Mass shooting streamed on Twitch - Payton Gendron/jimboboiii - 4chan schizo poltard kills 10 people, names /k/ and /pol/ in his manefisto

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who/What will get most amount of blame? (top 3)

  • 4chan

    Votes: 2,143 47.0%
  • Guns/assualt rifles/NRA

    Votes: 2,303 50.5%
  • Twitch

    Votes: 310 6.8%
  • Violent video games

    Votes: 358 7.8%
  • White people

    Votes: 2,793 61.2%
  • Toxic masculinity

    Votes: 455 10.0%
  • Trump/Republicans

    Votes: 1,715 37.6%
  • Mainstream media

    Votes: 112 2.5%
  • Crtitical Race theory

    Votes: 190 4.2%
  • A fucking leaf

    Votes: 291 6.4%
  • Kyle Rittenhouse

    Votes: 525 11.5%
  • Supreme Court

    Votes: 101 2.2%

  • Total voters
    4,561
Ah, you’re a bit dim. Got it. Here, let me try to simplify it for you.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of some people calling out discrimination while actively engaging in themselves.

It wasn’t a comment on board culture or a request for change, both of which you seem to have taken it to have been. But that’s okay, if I held your intellectual limitations against you you could rightfully accuse me of discriminating against the borderline retarded.
the fuck you even on about? you're sperging out at HHH and others for laughing at a newfag and trying to prove "hypocrisy" like it's some moral grand crusade. and you claim "you're a bit dim". No maybe its just you're overanalyzing shit. it's very simple

Newfag comes in and shits up the board ---> HHH and others laugh at him for being a retard ----> the newfag gets salty and leaves. it was that simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goth Commie
People loved the NSDAP. Outside Germany they loved the NSDAP. You sound as if the NSDAP could have worn tutus and danced the Nutcracker as long as that's what they thought the volk wanted and they could have come into power.

You act as if they just appeared and took over, nein mein Freund, they were voted in, legally. Adolf Hitler became Chancellor when Hindenburg appointed him as such. By ignoring the appeal of the NSDAP and the support it had you will never understand how, and most importantly why, such things come to be.
Also Germans hated juda before the war and many Europeans still do. Why do you think Europe has free immigration for Asians (Muslims)? It's because the Quran teaches that in the end times even the trees will call out to the Muslim: "There is a Jew hiding behind me, please kill it".
 
it's not about us forming a hugbox, it's about when someone that is the definition of a newfag comes in and tries to shit up the thread/board/website, various websites and boards have their own mini cultures, and said areas don't like newfags coming in and shitting up the place. like look at how /his/ and /k/ now treat /pol/niggers.

also gatekeeping is a good thing in moderation unless you want every website/board like twitter, anyone that cries about gatekeeping is a fag.


This image sums up my thoughts

View attachment 3291169
I find it funny when nat-socs think im on their side because i call out mostly left wing retarded takes but act shocked and surprised because I dont believe the hitler was a good goy and didin du nuffin wrong narrative.


I want you to know that not only is what you just wrote oversimplified, it's very inaccurate. Nazism isn't "socialism but kill the jews xD". Even though Bolshevism, Maoism (the two of which are only tangentially related), and Nazism are all retarded and authoritarian to their core, they are all far more complicated than can be reduced down to just "kill x to solve y". None of these ideologies were predicated on this assertion, and while all of them did eventually turn the nations they controlled into a slaughterfest, it was either paranoia fueled rampage (Lenin's hanging order, Stalin and Mao's repeated purges) or a slow build up of decisions that, while not initially intended, eventually lead to genocide (the Holocaust). I suggest reading on the Russian Revolution (and pre-revolution socialist activities), Nazi rise to power, and the Cultural Revolution in Communist China. That's the only way you'll understand any of these ideologies at their core, and make sense of their actions within context.
Im not arguing that there isn't a difference between Maoism/national socialism/fascism. Im arguing the differences if you want to be at its most basic is this.

Maoist China ~ lets kill the landlords and sparrows for prosperity.

Soviet Russia ~ lets kill the Kulak's, and those with Bourgeoisie sentiment.

Nazi Germany ~ lets kill the jewish Bolshevik menace threatening the fatherland.
Obviously there are finer points but it can be summed down that socialism usually needs a scapegoat to handle hard times.
 
The prosecution's case was laughably bad and Rittenhouse should never have even seen the inside of a courthouse.

Mass murder with a hate crime thrown on for good measure will get you a federal death penalty.
Imagine doing something that gets you the death penalty at 18. Honestly it's going to take years either way because "people have rights" even if he's proven guiltier than sin.
 
the fuck you even on about? you're sperging out at HHH and others for laughing at a newfag and trying to prove "hypocrisy" like it's some moral grand crusade. and you claim "you're a bit dim". No maybe its just you're overanalyzing shit. it's very simple
Can’t help but notice that you’ve moved on from being ‘the voice of Kiwifarms’ to lecturing me on what I‘ve written, and my intentions when doing so. Bravo.
Your writing style is rapidly degenerating as you get angrier, too. Have you tried writing in English and not Impotent Apoplectic Rage?

socialism usually needs a scapegoat to handle hard times.
Let’s not just point the finger at Socialism. Argentina started the Falklands War to boost a weak government with Nationalist fervor, Pinochet had his commies, and right-wing Nationalists in the EU and many other countries are trying the same shit as well.
Scapegoating is an activity beloved by authoritarians, despots and dictators regardless of left/right affiliation.
 
Last edited:
D6eXsWFWAAA1uxX.png
 
I see what Null means now about deleting this subforum, it turns even moderate-leaning and older members into complete fucking speds.
It's politics. Politics turns everyone into speds, at least having A&H concentrates it to one easily avoidable spot on the site outside of the blatantly political threads on certain persons and groups elsewhere such as Community Watch.
Scapegoating is an activity beloved by authoritarians, despots and dictators regardless of left/right affiliation.
It's one of the oldest political tricks in the book right next to promising one thing then doing the opposite, and selling out your position for money and influence. It's yet another thing that isn't left/right but gets bandied about like it is all the same.
 
Your writing style is rapidly degenerating as you get angrier, too. Have you tried writing in English and not Impotent Apoplectic Rage?
Sorry I'm not an English major and that I really don't give a shit about typing clean on the internet. Also those that pull the "angry/cope" card are always the one in that mood.
 
I don't understand the accelerationist idea that guns being taken away will cause a societal collapse. I'd recon we'd just end up in a 1984 constant government state. I mean we have examples of this working right now, China. The only thing "accelerating" is the loss of personal liberties. It's pretty demoralizing knowing the next few generations will have less and less rights. Born too late to explore the Earth, born too early to explore the universe. Perfect time to post schizo-radicalizing shit on 4chan.
As much as it pains me, I'm in the same boat at this point. It wouldn't surprise me too much if Americans ultimately roll over should the government finally throw down the gauntlet and start seizing firearms, or at the very least making actual, concrete moves towards reducing private ownership of them. Never underestimate what people are willing to tolerate as long as they're able to keep their creature comforts, and Americans are (generally, not all) addicted to their creature comforts. The boomers by and large don't give a fuck, and the younger generations are largely powerless to stop it and instead lash out in wildly unproductive and counter-intuitive ways. It's an extremely pessimistic take but it's easier to see as an American observing the country from the outside after having left the bubble.

That's not to say that an actual large-scale rebellion against such a draconian (and unjust) move by the state is impossible. In fact I think there's a +10% chance of it happening, but if the resistance is far smaller than what people have been hyping for so long, I wouldn't be surprised. A lot of people who love their right to keep and bear arms (and rightly so) also tend to prefer abiding by the law, and thus would dutifully follow the law even if it requires abandonment of their personal firearms rather than rebel against it, because that's 'losing with dignity'. It's a sobering thought.
 
What you're describing already happened in....the American Civil War. Destroying key enemy infrastructure such as trains or roads along with denying essential supplies to get in is what helped the federal forces win that time and would yet again in a repeat situation.

In all reality any strongholds of opposition would have essential services cut off and they'd turn on one another quickly. The federal government would be offering bounties on anyone involved and anyone dumb enough to try something would be sold out and dealt with.

Let's do a little mind exercise here. Think on it for a moment. Let's suppose that the federal government cut off all access to everything that makes a comfortable life. Electricity, fuel, lifesaving medications such as insulin for diabetes or nitroglycerin for heart problems. Easy access to food. The Internet, mobile services, even radio broadcasts gone overnight. Let's then suppose said government then tells everyone affected in that area it's because a few bad actors won't behave and access will be restored once things get under control.

Do you honestly, truly in your heart believe that the people they want in custody or dead wouldn't turn up on their doorstep? The vast majority of the people in the US are normal folks trying to live their lives. They're currently being given the carrot. If people wanted to try something, everyone would be given the stick. Your average person doesn't want the stick.

People espousing the idea that a rebellion could overthrow the federal government don't really think over it objectively. Having a cache of small arms isn't really going to mean dick when your neighbor hates your guts because they can't eat a cheeseburger and jerk off to porn for two hours.
You can't really compare the Civil War with a hypothetical modern equivalent. Mainly because the two sides aren't as well defined. It isn't South vs. North anymore. Every state will have people that disagree with each other on an ideological level. Besides, what I described is The State (TM) vs. The People (We).

I don't see the government destroying trillions worth of infrastructure. That's Marvel-tier villainy. That wouldn't even be shooting yourself in the foot, it would be removing the foot entirely.

Other than that, you do make a lot of sense. Thank you for this thought out reply.
 
As much as it pains me, I'm in the same boat at this point. It wouldn't surprise me too much if Americans ultimately roll over should the government finally throw down the gauntlet and start seizing firearms, or at the very least making actual, concrete moves towards reducing private ownership of them. Never underestimate what people are willing to tolerate as long as they're able to keep their creature comforts, and Americans are (generally, not all) addicted to their creature comforts. The boomers by and large don't give a fuck, and the younger generations are largely powerless to stop it and instead lash out in wildly unproductive and counter-intuitive ways. It's an extremely pessimistic take but it's easier to see as an American observing the country from the outside after having left the bubble.

That's not to say that an actual large-scale rebellion against such a draconian (and unjust) move by the state is impossible. In fact I think there's a +10% chance of it happening, but if the resistance is far smaller than what people have been hyping for so long, I wouldn't be surprised. A lot of people who love their right to keep and bear arms (and rightly so) also tend to prefer abiding by the law, and thus would dutifully follow the law even if it requires abandonment of their personal firearms rather than rebel against it, because that's 'losing with dignity'. It's a sobering thought.
Advanced tech means the narrative is controlled. 50% of the population would be against overthrowing a tyrant because he’s on “their team” and they’re salivating for a social credit score

The other 40% won’t know an overthrow is underway or will be lead to believe it’s a Nazi uprising

The rest will be dealt with accordingly
 
Sorry I'm not an English major
Passive-aggressive, like a pouty teenager.
I really don't give a shit about typing clean on the internet
You care enough to try to justify your retardation. Think it’s working?
Also those that pull the "angry/cope" card are always the one in that mood.
NO U, the post.

You literally reason and argue like the dumbest fucking wignat on Stormfront. “It’s okay to discriminate against X because X is not like us, right fellers?”. What makes the whole scenario amusing is that you just can’t see your own hypocrisy. Kudos.
 
Back