𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

Pajeets apologize for not sending their best:
pajeet2.png
pajeet.png
 
If a company is one of your only choices for a certain purpose, that's the result of unmitigated corporate consolidation. Twitter can get away with treating its customers like shit because it's part of an oligopoly, and that's the real source of the problem.
Agreed. Discussion groups that moderate like a dictatorship have been around since the dawn of internet. It's just that for many years, it was also fairly easy for dissatisfied users to just go somewhere else and set up a new group. That happened in pretty much every online community I've ever been a part of.

What makes these giant social media platforms so crappy is that even if you have enough interest and enough funds to support making a direct competitor to them, it's only a matter of time before some outside force jams a wrench into it somehow, including things like Visa and Mastercard just outright refusing to process payments for you. The problem isn't just Twitter/Facebook/whatever having bad moderation, it's also that there's no onus for them to ever have any better moderation because for some reason, nobody seems to be permitted to make an actual competitor to these sites. 🤔

I'm honestly not sure if ANY social media platform run for-profit is fully capable of being the "democratized source of information" Twitter purports to be. It has too many conflicts of interest in that area.
I don't think it can be. As long as a platform is making money from advertisers or donations, it's going to have a target audience that it caters to and doesn't want to piss off. (Just like mainstream media news outlets, but for some reason, nobody ever seems to be able to understand this concept.)
 
Last edited:
I've said this before and I'll say it again. The first amendment prevents the government from interfering with your free expression. That doesn't apply to private entities like businesses.

For instance, if you went into a Starbucks and called the barista a "nigger kike," you'll get kicked out, and there's nothing illegal about it. You're on their property, at their business, and if you want to be in the space they own, you have to follow their rules. A website is similar-- when you sign up for Twitter, you agree to their terms of use. They're a business and you're using the webspace they pay to maintain, so they can ban you for whatever reason they like. It's a natural consequence of private businesses now being the main vehicle for public discourse. They want money, and if they decide certain patron behavior is bad for their brand or public image, they're legally entitled to remove those patrons.

Notice that a lot of large protests regardless of political affiliation are held on public property; there's a reason for that. They know that the government has less control over what they say than a private business would.

I definitely don't agree with Twitter's moderation policies, which is why I don't use it. The lesson here is not to patronize businesses whose practices you disagree with.
There is plenty of reasons why businesses can have certain rules but not others. They can not choose to not serve certain people for example.
 
I think I finally understand the madness of politically-motivated lynch mobs. I wouldn't shed a tear if these people were strung up from light posts.

They hate the bedrock liberal/Enlightenment principles of the United States, they have contempt for its citizens, and they're conspiring to bring about government/corporate totalitarianism.
 
It really wasn't a joke, though. Musk was angry that he had stolen the spotlight from him so accused him of being a sexpat pedophile in a I'm-joking-but-also-not-really kind of way.
It was a genuinely pathetic display of ego. Musk had tried to thrust his pathetic little boat into a cavern where it literally couldn't fit. He took it as an insult to his manhood that when the literal lives of children were at issue, someone merely pointed out the physical reality that his dumb boat was of no use, as it literally couldn't physically fit into the cave.

Then this douchebag called the guy a pedophile for literally no reason at all.

Let's just please not fanboy Rusk, he was deliberately attempting to harm a completely innocent man who, unlike him, had actually saved lives in danger. All Rusk did in that situation was disrupt operations and call one of the actual rescuers a pedophile for nothing more than pointing out the stark physical reality that his shitty, gay sub wouldn't even fit in the cave and would have probably killed people just by blocking it up.

Elon Rusk is a retard, that's just what I'm saying. It may say something about the world that a retard like this is the smartest capitalist, but I'm not going there. Marx had some points, but he was a retard covered in boils and plus he ate his own boogers and you know he actually did eat his own boogers.

ETA: having a letter as an avatar is your announcement that "I am a weird pervert, I can't even come up with an avatar that isn't coomshit that nool sees and deletes!" coz i see just openly cropped furry porn and shit fpfs all the time and so how do those guys get away with that while you don't?

tism.
 
I wish there actually still was a retard dump for the shittiest people on the entire Internet to live so nobody else has to put up with them.

So I could sign up for that.

Or wait. I may have already done that.

Do you know that feel?
But your posts always make me grin.

I guess that's an indictment of me then.
 
It was a genuinely pathetic display of ego. Musk had tried to thrust his pathetic little boat into a cavern where it literally couldn't fit. He took it as an insult to his manhood that when the literal lives of children were at issue, someone merely pointed out the physical reality that his dumb boat was of no use, as it literally couldn't physically fit into the cave.

Then this douchebag called the guy a pedophile for literally no reason at all.

Let's just please not fanboy Rusk, he was deliberately attempting to harm a completely innocent man who, unlike him, had actually saved lives in danger. All Rusk did in that situation was disrupt operations and call one of the actual rescuers a pedophile for nothing more than pointing out the stark physical reality that his shitty, gay sub wouldn't even fit in the cave and would have probably killed people just by blocking it up.

Elon Rusk is a retard, that's just what I'm saying. It may say something about the world that a retard like this is the smartest capitalist, but I'm not going there. Marx had some points, but he was a retard covered in boils and plus he ate his own boogers and you know he actually did eat his own boogers.

ETA: having a letter as an avatar is your announcement that "I am a weird pervert, I can't even come up with an avatar that isn't coomshit that nool sees and deletes!" coz i see just openly cropped furry porn and shit fpfs all the time and so how do those guys get away with that while you don't?

tism.
The funniest thing to me about this whole thing is that Musk got all this money to buy Twitter in the first place by scamming these same leftist lemmings into buying his shit cars to virtue-signal.
 
Back