Mass shooting streamed on Twitch - Payton Gendron/jimboboiii - 4chan schizo poltard kills 10 people, names /k/ and /pol/ in his manefisto

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who/What will get most amount of blame? (top 3)

  • 4chan

    Votes: 2,143 47.0%
  • Guns/assualt rifles/NRA

    Votes: 2,303 50.5%
  • Twitch

    Votes: 310 6.8%
  • Violent video games

    Votes: 358 7.8%
  • White people

    Votes: 2,793 61.2%
  • Toxic masculinity

    Votes: 455 10.0%
  • Trump/Republicans

    Votes: 1,715 37.6%
  • Mainstream media

    Votes: 112 2.5%
  • Crtitical Race theory

    Votes: 190 4.2%
  • A fucking leaf

    Votes: 291 6.4%
  • Kyle Rittenhouse

    Votes: 525 11.5%
  • Supreme Court

    Votes: 101 2.2%

  • Total voters
    4,561
you have to realise that the absence of evidence isnt sufficient enough for these schizos to invalidate their hyper outlandish claims about it being a glowop. to a retarded brain like theres if they can think up a fantastical scenario thats completely unprovable it automatically is true. tbf though once you realise this and just take everyones "theories" as "made up bullshit" it becomes a lot easier to parse through the thread.

if theres no evidence of feds, its probably not feds
955f5fcb867a87bfe9187a14c3636bc5eac78f710f209e31b9f12e57e8d62462.png
 
Well I know about the Tuskegee Study on syphilis. I can understand why that may have passed back when it was done. So what else do you have that is well known and proven and not still in the realm of tinfoilers.
If you want something more recent and confirmed, we can look at operation Fast and Furious. The government forced gun stores to let obvious straw purchases for the cartel to go through, resulting in the deaths of a border patrol agent and many more people in Mexico.
 
All of the people claiming this was fed-instigated or a total false-flag have been on the internet too long and are detached from reality. There is no shortage of people like this guy, the so-called 'signs' that he's an obvious glow are just the inevitable things you see when one guy tries to plan something. This isn't a movie where everything happens in a predictable and logical way.

>muh why did he do his attack like this, I could have planned something way better with my CS:GO experience
There is a certain level of pragmatism involved in these sorts of things, and on top of that the sort of person whose going to do this isn't likely to be particularly smart anyway
It’s more like why would he make a manifesto naming off a bunch of specific controversial things knowing they would be targeted after the fact. I’d be less inclined to think anything suspicious at all if he hadn’t listed off every gun component, controversial website, and stressed that he definitely wasn’t a fed. He was an unhinged nutcase just waiting to pop off, in any case. There’s at least tens of thousands of genuinely hardcore poltards and 99.9% are cognizant enough to understand that doing something like this isn’t even helpful to their own ideology in the long run.
 
Because it's the man who kills, not the gun, if he hadn't had a gun he would have used a knife, as is done in London and China.
This is a disingenuous argument. I'm not against guns in principle because of their value as self-defence tools, but you also have to acknowledge the reality that it is far harder to kill 10 people with a knife, hell it's far less likely that someone will pull a knife on you compared to a gun because it's a harder weapon to use especially if you don't know what the other guy has. In a gun fight things can very easily be over in the time it takes to pull a trigger, whereas with a knife there are alot more ways for the attacker to fuck up such as slashing, leaving the knife, misjudging range etc
 
@CometBop I am not trying to convince them of anything. I have giving them one open door to come up with a plausible theory to even start thinking about taking what they say seriously.
 
you have to realise that the absence of evidence isnt sufficient enough for these schizos to invalidate their hyper outlandish claims about it being a glowop. to a retarded brain like theres if they can think up a fantastical scenario thats completely unprovable it automatically is true. tbf though once you realise this and just take everyones "theories" as "made up bullshit" it becomes a lot easier to parse through the thread.

if theres no evidence of feds, its probably not feds
I'm sorry, I didn't realize that "the feds knowing what this sperg was going to do and sitting with their thumb up their ass instead of stopping him" was a fantastical scenario. I guess it's just too hard to track people fedposting on clearnet websites, even when the feds have hardware level backdoors in every computer made after the mid 2000's.
 
It’s more like why would he make a manifesto naming off a bunch of specific controversial things knowing they would be targeted after the fact. I’d be less inclined to think anything suspicious at all if he hadn’t listed off every gun component, controversial website, and stressed that he definitely wasn’t a fed. He was an unhinged nutcase just waiting to pop off, in any case. There’s at least tens of thousands of genuinely hardcore poltards and 99.9% are cognizant enough to understand that doing something like this isn’t even helpful to their own ideology in the long run.
People make these sorts of manifestos for the same reason they make instagram accounts, narcissism. 99.9% might think it's unhelpful, but 0.1% think it is helpful, and of that 0.1% all it takes is one person with the balls to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: make_it_so
Back