2022-05-18 - Government of Australia: URGENT class 1 removal notice from the eSafety Commissioner [SEC=OFFICIAL:Sensitive]

[The Demon]

Is this the same Australia that literally had helicopters patrolling the streets looking for people doing such insane crimes as walking outside during lockdown.

they did have the military and police lock down some cities. the police were seen at barbecues breaking their own restrictions they enforce, also dogs were shot for some reason

 

[Feline Supremacist]

I'm still unsure why they believe they have jurisdiction over an American website. Did I miss something here?

 

[GHTD]

Yahoo v. LICRA, you dingo fucks.

US District Court already decided in 2001 that US websites do not need to comply with international legal orders.

 

[Johnny Silverhand]

For a country that was once a penal colony that violently gained it's independence they sure do want to go right back to prison like restrictive conditions for all their citizens.

 

[Pillar of Autism]

also dogs were shot for some reason

I thought that dog killing was more of an ATF thing.

 

[Biggusstickus]

So first its the Emu wars. When's Kiwi War electric boogaloo gonna start mate.

 

[Vesperus]

Not to open a can of worms here but for the purposes of expressing the nature of free speech - would anyone on here find it disturbing if someone tried to ask a website to remove content relating to the rape and murder of a child?

Given that this horrid act is also illegal as well as acts of terrorism, are we really expressing that we are open to free speech, or just that we think that Terorism isn't so bad and should be viewed at ones leisure? Because some find the idea of a gunman shooting lots of people for joy just as disgusting as other things - like the raping and killing of children.

A comment purely for the purpose of showing are we actually fighting for free speech or just what we think is acceptable? Because threatening others too is free speech but that is even bared on KF.

Would a video of a terrorist going through a school and blowing children away be met with the same response as "its free speech"? Just putting it out there to see what everyone else thinks.

Why, do the bad things stop happening if we close our eyes? If @Null wiped all footage of 9/11 from the site, would the towers spring back up from the ashes? If Turkey wished really hard that everyone would stop talking about Armenia, would that mean there was no genocide?

Stop being such a faggot. KF is a place where we tell the truth - at least, as best we can - then call each other retarded for lulz. If you want a fucking hugbox where all the bad things are ignored, piss off to reddit.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Wait, so you say that videos of rape should be public? lol

If its already in the public, the gov should not memory hole it. It helps others determine who to trust and not. All info is helpful to citizens to protect themselves, especially if the rapist flees to another country. It is good to be able to see who your neighbors are.

The victim in the video, obviously, should have her or his face censored.

 

[Gotta Groom Em All]

It legitimately makes me laugh every time Australia believes it’s a real country.

Not to open a can of worms here but for the purposes of expressing the nature of free speech - would anyone on here find it disturbing if someone tried to ask a website to remove content relating to the rape and murder of a child?

Given that this horrid act is also illegal as well as acts of terrorism, are we really expressing that we are open to free speech, or just that we think that Terorism isn't so bad and should be viewed at ones leisure? Because some find the idea of a gunman shooting lots of people for joy just as disgusting as other things - like the raping and killing of children.

A comment purely for the purpose of showing are we actually fighting for free speech or just what we think is acceptable? Because threatening others too is free speech but that is even bared on KF.

Would a video of a terrorist going through a school and blowing children away be met with the same response as "its free speech"? Just putting it out there to see what everyone else thinks.

Go back

 

[Wodanaz]

Not to open a can of worms here but for the purposes of expressing the nature of free speech - would anyone on here find it disturbing if someone tried to ask a website to remove content relating to the rape and murder of a child?

Given that this horrid act is also illegal as well as acts of terrorism, are we really expressing that we are open to free speech, or just that we think that Terorism isn't so bad and should be viewed at ones leisure? Because some find the idea of a gunman shooting lots of people for joy just as disgusting as other things - like the raping and killing of children.

A comment purely for the purpose of showing are we actually fighting for free speech or just what we think is acceptable? Because threatening others too is free speech but that is even bared on KF.

Would a video of a terrorist going through a school and blowing children away be met with the same response as "its free speech"? Just putting it out there to see what everyone else thinks.

retard. cataloguing and distributing cp content incentivizes more to be made on the black market. making fun of some incel who shot some people does the opposite. nobody wants to be a joke, and that's what we need to do to faggots who kill people for no reason - make them jokes.

 

[The Crust]

Time to have Null extradited to Australia so he can pay for his crimes of owning a site that someone posted a nasty on.

 

[HarblMcDavid]

I do find it interesting how the esafety commissioner is unwilling to even attach a name of literally any real person on the other end of this commission.

Completely faceless government entities are always the most accountable am I right?

 

[Chazzed Up]

I can't imagine anything more pathetic than governments that think they can and should police the dissemination of public events in a news and informational sense. If they really found the shooting and manifesto despicable, why do they NOT want citizens to see what happened?

I feel like they must be afraid white people are going to realize nobody around them looks like them anymore. It's not a reason to kill someone who looks different than you, but there certainly is some vested interest in gaslighting white people about demographic changes.

 

[Phil Ken Sebben]

Memestraylia is a literal meme circus joke clown country holy shit lol

View attachment 3295285

View attachment 3295286

And what exactly does showing the video or manifesto have to do with fucking Australia?

Look Australia. I like you. I really do. But fucking hell this is retarded even for you.

 

[4ChanPartyVan]

I was expecting a response similar to what Null gave to NZ.

I am thoroughly disappointed. :-(

 

[Thumb Butler]

eSafety™ is so important in this time and age. Think of the children politicians in Canberra! They might need to get a real job.

 

[AnOminous]

Surprised their letter isnt written upside down tbh

So when Australia swirls its way down the toilet of fascism, is it clockwise or counter-clockwise?

For a country that was once a penal colony that violently gained it's independence they sure do want to go right back to prison like restrictive conditions for all their citizens.

Once a jail punk, always a jail punk.

 

[The Demon]

I thought that dog killing was more of an ATF thing.

it is, but i guess it's just a police thing. there were rescue dogs in kennels, and they were shot to "prevent volunteers from traveling to pick up the animals" because of the varus. never go to new south wales

 

[Ronnie McNutt]

What the fuck is with shitty obscure countries in Oceania trying to police the speech of other countries' citizens

soon it's gonna be palau asking null to take down all the gore in the people dying thread

 

[Dyn]

I don't think so. I'm pretty sure Liberal will win again, although I hope the UAP provides a few upsets.

Maybe, but I doubt it. Doesn't really make a difference though, when it comes to internet censorship the party in charge is for it and the opposition is against it and then they do the hokey pokey and they turn around every time the government changes.