Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
What fucking damage could Russia do to the US? If Hillary is to be believed they kept her warmongering ass from being elected, which means they did us some good and kept us from harm. We should thank Russia for that, not antagonize it.
I don't know, I really don't know what damage could Russia do to the US. It is such a mystery.
 
We do know where some of it going, if this is accurate.
16503849988340.jpg

Out the back door and straight to Africa.
I don't know, I really don't know what damage could Russia do to the US. It is such a mystery.
I hate to break it to you over there in Poland but Red Dawn is fiction.
 
Last edited:
I saw a French podcast from the station Sud Radio asking if French president Macron should do a trip to Ukraine? If Macron goes to Ukraine and something bad happen to him in Ukraine, I don't think it'll be a big loss for France.

And Canada send heavy artillery to Ukraine and knowing how the CF-18 are old junk, I wonder if the Canadian heavy artillery had gone past its expiration date?

The government has announced a round of new sanctions targeting individuals with ties to the Russian government — including President Vladimir Putin's daughters — and plans to send heavy artillery to Ukraine as Russian forces step up their attacks in the country's eastern regions.

Katerina Tikhonova and Maria Vorontsova, Putin's adult daughters, are among 14 individuals being added to Canada's sanctions list. The U.S. and the U.K. made similar announcements earlier this month.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told a press conference in New Brunswick on Tuesday that Canada will send heavy artillery to support Ukrainian forces.

"We've been in close contact with President (Volodymyr) Zelensky since the very beginning and we're very responsive to what it is that they need most specifically," Trudeau said. "Their most recent request from Canada is to help them with heavy artillery, because that's what the phase of the war is in right now."
 
We do where some of it going, if this is accurate.
View attachment 3196560

Out the back door and straight to Africa.

I hate to break it to you over there in Poland but Red Dawn is fiction.
Does nobody in US get benfit from that, no matter if people live in Poland, Eypt, Vietnam or Sweaden, they wear Nike or New Balances, browse web with iPhone, drink Monster Energy, and have accounts in Facebook, Google?

No, that doesn't benefit US economy by any way?
 
Right. In a world without nukes, it would be more like fighting in Iraq 1991.
Breaking news: We live in a world with nukes and Russia has more than us. We don't even have enough to nuke all of Russia while they have more than enough to nuke all of the USA.
Nike or New Balances, browse web with iPhone, drink Monster Energy, and have accounts in Facebook, Google
Miss, this is Wendy's. Reddit is that way ------------------->
 
President Sleepy Joe not sure if he will visit Ukraine. Sources familiar with the matter say he's worried that the booms from Russian air strikes may interrupt nap time.
no_visit.png

Also, less than a week after announcing an $800m military aid package, the Biden administration announces they plan to send an additional $800m. This brings total US military aid since the start of the conflict up to $3.4bn. I for one am super glad my tax dollars are going to fund a jewish muppet, his cronies, and his vanity war with Russia.
new_aid.png

This war is likely to go on for a while. It's anyone's guess how long the US money faucet will stay open for, but if the hohols are burning through $800m a week I think that level of aid will become unsustainable pretty quick.
 
Okay but that page states that after the referendum, they declared themselves part of the Ukraine SSR anyway. What gives?
Yes, because parliament did not have the authority to make this decision and after Ukraine made changes to their constitution that gave Crimea greater autonomy, which was the entire thing with Donbass. It's funny how history repeats itself and yet most people don't repeat positive actions.

But don't think Crimeans were context with it either. Here is a 1994 Crimean referendum about greater autonomy and dual citizenship with Russia.
Which again received almost unanimous agreement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Crimean_referendum
1650408587550.png
 
Ok, what do you think generates wealth in US? Like a serious question, why do you think US is succesful? :story:
A proper answer would be as long as my thesis but the US is a country rich in farmland and natural resources, which should benefit the people of that nation, and only the people of that nation. Sending taxpayer monies meant to ensure the US functions properly and benefits the citizens of the US over to a country acknowledged by all to be the most corrupt in Eastern Europe to fight a war they cannot win does not make my country a successful nation; it makes the US venal, corrupt and ruinous. It only benefits a few wealthy and corrupt politicians and officials in the US.

But you already know this, Ms. Nuland.
 
Wot? Since when?
Since the last time they counted. I saw it somewhere in some officious looking report but I can't give it to you because I'm on another PC. But I doubt either side is 100% truthful in these matters.

Russia is very big and far away. Alaska doesn't have all our nukes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Right. In a world without nukes, it would be more like fighting in Iraq 1991.

Iraq was using monkey models and heavily weakened after the Iran-Iraq War despite Uncle Sam and the Soviets funny enough lol propping them up hard, and still were losing despite using Sarin gas on the Iranians.

And while the Soviets were almost about to collapse in 1991, it would have been more like Vietnam times 9000 since there are irregular forces to deal with as well in addition to the Soviets and a super high body count not seen since Korea or World War 2 itself in order to take them down.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon
I for one am super glad my tax dollars are going to fund a jewish muppet, his cronies, and his vanity war with Russia.
Honestly, I'm ok with my tax-dollars heading to Ukraine; they're actually fighting for it, unlike the countless American niggers & faggots who want their homes/cities rebuilt but won't even fight antifa.
 
Last edited:
Even in the event the US would win a direct war against Russia
The US would not win a direct war with Russia, unless it was hosted in Germany or France maybe. It'd be the biggest slaughter of Americans since the Civil War.

US troops are better trained, better equipped, and have better logistics. Morale might be better too, tho its been declining for years along with basic fitness standards. None of that will matter once the tac nukes turn US bases into crispy salsa and it becomes a WW2 style knock-down fight against an adversary that understands modern war. The relative restraint Rooskies have shown so far stops immediately as soon as the first Abrams rolls across the Ukrainian border - Rooskies would (correctly) interpret that as a war of national survival.

The late Cold War / early 2000's US military would've crushed the Warsaw Pact in a Tom Clancy approved orgy of combined arms before or after the ICBMs made victory basically irrelevant. Current US military has spent 20 years doing counterinsurgency without achieving much success other than to rearm the Taliban and make Iraq best buds with Iran. It's not the same army anymore, it's a lot weaker because the men and women LARPing as men are weaker than the guys from 1991 and 2003. These are the kids who grew up with safe spaces and limpouts if someone called them a gaylord. They'll get pregnant before deployment, or they'll break in the field because they'll be facing a level of brutality and desperation not seen since Vietnam and Korea, and nothing in their training or background will prepare them for that.

Russia would easily raise hundreds of thousands of fighting men to fill out their ranks, and China would gleefully pump out weapons and supplies to equip them, for the same reason the US is arming Ukraine. But if the US tried another draft there'd be riots. Doesn't matter how much Facebook Boomers and Reddit hate Russia - Zoomers, Mexicans and Blacks aren't gonna be lining up for the chance to die in a muddy ditch in Slavholistan for funny foreign meme president or creepy senile fraud president. And there's no reason why they should. They have their own lives to worry about and this shit doesn't concern them. If Pearl Harbor or 911 happened tomorrow the MSM would be beating the war drums and turning the patriotism up to 11 as usual, but this time half the country wouldn't believe them.

That's why we're fighting to the last hohol. There's plenty of people in DC hoping to escalate this into the open war with Russia they've been fapping over since 2008. But they're think tank faggots, neocon pet politicians and fast-talking, flabby ex-Soviet Jews with a weird little hateboner for the country of their birth. Nothing the Pentagon has said indicates they want to get into the middle of this fight, because they know better.
 
Since the last time they counted. I saw it somewhere in some officious looking report but I can't give it to you because I'm on another PC. But I doubt either side is 100% truthful in these matters.

Russia is very big and far away. Alaska doesn't have all our nukes.
If they meant that either of our nuclear arsenals being not enough to nuke every tiny village or town then sure. But they are called weapons of assured mutual destruction not without a reason. Nuclear winter and all that, even in case that half of the nukes get shot down or somehow don't explode.
But you know this. Just weird that someone pointed it out.

@Based Boy they are waiting for a mutiny or something.
 
Last edited:
If they meant that either of our nuclear arsenals being not enough to nuke every tiny village or town then sure. But they are called weapons of assured mutual destruction not without a reason. Nuclear winter and all that, even in case that half of the nukes get shot down or somehow don't explode.
But you know this. Just weird that someone pointed it out.
No I get you, I don't believe any side would win, or can win. Its unwinnable for either party. Just that the US can not hit every part of Russia with what we have while Russia could hit nearly all of the US with what they have. That both side admit to having. After the first one flies it becomes a moot point.
 
In official weather forecasts in China, Mariupol has already been designated as a Russian city
 

Attachments

  • photo_2022-04-20_06-01-12.jpg
    photo_2022-04-20_06-01-12.jpg
    47.7 KB · Views: 176
  • photo_2022-04-20_06-01-13.jpg
    photo_2022-04-20_06-01-13.jpg
    79.6 KB · Views: 175
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back