Mass shooting streamed on Twitch - Payton Gendron/jimboboiii - 4chan schizo poltard kills 10 people, names /k/ and /pol/ in his manefisto

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who/What will get most amount of blame? (top 3)

  • 4chan

    Votes: 2,143 47.0%

  • Guns/assualt rifles/NRA

    Votes: 2,303 50.5%

  • Twitch

    Votes: 310 6.8%

  • Violent video games

    Votes: 358 7.8%

  • White people

    Votes: 2,793 61.2%

  • Toxic masculinity

    Votes: 455 10.0%

  • Trump/Republicans

    Votes: 1,715 37.6%

  • Mainstream media

    Votes: 112 2.5%

  • Crtitical Race theory

    Votes: 190 4.2%

  • A fucking leaf

    Votes: 291 6.4%

  • Kyle Rittenhouse

    Votes: 525 11.5%

  • Supreme Court

    Votes: 101 2.2%
  • Total voters
    4,561
Is it just me or are the Christchurch copycat killers getting more spergy over time?

First there was the synagogue shooter who couldn't clear a jam in his rifle and got disarmed by the elderly rabbi's jewjitsu. Next there was the Halle shooter who was a moeshitter weeb and got outsmarted by a wooden door. Now we have a far right furry.

At this rate the next shooter is going to be a mixed race white ethnonationalist tranny.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Emperor Augustus, Executive Petrel, Mothra88 and 5 others
Rimbaud's Bussy said:
Is it just me or are the Christchurch copycat killers getting more spergy over time?

First there was the synagogue shooter who couldn't clear a jam in his rifle and got disarmed by the elderly rabbi's jewjitsu. Next there was the Halle shooter who was a moeshitter weeb and got outsmarted by a wooden door. Now we have a far right furry.

At this rate the next shooter is going to be a mixed race white ethnonationalist tranny.
Click to expand...
Femboy shooter when (hopefully they only manage to kill themself)
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Executive Petrel and secret watcher
You know, I wish you guys would reframe the way you see black people. Sure, they may cost the taxpayer money… but they create a lot of jobs. How could Koreans be so wealthy if not for black women buying weaves ?

Now apply that to prisons, the sports industry, social work, lawyers, and shoe stores…

We really need to reframe it more as a niggulus package
 
Sailor Kim Jong Moon said:
You know, I wish you guys would reframe the way you see black people. Sure, they may cost the taxpayer money… but they create a lot of jobs. How could Koreans be so wealthy if not for black women buying weaves ?

Now apply that to prisons, the sports industry, social work, lawyers, and shoe stores…

We really need to reframe it more as a niggulus package
Click to expand...
Great, back to seeing them as economic assets. For God's sake they're people. Start treating em like it.
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: Alex Krycek, Snack Cracker, Cpl. Long Dong Silver and 5 others
Sailor Kim Jong Moon said:
Can you imagine watching ten people shot next to you and as the shooter turns to kill you and you scream in terror… he simply apologizes and leaves? Surreal mind fuckery- I bet he’ll be in church next Sunday lol
Click to expand...
If the guy doesn't off himself for survivors guilt for being the one white guy there that the shooter apologized too before being taken away. That guy is ruined for life mentally because of that.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Snack Cracker, Executive Petrel, secret watcher and 3 others
Butcher Pete said:
I understand your jealousy, subhuman, and will pretend I care about it.

Aren’t you tired of feeling inferior whenever you see a successful White? Wouldn’t you feel better among your own kind? You could imitate the Whites you saw during your time with us to awe and subdue the other savages. You could be their king and enjoy the biggest-bootied bitches in the tribe (or whatever sexual characteristic you subhumans are attracted to, I’m not a zoologist). You could even paint her white and pretend you are a successful and worthwhile human.

You did nothing with “your” inventions. That is, if your fellow tribesmen actually invented them. History is littered with people creating successful things (flight, boy sorcerer fantasy books, etc.) being followed by dozens of losers screaming ackshually I created that!
Click to expand...
This is just depressing. This outlook stifles your ability to understand, learn from and appreciate the world at large. I'm not talking about being tolerant, sensitive, inclusive, etc., just for the hell of it -- what I mean is, you won't be able to get much out of traveling to a different country, picking up a book, seeing a work of art, and so on, if you insist on running it through such a crude filter. You'll either look at it and say, "I can interpret this to support my existing beliefs," or, "This goes against what I believe. It's bad and I reject it!"

I'm not suggesting it's better to be some sort of wishy-washy ideological agnostic, but your beliefs should be able to change to accommodate new information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snack Cracker, secret watcher, Hippopatumus and 1 other person
Éamon de Valera said:
Yeah also China was very isolationist so they didn't really have any interest in a global empire in the first place. Africa and the Americas didn't do much but imo that's due to geography and isolation respectively rather than genetics.
Click to expand...
China did have an interest in Empire just not in the way people think.

To call someone Chinese is more of a cultural thing than anything else. Genetically Chinese are a diverse lot. Occasionally there’s still kids born with Red Hair and Green Eyes in Inner Mongolia and Central China for example. The Southern Chinese are more closely related to Viets and Thais than people from like Shangdong. Han denotes a common culture rather than anything strictly genetic per se. That said traces of the Zhou genetics can be found throughout China. It’s just that it’s not as monolithic as people think.

Chinese also looked down on merchants and that gave far less incentive for a seafaring culture. They wanted a form of Autarky; if they needed or wanted a resource they’d take it by conquest. They would allow some foreign trade but substantially less in the Ming period. If I’m remembering correctly only trade was allowed with Portugal in Macau and some Dutch and British vessels in Guangzhou. Initially the Qing were far more open to trade and foreigners than the Ming (they even had an elite unit of Slavic Russian Cavalry for a while) but as the Manchu became increasingly Sinicized they took the same view as the Ming and sure enough their empire began to stagnate. They didn’t need to trade because pretty much all their neighbors except Russia and Japan paid tribute or got conquered. They did however really like Silver, it was their reserve currency and it was favored for chopsticks by the nobility. That being said, they also had a taste for Opium. So they started trading for silver and opium instead of for things could advance them further like guns and Industrial Equipment. The concepts weren’t really well understood in Chinese society because of the isolationism and small merchant class.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Emperor Augustus, Not A. Yankee, Executive Petrel and 2 others
Éamon de Valera said:
Great, back to seeing them as economic assets. For God's sake they're people. Start treating em like it.
Click to expand...
Well, yes, and while framed as a joke the point still stands that they’re not a drain on the economy when you factor in what it takes to keep everything running. Simplified and questionable tax statistics don’t paint a complete picture of the benefits of any group or individual: but that’s less fun to explain innit
 
  • Dislike
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher and Mayor Adam West
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back