The problem was definitely that the government did not involve itself. No one would defend someone shooting a man for breaking a window. There's not much else you can do to defend your property. No, that was a problem that could only have been solved by the city, not state or federal government. But the cities and their prosecutors did nothing.
You can commit suicide whenever you want, assuming you aren't a quadriplegic in which case you'd need assistance.
If you consider "politically opposed to the killing of babies, including nigbies" to be love, sure. I just think everyone deserves a chance at life. For niggers, preferably they get their chance far away from me, like in Africa.
They're better off with the wolves than you libtards, frankly.
First of all, even if I agreed, those are rare exceptions. Most people aren't born in these extreme situations you're presenting. Do you agree that only those cases should be approved for abortion? No? Then you're pointing to these cases for NO good reason except as a talking point.
No, just to be an abusive POS to his caregivers. Clearly had a complex about needing his ass wiped. Would you want that?
How? Are you unironically espousing the "they couldn't cured cancer" fallacy? Aborted fetuses have contributed a lot to medical science. Far more than the tards and niggers you insist be born.
So now you are advocating for abortion on the grounds that the child might grow up to be abusive to their spouse?
you said there’s no reason to kill innocent people then i gave you a reason. doesn’t change my stance on abortion
I actually wasn't, just pointing out he suffered a lot due to his disability.
They like killing and they look down on everyone else. They are arrogant enough to think that if "society crashed" they and their anime avatar would somehow not be "eaten by wolves." These people have zero capacity for self-reflection. They're antisocial losers.
You used his behavior as a justification for eugenics.
Eugenics isn't inherently wrong.
Your stance is that it's okay to abort for any reason because they're "not alive", which is not only incorrect but immoral. If you can justify the average case, then we can talk fringe cases.
i can say the same for you lol
I'm not saying this as a personal attack so much as an astonished observation: you are not very bright, are you?
a fetus still acts just like a parasite.
No, it acts like a fetus. Even if you observe some superficial similarities between the two things, that does not make them the same thing. For instance, you demonstrate the intelligence of a gerbil. This does not make you equivalent- morally, scientifically, legally- to a gerbil.
Tell me Einstein, how is a fetus not similar to a parasite (aside from the species thing)?
I didn't say they aren't similar. I said that having similarities does not make them the same for any scientific, moral, or legal purpose.
According to who?
Then why are infant and maternal mortality rates so high when there is no medical help available? Also, natural doesn't always mean good. Parasites are natural. So is cancer.
The fetus is disrupting her immune system. Your immune system's job is to keep you from getting poisoned and dying. I'd trust it.
Fuck you're retarded
