Natalie "Nady" Stewart / Milo Stewart / Quinby Stewart - "snip snoop, it's miloop <3 needed to die", not leaked

Outside a pool party even a drunk frat house rager, when is it EVER socially ok to take your shirt off at a party?

Part of me assumes this is a lie because who would want to see those scars? Scars aren't pretty exactly and why would you ask at a gathering? Something you'd handle in private if you really wanted to see that. Same with if someone had got a hip tattoo you might really want to see but you both wait till there's a time you can disrobe a bit in private.

The other part, of me thinks this is a lie and Nati is so isolated and weird she made this up thinking people will stand up and clap she came out to so many people.. but has no idea taking your shirt off at the friday pizza and movie party is fucking weird and unrealistic sounding.

But also Nati's the kind of person who would invite her self and do weird shit. So it might have happened, either way, she's a dumb titless girl whos very very lonley.
 
She takes off her shirt because she is a MAN™, ok? And MEN™ do that all the time, they take off their tops and nobody cares because it's so normal and they can do whatever they want despite she's not just a MAN™ but genderless so she's still not bounded to the limits and regulations that come with one's gender... duh.
 
Outside a pool party even a drunk frat house rager, when is it EVER socially ok to take your shirt off at a party?

Part of me assumes this is a lie because who would want to see those scars? Scars aren't pretty exactly and why would you ask at a gathering? Something you'd handle in private if you really wanted to see that. Same with if someone had got a hip tattoo you might really want to see but you both wait till there's a time you can disrobe a bit in private.

The other part, of me thinks this is a lie and Nati is so isolated and weird she made this up thinking people will stand up and clap she came out to so many people.. but has no idea taking your shirt off at the friday pizza and movie party is fucking weird and unrealistic sounding.

But also Nati's the kind of person who would invite her self and do weird shit. So it might have happened, either way, she's a dumb titless girl whos very very lonley.
You have to imagine a bunch of kids in college, crowded in a livingroom, listening to Imagine Dragons or something equally insufferable, using all their $10 words, either drinking wine and trying to be sophisticated or drinking IPAs and trying to get someone into bed, all trying to passive-aggressively out-do one another in a contest of being the most casually radical, the most subversive regarding gender, the very best at parroting talking points on all the "important" issues while also being edgy. Natalie suddenly finding a reason to take her shirt off is *exactly* the kind of thing that happens at such a gathering.
 
I've not heard about Naty since about 2017 or so. I thought that she would drop her trans bullcrap after getting numerous YT videos reacting to her dumbfuckery. I even saw a clip of her wondering if she should get top surgery and by gum, she actually did!

She still looks crazy as ever and I just wonder how long until she makes doom posts then suicidal tweets.
 
Muh gender
SmartSelect_20220324-222930_Twitter.jpg
 
Lol is she forgetting the giant new “non binary” slice of the community?

In clown world someone who is non binary can align more towards either gender (trans femme etc) or a lot of the time decide to stay in the middle entirely. She knows there’s non binary people that don’t identify strongly with either end of the binary.

But muh special gender wouldn’t be special enough then.
 
girl, you're alienating yourself from everyone by claiming you're so special and unique. besides, there's no community, there's just a bunch of lunatics, some with creepy fetishes, some just mentally ill and lost, all tweeting some meaningless shit at each other.

troons have the biggest infighting rate I've ever seen, it's amazing.
 
Her desperate need for a community only proves how the seek for individualism is a failed mission, specially among young people.

I'm not saying humans can't be independent thinkers, because we totally are. But we also need to belong somewhere with rules and structures and a sense of being part of it.

Liberalism, not even once.
 
Lol is she forgetting the giant new “non binary” slice of the community?

In clown world someone who is non binary can align more towards either gender (trans femme etc) or a lot of the time decide to stay in the middle entirely. She knows there’s non binary people that don’t identify strongly with either end of the binary.

But muh special gender wouldn’t be special enough then.
Of course she's forgetting it because that would make her less special.

If she's the ONLY non-binary person there is she's then super-extra special. If other genderspecials exist then she's just another face in the crowd with really bad scars and pepperoni nipples.
 
Nady 'How Can I Be Even More Insufferable and Weird' Stewert

'I know, I'll take off my shirt in the middle of a crowded room full of people I barely know and lecture them on my gender woo! That won't make those people uncomfortable AT ALL!'
She's attention starved and since gender is the hot ess jay dubau snow flake topic, she can not only do crazy shit like that for attention, then she can brow beat you aren't trendy and hip to know about her new pronouns.

It's kinda like some fucked up emporers new clothes thing, where "oh you don't know about my xyz". Really reminds me more of that stupid (yet charming) movie Billy Madison ALL THE COOL KIDS PEE DEY PANTS!! Because someone did something absurd, and then explained how cool it is, you had a group of 3rd graders letting the sink go in their levis.

Granted if you piss yourself you can wash your pants and scrub your groin, Natis fucking with hormones and trannies axe wounds, ain't so easy to fix.
 
Is anybody even giving her the attention she wants though? Her parents still treat her like being trans is just a funny phase and laugh at her antics while trying to be supportive but without engaging that much. She had to make up some "sexual assault" scenario to pretend her parents are awful and she's a victim of their oppression and it was such a non-issue that the whole deal wasn't more than a tweet. And she can't rebel against them because they just roll their eyes at her and say "ok, whatever" at all her demands for respect. For someone like her, this is a nightmare: her parents are supposed to hate what she is.

And then, her sexual identity isn't unique or different. There are dozens of girls who also chopped her tits and call themselves trans or non-binary and who do it better than she does. She doesn't look at all like a man, and she can't pass as a twink either. She's just the most random and ordinary type of basic bitch who hates the world because she looks like a goblin. She's the embodiment of gender theory, but has nothing else to offer: she's not a camwhore, she's not an activist, she's not even that much of a lolcow (this thread moves quite slow) to make people talk about her. She just exists.
 
Milo is so full of shit. Did anyone else see that video where she claimed that she's asexual, but loves sex and sex toys? There is no such thing as an "asexual spectrum." You're either asexual or you're not. If you like fucking and "having your clit tickled by dildos," you're not asexual!

For some reason, I also hate the way she says "important." Like, she emphasis the "t" way too much. "Im-por-TTTant." It's irritating.
 
Milo is so full of shit. Did anyone else see that video where she claimed that she's asexual, but loves sex and sex toys? There is no such thing as an "asexual spectrum." You're either asexual or you're not. If you like fucking and "having your clit tickled by dildos," you're not asexual!

For some reason, I also hate the way she says "important." Like, she emphasis the "t" way too much. "Im-por-TTTant." It's irritating.
It's like those people claiming they have a little bit of asthma or a bit of diabetes. No, you don't have a "little bit" of a disease, you have a disease with mild or controlled symptoms. It's not the same.

Being asexual is not having a little bit of sexual drive: it's not having any sexual drive at all. But for these people, it's not having sex or not having a relationship. I suppose it's their way to justify the fact that they can't find a partner or, if they have one, that they aren't attracted to each other because their relationship is pure cope and pretending. All scissoring in the world with some "non-binary" isn't gonna change the fact that Milo craves dick.

Realistically speaking, though, if she was indeed asexual, all those sex toys she owns would be the equivalent of raping herself. If she feels no pleasure nor desire for sex, and yet, she's making herself having sex, it's self-abuse. She's just too dumb to realise it.
 
Being asexual is not having a little bit of sexual drive: it's not having any sexual drive at all. But for these people, it's not having sex or not having a relationship. I suppose it's their way to justify the fact that they can't find a partner or, if they have one, that they aren't attracted to each other because their relationship is pure cope and pretending
I've heard that being asexual has nothing to do with sex drive and everything to do with attraction - to them, you can be the horniest POS in the world, but if you don't want to actually have sex with anyone, you're asexual. Which is a little strange, because then ACTUAL LITERAL ASEXUALS (as in, no sex drive, no desire, and fine with that) are lumped in with them.

I'm not saying it makes sense... I'm just saying what they say.
 
I've heard that being asexual has nothing to do with sex drive and everything to do with attraction - to them, you can be the horniest POS in the world, but if you don't want to actually have sex with anyone, you're asexual. Which is a little strange, because then ACTUAL LITERAL ASEXUALS (as in, no sex drive, no desire, and fine with that) are lumped in with them.

I'm not saying it makes sense... I'm just saying what they say.
Yes, I've seen people saying similar things and it's a bit dangerous for my taste. The idea is that sexuality is defined by you are you attracted to and that's misleading because you can feel platonic attraction to anyone. Sexuality is defined by having a sexual desire by someone; sexual orientation is defined by which sex you feel sexual desires for.

Activists and academics are creating "queer" people with these insanity: you like being close to someone of your same sex? You're gay. You don't want sex with them? Then you're asexual!"

That's not how it works.
 
I've heard that being asexual has nothing to do with sex drive and everything to do with attraction - to them, you can be the horniest POS in the world, but if you don't want to actually have sex with anyone, you're asexual. Which is a little strange, because then ACTUAL LITERAL ASEXUALS (as in, no sex drive, no desire, and fine with that) are lumped in with them.

I'm not saying it makes sense... I'm just saying what they say.
They're as batshit as all the body positive fat people who keep talking about their bodies as if they're separate entities. This brand of asexual is made up of annoying cunts who are late-bloomers or nervous about dating because it means becoming sexually active so they're trying to separate "romance" from sexuality (shows you how well they understand basic human interaction). A well-adjusted person can't seriously be romantically attracted to someone they wouldn't want to eventually touch, otherwise they are simply good friends no matter how much these needy attention whores want to say the bond with their bestie is different in a special way. In no way will an "asexual but romantic" couple actually exist and survive as life long partners, that's just a couple with a dead bedroom and a massive cope. Asexuality in this sense on their terms is just being celibate but that's an uncool word for dusty religious people.
 
Back