2022-05-18 - Government of Australia: URGENT class 1 removal notice from the eSafety Commissioner [SEC=OFFICIAL:Sensitive]

Status
Not open for further replies.
FuckedOffToff said:
And in the UK, the Conservative government is talking about censoring "legal, but harmful" speech on the Internet. It's all the same playbook. Rupert Murdoch is a cancer on this planet.
Click to expand...
The Anglo Conservatives have always been a nanny state authoritarian bastards that fly their nation's flag while destroying said nation from the inside due to their retarded policies. And so is Anglo Labour...and Anglo Libs...and Anglo Nationalists...and Anti-Anglo parties.

Really anything from that fucking island is cursed on way or another.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: quaawaa, Pillar of Autism, Dork Of Ages and 5 others
HarblMcDavid said:
I do find it interesting how the esafety commissioner is unwilling to even attach a name of literally any real person on the other end of this commission. 🤔

Completely faceless government entities are always the most accountable am I right?
Click to expand...
The only name easily found on their website is the head of the organization, Julie Inman Grant. Interestingly she seems to have largely worked in DC and then for US tech companies, in "government relations". That's code for either directly lobbying, trying to sell stuff to the government, or keeping the feds happy so they don't pass new laws that affect your business.

Screenshot 2022-05-18 at 13-13-15 About the Commissioner eSafety Commissioner.png


So if you're going to direct (legal, non-schizo) complaints to anyone, she is the Commissioner who couldn't be bothered to put her name or signature on that legal demand.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Pillar of Autism, Snack Cracker, The Valeyard and 8 others
This makes me wonder how much the Aussie government would like it if a country like Russia or any -istan were to send their website owners notices that they must censor websites that demand people to accept faggotry and to behave like massive faggots. Trying to command someone to censor documentation of important happenings vs telling people to stop brainwashing young adults, grooming children and normalizing destructive promiscuity. Hmmmmm, who would look like the reasonable society there..?
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Snack Cracker, Ventriloquism is not real, Full Race Replay and 9 others
Australia doesn’t deserve the respect of being labeled a “western” country. It doesn’t matter if they’re Anglos who originated from bongland. They act like chinks with censorship, and on top of that their government is completely inept.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
Useful_Mistake said:
If its already in the public, the gov should not memory hole it. It helps others determine who to trust and not. All info is helpful to citizens to protect themselves, especially if the rapist flees to another country. It is good to be able to see who your neighbors are.

The victim in the video, obviously, should have her or his face censored.
Click to expand...
Yeah... I don't think censoring the face of rape victim will help them when everyone online knows they were raped and can watch free porn of it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back