Disaster 2,000 tiny homes proposed for San Francisco’s homeless population - What could possibly go wrong?

2,000 tiny homes proposed for San Francisco’s homeless population

By Al Saracevic • April 26, 2022 1:00 pm - Updated April 26, 2022 1:16 pm

28384179_web1_220426-SFE-SARACEVIC_TINYHOMES_1.jpg
A row of tiny homes at 33 Gough St. for homeless individuals produced by Dignity Moves serves as a prototype for the kind of sites a new non-profit called MyOwnLockandKey.org hopes to build. (Craig Lee/The Examiner)

Alex Tourk wants to build 2,000 tiny homes for San Francisco’s homeless population. And he wants your help to get it done.

The political operative turned public relations specialist is teaming up with the citizen volunteer organization RescueSF to get this idea off the ground, The Examiner has learned. The newly formed nonprofit is calling itself MyOwnLockandKey.org. The goal? Increase transitional housing options and get the homeless off the streets.

Tourk, who ran point on Project Homeless Connect for former Mayor Gavin Newsom, knows the landscape and he’s banking that his history of running campaigns and building political coalitions will help move the plan forward.

He’s going to need all that experience and then some, because this idea is going to run into some serious hurdles.

First off, where are you going to put all these tiny homes, also known as modular housing units in the homeless advocacy world? Tourk says he’s identified 50 parcels of land across San Francisco that could house modular housing, owned by The City, state, federal government and private entities, such as religious organizations.

I asked where these parcels were, and he told me they’re spread across San Francisco. And that’s where it’s going to get interesting.

As we all know, people feel strongly about homelessness. They want something done. But they don’t want it done in their backyards. Tourk says he has an answer. That’s where you come in. Over the next 20 months, Tourk and RescueSF plan to “organize a broad citywide coalition of 25,000 San Franciscans to support bringing modular/tiny home transitional supportive housing projects to sites throughout the City.”

Good luck with that. And I mean it. If anyone can pull it off, it’s probably Mr. Tourk. He’s a driven organizer. He could sell the Pope dope. Part of the plan will be to hold 500 house parties across The City, where neighborhood supporters could gather their friends to hear the pitch.

“I could be pollyannaish here, right? There could be people who are like, ‘What are you talking about? … Get them out of my neighborhood,’” said Tourk. “But you know what? I want to inspire people. That’s what true organizing is. It’s like selling a vision and getting people to buy into it. This idea that you’re going to keep dumping people in the Tenderloin, in the Bayview, and this is going to somehow solve homelessness, just because it’s out of sight out of mind. If we really want to solve homelessness, we really want to make a dent in it, we all gotta participate, one way or another.”

OK, say you get the neighborhoods to buy in. Who’s going to provide the services needed? You can’t just give somebody a cabin and wish them luck. They’ll need services … and security.

Tourk believes The City is flush with cash (it is) and there are “a bevy of supportive services” available (um, not really). And he’s looking at the controversial nonprofit Urban Alchemy as a possible security solution.

OK. What about all the other nonprofits in town? The homeless industrial complex can be pretty territorial. Everyone wants to keep their piece of the funding under their own roof. On that front, Tourk figured the Coalition on Homelessness and the San Francisco Building Trades and Construction Council would be his biggest opponents. Both groups have traditionally opposed modular construction in favor of permanent housing.

But so far, Jennifer Friedenbach of the Coalition remains open to the idea and Rudy Gonzalez with the builders union is relatively supportive. Tourk says there are 1,300 union members who could benefit from building the 2,000 units proposed.

Funding may prove the biggest obstacle to MyOwnLockandKey. Tourk originally wanted to create a ballot measure that would make it possible to redirect some Prop. C money. (You know, the initiative that taxes the rich to help the homeless in S.F.) But that didn’t look politically expedient. Instead, his group wants to put this proposal in front of the Board of Supervisors and let them find the money. This could be Tourk’s Waterloo. Or Hamburger Hill. Many a dream has died in Room 250.

But this past week, the dream took a step toward reality. Not only is the group up and running, but they held a little party to kick things off. Tourk gathered a couple dozen of the biggest names in San Francisco’s homeless advocacy community at Civic Center Plaza to listen to his pitch and take a group photo.

“I picked this spot for a reason. And it really was three of them,” Tourk told the crowd. Turns out, George Moscone campaigned against the scourge of drugs and homelessness in the Plaza back in 1975. In 1988, this was ‘Camp Agnos,’ a homelessness tent encampment. And in 2004, Tourk and Judith Cain launched Project Homeless Connect on the same spot, spurring Tourk to say, “It made me realize that maybe my organizing skills were for something bigger than just electing politicians.”

“About a year ago, I met Mark (Nagel) and Laurie (Brooke), and these guys are doing amazing work at Rescue SF. They’re able to articulate a missing rung on the housing ladder, which is your transitional supportive, modular, tiny home construction. They are officially working with me as a policy arm of this foundation to help make sure we’re doing this appropriately, thoughtfully, with data and analysis. So again, today’s the beginning.”

Tourk points to existing, similar programs in Los Angeles, Oakland and Mountain View as his North Star. Not surprisingly, there were plenty of cheerleaders for his idea in the crowd at Civic Center Plaza.

“We’re very supportive of his idea,” said Brooke, co-founder of Rescue SF. “Having Alex come on board with his campaign experience and messaging experience, this could really take it to the next level.” She and her co-founder, Nagel pointed to an existing site at 33 Gough as their pilot.

The Examiner’s Sydney Johnson reported on the opening of that location, revealing that the site currently holds 30 cabins, with plans to expand to 70.

“Each unit is carefully and fashionably designed with details such as living plants, bookshelves and artwork, and features a bed, air conditioning, a desk and electricity,” wrote Johnson. “Bathrooms, showers and an eventual computer lab are all part of the development, which will get a wrap-around mural before the opening of all 70 units later this spring.” Generally speaking, residents would live in these cabins for months, rather than years. They’re intended to be a stepping-stone rather than a permanent solution.

But the site also only has a temporary lease. The developer wants to build on the site. That’s why movable units are important in this plan, Tourk argues.

“It’s about time that somebody really did something, stepped up and helped,” said Gwendolyn Westbrook, executive director of Mother Brown’s Dining Room, a social service group that runs a safe sleeping site in the Bayview. “Transitional housing is what they need.”

Here, here.

It was a lovely, sunny day in San Francisco. There was a feeling of hope in the air. Many of these people have been fighting on behalf of the homeless for years and years. And they’re not going to quit.

As I walked away from the gathering, I passed the safe sleeping site run by Urban Alchemy near City Hall. Many of the sites appeared empty inside the fence. Across the street, dozens if not hundreds of people milled about in search of a fix.

They seemed a lot more interested in heroin than housing.
 
Many of the homeless in my area stay in the riverbottoms, and the newest problem with that is, besides the incredible amount of garbage and stripped cars they leave behind, they cut hobbit holes into the levees and live in them during the winter.
If we get another rainy year like 2017, those holes greatly reduce the structural integrity of the levees, and they will break.

We've had two huge floods here in the last 35 years, but the cities and counties just act too helpless to do anything about it. All the police can do is suggest they NOT burrow into the levees and suggest they go to the local shelters instead.
Its a vermin issue when you look at the effects.
 
LOL the houses have full pane glass doors. Who the fuck thought of that? The doors and windows are going to be smashed by day 1. The door should be steel and the window made of plexi.

It's going to be fun and games until these things go up in a vacant lot and catch fire and the fire department has to respond to a call with no address, no list of tenants and no information as to the amount and layout of structures.
San Fran is a big pile of shit but full pane glass doors aren’t necessarily an issue. Look up Miami Dade impact glass testing. PGT has a lot of videos but there are others.

E: I know my house is cat 5 hurricane rated so lol at a moron with a hammer.
 
This is some "give a mouse a cookie" shit. They'll only encourage more people to turn up.
All I know is, I got put in time out in Kindergarten for believing that book was a cautionary tale about why you shouldn't give mice cookies because they always ask for more and more.

Seeing the world today, I feel vindicated. Suck it, Ms. Miller!
 
All I know is, I got put in time out in Kindergarten for believing that book was a cautionary tale about why you shouldn't give mice cookies because they always ask for more and more.

Seeing the world today, I feel vindicated. Suck it, Ms. Miller!
That's not what it's about? Ms Miller is a dumb bitch. Was she hot, though?
 
White, White Milk.



The Sierra Club has asked Sacramento County to clear the homeless along the American River, citing fire danger, but human shit is also a concern.
The city also put porta-potties down there for the homeless, and what did the homeless do?
Set them on fire, of course.

There were also dumpsters and trash cans placed in several areas, but I guess it's easier for the bums to throw trash in the river or wherever else they want.
 
LOL the houses have full pane glass doors. Who the fuck thought of that? The doors and windows are going to be smashed by day 1. The door should be steel and the window made of plexi.

It's going to be fun and games until these things go up in a vacant lot and catch fire and the fire department has to respond to a call with no address, no list of tenants and no information as to the amount and layout of structures.
On that front, it'll be fine. Amazon delivers to illegal encampments in my city. I'm sure the fire department can figure it out.

The problem with these "small homes" is blight and crime, especially if they're not managed well. I've seen and heard of well- and badly managed shack villages, and, the thing is, the only way to manage the villages well is by strictly enforcing rules among residents. So it's a great deal for homeless who are capable of getting their shit together, but is completely useless for those who aren't capable. And that latter group is responsible for like 99 percent of homelessness-related crimes.

So, SF has to choose. Do you let the residents run riot? Or do you tightly control these villages so the surrounding neighborhood isn't fucked beyond recognition? If they choose the latter, quite literally all of the fucked-up homeless are going to stay on the street.
 
I used to know a couple of cops that worked in my city until they both bounced to greener pastures. They asked me to guess where in the city that caused the majority of calls, and I guess two or three places downtown, and I was totally wrong..

It wasn't the bars downtown or even the local homeless (shocker), but it was the government housing (projects). In fact, the problem got so bad that they were forced to build a 24/7 police office onsite.

So if San Fransicko does build tiny homes for the unwashed, they better have a fully staffed police station near by or the site will go up in flames..
 
Sucks that we have to relearn the same lessons we did in the 1980s. Some people are poor for a reason and they'll drag everyone they can down to their level. Look at Cabrini-Green. This project will 100% become known for decay/drugs/disease/death and the city will get blamed for all of it.
Imagine the Pruitt-Igoe segment in Koyaanisqatsi, but instead of 11 massive apartment buildings it's 2000 tiny houses.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: TurdFondler
Give back to people who contribute to society. Lazy drug addict criminals should just be purged.
True, but San Francisco deserves it's homeless junkies. They wanted this, they voted for the laws that helped make this nightmare a reality, they can get fucked in the bed they made.
 
They'd have to pay me to live in San Francisco, free tiny home or not.
 
I've never seen intact glass in anything the homeless have been near.
Nothing is unbreakable to someone determined to break shit. If the glass doesn't go the frame will and you'll get the same result, gaping holes.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: TurdFondler
Nothing is unbreakable to someone determined to break shit. If the glass doesn't go the frame will and you'll get the same result, gaping holes.
It'd be fairly straightforward to make something that would handle anything but the most exceptional of outliers. The problem is it looks/is kind of mean/degrading but to be frank the people needing these also really need that. Solid poured concrete for walls, glass blocks in lieu of windows, PEX plumbing, and conduit over walls instead of behind it. The kind of destruction needed to really hurt it is going to call attention to itself. You'll lose your LEED certification or whatever but it's largely dirt cheap materials that are usually rendered worthless by salvage/demo. While I would prefer to just have circuit monitoring hooked up to a cyanide gas grenade that copper theft would trigger, I'd settle for just having at least per-unit monitoring so you can see if something loses power in real time. It'd be grounds for door-kicking intervention in my lease. Also you can save huge amounts of money by making one bigass building instead of 2,000 tiny ones. Take 2/3 of the savings to the bank, and spend 1/3 on security/cops/management.

It also cannot be free. This includes a special gibsmedat that they wouldn't otherwise get that then is "spent" on rent (In reality the government pays landlords directly in these schemes because even a dumbass politician isn't that stupid). Money, time, and/or effort. Otherwise what you give them will be treated like it is worthless because you've already proven to them that the item has no value. Even if you just put that cash in an index fund and return it+interest when they move out, they must have some kind of skin in the game.
 
Back