Mass shooting streamed on Twitch - Payton Gendron/jimboboiii - 4chan schizo poltard kills 10 people, names /k/ and /pol/ in his manefisto

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who/What will get most amount of blame? (top 3)

  • 4chan

    Votes: 2,143 47.0%
  • Guns/assualt rifles/NRA

    Votes: 2,303 50.5%
  • Twitch

    Votes: 310 6.8%
  • Violent video games

    Votes: 358 7.8%
  • White people

    Votes: 2,793 61.2%
  • Toxic masculinity

    Votes: 455 10.0%
  • Trump/Republicans

    Votes: 1,715 37.6%
  • Mainstream media

    Votes: 112 2.5%
  • Crtitical Race theory

    Votes: 190 4.2%
  • A fucking leaf

    Votes: 291 6.4%
  • Kyle Rittenhouse

    Votes: 525 11.5%
  • Supreme Court

    Votes: 101 2.2%

  • Total voters
    4,561
Read his manifesto, it's just full of questionable things like him listing all the brands of ammo, body armor, weapon, weapon parts and where he bought ammo from, aswell as websites he frequented (because associating yourself with certain websites is a good idea as a mass shooter, and won't give the media a narrative to shut those specific sites down)
Honestly the specific brand of autist shooters from 4chan and the like are weirdly into sharing the fact that they browse 4chan - Alek Minassain, in his interrogation, was also super into discussing his usage of 4chan and /r9k/.

I think to some extent these guys coming out of pol/r9k/k genuinely feel like if people consumed as much content from the boards as they did, they would understand. It's kind of like puzzle piece evangelism.

I don't think half of the guys shooting people up intend on surviving their crimes anyway, nor do I think their frontal lobes are developed enough to understand the consequences their behavior might have on their favorite website.

feds definitely help churn out inflammatory content for those boards though
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The King's Demon
'...I realized all black people are replacers just by existing in White countries' Dumbass, who the hell do you think brought black people to the Americas? This is like old-school Afrikaners bitching about there being so many black people in South Africa while actively importing them by the tens of thousands because the whites couldn't be bothered to mine their own gold.
The Jews that ran the slave trade? The slaves that sold them? The retarded Southerners who wanted to keep them on American soil?
 
So taking people's land is okay if the UN says so?
No more stolen than it was by the Roman's, byzantine, ottoman, and British before them it was nor were it's borders any more random and arbitrary than every other middle east and African nation the stateless Jordanian rejects could have accepted a compromise but I guess war of genocide is just the easier option
 
Because it's Occam's Razor. If we're supposed to take the "glowies did this" stuff seriously, how about some evidence first? Fact is there are plenty of retards on /pol/ that would radicalize this kid for free without them being feds. /pol/ is just that retarded.
Yeah, I'm not saying I have definitive proof of things, but I feel things should still be considered to take into consideration, like his listing of free-speech oriented websites and his listing of weapon, armor, helmet, supplier, etc. That's sort of things you shouldn't mention if you actually care for it. Because it's obvious now that those specific things you associate with are going to be put to blame, and it's not like it hasn't happened in the past. (8chan) and he should know that considering he wanted to suck Brenton Tarrant's nuts
 
>kill 10 mutts in the parking lot of a low-rent supermarket
>spent rest of your life in federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison

Way to go, saving the white race!
Why do Americans constantly talk about ass rape in prison? I swear literally any time someone mentions prison there's always an American going on about (usually black people) raping them in the ass. Very strange.
 
Because it's Occam's Razor. If we're supposed to take the "glowies did this" stuff seriously, how about some evidence first? Fact is there are plenty of retards on /pol/ that would radicalize this kid for free without them being feds. /pol/ is just that retarded.
look up mkultra, specifically john hinkley. or sirhan sirhan. or ted kaczynsky. it would be pretty dumb to blame the government if there weren't decades of declassified doccumentation of the government creating deranged killers for political motives. it doesn't help that this is also the plot of zoolander, a comedy movie
 
What an absolute idiotic loser. Just goes to show that /pol/ needs to dissapear of the face of the earth.
Yeah that's a great idea until it happens to KF and then wherever you go after that. Anybody can post propaganda and schizo memes and "mis/disinformation" anywhere, the whole internet is dangerous by your logic.
Ultimately people should be held responsible for their own actions. Trying to butterfly effect the blame onto words and infographics is a tactic of control freaks who I guarantee you would not stop shutting stuff down after they finished off the last "dangerous" place.
 
>Anyone who thinks wignats are retarded is a Jew
Anyone who believes that they're innately superior to anyone by any definition because of their genes is an unfortunate victim of Dunning-Kruger. Case in point: Ashkenazis and their ten million genetic diseases. Wignats should be able to acknowledge they're not the only ones to (falsely) claim superiority.
I don’t necessarily disagree but the fuck whitey talk has become tiresome. All people should look out for their interests but somehow it is anathema for whitey to do it. And somehow it is acceptable to push this message and the wording used (fellow white people, we whites) is almost scripted.

The superior due to genes argument is a leftist canard used to discredit the idea of ethnic/in-group cohesion. Some believe it, others cite culture, others history. They are all expressions of an in-group preference and if the genetic argument were invalid, it would still not invalidate the premise of ethic/national affinity
 
Honestly the specific brand of autist shooters from 4chan and the like are weirdly into sharing the fact that they browse 4chan - Alek Minassain, in his interrogation, was also super into discussing his usage of 4chan and /r9k/.

I think to some extent these guys coming out of pol/r9k/k genuinely feel like if people consumed as much content from the boards as they did, they would understand. It's kind of like puzzle piece evangelism.

I don't think half of the guys shooting people up intend on surviving their crimes anyway, nor do I think their frontal lobes are developed enough to understand the consequences their behavior might have on their favorite website.

feds definitely help churn out inflammatory content for those boards though
I'd have to disagree on the "survival" expectancy part. They almost always surrender peacefully. If they weren't so sure about their odds of survival they'd be fighting until the cop's mags were empty. I also couldn't begin to imagine why they tout their 4chan usage. I'd have to imagine it's a sense of superiority that they have over the common normal fag. "If you knew half as much as I knew...." ordeals. To an extent they are right in that they probably know 5x more than the average human would about their specific hole dwelling niche.
 
Read his manifesto, it's just full of questionable things like him listing all the brands of ammo, body armor, weapon, weapon parts and where he bought ammo from, aswell as websites he frequented (because associating yourself with certain websites is a good idea as a mass shooter, and won't give the media a narrative to shut those specific sites down)
Like the government really needs a reason to take down 4chan. They could take down 4chan any time and nobody would care. Do you think that there will be mass protest if 4chan was taken down?
 
Why do Americans constantly talk about ass rape in prison? I swear literally any time someone mentions prison there's always an American going on about (usually black people) raping them in the ass. Very strange.
Well considering prisons have a high population of blacks, and prisons are notorious for rapes because it's men locked up for a really long time, they'll get desperate and rape other men.
 
No more stolen than it was by the Roman's, byzantine, ottoman, and British before them it was nor were it's borders any more random and arbitrary than every other middle east and African nation the stateless Jordanian rejects could have accepted a compromise but I guess war of genocide is just the easier option
The difference between the four empires you mentioned and Israel is that Israel is still occupying Palestinian land and enforcing an apartheid system. If the other empires existed today you bet your ass they'd be criticized by the same people (other than maybe actual wignats)
 
Like the government really needs a reason to take down 4chan. They could take down 4chan any time and nobody would care. Do you think that there will be mass protest if 4chan was taken down?
I'm certain at least a big group of people would care. There's quite a lot of freedom of speech advocates.
 
Yeah, I'm not saying I have definitive proof of things, but I feel things should still be considered to take into consideration, like his listing of free-speech oriented websites and his listing of weapon, armor, helmet, supplier, etc. That's sort of things you shouldn't mention if you actually care for it. Because it's obvious now that those specific things you associate with are going to be put to blame, and it's not like it hasn't happened in the past. (8chan) and he should know that considering he wanted to suck Brenton Tarrant's nuts
It's likely because they're pathetic attention whores and want /pol/ to notice them because they think they'll get validation from there like Tarrant did. The flip shooter did the same thing, announcing what he was doing on /pol/. You have to stoop to their level of pathetic to understand their POV.
 
Yeah that's a great idea until it happens to KF and then wherever you go after that. Anybody can post propaganda and schizo memes and "mis/disinformation" anywhere, the whole internet is dangerous by your logic.
Ultimately people should be held responsible for their own actions. Trying to butterfly effect the blame onto words and infographics is a tactic of control freaks who I guarantee you would not stop shutting stuff down after they finished off the last "dangerous" place.
Anyone that tries to put too much control onto "information dissemination" platforms fails to realize that the more sterilized safe spaces you have the less likely-hood you have of open discussion of thought. At that point you may as well ban books, symbology and other forms of wrong-think. I guess maybe a lot of them don't realize that there is a perspective that you can shift. Just because /pol/ to you is a dangerous brainwashing board doesn't mean that the millions of other forums are somehow better when viewed under a different lens.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Green Man
I'd have to disagree on the "survival" expectancy part. They almost always surrender peacefully. If they weren't so sure about their odds of survival they'd be fighting until the cop's mags were empty. I also couldn't begin to imagine why they tout their 4chan usage. I'd have to imagine it's a sense of superiority that they have over the common normal fag. "If you knew half as much as I knew...." ordeals. To an extent they are right in that they probably know 5x more than the average human would about their specific hole dwelling niche.
I guess I say that re: survival, specifically thinking about people like Elliot Rodgers offing himself and Alek Minassain pretending to wield a gun in order to be shot at - I think at the end though, the vast majority of these people we're discussing are cowards barely out of their teens who fold the instant the cops in full body armor roll up despite their intentions to go out with a bang.
 
Back