2022-05-18 - Government of Australia: URGENT class 1 removal notice from the eSafety Commissioner [SEC=OFFICIAL:Sensitive]

Status
Not open for further replies.
lol
there were millions of people in Australia, a lot of them working in the media, police, and in the legal system, who didn't think a wild canine in a continent filled with deadly animals could be dangerous
To be fair compared to everything else, Dingos are the least dangerous . They're a failed byproduct of wild domestication, similar to how cats became domesticated multiple times by just living around human habitation. Dingos essentially crashed halfway and never actually became domesticated.

Raccoons are more dangerous than dingos, but they are a rare sight.
 
What's with the unusually polite response? I was expecting Reply of the Zaporozhian Cossacks level banter.
Contrary to popular opinion, nool doesn't just flip out instantly any time anyone does something that pisses him off. The New Zealanders weren't just dumb, they were insulting. Their demand was an insult to American sovereignty and demanded that nool become a rat against his users, and he's been pretty clear that while he'd obey a legitimate court order from a real court with jurisdiction over him and/or the site, or legitimate law enforcement requests from shit like the SDNY and FBI, foreign courts do not mean shit.

They don't have even tenuous jurisdiction. All they're threatening to do is put him on an Australian net nanny filter that the nanny state government inflicts on its subject, because nobody who puts up with that shit can be called a citizen. They have the jurisdiction to do that and he has the jurisdiction to tell them lmao no.
Question- could other countries actually impose and collect fines from American individuals or businesses even if you don't do business in that particular country?
Only through whatever process is available for the collection of foreign judgments, usually based on a convention to which the country of the judgment debtor is party, or sometimes based on bilateral agreements between the two states. Procedures for doing so are arcane and expensive, and the foreign judgment is often subject to collateral attack, e.g. collecting foreign libel judgments in the U.S. when the First Amendment would have protected the speech in question.
 
Last edited:
They weren’t making outlandish demands.
IMO any demand to censor any legal content is outlandish but compared to the NZ government asking for the info on everyone who viewed the video after the Christchurch massacre it is pretty tame.
What happened? It’s so far off how I used to see Australia. Is this the Chinese buying everything up and exerting influence or is there something in the culture ?
I’m starting to get that reaction every time I read the word ‘harm’ used online. It’s like a red flag for the thought police. Such a broad definition of harm - it can be anything they want. Like here in the uk, the hate crime laws plus the malicious comms acts ensure that any offence can be prosecuted. It’s terrifying. Why aren’t people more pissed off about all this?
They have no pesky 1st amendment getting in the way of lizard money goblins doing whatever the fuck they want to dissidents is my best guess, no second amendment either.
 
IMO any demand to censor any legal content is outlandish but compared to the NZ government asking for the info on everyone who viewed the video after the Christchurch massacre it is pretty tame.

They have no pesky 1st amendment getting in the way of lizard money goblins doing whatever the fuck they want to dissidents is my best guess, no second amendment either.
I think I’m just really disappointed in the western world for going along with all this. I assumed more of us would be objecting. It’s a bit depressing tbh. Not so much that governments are trying it on, you assume all governments want to, but that people seem to want it as well.
Class one removal makes me laugh, sounds like a hazardous materials designation.
 
If you can write-in a candidate for the Australian election coming up, any aussie Kiwi's should write-in "Nool" in protest.

I'm charging a carton of smokes and a pallet of beer. I'll give em dyns dox for free.:story:

Pfft. Dyn doxes himself. He's the only Abo that knows how to use a damn computer instead of urinating on or throwing feces at it, or getting down on his knees and worshipping it as a machine-god.
 
Sorry fam, was referencing Australia's absolute STATE of central control and heavy leaning to a nanny state. Apologizes for the activating the vaccine-related neurons; I just wanted to laugh at pre-beta test America.
I was only making a joke too. On a similar note this reminds me how australian prime minister went publicly on a tirade against 'basement dwelling trolls in Florida' for comparing his 'voluntary quarantine camps' to auschwitz.
 
It is cute when a Chinese vassal state larping as a western democracy tries to impose their policies on the citizens of a different sovereign nation.

If the eSafety Commissar perchance reads this, it is my most sincere wish for you and the government that appointed you to choke on a bag of dicks.
 
If you can write-in a candidate for the Australian election coming up, any aussie Kiwi's should write-in "Nool" in protest.



Pfft. Dyn doxes himself. He's the only Abo that knows how to use a damn computer instead of urinating on or throwing feces at it, or getting down on his knees and worshipping it as a machine-god.
You’re assuming Dyn isn’t an American nigger or some sort of bot. I personally suspect he’s a bot with a nigger personality matrix.

But then maybe he is within the top five percent of his benighted and pitiable race.
 
What use do Australians have for the internet?

I would have thought that fighting off roving gangs of neo barbarians on a never ending search for gasoline, while brokering occasional deals with Tina Turner leaves little room for web surfing.
If you want to be Master, I’ll be your Blaster
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
These ground harness wearing motherfuckers want to have their cake and eat it too. They connect to a website across the planet then demand it follow their rules. They could just block the website but that would make them seem authoritarian. Instead they decide to take an even more authoritarian approach. Can we demand they change things in their country or is that a one way street?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
Question- could other countries actually impose and collect fines from American individuals or businesses even if you don't do business in that particular country?
Almost certainly no. The two countries would have to have some sort of agreement, whatever the American business did must also violate US law, there must be Australian victims of whatever the business did and there must be political will to allow a foreign nation to tell one of our businesses what to do.

Simply not gonna happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back