Furry Fandom and Drama General

From the shooting thread:
Chuck's Fuck and Suck said:
3:10 in the video, shooter pulls up his phone to find directions, because he admits to "missing my turn" and being lost (lol). On his phone is furry porn, with what appears to be this image with the text "MARTHA SPEAKS".

Don't think this is nessecarily URL he was visiting, but this is definitely the correct file. If anyone can id the website or app he was using, kudos.

View attachment 3285552View attachment 3285567
Click to expand...
Chuck's Fuck and Suck said:
Here's the furry clip from the full video. Also, some juicy furfag comments.
View attachment 3285681
View attachment 3285682
View attachment 3285683
Click to expand...
 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
Reactions: lint roller, Toolbox, Sharklaser and 4 others
Activelo said:
From the shooting thread:
Click to expand...
wip archive of the e621 post. some pretty funny comments

Jannies btfo:
Context: The janny’s previous avatar said “stop taking the Internet so seriously”
Screen Shot 2022-05-15 at 4.02.25 PM.png
Screen Shot 2022-05-15 at 4.02.35 PM.png
Screen Shot 2022-05-15 at 4.02.39 PM.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Da Capo, Chao Garden, Toolbox and 5 others
I'm sure that's the same person (because it's too funny not to be), but this is a shitty argument:
Sintharia said:
You can’t prove it’s not you
Click to expand...
Spoonomancer said:
I have NO proof to show that it's NOT me
Click to expand...
You can't prove a negative. How do you prove you don't own an account besides doxing the person who does? It's not like having the account say "hey such-and-such on whatever site isn't me" would convince anybody, would it? Then the argument would just move on to "see? You do control it!"
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, thebananaonion and Spectre777
moocow said:
I'm sure that's the same person (because it's too funny not to be), but this is a shitty argument:


You can't prove a negative. How do you prove you don't own an account besides doxing the person who does? It's not like having the account say "hey such-and-such on whatever site isn't me" would convince anybody, would it? Then the argument would just move on to "see? You do control it!"
Click to expand...

Seriously, that's how you handle shit like that. It was a year-old post, replying to it just drew attention to him and made it look like a suspiciously specific denial. @Sintharia is correct: dredging up a post no one really cared about just paints a big target on your back. And the "notification bug" excuse is about as transparent as saran wrap.

Don't stir up shit and it won't stink up the place.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Da Capo, Toolbox, Spoonomancer and 1 other person
moocow said:
I'm sure that's the same person (because it's too funny not to be), but this is a shitty argument:


You can't prove a negative. How do you prove you don't own an account besides doxing the person who does? It's not like having the account say "hey such-and-such on whatever site isn't me" would convince anybody, would it? Then the argument would just move on to "see? You do control it!"
Click to expand...
Ok So I should have left well enouh alone. I get that now. It was really autismo of me to respond to some post from a year ago. anyway. last post on that topic.
 
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: SandyCat, Racoober and Spoonomancer
  • Agree
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, GlobalstarFM69, Da Capo and 3 others
Spectre777 said:
Top Kek. Why are e621s mods so trigger happy lol.
Click to expand...
It really depends what's going on. Unless a comment is about something illegal, moderation is mostly performative and only happens on high-traffic posts. (Once a comment hits 2 weeks without a report it's fairly safe.)
Activelo said:
Martha Speaks is now the fourth most commented on post on e621.
Click to expand...
5th most; 69/11 requires an account to view.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Neurotypical Mantis and Activelo
Spectre777 said:
Top Kek. Why are e621s mods so trigger happy lol.
Click to expand...
They do it for free lmao
For real though, it's saying a lot that this is a rare case of the e621 jannies actually doing their job as opposed to making sure that e621 has only marginally higher quality content than FA
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, Neurotypical Mantis, GlobalstarFM69 and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back