if tomorrow CNN came out and said actually shitting on incels isn't cool they would drop it so fast your head would spin.

One thing he's right on. It will happen eventually once enough men drop out of this fucked-up society.

 

[Eggman's Ghost]

Theres more to power than top positions

Not really tbh. We live in a patriarchal society so being male is considered the default. You have undeniable privileges when born male and the incels are so pathetic they can't even make their easy starting point work for them.
The "power" incels think women have over them is purely sex related and nothing else. The power they (and you?) despise is the power to deny pussy, only. Women don't have shit else and people like you are still implying we have some kind of grand sway in society at large by virtue of refusing to have sex with incels. Do you not see how these two things are completely different and not at all comparable?

 

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

It will happen eventually once enough men drop out of this fucked-up society.

IMO, I think a more precise term to describe what's happening is "segregation of the genders." Women are also having statistically less sex and relationships.

This is why I have a hard time sympathizing with incels. They have more agency in their situation. Physical attractiveness has always been a secondary concern to women, which is why short and bald men are still in the gene pool. Most women (rightfully) won't consider any sort of relationship with a man if he doesn't have some semblance of financial independence (notably missing from the vast majority of vocal incels). If they focused their energy towards having a career and a future (all fully within their control), more opportunities for relationships with women would open up.

Women who aren't born physically attractive are permanently hindered in finding mate for the rest of their life since the primary factor most men consider in dating is physical attractiveness. There's only so much the modern beauty industry can do for a woman with unfortunate genetics. In addition, women also need to be laser focused on what they want in life well before they finish emotional and mental development in their mid-20's. By their mid-thirties, women are essentially locked into their career/family balance pathway. Single mothers over 30 are effectively locked out of the viable dating market for the rest of their lives.

Assuming they grow out of their NEET phase, most incels are complaining about a dry spell that is virtually guaranteed to clear up by the time they hit their thirties (when they start hitting their financial prime) and only improve up until they experience erectile dysfunction. A single mother's dry spell essentially lasts the rest of her life, so yeah... I think this situation is worse for women.

 

[Mr Snek]

IMO, I think a more precise term to describe what's happening is "segregation of the genders." Women are also having statistically less sex and relationships.

This is why I have a hard time sympathizing with incels. They have more agency in their situation. Physical attractiveness has always been a secondary concern to women, which is why short and bald men are still in the gene pool. Most women (rightfully) won't consider any sort of relationship with a man if he doesn't have some semblance of financial independence (notably missing from the vast majority of vocal incels). If they focused their energy towards having a career and a future (all fully within their control), more opportunities for relationships with women would open up.

Women who aren't born physically attractive are permanently hindered in finding mate for the rest of their life since the primary factor most men consider in dating is physical attractiveness. There's only so much the modern beauty industry can do for a woman with unfortunate genetics. In addition, women also need to be laser focused on what they want in life well before they finish emotional and mental development in their mid-20's. By their mid-thirties, women are essentially locked into their career/family balance pathway. Single mothers over 30 are effectively locked out of the viable dating market for the rest of their lives.

Assuming they grow out of their NEET phase, most incels are complaining about a dry spell that is virtually guaranteed to clear up by the time they hit their thirties (when they start hitting their financial prime) and only improve up until they experience erectile dysfunction. A single mother's dry spell essentially lasts the rest of her life, so yeah... I think this situation is worse for women.

So women only care about money and incels should focus on making as much money as possible. Then when they're 30 they can screw over as many young women as they want.

 

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

So women only care about money and incels should focus on making as much money as possible. Then when they're 30 they can screw over as many young women as they want.

I suppose if you want to boil it down that way, you could. It's about as reductive as feminist concluding "men only care about one thing and it's fucking disgusting." Technically correct but most would consider that sentiment overly reductive.

Incels are natural lolcows because they only have empathy for their own tribulations, which are usually fully within their control. Rember, Chirs Chan is also an incel who has lived at his parent's home his entire adult life. Remember all of the totally real women throwing themselves at his dick? Do you think having his own place and a steady job would've helped in attracting a boyfriend free girl that wasn't his own mother? When he finally lost his virginity, it was by paying a hooker.

My point is this: A man needs to bring more to the relationship table than his desire to fuck. All men want to fuck but not all men are worth the trouble to fuck.

 

[Never Scored]

So women only care about money and incels should focus on making as much money as possible. Then when they're 30 they can screw over as many young women as they want.

It's less about money and more you can take care of them and whatever kids you put in them. They like dudes who can hunt and fix shit and build houses and stuff too; you can make up for a lack of money with skills. This is not what's literally going through her mind, there's just an instinct baked in by eons of evolution to seek out a guy who can club a deer for you to eat and defend you from bears while you're home in the cave breastfeeding your baby. If you mate with a guy who's not going to feed you when you're home with a baby on your tit, you and your baby are not going to live. Do you think it's a coincidence that women are generally attracted to jocks and most sports are based on skills that would also be very handy while hunting? That attraction isn't about money, that's some caveman shit.

 

[KoldHardTruth]

What is with incels and their hatred towards black women?

 

[Rich Evans Ayypologist]

This place has become a discount incels.is as of late and would not be surpised if the thread becomes about the Farms itself.

the foids from lolcow farms, the moids from kiwi farms...

together, by their power combined, we will fill a thousand trailer parks with the dysfunctional retard children to be born out of such a beautiful, fated pairing

 

[MichałDrzymała]

What is with incels and their hatred towards black women?

Man, even black dudes who aren't incels don't like black women. I've met more black Karens than black women who had a lick of common sense.

 

[b0x]

I suppose if you want to boil it down that way, you could. It's about as reductive as feminist concluding "men only care about one thing and it's fucking disgusting." Technically correct but most would consider that sentiment overly reductive.

It might seem reductive, but the data appears to back it up. By the look of how Men rate Women, it would fall in line with an attractiveness scale of you gave them 100 photos of random Women to rate.

While if you look at how Women rate Men, it would fall in line with an economic scale. At least perceived affluence in profiles would make you more attractive.

Incels want to destroy the economic dating game. Just like the "body-positive radfem" women want to destroy the appearance dating game.

 

[Never Scored]

It might seem reductive, but the data appears to back it up. By the look of how Men rate Women, it would fall in line with an attractiveness scale of you gave them 100 photos of random Women to rate.
View attachment 3192969

While if you look at how Women rate Men, it would fall in line with an economic scale. At least perceived affluence in profiles would make you more attractive.

Incels want to destroy the economic dating game. Just like the "body-positive radfem" women want to destroy the appearance dating game.

If they're 100 photos only, it's going to be skewered because women care more about personality and education and skills and shit than most men do.

 

[AnOminous]

Incels want to destroy the economic dating game. Just like the "body-positive radfem" women want to destroy the appearance dating game.

Lmao good luck destroying a game you can't even beat the tutorial of.

 

[Engie]

It might seem reductive, but the data appears to back it up. By the look of how Men rate Women, it would fall in line with an attractiveness scale of you gave them 100 photos of random Women to rate.
View attachment 3192969

While if you look at how Women rate Men, it would fall in line with an economic scale. At least perceived affluence in profiles would make you more attractive.

Incels want to destroy the economic dating game. Just like the "body-positive radfem" women want to destroy the appearance dating game.

The sample included only users of okcupid? If so, the sample barely corelate with the majority of the population, more data would be needed for us to conclude anything.

One thing i hate about the manosphere (mostly the blackpilled incel part of it) is how rational and scientific it tries to be. Love isn't a science, and we got to thank that this is the case, because it would be too fucking boring if it was one.

Maybe the rationalization thing is just the result of having too many men with nothing better to do coping with their miserable situation.

 

[b0x]

If they're 100 photos only, it's going to be skewered because women care more about personality and education and skills and shit than most men do.

If someones rating rating you 1-3 out of 10. What are the chances they want to find out if you have a good personality?

 

[JektheDumbass]

If someones rating rating you 1-3 out of 10. What are the chances they want to find out if you have a good personality?

Have you considered killing yourself?

 

[Knight of the Rope]

The sample included only users of okcupid? If so, the sample barely corelate with the majority of the population

It's the most hilarious sampling bias ever, in fact. They're comparing the most haughty of women with the most desperate of men.

You'd see those exact same graphs but gender-flipped if you compared attractive men on six-figure salaries with homely normie women instead.

 

[KoldHardTruth]

If they're 100 photos only, it's going to be skewered because women care more about personality and education and skills and shit than most men do.

Sadly a lot of incels think that women think exactly the same way as men do.

 

[b0x]

Sadly a lot of incels think that women think exactly the same way as men do.

I think Women are capable of being as shallow as Men. Equality.

 

[Never Scored]

I think Women are capable of being as shallow as Men. Equality.

It's not that women are not shallow, it's that they value different things. Like, if I were just banging a woman, no strings attached, I would only care about how physically attractive she is. Most women would actually still want to like the guy's personality in a nsa situation. Men send women dick pics on dating sites because they would love to get pictures of tits and ass and think women think like they do. That's why trannies can't just flip a switch and be a woman. Any man with a modicum of experience with women can tell you women's brains are wired different.