🐱 Dad legally banned from seeing his kids over nappy fetish

https://www.joe.co.uk/amp/news/dad-banned-from-seeing-his-kids-over-nappy-fetish-334667

He described it as a 'harmless activity' that 'affects no one'​

A dad in Australia has been banned from seeing his children because of his kink for nappies - a decision which he is trying to appeal.

The man, whose name has been kept anonymous for legal reasons, isn't allowed to see his kids anymore because he likes to wear adult nappies.

His ex-wife and the mother of his children knew about the fetish before they broke up but she told a family court in Australia that the fetish escalated, the Daily Telegraph reports.

The father began wearing the nappies around the house, the mother claimed. The Australian court then heard how the dad reportedly came to pick the kids up in 2019 and had a nappy "partially exposed".
His ex-wife then decided to take legal action against him and last year, a court ruled that the dad was not allowed to see his kids. The father said he posed no risk to them, and appealed the decision - but this was rejected on April 13 this year.

According to additional reports, Justice Hilary Hannan at the Family Court said the dad had not "satisfactorily addressed the issues of risk."
She added: "I have great reservations and ultimately do not accept that the father has an authentic willingness or capacity to disavow engaging in the behaviours in question and in his connections to the community."


She said it was inevitable that the father would expose his children to the fetish, which would have a negative impact on them.

The mother's legal team described the decision as a "landmark" ruling but the dad thought otherwise. In an email that he allegedly sent to the Daily Telegraph, the man described the decision as "horrendous" and said he felt he was being discriminated against. He later claimed that he plans to appeal the decision in high court.
The father said: "I feel for and have always respected other minority identities who have been persecuted or treated differently just for being who they are.
"What I choose to do in the privacy of my own home without any children present is my business.
"It is a harmless activity and affects no one."

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Oh, good.

 

[LUNEKO]

whose name has been kept anonymous for legal reasons

The government protects pedophiles more than their victims
Old Gary did nothing wrong

 

[Chaos Theorist]

How do you even develop such a fetish?

 

[Open Window Maniac]

In an email that he allegedly sent to the Daily Telegraph, the man described the decision as "horrendous" and said he felt he was being discriminated against.

You're not being persecuted for some immutable characteristic, you creep; you're being told 'no' when you want to parade around the house in diapers in front of your kids.

 

[Finder]

The government protects pedophiles more than their victims

Name the parent and you name the kids, and they don't need that following them around forever.

How do you even develop such a fetish?

The internet, how else?

 

[Bussy Catalog]

In an email that he allegedly sent to the Daily Telegraph, the man described the decision as "horrendous" and said he felt he was being discriminated against.

Oh fuck off, your boner is not an oppressed minority.

 

[mindlessobserver]

How sad for him.

Anyway.

 

[Pickle S8n]

The father began wearing the nappies around the house, the mother claimed. The Australian court then heard how the dad reportedly came to pick the kids up in 2019 and had a nappy "partially exposed".

The father said he posed no risk to them

How can someone even think that they aren't a risk to children when they have quite literally exposed their kink to children.
Even if it was under clothes, he still wore it to pick up the kids and around the house, and that in and of itself is performing kink in front of minors. It's just even worse that it was exposed/clearly visible. Of course, to state the obvious, this is inherently a risk to the well-being of children.

 

[Troonos]

Literal pedo. Keep your sexual fetishes away from all children, including your own.

 

[Jimmy Pop]

You're not being persecuted for some immutable characteristic, you creep; you're being told 'no' when you want to parade around the house in diapers in front of your kids.

And now he’s throwing a fit because he can’t expose himself to minors.

There’s always space to face the wall.

 

[Johnny Salami]

Never thought I'd ever agree with the Australian government. Either way

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Sad for his kids who will grow up and realized dad loved being a coomer more than he loved them. He's a waste of sperm and egg.

 

[Happy Fish]

Patriarch Gondawara will be displeased to hear this

 

[Saint Agustin]

Richard Kuta vibes here. He probably likes Sonic and is a furry too.

Anyone who is into Regression, Adult Baby Diaper Lifestyle, Littles, or cubs should be put on a sex offender registration list.

 

[Nick Gars]

"The father said he posed no risk to them"


Nigger, all pedophiles claim they are not a risk to children. If we took their word on it, things would be even worse than they already are.

Keep your fucking fetishes to yourself, faggot. You should count yourself lucky that not being able to see your kids is all you're being punished with, because we really need to start necking fucks like you to make an example.

 

[KiwiFuzz]

Anyone who is into Regression, Adult Baby Diaper Lifestyle, Littles, or cubs should be put in a gulag for 20 years of turning big rocks into little rocks.

FTFY, friendo.

 

[Sugriva]

My dad's farts are bad enough on their own. I can't imagine if he was literally shitting and pissing himself in front of me too. Diaper fetishists need to be culled from the gene pool.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

He shouldn't even be allowed out of a mental hospital until that's resolved, let alone be around children in privacy.

 

[Nod Flenders]

Good. Keep him away from his children, and all children nearby.