Mass shooting streamed on Twitch - Payton Gendron/jimboboiii - 4chan schizo poltard kills 10 people, names /k/ and /pol/ in his manefisto

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who/What will get most amount of blame? (top 3)

  • 4chan

    Votes: 2,143 47.0%
  • Guns/assualt rifles/NRA

    Votes: 2,303 50.5%
  • Twitch

    Votes: 310 6.8%
  • Violent video games

    Votes: 358 7.8%
  • White people

    Votes: 2,793 61.2%
  • Toxic masculinity

    Votes: 455 10.0%
  • Trump/Republicans

    Votes: 1,715 37.6%
  • Mainstream media

    Votes: 112 2.5%
  • Crtitical Race theory

    Votes: 190 4.2%
  • A fucking leaf

    Votes: 291 6.4%
  • Kyle Rittenhouse

    Votes: 525 11.5%
  • Supreme Court

    Votes: 101 2.2%

  • Total voters
    4,561
Not sure where you got this idea, but both Islam and Christianity have long had a cult of "martyrdom", where the highest good a person can achieve is to die for your faith. When you already have that idea and moral system in place then it really isn't a big leap of logic to arrive at suicide bombings.
Christian martyrs have nothing to do with suicide bombings or murdering other people.
 

Like I said, if you can't handle people saying shit you don't agree with, maybe forums aren't right for you. If you see everyone talking about a specific topic, and see it as "challenge pissing" it's you that is the problem. If you don't like what everyone else is talking about, reply with something different, if people want to talk about what you want to talk about they'll reply with you.
Screenshot_20220516-022505.png
Screenshot_20220516-022659.png
Screenshot_20220516-022733.png
Are we reading the same thread? This is the brilliant, nuanced """discussion""" you want to foster? Like yeah I get it free speech woo yeah cool, you're defending mouth breathers arguing over who's the bigger faggot.
 
Do we really NEED to make white supremacists look bad to the general public? That's a "Water is Wet" sort of thing.

I wouldn't know, I live in the hills and hollar where nobody cares about that kind of thing.

I don't deny they do shit like that, but I'm not about to throw the label out willy nilly.

A. Its not enough that in of itself is considered a bad thing snd a problem. We need to beat it into the masses heads like nazi propaganda akin to the jews. (Seriously watch any Hollywood movie in the last 20 years. The villain is
almost always a russian, German guy or southern white guy, or Englishman. The hero used to be american loser now its female/black person tokenism.)

B. Just because something doesn't affect you personally doesn't mean it doesn't affect millions of others elsewhere.

C. You're not wrong I Also agree this label shouldn't be thrown around willy nilly. But legitimate skepticism should remain. Like the Vegas shooting has quite a few holes never discussed. Lots of people investigating the OKC bombing ended up dying in mysterious ways afterwards. Like suicides and randomly being killed by a homicide a couple years later.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Not A. Yankee
No, fuck off with your idiot straw man.
You are just making excuses because it's something you like. You are part of the problem. Once it starts deviating from your narritive it's automatically bad though. Why fool yourself like that? 2 shootings in 2 months. Many more before that. Both posted on 4chan. One of them literally during the act. This isn't even about free speech anymore. There is an actual radicalization problem on 4chan and nobody is doing anything against it. THATS the problem.

Oh but I bet you secretly think thats based and redpilled so it's totally ok. We are on the interwebs afterall.
 
You are just making excuses because it's something you like. You are part of the problem. Once it starts deviating from you narritive it's automatically bad though. Why fool yourself like that? 2 shootings in 2 months. Many more before that. Both posted on 4chan. One of them literally during the act. This isn't even about free speech anymore. There is an actual radicalization problem on 4chan and nobody is doing anything against it. THATS the problem.

Oh but I bet you secretly think thats based and redpilled so it's totally ok. We are on the interwebs afterall.
I don't give a shit about 4chan.
 
Moderate your shithole decently or shut it down.

Simple as.
This seems like a good time to remind you that according to society, you’re posting right now on a cyberstalking hate-site full of extremists and doxxers that should really be shut down for the good of the internet.

So I’ll say the same thing to you as I say to all that want censorship rights over others’ free speech: you want censorship, then you go first, asshole.

Or do you reserve some kind of divine right and wisdom that infallibly guides you in your proclamations of what is and isn’t permissible as free speech?
 
Last edited:
Didn't this nigger literally copy parts of his manifesto from Brenton's?
I wonder if anyone has done a plagiarism analysis on the two manifestos yet
So I've run it through crappy free online plagiarism detectors (managed to find Tarrants bullshit), apparently not at all similar text wise. The formatting is very similar, but I would like to see it compared to that autist from Halle, Germany. I remember very clearly it reminded me more of that one in some aspects, with the long, autistic gun sperging and plans.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Not A. Yankee
the US has between 15k and 20k murders every year, the idea that mass shootings are 'epidemic' or are somehow a uniquely bad form of murder is just propaganda.

an average Saturday in a major city sees more people shot by black gangbangers, nobody gives a shit about that because the TV doesn't treat it like a crisis. they report it the way they report traffic jams. we are expected to just accept it as a fact of life, even though it's a far bigger and more serious problem than any hysteria about 'mass shootings'

they just memory-holed two DIFFERENT black mass shooters a couple of weeks ago because God forbid anyone ever holds blacks accountable for anything.
It doesn't bring money to Moms Demand Action or David Hogg. Hogg's Fed dad probably knows about half of these potential shooters.
Folks think shootings like this are staged ops for a number of very good and obvious reasons:

- The optics are horrifying and conveniently focus on targets of federal wrath (huwhite supremacists, unmoderated message boards, weapons that equalize the power between the people and the government)
- The feds have repeatedly over DECADES committed crimes in service to elite power agendas, specifically in ways that seek to manipulate public opinion
- Manifestos like this one utilize worn tropes that are too "perfect" for exploitation of power grabs
- Manifestos like this one are written in a non-believable way; literal copy/paste from the Christchurch manifesto, using DNC talking point phrases like "high-capacity magazines" and "assault style weapon" that nobody on 4chan would ever use
- The media and DNC apparatus appear to move in lockstep around certain shootings while ignoring others when the optics are not suitable, like the Vegas massacre that appears to have been a military operation
- Processes appear pre-arranged or sped-up around incidents like these. The shooter was in court two hours later? Really? On a Saturday?
- Spree shooters are often "known to the FBI" or have suspicious connections to the federal government

When you see certain patterns repeat over and over, it's hard to ignore.

Also:



You will never be a woman.
Every month or so, Biden's Domestic Terror unit or the DHS puts out fact sheets. Always, at the top, they stress how horrible white supremacy is and how it is the most violent threat to America. Biden will head out to the area on Tuesday, to no doubt give a meandering speech on the evils of white people and how they must atone any which way, with all the requisite talks on racism, slavery, and lynching included. Also gun control.

Naturally, this means guys like Tucker get brought up, because he talks about the Great Replacement. NYT and other trash mags insist it never happens/ isn't happening...while having articles candidly saying it's a good thing. Note this is also happening when there is an enormous surge at the US border; by getting Americans to talk about white supremacy, you make them talk about race in the way they want.

Rate me autistic or spergy but with the Tarrant shooting, all talks of demographic replacement or the needs of white people will always and forever be associated with mass shootings. In this case, the guy copypastas from other manifestos - remember the Texas shooter? Shot a few Hispanics? Said the same thing, mentioned demographic replacement, except he got smoked by armed shoppers - and bam, he fits the whole bill for what the Biden Admin is looking for. They want their waves of white supremacists and they found the right one.

That is, once they're done infiltrating all of the nationalist movements like RAM or send catbois like Fuentes in to destroy it before it even takes off. MLK was onto something, boys
Dylann Roof got 9 and look at the impact he had on America.
This cannot be overstated. It started with Confederate flags being lowered, then statues being toppled, and then statues of the Founding Fathers.
 
For what though? What end game?
Well the ATF does that shit to justify their existence. This particular case comes to mind. Who else are going to use terms like "BRRRRT" and "full rock and roll" and expect someone to understand what that means? Granted, they found out later that the guy couldn't legally own a gun, but some retard could easily have jumped on board for that out of sheer nativity.
As for any of the other three-letter agencies, considering they're the ones that dragged us into a war in a god forsaken country because of WMDs that were totally there, I can't say that they wouldn't make shit up for the sake of causing division or simply to further justify expanding their powers. The CIA was recently called out for going far beyond their jurisdiction by spying on American citizens. Who's to say it doesn't also serve as good posturing for politicians, although they're more likely just capitalizing on a good crisis.
I think what I'm trying to say, in short, is that a lot of these shootings that blow up align very closely with what narrative the media et. al try to push (AR-15 bad, white people bad, white supremacy is the biggest threat, etc.) and these organizations certainly have quite the track record of subversion in some way or another, so it shouldn't be so astonishing that the same organizations would turn a blind eye to an obvious threat for job security or a power grab? I certainly don't know, but once you see a bunch of coincidences that keep happening it certainly becomes a possibility.

I should also note that it's incredibly coincidental how many of these mass shooters were previously known to these alphabet agencies and they did nothing about them, despite posing credible threats.
 
If he hates niggers, he is going to love prison. lol

He was a pussy and didn't have the balls to blow his brains out. That means we get a show trial that will last for months. Luckily for me I don't watch the news on TV. I didn't even know this happened till I saw it here,
 
Damn thats a crazy cope
The fact you have to resort to an appeal to motive to score anything resembling an own betrays the weakness of your retarded beliefs. The only way you can make my position assailable is by rebuilding it into a house of cards. "You only defend free speech because it's 4chan" is a piss weak take.

Go lick boot for the crown, fag.
 
Back