🐱 Disney labels Tinker Bell, Captain Hook as 'potentially problematic’

CatParty

While going through its library of content for films and shows to put on its streaming service, Disney has reportedly labeled a few of its beloved characters as "potentially problematic," according to a report from the New York Times.

Tinkerbell and Captain Hook from the classic 1953 Disney animated movie "Peter Pan" reportedly fall under the category of characters who could possibly require a disclaimer on the Disney+ streaming service, as they could be seen as perpetuating negative stereotypes.

The NYT article says Disney's version of Tinker Bell, based upon J. M. Barrie's 1904 play "Peter Pan" and its 1911 novelization "Peter and Wendy," was flagged for concern because Tinker Bell is jealous of Peter Pan's attention toward Wendy, and because she is "body-conscious."


Captain Hook, who famously has a prosthetic hook where his hand would be, was reportedly flagged because he exposes Disney to accusations of prejudice against disabled individuals due to his villainous nature.


Disney's "Stories Matter" team was responsible for flagging potentially problematic characters and sending their findings to senior leads at the company, current Disney executives reportedly told the NYT.

Stories shape how we see ourselves and everyone around us. So as storytellers, we have the power and responsibility to not only uplift and inspire, but also consciously, purposefully and relentlessly champion the spectrum of voices and perspectives in our world," Disney's Stories Matter Team says on its website. "As part of our ongoing commitment to diversity and inclusion, we are in the process of reviewing our library and adding advisories to content that includes negative depictions or mistreatment of people or cultures. Rather than removing this content, we see an opportunity to spark conversation and open dialogue on history that affects us all. We also want to acknowledge that some communities have been erased or forgotten altogether, and we're committed to giving voice to their stories as well.
We can't change the past, but we can acknowledge it, learn from it and move forward together to create a tomorrow that today can only dream of," the Stories Matter Team says.
Another reported example of a potentially problematic Disney character is Ursula the Sea Witch from Disney's 1989 animated classic "The Little Mermaid."

The NYT article says Disney's team was concerned Ursula could come across as "queer-coded," and therefore her flamboyant behavior is potentially homophobic.

Also, as Ursula is of dark complexion and of a darker, light-purplish skin tone, the villainess was also reportedly a potential target of critics who would see her as a possible racist depiction.


Disney's "Stories Matter" team has been placing advisories on the company's content and products whenever potential problematic content is flagged and acknowledged. The advisory appears before the content is played.

This program includes negative depictions and/or mistreatment of people or cultures. These stereotypes were wrong then and are wrong now. Rather than remove this content, we want to acknowledge its harmful impact, learn from it and spark conversation to create a more inclusive future together," the content advisory reads. "Disney is committed to creating stories with inspirational and aspirational themes that reflect the rich diversity of the human experience around the globe.
Examples of content deemed necessary to receive the advisory by Disney include the animated movies "Aristocats" and "Dumbo."

In Aristocats, a cat with slanted eyes and buck teeth is noted by the team to be "a racist caricature of East Asian peoples." In Dumbo, a murder of crows who perform musical number is noted by the team to be an "homage to racist minstrel shows, where white performers with blackened faces and tattered clothing imitated and ridiculed enslaved Africans on Southern plantations."

Peter Pan is also a recipient of the advisory warning, as the team says the animated film portrays Native Americans in a stereotypical manner.

A celebration between the "Indians" and Peter Pan after the titular character rescues Princess Tiger Lily has characters engaging in "dancing, wearing headdresses and other exaggerated tropes, a form of mockery and appropriation of Native peoples' culture and imagery," the team says.

The Stories Matter Team is consulted by third-party organizations, such as the African American Film Critics Association, GLAAD Media Institute, and the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, among various others.
 
The audience is too braindead to figure that out.
The audience thinks the moment the ice queen princess queens gotta be evil villain figures let it go was a joyous moment. They don't see that that's the moment she gave up everything she worked for for all her life and resigned herself to never being able to see or interact with her family ever again.

If she wanted to be free but alone, she could have just left and been a hermit all along. It's not like her royal family can't afford to pay her living expenses for a magical freeloader, and it's not like they don't have a second daughter they can make deal with the lineage issue.

If the life she wanted were a life of solitary seclusion she could have had that all along, no need to piss away her childhood and work so hard to stay with her family.

But noooo, family is white supremacy or something so her giving up on all that is a good thing. There's no way she could have ever wanted that!

These people aren't just braindead, they're psychopaths incapable of love or empathy.
 
This is the sort of stupid shit that, over time, causes some normies to start thinking "I grew up with all this stuff and I turned out fine. Why are they scared of this?" and start looking deeper.

Disney's woke cult inside it has become so crazed that they've started attacking their own products.
 
Allow me to sperg out explain...

1a) Universities overrun by far left idealism
1b) Universities start to skew female; women are less likely to choose STEM degrees (77% M/23% F)
1c) People entering university are increasingly directionless, and getting a generic degree no longer holds the value it used to
2) Universities pump out a shitload of grads with social science/lib arts dead-end degrees
3) Market is flooded, only so many positions at Starbucks
4) UberRich notice people are getting angry at their fuckery and cheating the system
5) UberRich decide to distract people with -isms to divide the populace, find a ready-made horde of worthless grievance studies grads to carry this out
6) Universities get absolutely staggering admin bloat of worthless DEI positions
7) Bloat spreads to private sector and government (as planned)
🤡) Disney, like every other megacorp, labels everything made before CURRENT YEAR problematic

I'm probably missing a few steps, but close enough.
 
Last edited:
>Tinker Bell is jealous of Wendy getting Peter Pan's attention
>she is also "body-conscious"
>therefore this is "problematic"

... HUH??? I'm sorry, WHAT?

It's been a LONG time since I've seen Peter Pan, but was there ever a scene where Tinker Bell was "body-conscious"? The only thing I remeber as a kid was

  • Peter goes to London, takes kids with him to Neverland
  • Kids travel with lost boys, meets Indians
  • Eventually gets captured by Captain Hook
  • Peter fights Hook
  • Kids return to London
Doesn't Peter also flirt with the Indian girl and get's jealous of that as well? Tinker Bell is just always jealous when any other woman besides her is getting Peter's attention.

Is this supposed to be one of those "fat-shaming" things because Tinker Bell is "body conscious"? If so, that's some fucking huge mental gymnastics to make that kind of fucking leap.
There's some scene where she looks at herself and poses to show off to the male audience and that's bad.
 
How is Captain Hook problematic? Why can't people who have lost a hand be villains?

I always liked how Peterson described how Hook was missing his hand to the crocodile whom had a clock in it's throat because the crocodile was a step in for time itself and Hook's hand was a way if saying that Time already has a piece of you.

Peter Pan is meant to tell children the damages of always being a child and refusing to grow up. So I always thought Hook was a hero and wanted to get the Lost Boys away from Pan and his delusion of being a child forever.
 
How is Captain Hook problematic? Why can't people who have lost a hand be villains?
There's some sex toy that's just a giant hook you stick up someone's ass to help immobilize them. It can be used on both men and women as both have assholes, but I would hazard that it's more commonly/openly used by the type of person that wears bondage gear in the streets.

That combined with Hook being out to get Pan probably makes him a homophobic villain somehow.
 
Last edited:
The final step is to cancel Walt Disney and rename the company to Welt Dismal.
This ^^^^

I can assure you this is in the works. They cant achieve their final goals with a man like Walt (who was a man of honor by all accounts) as the legacy. It is interesting how as you posted, his wikipedia article continues to be quietly revised to try and blemish his image as a racist, capitalist... dare I say it anti-Semite...

I firmly believe he will be banished from the disney image in my lifetime.
 
to get the Lost Boys away from Pan and his delusion of being a child forever.
Which is pretty funny given so many disney fans are 25+ yr old children.

At least TriStar and Spielberg gave us best Tinkerbell.
18ed492d1be48ea3028c97e5e3ed9881.jpg
 
He didn’t just kidnap people in the night in the original story. Disney already heavily sanitized that shit. The original Peter Pan was a straight up psychotic killer.
As were the indians. Tiger Lily got captured originally because she had broken into the ship to kill pirates. Neverneverland is a pretty brutal place and basically everyone has a body count.
 
There was an episode of fairly oddparents where they wished everyone was exactly the same so no one was better or worse and it turned everyone into boring gray blobs in a boring gray world. I feel like that becomes more true every day.
I swear in 10 years we're going to start seeing non-satirical articles claiming reality to be "problematic" and "triggering" and the only way to rectify the situation is to nuke the entire planet to erase existence itself.


Lol, you can play this game with literally every movie. Take Nightmare before Christmas.

-Jack Skellington is a thin stick of a man and therefore imparts body shame on viewers.

-Oogie Boogie is is a big fat villain implying all fat people are evil. He's voiced by a black man and we can't have that because black people should never even touch villainy in acting (Darth Vader also problematic btw, as is Dr. Facilier for being not only a villain voiced by a black guy but an actual black villain in his movie. Of course it would be just as bad if he was changed to a white guy, because then he'd be appropriating voodoo culture from blacks.)

-Dr. Finkelstein is wheelchair bound and something of a grey character for keeping Sally locked up at his residence. It's ablest to portray a handicapped man with any sort of unsavory qualities whatsoever.

I could do this all day, but they don't pay me for it like some people.
 
There was an episode of fairly oddparents where they wished everyone was exactly the same so no one was better or worse and it turned everyone into boring gray blobs in a boring gray world. I feel like that becomes more true every day.
Also an episode of MLP.

Also the book @Diana Moon Glampers gets her name from.

And I'm sure there's more I didn't immediately remember.

It's a story for all ages and all eras, as long as you aren't some conformist commie type.
 
I never gave a shit about the fucking red skinned natives in the movie, you think I will give a shit about this now, nigga?

Soon the only villains Disney will approve of will be Frollo (religious hypocrite who lust for a "woman of color") and Clayton (the great white hunter who epitomizes toxic masculinity).

Funny how these villains wont get the "Wicked/Cruella"...for some reason.

Are they unironically retarded?

Why ask questions to which you already know the answer of?
That or they escaped from the universe of Idiocracy.

At this rate, I won't be surprised if the "Stories Matters" team won't blink an eye about "Cuties".

Escaped? No, they never left. In fact, they are there right now, which is here.

Idiocracy is happening right before our eyes, the movie just had a very exaggerated version on it, in reality its far more subtle...and sad.
 
Saying Captain Hook is bad because it makes a disables a villain is retarded. The few permanently disableds I know prefer to be treated like a normal human; obviously some things just don't work that way, but they're not interested in being coddled.

I also like to remember a Malcolm in the Middle episode where the dad wants to feel manly and tries to start fights to feel good about himself. So he tries to cause a car collision in a parking lot and starts mouthing off to the other driver; dude says how much he's gonna kick the dad's ass... As he gets his wheel chair out of the backseat of his truck, because he can't walk. Cripples can be mean, and it's funny to watch in the proper context.

Edit: Also figuring Tinkerbell is problematic not because she's body conscious; but a lot of the ham planet wine aunts who love Disney favor Tinkerbell. The character isn't body conscious, Disney's target demographic is.
 
Back