- Joined
- Feb 18, 2021
That's not even the problem. Even the renewables simps begrudgingly admit that nuclear is safe, they just claim that it's not profitable or that it's too late to start building them.But the problem here is that there's a lot of science semi literate and likely Elon Musk fanboys who associate nuclear power with Chernobyl, despite that reactor being well known for being built, in typical Soviet and Russian fashion, very shoddily with equally retarded staff that didn't even follow proper protocols. And of course, even the radioactive waste actually isn't the CIA reminiscent glowing barrels of green liquid. Now, the problem with thorium reactors is that they're pretty expensive to say the least. But I suppose that taxing the church even just a bit would help...hopefully.
You read that right. The watermelons who essentially argue for a command economy, if just for the energy and transportation sectors, become the ruthless venture capitalists they claim to hate as soon as you mention nuclear.
I actually heard that mixing some type of algae in the feed supresses an enzyme responsible for the production of methane inside the digestive tract.Now as for gas, I have a somewhat interesting suggestion. Why not just harvest it from cows? Yeah, you read that right, COWS! They seem to be big enough methane gas contributors, that I imagine one could probably harvest a good chunk of it that way. Or instead of just anally probing a cow for methane we could just grow the bacteria there and throw grass and algae at them so they produce methane.
Nevertheless you can get methane from almost anything, it's even produced spontaneously in landfills. It's just more profitable to collect from reservoirs.
How many Russian secrets did he leak?Remember Snowden? Seems to be doing just fine.