Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
Speaking of which. For some fucking reason a lot of the guys on the Pro-Russia side of things hyping up these nuclear threats seem to forget about Mutually Assured Destruction.

Plus I'm admittedly not an expert on the matter, but I do question if it's even possible to cause a massive tsunami with a nuclear weapon unless it's significantly more powerful than even the Tsar Bomba.
You always get this kind of hopium from retards that nuclear weapons are a 'get out of prolonged war free' card. Luckily the Russian leadership aren't terminally-online groypers/tankies and understand that escalating the war to nuclear exchanges will mean the end of the Russian nation-state rather than its mere containment.

The Russians aren't retards. Maybe poorly organized but not retarded.
 
Speaking of which. For some fucking reason a lot of the guys on the Pro-Russia side of things hyping up these nuclear threats seem to forget about Mutually Assured Destruction.

Plus I'm admittedly not an expert on the matter, but I do question if it's even possible to cause a massive tsunami with a nuclear weapon unless it's significantly more powerful than even the Tsar Bomba.
It's definitely possible to cause a small one at the very least based off of what's been released about soviet and us tests. Whether or not it would be that big is a different story. Even if it could, that would really fuck Russia over, because I would imagine that would make their sea access from the Baltics pretty radioactive.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: MrJokerRager
It's definitely possible to cause a small one at the very least based off of what's been released about soviet and us tests. Whether or not it would be that big is a different story. Even if it could, that would really fuck Russia over, because I would imagine that would make their sea access from the Baltics pretty radioactive.
The ocean is massive and water is an excellent moderator. Not to mention any patch that is irradiated will end up being immediately diluted by ocean currents. We'd see cancer rates tick up in the nordic and baltic countries but probably nothing so severe as Russia's baltic ports being unusable or even inconvenienced.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JosephStalin
And V1lat's meltdown about Pure's Z incident continues, this time he's calling out the Russian FSB to investigate Virtus.Pro and their players for the incident:

1651630573649.png

Player VP, Pure supported the Russian Army and the special operation, expressed his position to the whole world on the air. His club forced him to publicly apologize for this, and the next day he fired him for supporting the actions of the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine. Did I correctly understand the actions of the Virtus pro club? If I understand correctly what they have been writing about for the last two months, then this is a discrediting of the actions of the Russian Army. Starting from the overwriting of the symbol, and ending with the dismissal of a Russian player who publicly supported the army. This should be the subject of an investigation by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the FSB.

This guy looks like he won't stop his Russophobia, and shitting on VP, any time soon.
 
Speaking of which. For some fucking reason a lot of the guys on the Pro-Russia side of things hyping up these nuclear threats seem to forget about Mutually Assured Destruction.
Meanwhile everyone else seems to forget that Russians keep using nukes like they were designated to be used — as means of deterrence, a big fuck of sign to not fuck about Russia's borders.
And that our nuclear doctrine is reactionary unlike that of one country that had actually used nukes offensively. First strike doctrine, all that shit.

But nah, Putin be crazy.

Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 355 dated June 2, 2020 “On the Fundamentals of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the field of nuclear deterrence”
June 3, 2020

In order to ensure the implementation of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of nuclear deterrence, I decree:

1. To approve the attached Fundamentals of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of nuclear Deterrence.

2. This Decree comes into force from the date of its signing.
President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin

Moscow, Kremlin
June 2, 2020
№ 355

APPROVED
By Presidential Decree
Of the Russian Federation
dated June 2, 2020 N 355
The basics
State policy of the Russian Federation in the field of nuclear deterrence
I. General provisions

1. These Fundamentals are a document of strategic planning in the field of defense and reflect official views on the essence of nuclear deterrence, define military dangers and threats for the neutralization of which nuclear deterrence is carried out, the principles of nuclear deterrence, as well as the conditions for the transition of the Russian Federation to the use of nuclear weapons.

2. Guaranteed deterrence of a potential enemy from aggression against the Russian Federation and (or) its allies is among the highest state priorities. Deterrence of aggression is ensured by the totality of the military power of the Russian Federation, including nuclear weapons.

3. The State policy of the Russian Federation in the field of nuclear deterrence (hereinafter - the state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence) is a set of coordinated, united by a common plan political, military, military-technical, diplomatic, economic, informational and other measures carried out based on the forces and means of nuclear deterrence to prevent aggression against the Russian Federation. Federation and (or) its allies.

4. The state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence is defensive in nature, is aimed at maintaining the potential of nuclear forces at a level sufficient to ensure nuclear deterrence, and guarantees the protection of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the state, deterring a potential enemy from aggression against the Russian Federation and (or) its allies, and in the event of a military conflict - preventing escalation military operations and their termination on conditions acceptable to the Russian Federation and (or) its allies.

5. The Russian Federation considers nuclear weapons exclusively as a means of deterrence, the use of which is an extreme and forced measure, and takes all necessary efforts to reduce the nuclear threat and prevent the aggravation of interstate relations that could provoke military conflicts, including nuclear ones.

6. The legal framework of these Foundations consists of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, generally recognized principles and norms of international law, international treaties of the Russian Federation in the field of defense and arms control, federal constitutional laws, federal laws, other regulatory legal acts and documents regulating defense and security issues.

7. The provisions of these Fundamentals are mandatory for all federal state authorities, other state bodies and organizations involved in ensuring nuclear deterrence.

8. These Fundamentals may be refined depending on external and internal factors affecting the provision of defense.
II. The essence of nuclear deterrence

9. Nuclear deterrence is aimed at ensuring that a potential adversary understands the inevitability of retaliation in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation and (or) its allies.

10. Nuclear deterrence is ensured by the presence in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation of combat-ready forces and means capable of using nuclear weapons to cause unacceptable damage to a potential enemy in any situation, as well as the readiness and determination of the Russian Federation to use such weapons.

11. Nuclear deterrence is carried out continuously in peacetime, during the immediate threat of aggression and in wartime, up to the beginning of the use of nuclear weapons.

12. The main military dangers, which, depending on changes in the military-political and strategic situation, may develop into military threats to the Russian Federation (threats of aggression) and for the neutralization of which nuclear deterrence is carried out, are:

a) the buildup by a potential enemy in the territories adjacent to the Russian Federation and its allies and in adjacent sea areas of groups of general-purpose forces, which include means of delivering nuclear weapons;

b) deployment by States that consider the Russian Federation as a potential enemy of missile defense systems and means, cruise and ballistic missiles of medium and shorter range, high-precision non-nuclear and hypersonic weapons, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, directed energy weapons;

c) creation and deployment of anti-missile defense and strike systems in space;

d) the States have nuclear weapons and (or) other types of weapons of mass destruction that can be used against the Russian Federation and (or) its allies, as well as means of delivery of these weapons;

e) uncontrolled proliferation of nuclear weapons, their means of delivery, technologies and equipment for their manufacture;

(e) The deployment of nuclear weapons and their means of delivery on the territories of non-nuclear States.

13. The Russian Federation exercises nuclear deterrence against individual States and military coalitions (blocs, alliances) that consider the Russian Federation as a potential enemy and possess nuclear weapons and (or) other types of weapons of mass destruction or a significant combat potential of general-purpose forces.

14. When implementing nuclear deterrence, the Russian Federation takes into account the deployment by a potential enemy on the territories of other States of offensive means (cruise and ballistic missiles, hypersonic aircraft, attack unmanned aerial vehicles), directed energy weapons, missile defense, nuclear missile strike warnings, nuclear weapons and (or) other types of weapons mass destruction, which can be used against the Russian Federation and (or) its allies.

15. The principles of nuclear deterrence are:

(a) Compliance with international arms control obligations;

b) continuity of measures to ensure nuclear deterrence;

c) adaptability of nuclear deterrence to military threats;

d) uncertainty for a potential adversary of the scale, time and place of the possible use of nuclear deterrence forces and means;

e) centralization of state management of the activities of federal executive authorities and organizations involved in ensuring nuclear deterrence;

(e) Rationality of the structure and composition of nuclear deterrence forces and means, as well as their maintenance at a level minimally sufficient to fulfill the assigned tasks;

g) maintaining the constant readiness of the allocated part of the forces and means of nuclear deterrence for combat use.

16. The nuclear deterrence forces of the Russian Federation include land-based, sea-based and air-based nuclear forces.
III. Conditions for the transition of the Russian Federation to the use of nuclear weapons

17. The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear weapons and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies, as well as in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the State is threatened.

18. The decision on the use of nuclear weapons is made by the President of the Russian Federation.

19. The conditions determining the possibility of the use of nuclear weapons by the Russian Federation are:

a) receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territories of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies;

b) the use by the enemy of nuclear weapons or other types of weapons of mass destruction on the territories of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies;

c) the enemy's impact on critically important state or military facilities of the Russian Federation, the disabling of which will lead to the disruption of the response actions of the nuclear forces;

d) aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.

20. The President of the Russian Federation may, if necessary, inform the military and political leadership of other states and (or) international organizations about the readiness of the Russian Federation to use nuclear weapons or about the decision taken on the use of nuclear weapons, as well as about the fact of its use.
IV. Tasks and functions of federal state authorities, other state bodies and organizations on implementation of the state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence

21. The general management of the state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence is carried out by the President of the Russian Federation.

22. The Government of the Russian Federation implements measures to implement economic policy aimed at maintaining and developing nuclear deterrence, as well as forms and implements foreign and information policy in the field of nuclear deterrence.

23. The Security Council of the Russian Federation forms the main directions of military policy in the field of nuclear deterrence, and also coordinates the activities of federal executive authorities and organizations involved in the implementation of decisions adopted by the President of the Russian Federation concerning the provision of nuclear deterrence.

24. The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, through the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, carries out direct planning and implementation of organizational and military measures in the field of nuclear deterrence.

25. Other federal executive authorities and organizations participate in the implementation of decisions adopted by the President of the Russian Federation concerning the provision of nuclear deterrence, in accordance with their powers.
Document overview

The President approved the fundamentals of state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence, in which:

- the official views on the essence of nuclear deterrence are outlined;

- military dangers and threats have been identified, for the neutralization of which nuclear deterrence is carried out;

- the principles of nuclear deterrence are outlined;

- the conditions for the transition of the Russian Federation to the use of nuclear weapons have been established.

The state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence is defensive in nature. It is aimed at protecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the state, deterring a potential enemy from aggression against Russia and its allies, and in the event of a military conflict - at preventing the escalation of hostilities and their termination on acceptable terms for the Russian Federation and its allies.

The decision on the use of nuclear weapons is made by the President of the Russian Federation.

The decree comes into force from the date of signing.
 
Last edited:
@K-Hole That Titan II museum is great (for the fans, it was one of the filming locations for ST:First Contact), and I visited that and some of the abandoned Titan I silos a few years ago. And 12 years ago did the launch simulation deep underground at the Strategic Rocket Forces Museum in Pervomaisk, where the former officer delighted in telling us that the missiles in that sector under his command had targeted the UK.
 
They've already started converting some of them I believe and iirc test flights have been made. I wouldn't be surprised if they make an outright catapult carrier soon though. These ships will help rebuild their ability for carrier operations.
Indeed, and you can bet the Japanese will, as they have been doing for decades now, exercise with the US Navy to get up to snuff with their carriers.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Spicey McHaggis
View attachment 3244556

Confirmed strikes on railways:

➖ Substation "Sknilov-transit" — 49.829456, 23.945272
➖ Electrical substation PS "Kleparov-transit" — 49.864689, 23.948731
➖ Traction substation PS 110/27,5/10 kV "Podbortsy-T" — 49.847452, 12/24/13376

Looks like that's it for connections from Slovakia & Poland to Ukraine for now.

What remains are the Hungarian connections (irrelevant, no arms shipments allowed through) and I believe some Romanian connections, though perhaps not to Odessa since they were also hit today.

View attachment 3244578

Three days ago, Yampol was taken. Today, LiveUAMaps quietly admitted it. The Russians slowly and silently inch towards Slaviansk. An offensive is being prepared by the LPR and Russian forces towards the city (village?) of Barvinkove. Looks like the second battle of Slaviansk will happen eventually, but in my opinion it will still take a while. Lyman and Barvinkove must still be taken, as well as a lot of villages in between.
Sounds fucked up, but I'm hoping Hungary ends up with a big win from all of this, which seems like a real possibility now. Not only will their companies now have the most access to the country when the rebuilding starts, them staying neutral keeps them from suffering any real lasting blowback like what is probably going to happen in other countries that picked a side.
 
Speaking of which. For some fucking reason a lot of the guys on the Pro-Russia side of things hyping up these nuclear threats seem to forget about Mutually Assured Destruction.

Plus I'm admittedly not an expert on the matter, but I do question if it's even possible to cause a massive tsunami with a nuclear weapon unless it's significantly more powerful than even the Tsar Bomba.
yes Its hypothetically possible to do so
 
View attachment 3245139
They have the Izumo class and its predecessor the Hyuuga class. Both of these are technically termed 'helicopter destroyers' but modifying them to launch STOVL aircraft like the F-35B would be trivial. Four such vessels are currently in operation by the JSDF.
I think it's funny how all of these years later the US still has that retarded tonnage treaty with Japan.
 
Video of a fire at an oil depot in Makeyevka

The dead and wounded are reported.
It is reported that 4 large-capacity tanks of 5,000 tons each caught fire at an oil depot in Makeyevka.



photo_2022-05-04_13-47-14.jpg
photo_2022-05-04_13-55-14.jpg


The Immortal Regiment campaign was held at the Russian Embassy in Japan.

About half of the participants are Russian, but nevertheless, such an action in Japan is unexpected.





I noticed this on Thingiverse. It's a website that hosts free .stl files for 3d printing. These calibration cubes are very common as they're used to test issues with the X, Y, and Z axis on 3d printers. None of the comments were in English.

View attachment 3245980
There are letters on the cube - Х, У and Й which when combined translate to "dick" in Russian.

They probably joke about that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Russians, who also had never seen asphalt or street lights were caught in shock and disbelief at how Our Democracy ™️ brought prosperity even to the smallest, vibrant Ukrainian village.
View attachment 3245939
I'm 100% convinced these people think Russia hasn't changed one bit since the 90s when there was total economic turmoil that left a lot of people scrapping by. The only truth I'd see in this is if these were troops from rural areas of Russia where the local economy is fucked and Army service is their only way out of being stuck in a shithole full of drunks.

Plus the average monthly income of a Ukrainian is half of that of a Russian's in perspective.
 
Detachments of a special military operation are clearing the village of Novoselovka from nationalists, filmed in a captured school that was turned into a base.

The flags on the cans of food are noteworthy.
Evacuation of civilians from Mariupol from the Ukrainian side At 2:05, the woman says, "We were not interested in Russian humanitarian corridors."
 
1651650822725.png


An import ban, but only when the EU can source supplies from elsewhere. Should be doable with crude but as the EU doesn't have enough refinery capacity and rely heavily on Russian diesel imports that's going to take a long fuckin time to replace.

Slovakia and Hungary are already seeking exemptions or else they'll veto.

Likely this is just optics. But if they're serious the citizens of the EU can expect massive price rises and shortages of everything, especially food. Diesel is required for every aspect of the food production and transportation chain. Maybe EU politicians are on such an escalation spiral that they don't care about empty supermarket shelves and food riots but I'm thinking this is more theatre to placate the burgers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back