Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why is it bad to take resources from your wartime enemy again? I am trying to understand the logic here.

OWLZkOgcBWSc.jpeg
 
Lol wut, did Ukrainian mass resettlement citizens of Donbass? Did Zelenskyy publish essay stating that there is no such nationality as Russian and they are all just Ukrainians?
Yes, resettlement by artillery shells. Are you ignorant, dishonest, or both? And what kind of genocide by displacement of Ukrainians are you talking about? Ukrainians were free to stay in Crimea without any problems. Hell, Ukrainian is even available as a primary language in schools there.
 
Yes, resettlement by artillery shells. Are you ignorant, dishonest, or both? And what kind of genocide by displacement of Ukrainians are you talking about? Ukrainians were free to stay in Crimea without any problems. Hell, Ukrainian is even available as a primary language in schools there.
Right now, Ukrainas from Crimea, Lugansk, Donbass are forced to fight for russia army as a constricts in first lines. Because professional soldiers refuse to fight in that position and those deaths won't count into russian statistics. Right now mere of Mariupol, among other Ukrainian officials from conquered areas are saying that Russia is resettling civilians to different part of Russia. So they lost contact with Ukraine, their culture and speak. There is mass "adoption" of Ukrainian orphans to Russia.
 
The fucking UNITED NATIONS you stupid Polack is not a court not is it the Royal/State/Official Academy of Language for any country, except in your thick Clorox fried brain.
United nation is not court :suffering:

Excuse me, but who do you think sentenced nazis after WWII? What organization states international law?
Screenshot 2022-05-12 at 20-34-53 Genocide - Wikipedia.png
 
Right now, Ukrainas from Crimea, Lugansk, Donbass are forced to fight for russia army as a constricts in first lines
Conscription for military service in the Donbas is for all men without health problems from 18 to 60, as well as women who are in the police or army. They have a war, if you didn't know.
You know, Crimea is part of Russia, you clown. The regular army comes from there, not the militia
those deaths won't count into russian statistics
Because these are not Russian losses? When the republics post statistics on losses, it will be possible to read the total amount of losses.
resettling civilians to different part of Russia
They're evacuating; people are yelling about how Russian barbarians destroyed half of Mariupol and now want to force Mariupol residents to live in the same ruins; it's a difficult mental gymnastics.
So they lost contact with Ukraine, their culture and speak
In Russia, there is no ban on the Ukrainian language or literature. Unlike Ukraine with the Russian language, they can support Ukrainian culture on the territory of Russia if they want.
There is mass "adoption" of Ukrainian orphans to Russia.
And that's a good thing.
 
The fucking UNITED NATIONS you stupid Polack is not a court not is it the Royal/State/Official Academy of Language for any country, except in your thick Clorox fried brain.
Calm down and literally just read.
Having considered the declaration made by the General Assembly of the United Nations in its resolution 96 (I) dated 11 December 1946 that genocide is a crime under international law, contrary to the spirit and aims of the United Nations and condemned by the civilized world,
Yes, it is up to individual member countries and the ICJ to actually enforce any of this, but the UN definition is by and large the written language of the law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elbereth
Yes, resettlement by artillery shells. Are you ignorant, dishonest, or both? And what kind of genocide by displacement of Ukrainians are you talking about? Ukrainians were free to stay in Crimea without any problems. Hell, Ukrainian is even available as a primary language in schools there.
Donbabwe and Lugansk are bullshit "republics" created by the Russian government, propped up by the Russian army, and ran through bandit chiefs by the Russian government. They are not and were never real countries.
Russia created them to use them to fuck Ukraine for demented imperialist reasons. Same goes for Transnistria and Abkhazia for example, and if the Baltic countries hadn't joined NATO you can bet they would have their little cancer fake republics too. Russian speaking people in the Ukrainian parts of these areas were living a perfectly normal life and were ironically far freer than Russians in Russia, let alone the bandit ran regions under Russian control.

Every single person who died in the Donbass died because of the Russian government. Without Russian interference the uprising would never have become this militant, and without the intervention of the Russian military the whole thing would have ended 7 years ago with the reintegration of the regions into Ukraine and the resumption of normal economic and political life there.

I'm amazed by how many people in this thread take Russian news at face value, they live in a made up reality that has nothing to with what is actually happening in the world.
 
Conscription for military service in the Donbas is for all men without health problems from 18 to 60, as well as women who are in the police or army. They have a war, if you didn't know.
You know, Crimea is part of Russia, you clown. The regular army comes from there, not the militia
Sending people you "liberated" into meat grinder is apparently based :story:
They're evacuating; people are yelling about how Russian barbarians destroyed half of Mariupol and now want to force Mariupol residents to live in the same ruins; it's a difficult mental gymnastics.
Force resettlement = evacuation. If they have such good intention for them, why force them to go into Russia, instead of letting them walk into unoccupied Ukraine?
In Russia, there is no ban on the Ukrainian language or literature. Unlike Ukraine with the Russian language, they can support Ukrainian culture on the territory of Russia if they want.
So fucking what? If you drop people into foreign territory, they won't be able to retain their culture.
 
Donbabwe and Lugansk are bullshit "republics" created by the Russian government, propped up by the Russian army, and ran through bandit chiefs by the Russian government. They are not and were never real countries.
Russia created them to use them to fuck Ukraine for demented imperialist reasons. Same goes for Transnistria and Abkhazia for example, and if the Baltic countries hadn't joined NATO you can bet they would have their little cancer fake republics too. Russian speaking people in the Ukrainian parts of these areas were living a perfectly normal life and were ironically far freer than Russians in Russia, let alone the bandit ran regions under Russian control.

Every single person who died in the Donbass died because of the Russian government. Without Russian interference the uprising would never have become this militant, and without the intervention of the Russian military the whole thing would have ended 7 years ago with the reintegration of the regions into Ukraine and the resumption of normal economic and political life there.

I'm amazed by how many people in this thread take Russian news at face value, they live in a made up reality that has nothing to with what is actually happening in the world.
This thread is unfortunately infested with wannabe gopnik putler fangirls that are the flipside to twitter salava ukraini larpers. Just like the twittermob believe whatever feel-good bullshit rolls across their feed, the other side of the coin won't look at anything objectively because the Russian propaganda arm is constantly elbow deep in their asshole, which is how they like it. I know this just comes across as fencesitting centrist bullshit but the only people still engaged in this ten weeks later are one of those heavily invested extremes.
 
@Fougaro reply bug

Multiple DPR fighters who participated in 2014 confirm this. I've seen quite a few evaluations of him, most of them very succinct but the sentiment is there. Strelkov in his defence claims that there was no real proper support for his troops from Russian side - had to fight with sticks and stones, basically. With the stuff they managed to take from Ukrainians in the first days of war, starting with raiding Ukrainian police force warehouses for weapons. He says that he chose to leave those hard fought territories due his troops getting ground down and no proper reinforcements were coming. But both his troops and he himself are pretty shady so who the hell knows. And btw, Strelkov vehemently claims him and his troops who had that BUK to be innocent of shooting down MH-17. And he couldn't care less about Hague.
He has been in "total mobilization or all is lost" mode since the start of the operation. Peculiar thing is that he hasn't been made to shut up yet for some reason.
https://t.me/s/strelkovii - his telegram.

I'm really surprised that no one seems to know what actual Russian army is doing. Seems like good opsec.
I don't have much of an opinion on Strelkov since I know next to nothing about him, except what I heard from Deki and the fact that Strelkov fought for us in Bosnia during the 90s. The impression I get is that he's either an incompetent commander whose pussy still hurts over being dabbed on for his failures, or alternatively someone who tried to make the best of an impossible situation and got thrown under the short bus for which he seeks revenge against both Ukraine and Russia. The second option would make him a decent 90s action movie villain if I may be honest.
 
They are not and were never real countries.
Indeed, they weren't countries. After the coup in Kiev, they demanded to lift the ban and greater autonomy within Ukraine and got bullets in response. Even in the Minsk agreements, they were considered part of Ukraine, so Ukraine ignored the wishes of residents of Donbass and shelled its own citizens for 8 years. How nice.
Russia created them to use them to fuck Ukraine for demented imperialist reasons
They were created spontaneously throughout all of east Ukraine the next day after the success of Maiden and the loss of power by Yanukovych. Or do you want to say that the Russians planned this 5th move to lose their puppet?
Same goes for Transnistria and Abkhazia for example
Yes, guess why. It's got nothing to do with the large minority of Russians that are still there after the dissolution of the Union, and they really get butthurt when they are considered second-class citizens based on their ethnicity. If only there was a way of making their government not be retarded and antagonise their own population.
Russian speaking people in the Ukrainian parts of these areas were living a perfectly normal life
You could say that, right until 2014.
ironically far freer than Russians in Russia
lmao
Every single person who died in the Donbass died because of the Russian government. Without Russian interference the uprising would never have become this militant, and without the intervention of the Russian military the whole thing would have ended 7 years ago with the reintegration of the regions into Ukraine and the resumption of normal economic and political life there.
If you don't accept that Ukraine just needs to surrender now too because war is bad and people are dying, then what you wrote here is garbage.
I'm amazed by how many people in this thread take Russian news at face value, they live in a made up reality that has nothing to with what is actually happening in the world.
What Russian news are you talking about, you presumptuous clown?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back