Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Social justice in a nutshell. On a lot of things. The same movement that whines about bigotry ironically reinforces it.

Also, I agree with this comic.

Sometimes, it feels like culture war shit really does cause other more pressing issues to be ignored. I despise SJWs, but I would also like to see glaring structural problems resolved. If our country falls apart for other reasons, then any culture war grievances will be a moot point if we don't have a country in the first place.
The deeper issue is that the SJW types don't care about the same problems we do. They don't care about the misinformation board becuase they see it as nessasary, they don't mind the billions to Ukraine becuase they see it as just, they tolerate inflation and shortages because they support the policies that is causing the inflation and food shortages, and they don't or won't connect the dots between them. I know culture war shit seems dumb and petty, but at the same time a lot of these issues are tied to it. I don't see how we can get america united on these problems without pushing back progressivism and establishing a stronger voice on the National discussion, becuase right now the progressives have the upper hand on information and education.

Besides the SC decision on RvW if it officially happens is a right step in the direction of solving the bigger issues. If they roll back abortion due to how poorly the court case is handed then there is a good chance that the court will decide in favor of the citizenry when it comes to things like 1A, 2A, and (hopefully) gov privacy violations and overreach.
 
For instance, one of my suggestions was to look at how income inequality affects blacks and whites alike. Nope. That's racist! Why not educate people on how issues like free speech or privacy affects everyone? Nope. That's also racist! There was no winning with these assholes.
I'm almost convinced that one of the primary goals of the sjw movement is to increase the wealth inequality between the rich and the poor, though most sjw foot soldiers likely do so unconsciously. For all their talk about improving the quality of life for people, you very rarely hear them address general income inequality post Occupy 2012 (though I wouldn't necessarily include these protestors in the same bubble as the current sjws). Their main uses seem to be to divide the people in order to distract them from the financial downward spiral we have been experiencing, and secure power for the liberal-corporate alliance through threats and accusations, various fear tactics, and general censorship.

They really don't seem to care about the general well being of people, only the people in power that they support and their political pawns when convenient for their current crusade. Basically they're sacrificing the general quality of life in their county/country to support the elite in exchange for a continuous supply of narcissistic dopamine hits with diminishing returns.

I tend to think this movement was co-opted rather than masterfully planned, but if it was planned it's damn impressive. Never would I have thought you could convince so many people to pull themselves and everyone else down in such a ridiculous way and succeed.
 
You just can't win:
1652542910788.png
 
My cousin invited me to a local protest for reproductive rights (not sure why they're protesting in a blue state with abortion protected by law), as soon as I walked into earshot I heard the speaker blaming white men for laws, and how trans people are more affected by restricting abortion access.
I don't think I even heard the speaker call women 'women,' it was "people with vaginas, trans people, and non-binary people" are most affected.

A protest for womens' rights couldn't even call women "women."
 
Don't be so hard on yourself, you're not the only one. People become SJWs with very often the best of intentions. Probably most of the time.
Thank you! It always bothers me though because when I look at how awful the movement is these days and how much power it has, I realize I contributed to the wrong side of history. However, at least I learned from my mistakes.

A study that was probably done looking at race and gender only, and no other variables, and then coming to the conclusion that white male characters are the dominant (possibly only!) reason these games sold. Not only is there a ton of additional factors about these characters, there is also gameplay, graphic, storyline, marketing and many other factors that contribute to amount of games sold.
Exactly. It never occurs to them that the games they resent may have done well not because of white characters, but because they happen to be good games. The point is lost to them. Same with other media. They NEVER think to make quality products, good characters, or interesting stories. They always turn to the same politically charged bullshit that no one but them likes.

Once again, for all their talk of TRUST THE SCIENCE and THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED, woke sjws show they have zero idea what confound and extraneous variables are, and completely ignore their own confirmation bias. Literally class number 1 in any research methods or basic statistics course. Everything has to be discrimination, there's not even any other possibility in their minds.
They never supported science. I've said before, and I'm sure many of you are aware, but SJWs will eagerly support superstition and religious fundamentalism if the believers aren't white and/or Christian. On the same note, and we already know this, they'll support anything their political manifestos tell them even if it's anthetical to science and progress.

I'm almost convinced that one of the primary goals of the sjw movement is to increase the wealth inequality between the rich and the poor, though most sjw foot soldiers likely do so unconsciously. For all their talk about improving the quality of life for people, you very rarely hear them address general income inequality post Occupy 2012 (though I wouldn't necessarily include these protestors in the same bubble as the current sjws). Their main uses seem to be to divide the people in order to distract them from the financial downward spiral we have been experiencing, and secure power for the liberal-corporate alliance through threats and accusations, various fear tactics, and general censorship.

They really don't seem to care about the general well being of people, only the people in power that they support and their political pawns when convenient for their current crusade. Basically they're sacrificing the general quality of life in their county/country to support the elite in exchange for a continuous supply of narcissistic dopamine hits with diminishing returns.

I tend to think this movement was co-opted rather than masterfully planned, but if it was planned it's damn impressive. Never would I have thought you could convince so many people to pull themselves and everyone else down in such a ridiculous way and succeed.
That's why I personally think all this social justice shit has a nihilistic streak to it. I know what nihilism is, but the reason I say this about social justice is the movement's eagerness to destroy so many institutions, relationships, and ideas. It leaves nothing but destruction and decay in its wake. None of the supposedly empowered groups under its banner ever genuinely improve because social justice has convinced them they're already perfect. They don't give a fuck about society overall because it's all created by the evil white man so why bother? It's awful to witness this slow-motion trainwreck.

Exactly! Nothing will EVER be good enough for these assholes! No fun allowed. No thinking allowed. You can't be yourself. You can't be equals. You can't do anything. It's a very stifling ideology.
 
Last edited:
Talk about a train wreck. It's common with the left to criticize the nuclear bombings of Japan. You also have conspiracy theorists who cry that it was done to scare the Soviets.
Sometimes I wish I had a way to send these people to a 1945 where Operation Downfall went through, and see just how they would feel about being shipped to fight on the Japanese Mainland where the government is prepared to fight to the last man rather than surrender. And I'd love to see how the Red Army taking one small portion of upper China was what was going to topple Japan without MacArthur and ANZAC backing them up.
 
Talk about a train wreck. It's common with the left to criticize the nuclear bombings of Japan. You also have conspiracy theorists who cry that it was done to scare the Soviets.
It also wasn't nearly as deadly as the fire bombing of Tokyo in 1945 but this is the result of progressive morons being 'educated' by popular media.
 
Talk about a train wreck. It's common with the left to criticize the nuclear bombings of Japan. You also have conspiracy theorists who cry that it was done to scare the Soviets.
That's not conspiracy theory. Announcing to the world that you have a giant swinging nuclear dick and they don't is pure realpolitik. And if Japan had got right back in line to surrender immediately when it should have been obvious they weren't winning, that shit wouldn't have happened.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: chickenbutt
That's not conspiracy theory. Announcing to the world that you have a giant swinging nuclear dick and they don't is pure realpolitik. And if Japan had got right back in line to surrender immediately when it should have been obvious they weren't winning, that shit wouldn't have happened.
The conspiracy is more that the bombings were done to deny the Soviets the glory of single-handedly defeating Japan like how they supposedly did with Germany. (Lend-Lease? What the hell is that?) Commies refuse to admit that they did not win WWII all by themselves, and so they treat Hiroshima-Nagasaki as an act of spite against GLORIOUS MOTHER RUSSIA! rather than a tactical decision by US forces preparing for a mainland invasion.
 
Last edited:
Want to see something REALLY medically illiterate and disingenuous? Too bad, you're seeing it anyway?
View attachment 3284233
No matter which side you are on, you can't really debate abortion without first understanding The Doctrine of Double Effect, otherwise you'll succumb to dumb shit like this. The doctors in each case are not performing abortion as such, but life-saving procedures with abortion as an inevitable complication. In the most pedestrian cases of abortions, however, the abortive procedure is done solely for the sake of abortion.
 
Sometimes I wish I had a way to send these people to a 1945 where Operation Downfall went through, and see just how they would feel about being shipped to fight on the Japanese Mainland where the government is prepared to fight to the last man rather than surrender. And I'd love to see how the Red Army taking one small portion of upper China was what was going to topple Japan without MacArthur and ANZAC backing them up.
The casualties were expected to be so high, that the US military is still giving out Purple Hearts minted in anticipation of Operation Downfall. The US, in regards to Japan's surrender. was between a rock and a hard place and took the option that resulted in fewer dead American soldiers.
 
Last edited:
The casualties were expected to be so high, that the US military is still giving out Purple Hearts minted in anticipation of Operation Downfall. The US, in regards to Japan's surrender. was between a rock and a hard place and took the option that resulting in fewer dead American soldiers.
It probably also meant less dead Japanese too, considering prior battles saw mass civilian suicides and banzai charges by soldiers trained/indoctrinated to choose death over surrender. War is hell, and nuclear strikes are horrific, but sometimes victory takes surgical devastation.
 
No matter which side you are on, you can't really debate abortion without first understanding The Doctrine of Double Effect, otherwise you'll succumb to dumb shit like this. The doctors in each case are not performing abortion as such, but life-saving procedures with abortion as an inevitable complication. In the most pedestrian cases of abortions, however, the abortive procedure is done solely for the sake of abortion.
Yup. This is very similar to how gun-grabbers equate Kyle Rittenhouse with Nicholas Cruz (the Broward County school shooter).

Equating ectopic pregnancies with casual fetus deletus scrapings is particularly vile, too, since the former cannot develop to term with current medical technology. It's a death sentence for both.
 
Back