Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

[Lichen Bark]

@Secret Asshole
Since we've had recent dump of documents from the FOIA new things are being talked about. I came across this substack where this woman shows that they have only released a tiny tiny fraction of CRFs (Case Report Forms) for each of the listed trial sites. It's a pretty short posting. What do you think is going on here, why the hold up on the CRF release? Is Pfizer just being intentionally difficult?

These forms sound pretty important to me:

Spoiler: Case Report form according to National Library of Medicine

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170533/

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/this-took-all-day-and-it-is-worth?s=r
https://archive.ph/qVLVW

This was her main table:

 

[Protistology]

So how fucked am I if I got the initial two jabs? Moderna.

Depends if you got saline or not. Look up your batch numbers.

 

[Smug Chuckler]

So how fucked am I if I got the initial two jabs? Moderna.

You wake up one day and see Bill Gates in the mirror. OH MY GOD NOOOOOOO!

 

[Ruin]

So how fucked am I if I got the initial two jabs? Moderna.

I can't predict exactly when but your heart is going to explode.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

“Remember, it was your choice. No one forced you to take it.”

Let's wait for their Pikachu surprising faces when the MSM will do when people will upload clips where they preach for the vaxx and wait for better excuses than saying "I was drunk".

 

[Blasterman]

I can't predict exactly when but your heart is going to explode.

Well, then at least it's a quick death.

You wake up one day and see Bill Gates in the mirror. OH MY GOD NOOOOOOO!

BLOODY BILLY BLOODY BILLY BLOODY BILLY

 

[sperginity]

So how fucked am I if I got the initial two jabs? Moderna.

no one really knows. Anyone who tells you that they know for sure is lying, it is too soon to be certain about any of it. that being said, the POSSIBLE bad outcomes can come from two sources:

1. the effect of the vaccine on the body

2. the effect of widespread vaccination on the evolution of the virus

if the problems are limited to the first category, no one can say how fucked any individual is. Just like we all know that smoking causes cancer, that does not mean that we know YOU will get cancer if you smoke, and plenty of people smoke their entire lives and die of something else. If this is the case, then the brand of vaccine and number of doses may matter a lot, and it is too early to say which ones are worse (or if one type is worse for a certain demographic and ok for another, etc).

if the problems include the 2nd category, it may well end up being a situation where you are waiting to catch covid again in the future, but disease is much more deadly for vaccinated people because their immune systems are stuck responding to the original spike protein only.this is a much spookier set of problems to cope with, no one knows how or when they will unfold or how much worse the virus would be. This is the future that Geert Vanden Bossche has predicted, he is extremely experienced as a vaccinologist (read his resume) and has a pretty good track record of prediction from the start of the pandemic until now. If what he says is true then it doesn't matter which vaccine you got, the problem is the immune response being restricted to spike protein, and also being in countries that have a bunch of vaccinated people around that pressures viral evolution in the direction of circumventing the narrow immunity generated by vaccines. One thing that supports his prediction is that the tests of omicron specific mRNA vaccines failed. The only recruits for it were people who were vaccinated against the original strain already, and they didn't generate any new or different antibodies in response to the omicron shot. That seems like a circumstance that evolution will exploit, given enough time and enough people whose immunity is limited to the original spike protein. If a virus can evolve in such a way that it tricks the body into making ineffective antibodies then it will have a massive advantage over other strains of virus. Even people infected with the original strain will have additional antibodies to other parts of the virus so they are not going to be fucked. It may be that unvaccinated people would have responded to the omicron mRNA vaccine, but such people tend to be against covid vaccines on principle at this point.

 

[Drain Todger]

While in the throes of my doc review autism fit, I saw references in the reviewers' notes to "blunting <some specific immune system component> response." Not exactly sure what was meant by that as I was scanning fast and medical stuff is outside my area of education, but perhaps @Drain Todger , @Lichen Bark , or @RiverFalcon can chime in.

With what I've seen, there are numerous mechanisms by which the "vaccine" could actually inhibit the immune system.

1. Direct LFA-1 Integrin binding and blockage or premature activation by Spike or by Spike-bearing exosomes(?)
2. Inhibition of TLRs by pseudouridylated mRNA.
3. Inhibition of V(D)J recombination by Spike localizing in the nucleus.

Not to mention, the constant strain of the immune system tracking down and eliminating all these cells transfected with Spike, or what might happen if the mRNA-bearing LNPs get into the bone marrow and start transfecting immature blood cells and causing the immune system to actually attack the bone marrow.

Wait. Can that even happen?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863340/

As of September 2021, SARS-CoV-2 booster shots became widely available in the US to ensure continued protection against the virus. A temporal relationship has been previously reported between the first or second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and the development of thrombocytopenia. However, adverse events related to the third COVID-19 vaccine are still being reported and studied. We report a 74-year-old male who developed bone marrow suppression and pancytopenia recorded seven days after receiving the Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. During his hospital stay, the patient’s hemoglobin, white blood cell, and platelet levels continued to trend downwards. However, all three levels showed improvement one week after discharge without robust intervention. Global vaccination is of utmost importance, as is understanding and documenting post-vaccination reactions including bone marrow suppression. Prompt evaluation and patient education are imperative to improve patient outcomes and combat hesitancy against vaccine administration.

Oh my god. This shit is not good.

@Secret Asshole
Since we've had recent dump of documents from the FOIA new things are being talked about. I came across this substack where this woman shows that they have only released a tiny tiny fraction of CRFs (Case Report Forms) for each of the listed trial sites. It's a pretty short posting. What do you think is going on here, why the hold up on the CRF release? Is Pfizer just being intentionally difficult?

These forms sound pretty important to me:

Spoiler: Case Report form according to National Library of Medicine

View attachment 3249926
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170533/

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/this-took-all-day-and-it-is-worth?s=r
https://archive.ph/qVLVW
View attachment 3249919
This was her main table:
View attachment 3249917

Jikky had something to say about that:

https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1521642114546761728

Thread by @Jikkyleaks on Thread Reader App

@Jikkyleaks: I'll just keep repeating - all 44,000 "patients" were numbered with an 8 digit number: [Site number e.g. 1006][Patient number, e.g. 1001] The patient numbers are CONSECUTIVE. Can you see the problem? @A...…

threadreaderapp.com

Thread by @Jikkyleaks on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App

archived 5 May 2022 16:45:41 UTC

archive.ph

So the CRFs for those sites were already released in January in full in accordance with the schedule.

But they were only 3% of the randomised patients, which means any of the following....

(1) The FDA only have 3% of the CRFs because only a sample were provided by Pfizer (which would contravene ICH-GCP and make the study subject to a full investigation)

(2) Pfizer only provided a sample now and defied the court order (contempt of court)

(3)...
..(3) the other CRFs don't exist or don't corroborate with @IamBrookJackson's and other research nurse records and so they were withheld.

That would indicate that the missing 42,800+ patients were synthesised or altered from the clinical record.

97% of the subjects in the trial may not even have fucking existed.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Could we said "it begins" like Barney Gumble after what we read the FDA latest recommandations about the Janssen vaccine?

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Limits Use of Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to Certain Individuals

The FDA has limited the authorized use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals 18 older for whom other available COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to individuals 18 and older who elect to receive it because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

www.fda.gov

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Limits Use of Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to Certain Individuals

The FDA has limited the authorized use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals 18 older for whom other available COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to individuals 18 and older who elect to receive it because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

web.archive.org

For Immediate Release:May 05, 2022

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has limited the authorized use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals 18 years of age and older for whom other authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to individuals 18 years of age and older who elect to receive the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

Key Points:

• After conducting an updated analysis, evaluation and investigation of reported cases, the FDA has determined that the risk of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), a syndrome of rare and potentially life-threatening blood clots in combination with low levels of blood platelets with onset of symptoms approximately one to two weeks following administration of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine, warrants limiting the authorized use of the vaccine.
• The FDA has determined that the known and potential benefits of the vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 outweigh the known and potential risks for individuals 18 years of age and older for whom other authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and for individuals 18 years of age and older who elect to receive the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine.
• The Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine now reflects the revision of the authorized use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and includes a warning statement at the beginning of the fact sheet for prominence which summarizes information on the risk for TTS. Additionally, information on the revision to the authorized use of the vaccine and updated information on this risk of blood clots with low levels of blood platelets has been added to the Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers.

“We recognize that the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine still has a role in the current pandemic response in the United States and across the global community. Our action reflects our updated analysis of the risk of TTS following administration of this vaccine and limits the use of the vaccine to certain individuals,” said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “Today’s action demonstrates the robustness of our safety surveillance systems and our commitment to ensuring that science and data guide our decisions. We’ve been closely monitoring the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and occurrence of TTS following its administration and have used updated information from our safety surveillance systems to revise the EUA. The agency will continue to monitor the safety of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and all other vaccines, and as has been the case throughout the pandemic, will thoroughly evaluate new safety information.”

 

[Protistology]

Could we said "it begins" like Barney Gumble after what we read the FDA latest recommandations about the Janssen vaccine?

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Limits Use of Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to Certain Individuals

The FDA has limited the authorized use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals 18 older for whom other available COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to individuals 18 and older who elect to receive it because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

www.fda.gov

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Limits Use of Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to Certain Individuals

The FDA has limited the authorized use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals 18 older for whom other available COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to individuals 18 and older who elect to receive it because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

web.archive.org

Remember that clip from Veritas of the Jansen employees laughing and saying they never would take the J&J vaccine themselves because it was shit? Just a conspiracy two years ago.

 

[Irrational Exuberance]

Could we said "it begins" like Barney Gumble after what we read the FDA latest recommandations about the Janssen vaccine?

I don't know - can we?

 

[Dancing Axolotl]

Well Kiwis, they finally got me. Received a very tasty e-mail from HR yesterday saying they checked their records and I haven't submitted a covid test since 11/29 and that they would like me to promptly resume weekly testing or take a pic of my vaxx card which doesn't exist. I'm tempted to ignore it going forward, considering I plan on seeking other employment in a couple of months but not sure if I will stick with that plan just yet. I'd rather not have a personal chat with a supervisor over something that may implicate me further. I just don't want the stupid swabs and I especially don't want to end up testing positive and having all of my information submitted into the virtual log book that counts me as a case. Fuck that. I'm so over this shit.

Update, I pretty much ignored HR because fuck this shit, but they sent me another tasteful e-mail today and CC'd my damn supervisor. I replied with a straight up lie saying I got two shots early last year, lost my card forever ago, and haven't been weekly testing consistently but I've totally definitely done it since November! This must be a mistake!

Guess I'll suck it up and swab away. They won again. But even with my lie, it's not enough of a leg to stand on socially, because the definition of fully vaccinated includes having a booster. How dare I be so rebellious as to not even get my 3rd shot? Imagine putting the juice in you 3+ times just so you don't have to swab JUST so you can keep your job.... Also this probably ruined any and all chances I had at another role within my building; I had an interview earlier in the week that went decently well. I went home without speaking to my supervisor in person but now I'm pretty much forced to face this head on with a sweet lie at my side.

 

[Gorilla Tessellator]

Could we said "it begins" like Barney Gumble after what we read the FDA latest recommandations about the Janssen vaccine?

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Limits Use of Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to Certain Individuals

The FDA has limited the authorized use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals 18 older for whom other available COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to individuals 18 and older who elect to receive it because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

www.fda.gov

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Limits Use of Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to Certain Individuals

The FDA has limited the authorized use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals 18 older for whom other available COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to individuals 18 and older who elect to receive it because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

web.archive.org

They were attaching J&J to "extremely rare" blood clots from the very beginning, and personally I think that the negative side effects of J&J are on par with Pfizer and Moderna, not spectacularly worse. Both Pfizer and Moderna also can cause bloodclots on top of all other nasty side effects they have. Since J&J gave up on raking it with vaccines, they became a proof that vaccines get any proper scrutiny. They can wave it in front of our eyes, while simultaneously overlooking copious problems with Pfizer and Moderna shots.

 

[Josterman]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/05/us-johnson-johnson-covid-vaccine-blood-clot?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_b-gdnnews&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1651789991

 

[SCSI]

These forms sound pretty important to me:

Spoiler: Case Report form according to National Library of Medicine

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170533/

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/this-took-all-day-and-it-is-worth?s=r
https://archive.ph/qVLVW
<snip>

<snip>
Jikky had something to say about that:

https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1521642114546761728

Thread by @Jikkyleaks on Thread Reader App

@Jikkyleaks: I'll just keep repeating - all 44,000 "patients" were numbered with an 8 digit number: [Site number e.g. 1006][Patient number, e.g. 1001] The patient numbers are CONSECUTIVE. Can you see the problem? @A...…

threadreaderapp.com

Thread by @Jikkyleaks on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App

archived 5 May 2022 16:45:41 UTC

archive.ph

That tracks with the comments from reviewers I saw in Wolf's ad hoc edisco project for these FOIA docs -- more than one reviewer was flagging "where the fuck are these records?" I didn't make a bigger point about it at the time as I didn't have the review schedule linked on Twitter by this Jikky fellow, and was assuming stupidity/laziness rather than malice -- that production of that particular dataset was incomplete because S L O W FOIA team. After reading that, and assuming that it's still valid with regard to when and how all the CFRs are supposed to be produced (don't forget the courtroom slapfight that happened Jan-Feb about speeding shit up to something at least vaguely resembling a modern doc review output rate that I've rum-raged about on a couple occasions), my eyebrows about shot off my forehead. Someone's being a fuckweasel with these docs.

(Incidentally, I appreciated Rose's hearty "REE" about how disorganized this stuff is being delivered. The fact that there's not even a consistent naming scheme for the output that reliably includes its Bates range makes me want to strangle someone. Fucking unprofessional.)

Parting thoughts -- Note the recurring org involved in the missing CFR data. "Ventavia Research Group." Ring any bells? It should. They're the group involved in the whistleblower's lawsuit that came up in the first thread about a year ago. Said whistleblower was calling them out for their utter failure at following proper standards for running a clinical trial. You might also recall that this isn't their first time getting nailed for sucking at their jobs.



And for bonus fun, remember some of the doc reviewers' comments I flagged yesterday? About the test subjects who got the 100 microgram "holy shit" doses that were apparently sketchy enough that they aborted continuing testing that dose size? One of the reviewers noticed their doco is in the CFR batches that seem to have not been produced.

 

[Screamer]

It was amusing, I watched a story on a news/current affairs type show where they were discussing the strange rise in hepatitis among kids and what the possible reasons could be. It really felt like there was an awkwardness about mentioning one potential reason.

 

[RiverFalcon]

It seems like social media censors have their work cut out for them, from what I've seen between the Israeli cardiovascular study, the Pfizer docs, and the update on the J&J jab it seems like they've been working overtime. Let's add to the pile

It looks like Paxlovid doesn't work quite as well as Pfizer hoped (1) (2) (3) This might not help with the allegations of profiteering.

Another news article asking about vaccine injuries

More doctors asking questions about the current booster strategy

Fully vaccinated gorilla dies of multiple organ failure. Note that the multiple organ failure started with fibrotic heart disease.

But hey, that's all part of the new normal (Make sure to take a look at who wrote this. I'm sure there's no conflicts of interest there)

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

It was amusing, I watched a story on a news/current affairs type show where they were discussing the strange rise in hepatitis among kids and what the possible reasons could be. It really felt like there was an awkwardness about mentioning one potential reason.

The hepatitis thing is bizarre and worrying since it doesn't appear directly linked to vaccines. A lot of the stats on the hepatitis outbreak regard kids ages 1-6, but only 5-6 year olds can receive the Moloch injection (under 5 I think there were only a few trials). The younger children 1-2 can be attributed to breastfeeding from vaxxed mother, but what about the kids too young to be vaxxed but too old to be breastfed? Drinking after their parents/vaxxed siblings and sharing a plate? It's a bit distressing knowing that the vaxx can be spread so easily.

 

[Shaka Brah]

The hepatitis thing is bizarre and worrying since it doesn't appear directly linked to vaccines. A lot of the stats on the hepatitis outbreak regard kids ages 1-6, but only 5-6 year olds can receive the Moloch injection (under 5 I think there were only a few trials). The younger children 1-2 can be attributed to breastfeeding from vaxxed mother, but what about the kids too young to be vaxxed but too old to be breastfed? Drinking after their parents/vaxxed siblings and sharing a plate? It's a bit distressing knowing that the vaxx can be spread so easily.

Just because a drug isn't recommended for that age group doesn't mean it's not pushed on them by pediatricians or parents. There's certainly a chance they received a jab even if it's not recomended.

 

[Duck Duck *Honk*]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HSsGnpzT4JGC/

Over an hour and a half compilation video of more vax-cattles suffering the adverse side-effects of the Fraudxi flu shots. Some describe their incident with the jabs with avid details, others still recommending them despite the contrary of what's happening to them even if they're trying to be, others of course y'know the typical I regret stuff, and others really struggling to deal with the pains and injuries from their injections with a bit of commentary as usual from my perspective about this stuff.

42:06 - 42:56: Of all the responses that you can get from the "doctors" or "nurses" after telling information that doesn't fit their narrative with: "Just get the vaccines bro! They're safe and effective for you!", or "Those symptoms you mention or gotten are rare.", or "We couldn't do anything to treat your symptoms or find the diagnosis of the problem." Or even just straight up not responding at all for reporting the side effects that they're been getting from their patients typically speaking. And that's coming from those so-called insert whatever medical professions they claim to be in.

It is also not common for the medical work field to inform us without trying deceiving us in the process, as pointed out by this nurse who was skeptical of the medication she was giving to the physical ill patients she tried to cure on 1:15:20 - 1:19:27, with this shit show of an ongoing event ruining the reputations of those who work in the medical industry in general. And they want us to keep on taking the experimental jabs, and or also follow certain, if not all no-plandemic policies before anything else, including being treated for other health conditions for the sake of power over law and virtue, etc.

1:21:40 - 1:23:01: I also found the same woman with the bipolar disorder who spoke out against the vaccines and the no-policy mandates in the video above that was also from this website I found back with the video for reference: https://www.realnotrare.com/

Spoiler