𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

Redditors smoking truly prodigious levels of copium right now
View attachment 3218280
Also, I'm somewhat familiar with this user and he's notorious for posting studies and then either deliberately misrepresenting what they say or misunderstanding them, not realising that they actually tend to disprove his point. I've considered making a lolcow thread for him in the past.
I can see the cow, but where's the lol?
 
what is the positives and negatives of this acquisition? it is really confusing 😭😭😭
as someone who doesnt touch twitter with a 10 foot pole -
positives : even more cow content!
cons : generally speaking there is only one major con i can see immediately, which is what the feds are gonna do about this purchase since lord knows our government needs in on the action! more specifically, there has been general fearmongering regarding specifically section 230, which for those of you lurking who dont wanna click links, can be summed up as the thing protecting null from getting sued thanks to the retardation we spout here every day
 
I know it was a joking comment. It just happened to be one thing in this thread I could in some way "contribute to" by being a "well, ackshually" poster.

On the topic of this thread, it means that the porn goes to where the porn consumers are, so don't run them off if you want their dollars. The question is: would Twitter really suffer if the coomers all left? It's not like Tumblr where that was literally the only value it had. So would removing porn actually make the site worse for the average user? I'm guessing not.
Imagine if Elon Musk banned linking OnlyFans accounts to Twitter. Sure some would simply Link Tree it but the sperging would be great.
 
i ask here cuz the other places wont give a straight answer and doesnt tell me what it means
1. The left hates Elon Musk, partially because he's a billionaire and partially because he is right-wing, or at least libertarian. There are plenty of valid reasons for hating Musk, but the main reason they don't like him is because the people who do like him tend to be their enemies. Twitter is generally their site of choice, especially since Tumblr died and Reddit still has the (largely unearned) reputation for being a "hub of nazi incels". This decision means they either have to be okay with supporting Musk financially or stop using Twitter. They're being forced to put their money where their mouth is.

2. Elon Musk owning Twitter most likely means he will make the site friendlier for the right and less of a progressive hugbox. Trump and Tucker Carlson having their accounts reinstated, for example. This pisses them off for obvious reasons.
 
Everyone knows racists and bigots are metaphysically evil so their opinions can be summarily dismissed. Also, we have the entire main stream media to counter misinformation.

So, what's the problem? 😁
IMG_20220426_073315_581.jpg
 
>"elon musk has distorted views of free speech and censorship"
>says this: https://twitter.com/davidmweissman/status/1445499087017562113
This fucking retard LOL. Banning (now former) world leaders you don't like from... sending text? Not censorship? I want Putin to have Twitter by Elon so I can call him a faggot directly. Why would I *not* want that? Why would *anyone* not want that?
 
I can see the cow, but where's the lol?
That's the main reason I've held off from making a thread, they're more just annoying than anything else. I've witnessed a few times where he gets flummoxed and his "I'm an academic and you're an uneducated peon" act completely falls apart and he resorts to hurling childish insults, which can be pretty funny but that only happens occasionally.
 
Last edited:
I know it was a joking comment. It just happened to be one thing in this thread I could in some way "contribute to" by being a "well, ackshually" poster.

On the topic of this thread, it means that the porn goes to where the porn consumers are, so don't run them off if you want their dollars. The question is: would Twitter really suffer if the coomers all left? It's not like Tumblr where that was literally the only value it had. So would removing porn actually make the site worse for the average user? I'm guessing not.

I would say the proof is incontrovertible. Reddit, Twitter, and Instagram all allow, at least nudes. And then artwork of gore, guro, and loli. Everything they host practically skirts international laws.
 
Everyone knows racists and bigots are metaphysically evil so their opinions can be summarily dismissed. Also, we have the entire main stream media to counter misinformation.

So, what's the problem? 😁
View attachment 3218325
>bad-faith actor

Deserves a spot in the Current Year Terms thread if not already in. I've been seeing a lot of leftists using this term lately and it's quite annoying.
 
yea, the whole thing seems really inconsequential which is why i dont understand why people get upset
The likely outcome is for some kind of federally planned widespread chimpout in response to any kind of attempt to make the platform neutral as opposed to one that gives preferential tratment to letists/niggers/troons. The left cannot ever concede ground or compromise and are going to force this to be another issue of racism or faggot rights. Either that or a lot of bs lawsuits and I kinda think either possibility is going to come off as desperate and is going to force more centerists into the far right.
 
>"elon musk has distorted views of free speech and censorship"
>says this: https://twitter.com/davidmweissman/status/1445499087017562113
This fucking retard LOL. Banning (now former) world leaders you don't like from... sending text? Not censorship? I want Putin to have Twitter by Elon so I can call him a faggot directly. Why would I *not* want that? Why would *anyone* not want that?
>(((DAVID)))
>(((WEISSMAN)))
 
I don't care how it turns out. If Elon uses all of Twitter's collected data to enhance Tesla driving AI, to use its infrastructure for his own apps, or to liquidate it and abolish it forever.

Even if it continues as it is with the same janny freaking out, the trannies, commies and everyone not normie freaking out, it's worth it for this meltdown and exposing the things we already knew and were saying about these people that are suddenly upset their playground might include everybody instead of the "right people". He just risked his Bishop and they exposed their King.
 
I would say the proof is incontrovertible. Reddit, Twitter, and Instagram all allow, at least nudes. And then artwork of gore, guro, and loli. Everything they host practically skirts international laws.
No (full) nudity allowed on IG believe it or not. All nipples and shit have to be censored or else you can get banned for it.
 
Back