World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

Economic and cultural manipulation.
Pretty broad, what does that entail?
Unlike in the Industrial era where poor farmers and rural manor owners had interest groups advocating for them that managed to develop the countryside and alleviate the difficulty in economic transition (i.e. mechanization of agriculture), in the Great Reset there will be no aid.
So....just like now?
The increasingly high price of fuel will strangle rural businesses, farms will either be consolidated into Big Ag-affiliates or turned back to nature (i.e. what Ted Turner is doing in the West), and the people left to die out as their children move to cities.
Also a "just like now?"
Jobs will be filled with cheap immigrant labor picking crops on the large farms.
What about mining? That's a whole different beast and still bigger than agri around here.
It may be possible to live off the UBI in a rural area, but one would pay so much for services and likely run into legal issues fishing/hunting/gathering/farming that life would be very difficult compared to the "easy" life of living in a pod and eating bugs in the city.
Game laws and the like are insanely hard to enforce as it is, and that's not counting for those of us already possessing licenses. They can't even stop ginseng hunters.

Also, cost of living remains much lower, and it'd be a hell of a feat to artificially raise it out in the boonies.
What rural life is left will mostly be the second and third homes of the laptop class and the oligarchs. Note that this is already happening with the vast amount of land purchases made by people like Ted Turner, Bill Gates, and orgs like Blackrock. They REALLY want the entire world to become renters, and they hate that people could ever do something like experience the beauty of nature on their own terms and not through some commercialized bullshit.
True, but again, there's still a whole lot of working class yokels like me to account for. It sounds honestly like not all that much is gonna change for the rednecks, or if it does, it's going to be slow as molasses and I'll even more likely be dead before it comes up into the sticks.
 
So I've noticed a thing.

People are making a big deal (including the Smithsonian rag) about how libraries are being transformed into shit like music studios (no really, gotta entice the black yoot into the space). The books subreddit absolutely adores the idea of a library being a rental station (watch them swoon over cake pans being loaned). In the comments: NOW DO TOOLS! (as if Home Depot does not exist).

Point being, that nowadays not only do words mean nothing (like fucking LIBRARY), but young folk nowadays are very interested in not owning anything, just borrow or rent that shit. VERY easy to move from household items, to cars (that are already leased), to their permanent living spaces (where they can share all their rented shit with other pod people).

I love libraries, because they're quiet. At least, I used to. What happened to community centers?

 
Last edited:
Not directly related to the WEF, but it's still worrying if what Mark Taylor "telegramed" is really true.

Biden Handing Over U.S. Sovereignty to WHO​

by Peter Breggin MD and Ginger Ross Breggin

Originally posted to America Out Loud May 4, 2022 | Feature 1, Healthcare, Politics, World

Please take seriously the severity of this existential threat to everything free people hold dear. Do everything in your power to pass this report on to others and to find ways to communicate with and to influence people to stop empowering WHO to take over our national sovereignty and freedom.


On May 22-28, 2022, ultimate control over America’s healthcare system, and hence its national sovereignty, will be delivered for a vote to the World Health Organization’s governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).

This threat is contained in new amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, proposed by the Biden administration, that are scheduled as “Provisional agenda item 16.2” at the upcoming conference on May 22-28, 2022.1

These amendments will empower WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.
 
but young folk nowadays are very interested in not owning anything, just borrow or rent that shit. VERY easy to move from household items, to cars (that are already leased), to their permanent living spaces (where they can share all their rented shit with other pod people).
This happened because consumerism became too expensive. You literally cannot own all the things you're expected to have because [long boring economic rant you already know]. So rather than move on from consumerism and, you know, consume less, they simply gave up on the idea of owning the things. They'll still have them... but in a communal sense.

At some point the monkey mind will reassert itself and pull us out of this dystopia. But we've got a few more years left of marveling at man's inhumanity to himself.
 
Last edited:
This happened because consumerism became too expensive. You literally cannot own all the things you're expected to have because [long boring economic rant you already know]. So rather than move on from consumerism and, you know, consume less, they simply gave up on the idea of owning the things. They'll still have them... but in a communal sense.

At some point the monkey mind will reassert itself and pull us out of this dystopia. But we've got a few more years left of marveling at man's inhumanity to himself.
The giant Ponzi scheme of an economy that we live in is 100% dependent on constant consumption. If demand slows even briefly, credit and asset bubbles form and then explode into depressions. This is why they're desperate for a central bank digital currency. If you're a dissident, they want to be able to turn off all of your cash, but also, they want to make it so that your savings expire if you don't use them, forcing you to spend.

The servitization/rental economy they're trying to build would, in theory, create constant demand and prevent people from "hoarding money", because no one would ever accumulate enough "stuff" that their needs are satisfied and they don't need to buy anything more.

This would, in turn, increase the velocity of money in the markets and conceal the massive financial grift. It would also force people to pay rents to consume the same unit of production over and over again, which would allow them to stretch natural resources out longer.
 
If you're a dissident, they want to be able to turn off all of your cash, but also, they want to make it so that your savings expire if you don't use them, forcing you to spend.
This is an old, old idea that pops up from time to time, but was never remotely feasible until the advent of digital banking. The first time I actually encountered it was in kim stanley robinson's "green mars", back in the eary 90s, during a scene where several of the minor protagonists are discussing the shape of the society they want to craft after their grand revolution against earth. One of the ideas they discuss is using nitrous oxide as currency, which would allow the state banks to release peoples savings to the atmosphere, preventing them from maintining a positive balance. This idea of destroying personal wealth, along with all the fallout from that policy, was discussed in glowing terms as if it was self-evidently good.
 
People tend to scoff at the transhumanist aspects of all of this, but they really are trying to do some crazy shit. Look up the "Internet of Bodies" and "Intra-Body Communication".





Internet-of-Bodies-Examples-RAND-768x512.png


We are dealing with totalitarian control freaks of the worst possible kind. Everyone ought to read Joost Meerloo's The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing.

The enemies of the free world have manufactured hysteria and mass psychosis, just so they can implement "reforms" that will bring about further tyranny, brainwashing, madness, privacy invasions, and totalitarianism, and they aren't even discreet at all about the methods by which they aim to accomplish this.
 
The enemies of the free world have manufactured hysteria and mass psychosis, just so they can implement "reforms" that will bring about further tyranny, brainwashing, madness, privacy invasions, and totalitarianism, and they aren't even discreet at all about the methods by which they aim to accomplish this.
I'd be more outraged if the so called defenders of the free world wanted anything different.
 
You know what's funny about the name (World Economic Foundation) is that most normies when they hear the name prob think its just some organization of boring economic professors discussing macroenomic inflations or something like that.
What, as opposed to a bunch of Rothschild, Rockefeller, and Club of Rome sidekicks carrying out secret depopulation, eugenics, and degrowth orders under a literal Kissinger acolyte?


 
People tend to scoff at the transhumanist aspects of all of this
I think it's not taken seriously that way because current_year transhumanism is almost always a repetition of mere authoritarian/totalitarian "Orwellian" shit that predates computers, or a retarded cargo-cult parody of last century's "optimistic" sci-fi transhumanism.

If you use spellcheck, you're a cyborg or Transcendence begins with sawing your dick off don't feel futuristic/revolutionary. They feel pre-medieval—pre-human, even.
 
Back