Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Well I guess nobody mentioned this but Veondre Mitchell (the passable troon known for making cringe tik toks and dressing like a slut on social media) is no longer a minor. He turned 18 two weeks ago or so and already I see signs that he is hitting a wall in his transition. Basically what I am trying to say is that this troon is starting to not look as feminine as he used to, like I see signs of baldness and his face changing.
Before
Opera Snapshot_2022-05-03_190717_www.instagram.com.png

After
Opera Snapshot_2022-05-03_190050_www.instagram.com.png

Opera Snapshot_2022-05-03_190018_www.instagram.com.png

Opera Snapshot_2022-05-03_190031_www.instagram.com.png
 

Based women. Cope, seethe, dilate, etc. I hope she wins. To quote trannies: rights aren't like pie. Women getting a group of their own doesn't take away the mixed-sex and male only groups.

View attachment 3242933
idk if this is weird to say or OT, but does this Roe v. Wade overturn's phrasing mean bad things for troons? the emphasis on "defining concept of existence" is such a bizarre phrasing. not to say trannies caused this, nor do i support the overturn, I just wonder if this'll fuck with their shit too based on the phrasing of it.

Possibly, yes. These are other cases Alito claimed had no solid roots in history, which is his main claim as to why abortion is bad mmmkay? One tweet I read said he included the law on crosdressing, although I haven't seen that (I admit to being too sad/angry to have read the brief, I don't enjoy being MATI), for the same reason. I do find that to be likely as it fits the theme as shown here, but as of now it's hearsay.

That would make "being trans" illegal, in theory, even in the privacy of your home. However, like sodamy laws, how do they enforce that?

Even if you're against abortion, this is a legitimate terrifying precedent to set. It could have tremendous ripple affects that genuinely set back freedoms that people, mostly women and other minority, today take for granted. Like the ability to own property and our own bank accounts. I don't think the right to vote will be taken away, but I'm not 100% sure.

Edit: and before you vote me retarded for fear-mongering, remember as recently as less than six years ago practically everyone was saying to women and some men "stop being retarded, they will never overturn roe v Wade". If you still think I'm a retard, well, I can't stop you.

5DC641A4-A723-4615-8A46-02AA7ED5A860.png7EC300C1-226F-41F0-BB3D-81E2C77BAC2B.png
CFE5E714-546B-477D-9704-2D10B6F2A838.png
 
Last edited:
I'm not an Americano so if burgerland wants to go 50 years backwards I couldn't give less of a fuck. However, do the people tweeting the above nonsense not see that maybe...just maybe spending so much fucking time on this gender nonsense and policing who is called what instead of trying to defend actual rights may have led here?

You could have been out there advocating / donating / protesting to groups who are actually interested in protecting your rights but instead you chose to sit around saying *whiny voice activated* 'well actually men can get pregnant too durrrrr'.

On the up side, seeing these troons cry about being most affected by this might finally wake up some of the libfems who have been metaphorically and literally sucking the girl dick the last few years at the expense of their own rights.

Oh my dear wokies, you've all worked so hard to make sure the word 'woman' means nothing anymore. If it means nothing then women no longer needs those laws that enshirne certain protections and rights. Here is the end result handmaidens. I hope the taste of the girl dick was worth it.
My hope is, that because of the abortion opinion, that woke leftists will be forced to define woman in law in such a way that troons with dicks can't weasle their way in. Like, the CROWN act recently came out defining race as immutable and what not, so now because of this abortion scare, I'm hoping that dems will have to write legislation that defines "woman" as an immutable characteristic in order to protect abortion rights. If that happens, troons can't be saying they're women and should be allowed in women's spaces, because in law woman would be defined by it's immutable characteristics, not the stuff that could be changed via surgeries and drugs.
 
"I spend so much time. . .being tuned in to other peoples needs but people just ignore mine[.]" Ignoring the stupidity of this, just think about that statement. What "needs" does this man want to satisfy by massaging women? I'm sure we all know the answer, but it's still rather telling that he massages not to earn money or even give a sense of relaxation to his clients. It's about what he "needs."

There's also an update posted about the same time:

Massage Screenshot.PNG
More of the same sense of narcissism. It's really not surprising, but still interesting to see, in a way.

Here are some of the choice responses, as well as replies from the masseur himself:
Massage Screenshot 2.PNG


Massage Screenshot 3.PNG

I'm just thankful there's still some users of Reddit that are more level-headed than the rest.

Here's an image of the e-mail the client sent to the massage-parlor manager. I'll spoiler it, though, as it's somewhat long.
oHFykX5.png
 
Even if you're against abortion, this is a legitimate terrifying precedent to set. It could have tremendous ripple affects that genuinely set back freedoms that people, mostly women and other minority, today take for granted. Like the ability to own property and our own bank accounts. I don't think the right to vote will be taken away, but I'm not 100% sure.
This is something I think a lot of people genuinely aren't realizing.

From my understanding, Roe v Wade only went through because it was considered a matter of privacy. Well, it turns out that a good bit of Supreme Court cases are based on that, and matters like this actually fall under the Fourteenth Amendment, which is why they are generally allowed through.

My point is that if they can do this, what other private matters could just stop being private matters, and what other amendments could they bend, and/or just straight-up change? A lot of the Amendments could also fall under privacy, including the Second, and the First, and we've seen firsthand just how desperate some people are to get rid of them.

I know, slippery slope, and all, but as you said, the precedent this sets is rather unsettling.
 
My hope is, that because of the abortion opinion, that woke leftists will be forced to define woman in law in such a way that troons with dicks can't weasle their way in. Like, the CROWN act recently came out defining race as immutable and what not, so now because of this abortion scare, I'm hoping that dems will have to write legislation that defines "woman" as an immutable characteristic in order to protect abortion rights. If that happens, troons can't be saying they're women and should be allowed in women's spaces, because in law woman would be defined by it's immutable characteristics, not the stuff that could be changed via surgeries and drugs.

We need to pass a law that says we can ratify the Equal Rights Amendment. Once women cannot be discriminated against based on sex we have the constitutional right to stand up to these sex based laws. How can you make abortion illegal, or contraception, without discriminating against women based on our sex? Those are explicitly sex based laws.

The required number of states to ratify the amendment has passed the motion or whatever, as of 2019 (I think, maybe 2018). But the deadline to do so as passed by Congress expired decades ago. The House last year passed an extension to it, but it hasn't even come up in the Senate.

I'm aware that this has a snowballs chance in hell of passing the Senate, then it would probably be argued that it has to go around through the states again, which means it wouldn't make the 2/3rds majority. But that's what's it's going to take.
 
This is something I think a lot of people genuinely aren't realizing.

From my understanding, Roe v Wade only went through because it was considered a matter of privacy. Well, it turns out that a good bit of Supreme Court cases are based on that, and matters like this actually fall under the Fourteenth Amendment, which is why they are generally allowed through.

My point is that if they can do this, what other private matters could just stop being private matters, and what other amendments could they bend, and/or just straight-up change? A lot of the Amendments could also fall under privacy, including the Second, and the First, and we've seen firsthand just how desperate some people are to get rid of them.

I know, slippery slope, and all, but as you said, the precedent this sets is rather unsettling.
I get the feeling you're a fellow reproduction husk, and yeah this fucking sucks, but I don't come to KF to read more sad news - I'm here to laugh at trannies. In that vein, I ask y'all to consider this:

FPMvQUOVEBA2qLP.jpeg

This asshole is currently k11ngm1dasXXX on Twitter, and beyond being a hilarious Aiden, she's also incredibly abrasive and entitled. Plus she lied about having Ovarian Cancer and got like several thousand dollars in a GoFundMe grift a few months back. She full admitted to lying, but claimed an alter did it (yes of course she's "plural") - then she slightly changed her username and everyone seemed to just forget?? It was bonkers to observe. Obviously truth means nothing.

She's one of my personal lolcows - although I do believe she's had a write up about her gogriftme exploits on KF before. She's changed her name enough I can't currently find it, but yeah she's good for a chuckle and/or something else to be MATI about.

ETA: Found It.

Also, sad deflated titties under the spoiler (she got the lipo kind of "teetus deletus" and so she's got some very sad empty titty pouches she enjoys showing off)
troontit.png
 
Last edited:
Pouring one out for reproductive husks in red states.

Also the trannies saying it doesn't affect just women makes me mati af. YWNBAW and therefore will never need an abortion. It's not rocket science appliances to figure out that not having the capacity to get pregnant excludes them automatically. I wish they'd fuck off and let the real women be righteously pissed about something and hate on dicks/men for a bit without "actually"ing at them jfc.
 
I think if you try to opt out of being a woman, you opt out of getting cared about when women's rights are threatened. Oh no the Aidens might not be able to get their fucked up cross hormone pregnancies terminated? You cast your lot, get fucked.
 
I get the feeling you're a fellow reproduction husk, and yeah this fucking sucks, but I don't come to KF to read more sad news - I'm here to laugh at trannies. In that vein, I ask y'all to consider this:

View attachment 3243398
This asshole is currently k11ngm1dasXXX on Twitter, and beyond being a hilarious Aiden, she's also incredibly abrasive and entitled. Plus she lied about having Ovarian Cancer and got like several thousand dollars in a GoFundMe grift a few months back. She full admitted to lying, but claimed an alter did it - then she slightly changed her username and everyone seemed to just forget?? It was bonkers to observe. Obviously truth means nothing.

She's one of my personal lolcows - although I do believe she's had a write up about her gogriftme exploits on KF before. She's changed her name enough I can't currently find it, but yeah she's good for a chuckle and/or something else to be MATI about..

What a totally manly way for a true dude to pop his legs and pose for a photo!
 
>I spend so much time being in tune to other's needs but people just ignore mine.

That is just a flat out admission that he wants to massage women (in a professional setting) to fulfil his own (fetish) needs. The woman could probably smell the creep from a mile away.

Am I wrong in thinking that massage is a service industry? In what clown world is it acceptable for a service industry employee to prioritise their own needs over that of a customer when on the clock.
 
Pouring one out for reproductive husks in red states.

Also the trannies saying it doesn't affect just women makes me mati af. YWNBAW and therefore will never need an abortion. It's not rocket science appliances to figure out that not having the capacity to get pregnant excludes them automatically. I wish they'd fuck off and let the real women be righteously pissed about something and hate on dicks/men for a bit without "actually"ing at them jfc.
Tbf those trannies are saying that "men", aka confused women, are being affected by this. A lot of people here seem to think they are saying mtfs are being affected, which would be retarded. However, they are talking about ftms for once. Since that almost never happens, I understand why everyone is confused.

Not blaming you specifically or calling you a tard, you just happened to be the most recent one, so I quoted you. :feels:
 
"Burgerland" I literally only see this term on Kiwi Farms, it's really weird. Like an idea from the 50s. Europeans consume billions of burgers a year at McDonald's alone (France weirdly being #1). Not that there's anything wrong with burgers, but when it comes to fast food, IF you eat fast food, tens of millions of Americans don't, places like Chipotle or Taco Bell or Panera are right up there in the US, burgers are I guess still best-sellers but they're not some national obsession, and non-Americans certainly consume a fuckton of hamburgers themselves. "Burgerland" is just stupid.
Fucksake dude dry your eyes, this is Kiwifarms.
If someone says "Brits are pedos" it gets a thousand likes, so fucking what?
Everyone here is a retard, a shut-in or spastic-autastic, at least try to hide it.
 
Back