Teacher reveals how schools are struggling with trans rights - Worried parents, angry teens and furious battles over pronouns. An experienced teacher lifts the lid and explains why he had to leave his job

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...ls-are-struggling-with-trans-rights-7068kn350 | Archive

Teacher reveals how schools are struggling with trans rights​


Worried parents, angry teens and furious battles over pronouns. An experienced teacher lifts the lid and explains why he had to leave his job​


Sian Griffiths

Saturday May 21 2022, 6.00pm BST, The Sunday Times

For many people, the story that emerged last week of an 18-year-old girl who expressed doubts about ‘‘transgender ideology” and was bullied out of school by her peers was no doubt a shocking one. The girl, who wants to remain anonymous, says that she was “treated like a heretic” after she questioned a female member of the House of Lords who had come to the school to speak about transphobia in parliament. The visitor used language that the girl believed implied critical theory took precedence over biological reality in defining women. The incident prompted her fellow pupils to turn on her — she claims that a crowd of up to 60 girls screamed, swore and spat at her. She has since left the school.
JK Rowling and the education secretary, Nadhim Zahawi, have come out in support of the girl, whose case was made public by a whistleblowing teacher. Rowling criticised schools for pandering to quasi-religious fanaticism; Zahawi said her treatment was “hugely concerning”; and invited teachers with similar concerns to come forward.

While it is undoubtedly an extreme example, the story is also evidence of something that teachers like me know to be true: that gender politics is causing chaos in schools around the country, leaving staff and pupils afraid to express their views.

74c9b7b93d5b8a9309abe1e820352fc0ddb17065.jpg
JK Rowling has backed a pupil bullied out of school over her views on trans matters.

I have been a teacher for more than a decade and, until recently, was a science teacher at a secondary school in Oxfordshire. I was also head of year 9, responsible for the pastoral care of about 150 pupils aged 13 and 14 while managing a team of teaching staff who worked with them. It was a job I enjoyed and believe that I did well.
Last spring I was asked to handle the case of a year 9 student who was questioning her identity; she no longer wanted to be called by a girl’s name and asked to be addressed using the pronouns they and them.
This was not the first such incident at the school. There was an older pupil who had been born female and had in effect transitioned — and was already being called by a boy’s name.
The school had no clear written policy about what to do in such cases. My first response was to pick up the phone to the year 9 girl’s home. I rang her mother to try to find out more about the background; had the teenager spoken about not wanting to be treated as a girl? It turned out that it had been aired and a therapist had been brought in.
The child’s mother said there was an explicit instruction from the therapist that she continue to be called by the name she was given at birth and addressed as female. There was a belief that there were other psychological issues to explore and the mother said it was imperative the school follow the same line as was being taken at home.
I relayed this to the teachers dealing with this particular child and explained the reasoning behind it. I said we could not stop her friends from calling her a different name in school because that was too complex to grapple with but as teachers we would use the legal name that was on the register.
My colleagues agreed, but soon after some members of the teaching staff began to experience hostility from the pupils. The child’s class tutor, in particular, was targeted. One day he walked into class to find that water had been poured all over his chair. On another occasion he found the word “transphobe” scrawled on the whiteboard. There were other outrageous incidents: he was constantly heckled in class for “misgendering” her by using the “wrong” pronouns, behaviour that was difficult and disrespectful.
The tutor in question was experienced but even so he was taken aback, concerned enough to tell me what was happening. I decided to have a sit-down with some of the pupils and hold what the school calls a “restorative conversation” — a discussion where both sides just air their point of view.
The children arrived prepared: they said they had watched TikTok videos and clips on other social media sites where films suggest that you can change sex, that there are many different genders, that it is cruel to deny a child who feels as though they are in the wrong body.
We tried to address the situation calmly. I have no ideological position on the issue and felt that it would have been wrong to come down too hard on either side. We explained that the problem was not that the teaching staff did not believe the pupils, but that there were complicated matters to consider, that the person you believe you are now may not be the person you want to be in ten years’ time and that decisions made now could have longer-term ramifications. I also explained that it was not the school’s place to override a parental decision.
The issue of gender identity is an incredibly hard one for teachers to manage and the questions involved are highly complex: should children be allowed to transition without a parent’s consent? What if they are under 16? How should we handle the knock-on situations this raises for sports, school trips, changing rooms?
I know from friends working in schools in Essex and Northern Ireland that this is what they are dealing with day to day and doing so in an atmosphere that is highly charged: no one wants to be called a bigot by the children in their class.

c812c16bd83e3e0a864bc2929a0a8e9e9fb02800.jpg
Nadhim Zahawi, the education secretary, said the treatment was “hugely concerning”

At the end of the meeting I felt there was an understanding from the pupils that we were not being cruel, we were simply saying to her: take it slowly, you are only 14. Nevertheless, I decided to raise the issue with my line manager, who was also in charge of safeguarding, who suggested I raise it with the head teacher.
The head took a different view to mine. He saw no reason not to do what the child wanted. I explained that I had no ideological axe to grind but felt uncomfortable about disobeying a parent’s request. We discussed it and I agreed to leave it with him while he deliberated the right path to take. In the meantime we agreed that the teaching staff would continue to use the child’s female pronouns.
Over the course of the year, however, I got a few calls from the mother complaining that some teachers were calling the girl by the name she had requested. The girl would take her books home and her chosen name would be written on the front of them. The mother was concerned and said she was being ignored. I could see her point. But the staff were reluctant to face the continuing resentment from pupils in the class.
There had been a bit of a cultural shift in the school by this point. The sixth form lavatories were redone and were made unisex. They were labelled “gender neutral”. There was some talk about painting the bollards in rainbow colours to signal LGBT awareness too. The school already had a mix-and-match uniform: girls could wear trousers or skirts.
Now the issue began to bubble up more frequently in personal, social, health and economic education and science lessons too.
Some teenagers would say: “Why can’t I be non-binary or why can’t I be a boy?” Children seemed to feel emboldened, absolutely certain that there was only correct point of view. The school seemed to be reinforcing this. If a teenager questioned the prevailing view among their peers and said: “You can’t just become a boy, you can’t change your sex”, then they could be sent to the pastoral hub and it might be suggested they undertake an LGBT course.
Around the same time, more children in the lower years were starting to question their gender identity. It began to feel like a social contagion was spreading through the school.
Eventually I decided that it was time to move on. I kept quiet until I had a new teaching job — I knew I would need a reference. Then I aired my concerns in my exit interview. The head listened but pointed out that the changes in the school had been welcomed by some LGBT pupils who had told him how much they appreciated them.
I don’t blame the school for its chaotic approach; the arguments about gender identity and biological sex have become a fearsome culture war. Teachers lack the training and information to cope. Like most parents facing the same questions, they are afraid of doing something that is not in a child’s best interests.
That is why it is imperative that the Department for Education (DfE) gives clear guidelines for schools on how to tackle this problem; it should be a policy that is evidence-based and universal. That is the only way to calm the anger bubbling up in classrooms and to allow teachers to get on with their jobs.
I chose this profession because I wanted to impart knowledge; that’s about more than teaching my subject, it’s considering a child’s wellbeing and their mental health too. I believe that most teachers feel the same way. But in the current climate, this is becoming increasingly hard to do.
We are under instruction from the DfE to teach British values and to teach tolerance in particular. The idea that it is transphobic to suggest that sex and gender are different and to howl down opposition is not tolerant, nor is it tolerant to brand a teacher transphobic or to bully a pupil out of school.
 
The teacher is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, shitlib, lazy, propagandist it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a groomer and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
 
But the staff were reluctant to face the continuing resentment from pupils in the class.
This is pretty shocking - you’re not there to be mates with them, you’re there to teach them and exercise a duty of care in loco parentis. If a teacher is actively going against safeguarding and parental wishes because they are either in thrall to ideology or the pupils are being mean to them, they have no business being a teacher.
Schools are key grounds where this grooming occurs. Their weakness and cowardice and their active encouragement helps it all along.
 
It's fascinating really for me as an academic. I really do think there is a study to be had here of social contagion and comparisons to the initially peaceful proliferation of the likes of Mystery Cults and the Early Church moving into ever increasingly militant and intolerant social pressure groups.

History really does repeat itself, even when societies have supposedly "progressed".
 
Last edited:
The children arrived prepared: they said they had watched TikTok videos and clips on other social media sites where films suggest that you can change sex, that there are many different genders, that it is cruel to deny a child who feels as though they are in the wrong body.
I'm kind of sitting here open mouthed. Words fail me.
 
The problem is that the proper response is to throw all the little shits in detention and then continue to up the negative consequences until they learn some respek, but you can't do that because you will get no support from the school administration and in fact the negative consequences will come down on you for trying to civilize feral children
 
I'm kind of sitting here open mouthed. Words fail me.
I am too. This is just fucking weak on the teachers part "w-w-well ok maybe you're right. but uh don't you see our point of view?"

I mean seriously imagine being a teacher and some kid for a research essay quotes a bunch of tiktok videos as "proof". Would you give them a good grade? I fucking hope not! This is where you teach the self-righteous little shits that just because a bunch of people say something is true that doesn't mean shit. If I pulled out some tiktoks saying "black people are inferior and gays are pedophiles" would that change their worldview? No, so why should it matter with this shit?

Good god I'm so glad that I finished highschool before ClownWorld started really taking off.
 
Last edited:
It's fascinating really for me as an academic. I really do think there is a study to be had here of social contagion and comparisons to the initially peaceful proliferation of the likes of Mystery Cults and the Early Church moving into ever increasingly militant and intolerant social pressure groups.

History really does repeat itself, even when societies have supposedly "progresed".
Indeed, when societies are at their lowest, or entering a period of great struggle or terror you can always find similar causes. I wonder why the craziest of the Roman Emperors could often be found dressing in drag, even castrating other men to "turn them into women".
 
>should we let kids transition without their parents knowing
>hard question

I think letting kids transition in the first place is retarded even if the parents are okay with it. Your job as a teacher is to teach basic math, English skills for the purpose of writing and speaking, basic understanding of science, and what not.
Girls wanting to troon out because they are uncomfortable with their bodies is something they should discuss with their parents. Not 40-80 year old sour bitches who try to be friends with the kids.
 
But the staff were reluctant to face the continuing resentment from pupils in the class.
This is pretty shocking - you’re not there to be mates with them, you’re there to teach them and exercise a duty of care in loco parentis. If a teacher is actively going against safeguarding and parental wishes because they are either in thrall to ideology or the pupils are being mean to them, they have no business being a teacher.
Schools are key grounds where this grooming occurs. Their weakness and cowardice and their active encouragement helps it all along.
I am too. This is just fucking weak on the teachers part "w-w-well ok maybe you're right. but uh don't you see our point of view?"
Issue is the teachers that haven't drunk the clown world kool-aid risk being not only fired, but effectively blacklisted from any future career in the field if they don't kow-tow to the troon's demands. And as noble of an idea that sacrificing your career for your beliefs is, most people care more about being able to afford food and water, especially if they have a family to look after.
Indeed, when societies are at their lowest, or entering a period of great struggle or terror you can always find similar causes. I wonder why the craziest of the Roman Emperors could often be found dressing in drag, even castrating other men to "turn them into women".
To be fair, that one's probably more due to the Greek influence. Even during times of prosperity, the Greeks would still lust over bussy.
 
America is literally the most litgious society in the world. We mock your kind because you're too stupid to know that coffee is usually hot and get ass mad you scalded yourself when it was spilt.
The coffee was intentionally heated well beyond safe temperatures to discourage people from getting free refills, and it was so hot the woman's labia needed surgical repair as a result of the spill. Not to say that there aren't stupid-ass lawsuits, but that particular one was fully justified, and McDonald's spent a great deal of time and money to initially push that propaganda that you just regurgitated free of charge.
 
The coffee was intentionally heated well beyond safe temperatures to discourage people from getting free refills, and it was so hot the woman's labia needed surgical repair as a result of the spill. Not to say that there aren't stupid-ass lawsuits, but that particular one was fully justified, and McDonald's spent a great deal of time and money to initially push that propaganda that you just regurgitated free of charge.
You are aware water evaporates at 212° F right?

Literally anyone who has made instant coffee at home has handled a temperature around this amount and probably has spilt a quantity of boiling water at some stage.

Unless they were serving steam, it literally cannot be hotter than something you probably handle at home on a regular basis when you turn on your kettle or heating apparatus of choice.


But of course an American needs to have a $3 million pay out first to know coffee is hot. Lmao.
 
You are aware water evaporates at 212° F right?

Literally anyone who has made instant coffee at home has handled a temperature around this amount and probably has spilt a quantity of boiling water at some stage.

Unless they were serving steam, it literally cannot be hotter than something you probably handle at home on a regular basis when you turn on your kettle or heating apparatus of choice.


But of course an American needs to have a $3 million pay out first to know coffee is hot. Lmao.
Yes, and that shit tends to cause extremely nasty burns once spilled. Go on, go pour some boiling water on your snatch that's as shriveled up as your "empire" and tell me how much it hurts and how many surgeries you need to fix the damage.
 
Yes, and that shit tends to cause extremely nasty burns once spilled. Go on, go pour some boiling water on your snatch that's as shriveled up as your "empire" and tell me how much it hurts and how many surgeries you need to fix the damage.

Did the employee direct her to throw the coffee onto her snatch? Was there any implication they threw it at her?

The former could be considered a form of control or abuse of a vulnerable person maybe, the latter would be some sort of assault.

But lacking that, why is it McDonald's fault that a seventy nine year old woman dropped her coffee and was suprised it hurt? Would it have hurt any less if she'd done it at home, her daughter's flat or the community centre?

The case in question is Liebeck vs McDonald's Restaurants for anyone who is interested. Similarly, the Coffee Association of America actually advises serving coffee at that temperature (176–194). Something McDonalds and other restaurants continue to do, and all major coffee chains have comparable serving temperatures even today.
 
Last edited:
  • Dislike
Reactions: Luna Tick
Back