Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

[Machine head]

Amber only committed low level reactive violence.


Because the forceful removal of a finger is low level.

Because starting a physical altercation and verbally berating the victim is reactive.


Because she has PTSD not from childhood trauma but trauma in a single relationship where she projected her father onto a man her father’s age.

As for Dr. Huges.

She views all women as victims and or potentially a victim of a male.

She views all males as our protestors and aggressor towards female victims

The only males she allows to be the victim or minors to small and weak and the gays.

As if it’s two men in a relationship there is still a male being the aggressor to a victim.

However she isn’t bias. It’s not like she peppered her explanation of generalized terms and key concepts with pronoun bias terms to paint a picture of bias.

I hate that there is a week long break. As now I’ll have to wait and see if this gets renewed for a second season to get the ending.

 

[Josterman]

Devin posted a video about the trial

 

[Executive Petrel]

This case may not only be a milestone for changing the citzens view on domestic violence commited by women, but also set "red flags" for a certain type of behavior that women like Amber tend to show. You have the archetype of the male domestic abuser and the typical characteristics to warn women about. The trial shows how a certain type of female aggressors will act when confronted with their misdeeds and alot of men who were too ashamed to talk about this may relate and get the courage to speak up.

 

[W00K #17]

Wait this was the chick from pineapple express?

She was fine af in that movie, but even back then you could see she had bpd crazy eyes.

 

[murph]

The only issue is whether he abused her. He did. Yes, she shat the bed, she was a gold-digging whore, she fake cries on the stand, she's fucking crazy, none of that is at issue in the trial. It's about defamation. Did he abuse her or not, not whether she was abusive.

They are both insane and abusive. But she's going to win on the merits, or she'll lose because of public opinion, and the fans are going to freak the fuck out either way. It will be glorious.

 

[CharcoalChkn]

Things that seem like no brainers for Amber's legal team but have not happened.

- Call the multiple women he allegedly assaulted for getting too close to her as witnesses.

- Show photos of all the shit JD wrote on the walls with his blood from his cut off finger, SERIOUSLY they had so many photos of the "damage" but none of the wild shit she talked about was there.

- There is no way Heard or JD cleaned up after themselves, contact the housekeeping service that was used as a witness?

Correct me if these are not reasonable things to use as evidence.

I can't wait for the cross examination, her stories have way too much unneeded detail there is no way she is going to be able to remember all the bullshit when she's put on the spot by JD's team, it's going to be fun.

 

[Allanon]

Someone cleaned up and cut down the audio Amber herself secretly recorded immediately following the Australia incident. It's inadmissible in court because they have apparently ruled 'only audio with just Amber and Johnny in it is admissible' but that's probably because Amber should be absolutely desperate not to let anyone hear that. She apparently submitted it in the past to the Sun or something like that, but with an intentionally wrong transcription.

It's a half hour long, but interesting to listen to: it has the doctor and nurse looking at Johnny's hand, Amber having a meltdown screaming about how she 'didn't mean to hurt him', and Jerry ranting for a long time about how he doesn't believe her and thinks the scratches on her arms are self-inflicted. Also a lot of Amber's drug use in it. If for some insane reason you actually believed her testimony about being omegabeaten and bottle raped where all the evidence of the assault was 'just out of frame' of the photos, the recording pretty definitively proves it to be false.

 

[PlumSyrup]

Someone cleaned up and cut down the audio Amber herself secretly recorded immediately following the Australia incident. It's inadmissible in court because they have apparently ruled 'only audio with just Amber and Johnny in it is admissible' but that's probably because Amber should be absolutely desperate not to let anyone hear that. She apparently submitted it in the past to the Sun or something like that, but with an intentionally wrong transcription.

It's a half hour long, but interesting to listen to: it has the doctor and nurse looking at Johnny's hand, Amber having a meltdown screaming about how she 'didn't mean to hurt him', and Jerry ranting for a long time about how he doesn't believe her and thinks the scratches on her arms are self-inflicted. Also a lot of Amber's drug use in it. If for some insane reason you actually believed her testimony about being omegabeaten and bottle raped where all the evidence of the assault was 'just out of frame' of the photos, the recording pretty definitively proves it to be false.

"I hate that I'm the one that has to deal with all the hurt" excuse me?

idk if I accidentally cut someone's finger off in self-defense during a fight, and people were trying to separate us, I would beg them to help me get away as fast as I can. Even if that person was my husband and I wanted to stay together and fix things, I would honestly get want to get out of there for at least like, the night.

 

[Lemmingwise]

The new york post photoshopped amber and added tears to her cheeks (in reality she was unable to produce any).

(The new york post is under same owner as the sun, who Depp sued in the UK)

 

[The Fair Lady]

Barely paying attention to it but Heard sounds insane.

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

Things that seem like no brainers for Amber's legal team but have not happened.

- Call the multiple women he allegedly assaulted for getting too close to her as witnesses.

- Show photos of all the shit JD wrote on the walls with his blood from his cut off finger, SERIOUSLY they had so many photos of the "damage" but none of the wild shit she talked about was there.

- There is no way Heard or JD cleaned up after themselves, contact the housekeeping service that was used as a witness?

Correct me if these are not reasonable things to use as evidence.

I can't wait for the cross examination, her stories have way too much unneeded detail there is no way she is going to be able to remember all the bullshit when she's put on the spot by JD's team, it's going to be fun.

These are absolutely reasonable things to use as evidence. Any lawyer worth their pay is going to insist on calling any and all witnesses to anything that happened in any lawsuit, because witnesses bolster the testimony of whoever is giving the testimony.

There's some truth in eyewitness testimony being flawed, people do remember "seeing" things that didn't happen -memory is flexible and implanted memories are a real thing if the lawyers and police (if applicable) involved aren't careful in questioning them. But generally speaking if there's a witness a lawyer is going to ask for their names and contact information so they can get them to testify because in general they work well enough. Especially if there are multiple witnesses all saying more or less the same thing, and from what I understand Heard is claiming there are multiple witnesses - so where are they?

The only answer is that they don't exist.

Because not even a lawyer who passed law school and the bar by the skin of his teeth is going to fail to call witnesses if they exist. I'm just a former paralegal with only a tiny bit of experience in the field and even I know to call all the witnesses you can!

 

[Lemmingwise]

implanted memories are a real thing

Not really to the degree as advertised. The group of scientists that came up with this were the very same parents under investigation for pedo allegations that almost certainly happened. They created a whole area of science to protect pedo's, essentially.

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

Not really to the degree as advertised. The group of scientists that came up with this were the very same parents under investigation for pedo allegations that almost certainly happened. They created a whole area of science to protect pedo's, essentially.

Not full memories, no, but details can be changed by asking leading questions. Or false identifications can be made in a lineup of criminals. That sort of thing.

Here's more information on what I mean:

1.12 Problems with Memory: Eyewitness Testimony – Human Biology

open.lib.umn.edu

 

[Lemmingwise]

Not full memories, no, but details can be changed by asking leading questions. Or false identifications can be made in a lineup of criminals. That sort of thing.

Here's more information on what I mean:

1.12 Problems with Memory: Eyewitness Testimony – Human Biology

open.lib.umn.edu

I know what you mean, and it's not that it's a completely fake phenomenon, but it definitely is something considerably exaggerated.

What you linked to is research by "the innocence project" which was started by the lawyers that got OJ Simpson off scott free, for example, and their other supporting evidence is the false memory syndrome which is exactly what I referenced earlier, where the accused parents of pedophilia started the false memory foundation.

 

[SpergPatrol]

Only good thing to come from this shitshow

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

I know what you mean, and it's not that it's a completely fake phenomenon, but it definitely is something considerably exaggerated.

What you linked to is research by "the innocence project" which was started by the lawyers that got OJ Simpson off scott free, for example, and their other supporting evidence is the false memory syndrome which is exactly what I referenced earlier, where the accused parents of pedophilia started the false memory foundation.

Ah. I didn't realize that. About the innocence project that is. OJ was guilty as sin. Appreciate the information.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Ah. I didn't realize that. About the innocence project that is. OJ was guilty as sin. Appreciate the information.

No worries. It's a popularly believed and I keep running into it when I read books like Cialdini's persuasion book, so I got interested in it and did a little digging and came out of it with a different perspective. It's quite an effective tool if you want to protect pedo's, because it creates open season on the detectives / psych support people that are on the kid's side. Lots of people believe it and I did too until a couple of years ago.

 

[Wuornos]

The vast majority of Depp's supporters are women. A good percentage of them have experienced DV themselves. There is no evidence backing up Heard's false allegations against Depp. There *is* evidence that proves Heard has lied and was the actual abusive party.

Whether Depp wins this trial or not, he has already won. Heard has been exposed as a psychotic, lying cunt who tried to destroy Depp's career because he refused to yield to her financial blackmail.

I'm from a different era. So I don't give a shit about his politics or that he cracked a JOKE about Trump which was no worse than the JOKES being cracked about Hillary Clinton at the time. He's an excellent actor imo (Black Mass, Donnie Brasco, Minamata, The Libertine, Ed Wood, Public Enemies, Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas, etc) and I've enjoyed many of his films over the decades.

Good luck to him.

 

[LurkNoMore]

This is some great programming. Absolutely fantastic. He said, she shit the bed!

Amber is a crazy bitch. She is just all over the place. She beat her previous girlfriend. She beat Johnny. Typical crazy ass lesbian. No telling how many other men and women she has assaulted.

The whole thing with the bottle is...just wow. She honestly expects anyone to believe he raped her with a broken bottle and his doctors fixed her? I imagine most women would have bled to death if something similar occurred to them. Let alone get up the next day and make their rapist a cup of coffee. Absolutely crazy lesbian bitch, but I repeat myself. Cross better be brutal. I mean johnny's team better go in fast and hard. Just tear her apart up there on the stand.

Hope Johnny wins. Hope he gets the fifty million. Hope this kills metoo and all associated feminist bullshit. Hope she has a meltdown on the stand during cross.

The one thing this trial has done is shown men can be victims. That women lie and will happily run around town with said lies. I can only hope the major take away is that women are just as shitty as men by the public.

 

[Machine head]

The only issue is whether he abused her. He did. Yes, she shat the bed, she was a gold-digging whore, she fake cries on the stand, she's fucking crazy, none of that is at issue in the trial. It's about defamation. Did he abuse her or not, not whether she was abusive.

They are both insane and abusive. But she's going to win on the merits, or she'll lose because of public opinion, and the fans are going to freak the fuck out either way. It will be glorious.

You seem to think JD cares if he wins.


Winning would be a bonus.


All this trail is intended to do is gain enough public opinion on his side that he was either the victim or as much or more the victim as the woman was.

That appears to have been achieved. With the intention of allowing JD to do high profile movies once again as he has regained pubic appeal.